Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Fulltext PDF
Research Article
The Use of Trichoderma harzianum and T. viride as Potential Biocontrol Agents Against Peanut Microflora and Their Effectiveness in Reducing Aflatoxin Contamination of Infected Kernels

Emma W. Gachomo and Simeon O. Kotchoni

The antagonistic mechanism used by four Trichoderma isolates against peanut moulds; Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus, A. niger, A. ochraceous and Fusarium species was investigated under laboratory conditions. Two isolates of T. harzianum namely Th1 and Th2 and two isolates of T. viride, Tv1 and Tv2, were found to efficiently suppress the growth of peanut moulds and to significantly reduce aflatoxins, AFB1 and AFB2, contents in infected peanut kernels. The degree to which Trichoderma species suppressed the growth of peanut moulds correlated to their extracellular enzymatic activities. The Trichoderma isolates displayed various extracellular enzymatic activities including amylolytic, chitinolytic, pectinolytic, proteolytic, lipolytic and cellulolytic to fight off the other fungal competitors in the media. The more diverse the enzymatic activities, the more effective are the antagonists in suppressing the growth of peanut moulds and aflatoxin production in kernels. Present results suggest that Trichoderma-enzymolomic can be exploited as potential antimicrobial candidates against peanut moulds and the subsequent aflatoxin production in peanut kernels.

Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

  How to cite this article:

Emma W. Gachomo and Simeon O. Kotchoni, 2008. The Use of Trichoderma harzianum and T. viride as Potential Biocontrol Agents Against Peanut Microflora and Their Effectiveness in Reducing Aflatoxin Contamination of Infected Kernels. Biotechnology, 7: 439-447.

DOI: 10.3923/biotech.2008.439.447



The genus Aspergillus is one of the most widely studied genera of spoilage fungi associated with nuts, grain and seed crop products. Some Aspergillus species, predominantly Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus produce aflatoxins as secondary metabolites, which cause harmful effects in humans and animals (Logrieco et al., 2003; Gachomo et al., 2004). A. nomius, A. tamari (Goto et al., 1997) and A. pseudotamarii (Ito et al., 2001) are also known to produce aflatoxins. Among several forms of aflatoxin, AFB1 is the most potent and more common in food and feed (Kew, 2003). Plant products that are commonly contaminated by aflatoxins include cereals (maize, rice and wheat), oilseeds (groundnut, soybean, sunflower and cotton), spices (chillies, black pepper, coriander, turmeric and ginger), tree nuts (almonds, pistachio, walnuts and coconut), coffee and most dried fruits (Bankole and Adebanjo, 2003). Almost 40% of crop products are lost yearly due to aflatoxin contamination in developing worlds (Miller, 1996). Moreover aflatoxins are among the most potential mutagenic, carcinogenic and immunosuppressive substances known and represent a major risk factor in the multifactorial etiology of human liver cancer in tropical regions (Montalto et al., 2002; Elegbede and Gould, 2002; Bankole and Adebanjo, 2003). Therefore, developing ways of controlling aflatoxin contamination of food commodities is of global importance.

Peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) is an important legume grown on 19.3 million ha in about 82 countries worldwide (Reddy et al., 2003). It is a high-energy food that contains high amounts of edible oil (44-56%) and proteins (25-30% of the dry seed weight) (Reddy et al., 2003; Gachomo et al., 2004). Peanuts are rich in niacin and other B vitamins and also contain appreciable amounts of calcium, iron, phosphorus and potassium (McWatters et al., 1995). Like other legumes, peanuts possess a unique ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen that enriches soil fertility. Research data show that more than half of the peanut production areas are in warmer arid and semi-arid regions. The major limiting factor in the production and marketing of peanuts remains their contamination with aflatoxins (Gachomo et al., 2004).

Control of peanut infection by aflatoxigenic moulds is still a widely recurring challenge. No single method of control has been found to be completely effective. However, the use of microbial antagonists as biological control agents seems to be a promising way to control the infection of valuable crops by aflatoxigenic moulds.

