Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Fulltext PDF
Research Article
Anthropometric and Motor Performance Characteristics of Nigerian Badminton Players

Yahaya Abdullahi, Abel Lamina Toriola, Daniel Ter Goon, Yvonne Paul, Nicholas Uzochukwu Igbokwe and Mukaila Abimbade Suarau

Background and Objective: Anthropometric indicators of body size and proportions, physique and body composition are important factors in physical performance and fitness. The study examined the relationship between anthropometric and motor performance characteristics of Nigerian national badminton players. Materials and Methods: Height, weight, skinfolds, arm span and chest width, sit and reach, running speed, push-up, sit-up, vertical jump height and long jump length were taken from 29 participants (20 males and 9 females), including six national players. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 software was used to determine the descriptive, multiple correlation coefficient (r) and independent t-test statistics. An alpha level of 0.05 was used for all statistical significance. Results: There was significant correlations between height and running-speed (r = 0.44, p = 0.02), push-up (r = 0.48, p = 0.01), sit-up (r = 0.58, p = 0.00) and vertical-jump (r = 0.72, p = 0.00); percentage of body fat and sit-and-reach (r = 0.55, p<0.05), running-speed (r = 0.65, p = 0.00). Apart from flexibility (t = 0.7, p = 0.43), male players demonstrated superior health and motor fitness compared to female players. Similar trend was noted for the national in contrast to the provincial level players (t = 1.7, p = 0.09). Conclusion: A significant correlation exists between some anthropometric characteristics’ and motor performance characteristics in badminton players. Except, flexibility, male players had superior anthropometric and motor fitness compared to female players. Also, the national players exhibited satisfactory anthropometric and motor fitness parameters compared to the provincial badminton players. The findings of this study should inform trainers, coaches and sport scientists in the designing and training programme to enhance badminton performance.

Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

  How to cite this article:

Yahaya Abdullahi, Abel Lamina Toriola, Daniel Ter Goon, Yvonne Paul, Nicholas Uzochukwu Igbokwe and Mukaila Abimbade Suarau, 2017. Anthropometric and Motor Performance Characteristics of Nigerian Badminton Players. Asian Journal of Scientific Research, 10: 244-251.

DOI: 10.3923/ajsr.2017.244.251

Received: April 21, 2017; Accepted: June 05, 2017; Published: June 15, 2017

Copyright: © 2017. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


In badminton, anthropometry and motor performance ability of players seems to be the most vital determinants of success1-3. Anthropometric measurements have the potential to quantify the relationship between bone mass, body structure4,5, physical characteristics and individual players’ sporting abilities6-8, thereby providing the basis for evaluating sport performance9. Anthropometric measurements are often used to classify players according to their respective age or level of performance. Height is an advantage in executing attacking strokes in badminton10.

Body composition is an important aspect of fitness11. Similarly, in sports where body weight has to be lifted repeatedly against gravity, such as in badminton; extra mass in the form of fat would be disadvantageous11. It has been established that excess percentage of body fat (%BF) is detrimental to health and that the %BF required for excellence in performance differs between males and females and varies from sport to sport12. Furthermore, long arms are advantageous in badminton that involves jumping to reach a shuttle at the highest possible point when descending for a better stroke as in a smash and drop shot13,14.

Explosive power is crucial to good court movement and correct positioning on the court15. Running Speed (RS) is needed in badminton in moving to and from the shuttlecock. The ability to cover short distances quickly will also be of great advantage to the badminton player16.

Badminton players requires tremendous physical ability, most especially agility, aerobic capacity and explosive power17, for successive and improved performance. To achieve this, it is imperative to ascertain the specific attributes and factors that contribute to playing ability17. Anthropometric characteristics are closely linked with motor performance characteristics as body size and proportions, physique and body composition are important factors in physical performance and fitness. However, there is paucity of information on the anthropometric and motor performance profile of Nigerian National badminton players. This present study examined the relationship between anthropometric and motor performance characteristics of Nigerian national badminton players.