Trichoderma species are known to be antagonistic to other microorganisms. Application of T. harzianum or T. koningii to pea seeds reduced the incidence of pre-emergence damping-off caused by Pythium sp. (Lifshitz et al., 1986). T. harzianum was successfully used in the control of fungal soil-borne pathogens (Tronsmo, 1996). Recently, Kanjanamaneesathian et al. (2003) reported on the use of Trichoderma sp. as seed treatment to control Pythium aphanidermatum, the causal agent of damping-off of Chinese kale seedling. However, the mechanisms by which Trichoderma species influence and repress growth of other microorganisms are not fully understood. A lack of understanding these mechanisms can limit their use as biocontrol agents.

To investigate the mechanisms by which Trichoderma species suppress growth of other microorganisms, we examined in this study the growth pattern of various moulds isolated from fresh peanut kernels (Gachomo et al., 2004) in presence of different isolates of T. viride and T. harzianum. We quantified the amounts of aflatoxins produced by the aflatoxigenic moulds (A. flavus and A. parasiticus) in peanut kernels in presence of the Trichoderma species. In addition the ability of Trichoderma species to display various extracellular enzymatic activities is here discussed in an effort to understand the mechanisms underlying the antagonistic action of Trichoderma species.


Peanut samples and fungal species: Peanut kernels variety Homa Bay Local (HbL) sampled from five randomly selected markets within Kenya and the previously described peanut moulds (Gachomo et al., 2004) were used in this study. The peanut moulds were used as test pathogens, which included Fusarium species, Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, A. parasiticus and A. ochraceous. Four isolates of Trichoderma species (two isolates of Trichoderma viride, Tv1 and Tv2 and two isolates of T. harzianum, Th1 and Th2) were used as antagonistic agents in this study. The individual fungal strains were maintained on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) and as soil cultures at -20 °C. Unless otherwise described, all experiments in this study were done in triplicate and the data represent mean values ( ± SE) where applicable.

Antagonistic effects of Trichoderma species on the test pathogens: To assess the antagonistic effect of Trichoderma species on the test pathogens, a co-culture of the test pathogen and the antagonist was established on PDA. A line was drawn diagonally across the bottom of petridishes containing PDA dividing the plates into two equal halves. Points were marked at 2 cm from the edge of the petridish on either side of the line. The middle of each petridish was also marked. A Trichoderma isolate was point-inoculated 2 cm from the edge of the petridish on one side of the line and the test pathogen was point inoculated on the other half of the petridish at the second marked point (2 cm). The petridishes were then incubated at 23 °C ( ± 2), with light intensity of 300 μExm-2 at day/night cycle of 14/10 h and a relative humidity of 48 ± 5%. For control, each test pathogen alone without the antagonist was inoculated into plates of PDA. Ten petridishes were used per treatment. The colony diameters of the test pathogens and their controls were recorded 7 days after inoculation. The data were expressed in percentage of colony size reduction with the control being taken as reference (100%).

The Trichoderma isolates were also tested for the ability to produce volatiles. The effects of volatiles produced by Trichoderma species against the test pathogens was investigated using in inverted cultures according to the method of Dick and Hutchinson (1966).

Production of extracellular enzymes by Trichoderma species: The production of extracellular enzymes (cf. Table 1) by the Trichoderma isolates (Tv1, Tv2, Th1 and Th2) was assayed on solid media according to the modified method of Calistru et al. (1997). The indicated enzymatic activities were assessed 7 days after incubation.

Chitinase activity of Trichoderma-culture filtrates: To test for chitinolytic activity, Trichoderma isolates were inoculated into 300 mL of Potato Dextrose Broth (PDB) and incubated (150 rpm, 23 ± 2 °C) at constant light for 12 days. The mycelia were filtered out and the filtrate was sterilised by passing it through a 0.45 μm pore filter. The filtrate was used as source of chitinase. Chitinase activity was assayed as described by Vyas and Deshpande (1989). The assay consisted of three replicate reactions of: 10 mg acid swollen chitin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), 50 μmoles of acetate buffer (pH 5.8) and 1 mL of enzyme source in a total reaction volume of 3 mL. The reaction was done at 50 °C for 10 min. The product was estimated by Nelson method (1944). One unit of chitinase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to liberate one μmole of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine equivalent per hour at 50 °C.

Table 1: Method of assessing extracellular enzymes produced by Trichoderma species

Inhibition of aflatoxin production in peanut kernels by Trichoderma species: Prior to assessing the ability of Trichoderma species to inhibit aflatoxin production by the moulds, the test pathogens were qualitatively assessed for the production of aflatoxins according to Cunnif`s method adopted for aflatoxin analysis by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (Cunnif, 1995). Basically, the method consists of an extraction phase, followed by a column clean-up phase and finally by a qualitative assay via a one-dimensional Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) (Sorbent Technologies Inc. Atlanta, GA, USA), which uses a silica gel adsorbent and an acidic solvent system as described by Kuiper-Goodman and Scott (1989). For the quantitative estimation of aflatoxins, scanning densimetric analysis was carried out. The TLC plates were scanned according to the instructions of the manufacturer using CD 60 Desaga computer program. The program is set up to analyse the intensity of the spots developed by TLC. The peak areas of the samples were compared to those of the standards to quantify the aflatoxin content in the samples.

Seven-day-old cultures of Trichoderma isolates and the selected aflatoxigenic fungi (Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus) were used to make spore suspensions (1x105 spores/mL). Two representative Trichoderma isolates, T. harzianum (Th1) and T. viride (Tv1) were used in this experiment. Sterilised peanut kernels were sprayed with A. flavus spore suspension and allowed to air-dry before being sprayed with the spore suspension of T. harzianum (Th1). The kernels were then incubated on PDA plates for 7 days. After incubation, the kernels were assayed for aflatoxin content as described by Gachomo et al. (2004). Three types of control were set up: one in which the kernels were only inoculated with the spore suspension of A. flavus, another where the kernels were inoculated with T. harzianum and yet another where the kernels were sprayed with sterile water. For the aflatoxin inhibition test, 100 peanut kernels were used per treatment. The same experiment was repeated with A. parasiticus as a test pathogen. In another set of experiments T. viride (Tv1) was used as the antagonist with A. flavus and A. parasiticus as test pathogens.

Statistical analyses: Data were expressed as mean values ( ± SE) of at least three independent experiments where applicable. p-values were determined by Student`s t-test analysis. A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant for the mean differences.


Antagonistic ability of Trichoderma species: In our previous report, different microorganisms were isolated from peanut kernels and further characterized with respect to their ability to produce aflatoxins (Gachomo et al., 2004). Here as shown in Fig. 1, it was obvious that the collected kernels, apparently healthy, harboured various moulds. The four isolates of Trichoderma species were found to display antagonistic effects against the peanut moulds, by suppressing their growth to varying degrees (Table 2). T. harzianum isolates were found to be more effective in suppressing the growth of the test fungi than T. viride isolates (Fig. 2). T. harzianum isolates overgrew the test pathogens when grown together in a single plate (Fig. 2f, h). The greatest colony size reduction by Trichoderma species was observed against A. niger and the least was against A. ochraceous (Table 2). When the test pathogens were exposed to the trapped atmosphere from cultures of Trichoderma species, their growth was inhibited (data not shown). Since Trichoderma isolates were able to suppress growth of the peanut moulds, we further examined the probable suppressive mechanisms by which these antagonists operated.

Production of extracellular enzymes by Trichoderma species: Trichoderma species have been reported to produce various proteins with known antimicrobial effects when co-cultured with other organisms (El-Katatny et al., 2001). We therefore hypothesized that T. harzianum and T. viride considered in this study probably produced an array of enzymes with antimicrobial effects against the test pathogen(s).

As shown in Table 3, indeed the Trichoderma strains showed various extracellular enzymatic activity, including lipolytic, proteolytic, pectinolytic, chitinolytic and cellulolytic in the growth media supplemented with specific substrates. T. harzianum isolates displayed five (lipolytic, amylolytic, pectinolytic, chitinolytic and cellulolytic) of the six enzymatic activities examined, while the T. viride species produced four (lipolytic, proteolytic,

Table 2: Reduction of colony diameters of the test pathogens by Trichoderma species. The reduction of the colony size was expressed in percentage reduction compared to the control pathogen grown without the antagonist

Table 3: Extracellular enzymatic activity produced by Trichoderma species
+: Detection of enzymatic activity, -: No detection of enzymatic activity

Fig. 1:
Visual observation of moulds evolved from apparently healthy peanut kernels. Fs: Fusarium species; Af: Aspergillus flavus; An: Aspergillus niger

amylolytic and cellulolytic) of the six enzymes assayed for. All Trichoderma species tested produced amylolytic and cellulolytic enzymes. Both isolates of T. harzianum and one isolate of T. viride, Tv1, produced pectinolytic enzyme and only one isolate of T. viride (Tv2) tested was able to display positive proteolytic activity, while none of the T. viride isolates tested showed chitinase activity (Table 3).

Inhibitory effects of the antagonists on aflatoxin production: In our previous study we showed that peanut kernels screened contained high amounts of AFB1 and AFB2 and lower amounts of AFG1 (Gachomo et al., 2004). The qualitative assay of aflatoxin production by peanut moulds showed that A. flavus and A. parasiticus were the producers of aflatoxins, predominantly AFB1 (Fig. 3). Since we observed growth suppression of toxigenic moulds by the Trichoderma species (Fig. 2), we therefore hypothesized that the antagonists might probably reduce the aflatoxin contamination of the peanut kernels infected by the aflatoxigenic moulds.

Inoculation of peanut kernels with Trichoderma isolates led to significant (p<0.05) reduction of aflatoxins, AFB1 and AFB2, produced by A. parasiticus and A. flavus compared to the control samples, inoculated with aflatoxigenic moulds alone (Fig. 4). In general, the reduction of aflatoxin production was greater when the kernels were inoculated with the antagonists before the test pathogens, while the least reductions were observed when the kernels were inoculated with the aflatoxigenic moulds first (Fig. 4). The same inhibition pattern of aflatoxin production was observed when T. viride was used as an antagonist (data not shown).

In summary, these data suggest that Trichoderma species can efficiently control aflatoxin contamination in peanut kernels.

Fig. 2:
Antagonism of Trichoderma species against Aspergillus species. (a) pure cultures of A. ochraceous, (b) pure culture of A. niger, (c) pure cultures of T. viride (Tv1), (d) pure culture of T. harzianum (Th1), (e) a culture of T. viride (Tv1) and A. ochraceous, (f) a culture of T. harzianum (Th1) and A. ochraceous, (g) a culture of T. viride (Tv1) and A. niger, (h) a culture of T. harzianum (Th1) and A. niger

Fig. 3:
Detection of aflatoxin AFB1 and AFB2 produced by the genus Aspergillus. TLC analysis of the samples was performed using mixed standards of AFB1, AFB2, AFG1 and AFG2 as control. Representative Data of three independent replicates are depicted. Std: Aflatoxin mixed standards; A.f: Aspergillus flavus; A.n: Aspergillus niger; A.p: Aspergillus parasiticus; A.o: Aspergillus ochraceous

Fig. 4:
Aflatoxin content in peanut kernels infected by test pathogens under the control of antagonists. Amounts of aflatoxin produced by A. flavus (a) and A. parasiticus (b) under the control of T. harzianum (Th1). -a/-p, without antagonist/without test pathogen; +a/-p, with antagonist/without test pathogen; -a/+p, without antagonist/with test pathogen; +a/+p, antagonist and test pathogen inoculated the same day; +a/+p*, antagonist inoculated 2 days before the test pathogen was inoculated; +a/+p**, antagonist is inoculated 2 days after the test pathogen has been inoculated


Trichoderma species have been successfully used as biocontrol agents due to their high reproductive capacity, efficient utilization of nutrients, strong aggressiveness against other phytopathogens, efficiency in promoting plant growth and defence mechanism and ability to modify the rhizosphere (Kleifeld and Chet, 1992; El-Katatny et al., 2001; Benítez et al., 2004). However, understanding the antagonistic mechanisms used by Trichoderma species on a wide range of pathogens is important in optimizing their use as biocontrol agents. In this study, we demonstrated that growth of five test pathogens (Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, A. parasiticus, A. ochraceous and Fusarium species) was significantly inhibited when co-cultured with Trichoderma species (Fig. 2). Some of the test pathogens were overgrown by T. harzianum isolates but not by T. viride isolates suggesting that T. harzianum had characteristics that T. viride isolates did not have. This could probably be linked to the chitinase activity displayed by T. harzianum. Chitinase is believed to be a key enzyme in mycoparasitism (Howell, 2003). Growth of the test pathogens was also inhibited when they were exposed to a trapped atmosphere from Trichoderma species, suggesting that the test pathogens were susceptible to the volatiles produced by Trichoderma species. Trichoderma species used in this study displayed various extracellular enzymatic activities, which included lipolytic, chitinolytic, cellulolytic, amylolytic and pectinolytic. These extracellular enzymatic activities positively correlated with the effectiveness of Trichoderma species in suppressing growth of the test pathogens. Chitinase, cellulase and β-glucanse are considered important enzymes against plant pathogens (Chet and Baker, 1981). Based on our findings we concluded that the likely mechanisms by which Trichoderma species suppressed peanut moulds might involve production of volatiles and/or production of extracellular enzymes. Mycoparasitism may as well be part of the antagonistic mechanisms, although no experiments were carried out to confirm this. This is an important finding because it opens door to further study the underlying antagonistic mechanisms of the genus Trichoderma to efficiently control aflatoxin contamination of crop products.

A study by Calistru et al. (1997) revealed that production of volatiles and extracellular enzymes rather than mycoparasitism were the likely means by which Trichoderma species suppressed the growth of both A. flavus and Fusarium moniliforme. These findings were additionally supported by the study of Doi and Mori (1994), which demonstrated that volatiles from Trichoderma species were able to arrest the hyphal growth of different fungal pathogens on agar plates. Research has also shown that most Trichoderma strains produce volatiles and non-volatile toxic metabolites such as harzianic acid, alamethicins and tricholin that hinder growth of other microorganisms (Vey et al., 2001). Therefore production of volatiles and extracellular enzymes by Trichoderma isolates in this study may have been sufficient to suppress the growth of the peanut moulds.

The involvement of enzymes from Trichoderma species in antagonism has been further demonstrated using a forward genetic approach by transferring Trichoderma-genes encoding cell wall degrading enzymes into plants thereby conferring resistance to various pathogens. Transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabaccum) and potato (Solanum tuberosum) plants overexpressing an endo-chitinase (CHIT42) from T. harzianum have been shown to be highly resistant to the foliar pathogens Alternaria alternata, Alternaria solani, Botrytis cinerea and also to the soil-borne pathogen Rhizoctonia solani (Lorito et al., 1998). Recently it was demonstrated that overexpression of T. harzianum-chitinase (CHIT42) could even enhance resistance to both biotic and abiotic stresses in transgenic tobacco (Dana et al., 2006). T. harzianum 1051 is known to produce extracellular enzymes, such as chitinase, endoglucanases, proteases and amylases to repress growth of other organisms (De Marco et al., 2000).

It has been shown that fungi with a broad enzymatic activity possess high eco-nutritional versatility. This concept was defined by Cooke and Whipps (1980) as the ability to survive in a vegetative state in order to overcome environmental changes that might normally be harmful to the antagonists. This wide range of enzymatic activity of the antagonists allows them to have a unique and wide nutritional versatility that increases their survival chances in unfavorable environments (Cooke and Rayner, 1984). This probably explains the array of enzymatic activities detected in the Trichoderma species screened (Table 2). These enzymatic activities were presumably used against the other microorganisms competing for the same resources/nutrients in the peanut kernel. Our overall understanding of the mode of action of antagonistic agents against potential pathogens is still limited. However, this study identifies candidate enzymatic activities that are important in antagonistic effects of Trichoderma species against peanut moulds.

The antagonists were able to significantly (p<0.05) reduce aflatoxins produced by A. flavus and A. parasiticus in peanut kernels screened. This aflatoxin reduction is thought to be an indirect result of the suppressed growth of the aflatoxigenic moulds by Trichoderma species, leading to the assumption that smaller colonies produced less toxins. The reason why the aflatoxin inhibitory effects of the Trichoderma species were more pronounced on A. paraciticus than on A. flavus (Fig. 4) is unknown. This study shows that Trichoderma-proteomics/enzymolomics might be a potential source of anti-pathogenic activity that can be used to control crop invaders and mycotoxin contamination in crop products simultaneously.

Bankole, S.S. and A. Adebanjo, 2003. Mycotoxins in food in West Africa: Current situation and possibilities of controlling it. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 2: 254-263.
Direct Link  |  

Benitez, T., A.M. Rincon, M.C. Limon and A.C. Codon, 2004. Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma strains. Int. Microbiol., 7: 249-260.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Calistru, C., M. McLean and P. Berjak, 1997. In vitro studies on the potential for biological control of Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium moniliforme by Trichoderma species. Mycopathologia, 137: 115-124.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Chet, I. and R.R. Baker, 1981. Isolation and biocontrol potential of Trichoderma hamatum from soil naturally suppressive to Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology, 71: 286-290.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Cooke, R.C. and A.D.M. Rayner, 1984. Ecology of saprotrophic fungi. Longman, London.

Cooke, R.C. and J.M. Whipps, 1980. The evolution of modes of nutrition in fungi parasitic on terrestrial plants. Biol. Rev., 55: 341-362.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Cunnif, P., 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th Edn., AOAC International, Arlington, VA.

Dana, M.D.L.M., J.A. Pentor-Toro and B. Cubero, 2006. Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing chitinases of fungal origin show enhanced resistance to biotic and abiotic stress agents. Plant Physiol., 142: 722-730.
CrossRef  |  

De Marco, J.L., M.C. Valadares-Inglis and C.R. Felix, 2000. Production of hydrolytic enzymes by Trichoderma sp. isolates with antagonistic activity against Crinipellis perniciosa, the causal agent of witches broom of cocoa. Folia Microbiol., (In Press).

Dick, C.M. and S.A. Hutchinson, 1966. Biological activity of volatile fungal metabolites. Nature, 211: 868-868.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Doi, S. and M. Mori, 1994. Antifungal properties of metabolites produced by Trichoderma isolates from sawdust media of edible fungi against wood decay fungi. Mater. Organ., 28: 143-151.

El-Katatny, M., M. Gudelj, K.H. Robra, M. Elnaghy and G. Gubitz, 2001. Characterization of a chitinase and an endo-β-1,3-glucanase from Trichoderma harzianum Rifai T24 involved in control of the phytopathogen Sclerotium rolfsii. Applied Microbiol. Biotechnol., 56: 137-143.
CrossRef  |  

Elegbede, J.A. and N.M. Gould, 2002. Monoterpenes reduced adducts formation in rats exposed to aflatoxin B1. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 1: 46-49.
Direct Link  |  

Gachomo, E.W., W.E. Mutitu and O.S. Kotchoni, 2004. Diversity of fungal species associated with peanuts in storage and the levels of aflatoxins in infected samples. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 6: 955-959.
Direct Link  |  

Goto, T., Y. Ito, S.W. Peterson and D.T. Wicklow, 1997. Mycotoxin producing ability of Aspergillus tamarii. Mycotoxins, 44: 17-20.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Howell, C.R., 2003. Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma species in the biological control of plant diseases: The history and evolution of current concepts. Plant Dis., 87: 4-10.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Ito, Y., S.W. Peterson and T.D. Wicklow, 2001. Aspergillus pseudotamarii, a new aflatoxin producing species in Aspergillus section flavi. Mycol. Res., 105: 233-239.
Direct Link  |  

Kanjanamaneesathian, M., V. Phetcharat, A. Pengnoo and S. Upawan, 2003. Use of Trichoderma harzianum cultured on ground mesocarp fibre of oil-palm as seed treatment to control Pythium aphanidermatum, a causal agent of damping-off of Chinese kale seedling. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 19: 825-829.
CrossRef  |  

Kew, M.C., 2003. Synergistic interaction between aflatoxin B1 and hepatitis B virus in hepatocarcinogenesis. Liver Int., 23: 405-409.
CrossRef  |  

Kleifeld, O. and I. Chet, 1992. Trichoderma harzianum-interaction with plants and effect on growth response. Plant Soil, 144: 267-272.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Kuiper-Goodman, T. and P.M. Scott, 1989. Risk assessment of the mycotoxin ochratoxin A. Biomed. Environ. Sci., 2: 179-248.
PubMed  |  

Lifshitz, R., M.T. Windham and R. Baker, 1986. Mechanism of biological control of preemerge damping-off of pea by seed treatment with Trichoderma sp. Phytopathol., 76: 720-725.
Direct Link  |  

Logrieco, A., A. Bottalico, G. Mule, A. Moretti and G. Perrone, 2003. Epidemiology of toxigenic fungi and their associated mycotoxins for some Mediterranean crops. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 109: 645-667.
CrossRef  |  

Lorito, M., S.L. Woo, I. Garcia, G. Colucci and G.E. Harman et al., 1998. Genes from mycoparasitic fungus as a source for improving plant resistance to fungal pathogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 95: 7860-7865.
PubMed  |  

McWatters, K.H., A.V. Resurreccion, L.R. Beuchat and R.D. Phillips, 1995. Use of peanut and cowpea in wheat-based containing composite flours. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr., 47: 71-87.
CrossRef  |  

Miller, J.D., 1996. Mycotoxins. Proceedings of the Workshop on Mycotoxins in Food in Africa, November 6-10, 1996, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Benin, pp: 18-22.

Montalto, G., M. Cervello, L. Giannitrapani, F. Dantona, A. Terranova and L.A. Castagnetta, 2002. Epidemiology, risk factors and natural history of Hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 963: 13-20.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  

Nelson, N., 1944. A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for the determination of glucose. J. Biol. Chem., 153: 375-380.
Direct Link  |  

Reddy, T.Y., V.R. Reddy and V. Anbumozhi, 2003. Physiological responses of groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) to drought stress and its amelioration: A critical review. Plant Growth Regul., 41: 75-88.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Tronsmo, A., 1996. Trichoderma harzianum in Biological Control of Fungal Diseases. In: Principles and Practice of Managing Soilborne Plant Pathogens, Hall, R. (Ed.). Chapter 10, American Phytopathology Society, St. Paul, MN., USA., ISBN-13: 9780890542231, pp: 213-236.

Vey, A., R.E. Hoagland and T.M. Butt, 2001. Toxic Metabolites of Fungal Biocontrol Agents. In: Fungi as Biocontrol Agents: Progress, Problems and Potential, Butt, T.M., C. Jackson and N. Magan (Eds.). CAB International, Bristrol, pp: 311-346.

Vyas, P. and M.V. Deshpande, 1989. Chitinase production by Myrothecium verrucaria and its significant for fungal mycelia degradation. J. Gen. Applied Microbiol., 35: 343-350.
Direct Link  |  

©  2019 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved
Fulltext PDF References Abstract