Participants: This prospective, descriptive and cross-sectional study involved 29 (20 men and 9 women: Aged 21.24±6.41 years) conveniently selected badminton players from the Northern states of Nigeria. All the players participated at the 2010 Commonwealth Games selection trials. The ethics committee of Bayero University gave approval for the study (BUK/SPS/PHE/09/0005). Informed consent was obtained from participants prior to data collection. Data was collected at the Package B, National Stadium, Abuja, Nigeria during the 2010 Commonwealth Games trials.

Measurement procedures
Body composition: Anthropometric variables [weight (kg), height (cm), skinfolds (mm) chest width (cm) and arm span (cm)] were measured according to the protocols of International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry18. Height was measured as the perpendicular distance between the vertex of the head and the feet. A calibrated vertical stadiometer (Seca Portable 217 Seca, UK) was used to measure stature to the nearest 0.1 cm. Weight was measured in light clothing without shoes using a calibrated digital electronic weighing scale (Seca 813, Seca, UK) to the nearest 0.1 kg. Body mass index was derived by dividing the weight in kilogram (kg) by the height in meter-square (m2). Skinfold thickness was measured using Harpenden skinfold caliper and surgical pen marker (Creative Health Product, MI, USA) by grasping a fold of skin and the underlying subcutaneous tissue at the site to be measured. The fold was pulled away from the underlying muscle and the jaws of the calipers were placed on either side of the site at a depth of approximately 1 cm away from the edge of the thumb and finger. The measurement was recorded with a required accuracy of less than 1.5 mm. Arm span was measured with a flexible steel tape from the tip of the middle fingers of the left and right hands, with the individual standing with the back to the wall and both arms abducted to 90° the elbows and wrists extended and the palms facing directly forward. Readings were taken to the nearest 0.1 cm.

Flexibility: The sit-and-reach test was conducted indoors using a sit-and-reach box supplied with a tape measure using the procedures outlined in the ACSM manual19. The purpose of this test was to assess the flexibility of the lower back and hamstring. The participant was instructed to sit with legs together and extended in front so that the feet (shoes off) touched the first step. Both knees were held together and flat on the floor. The task was to perform the furthest possible front bend with arms extended and hands on top of each other, palms facing downward. The maximal reach distance was recorded in centimeters after three trials.

Muscular fitness
Vertical Jump test (VJ): The procedure to describes the method used for directly measuring the VJ height jumped. Similarly, the Long Jump (LJ) test, the average of three best jumps, marking the difference between the length of the standing lunge and the maximum LJ length as described by Haff and Triplett20 was recorded in in centimeters. Both VJ and LJ scores were converted to watts (W) using Sayers’ PAPw formula21. Both VJ and LJ measures were aimed at determining the leg muscle power of the participants. The sit-ups (SU) test (2 min), push-up test (PU) (1 min) and Running Speed (RS) were assessed using the SISA protocol22. These tests were used to determine trunk, abdominal and upper body endurance of the participants.

Running Speed (RS) tests: Running speed testing was performed to determine acceleration, maximum RS and sped endurance using a set distance of 35 m dash23. The time taken to cover the distance was recorded in seconds.

Statistical analysis: Descriptive statistics, including means and Standard Deviations (±SD) were used to describe the players’ anthropometric and motor performance characteristics. Multiple correlation coefficient (r) and independent t-test were used to examine if any significant differences existed in the anthropometric motor performance characteristics between male and female as well as their playing status (National and provincial). For all statistical analyses the level of significance was set at p<0.05. Data were analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 for windows (SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA)24.


The anthropometric and motor performance characteristics of the participants stratified by gender are displayed in Table 1. The mean values for weight, height, BMI, AAL, muscular endurance, PU and SU were 60.6±5.8 kg, 173.2±8.7 cm, 20.4±2.9 kg m2, 136.6±7.5 cm, 38.0±14.4 ×/1 min and 73.6±20.2 ×/2 min, respectively (Table 1). The explosive powers of the study participants obtained were 3779.8±1309.3 W (50.9±10.2 cm) for VJ and 3925.5±1260.8 W (53.3±9.4 cm) for LJ. The male (177.9±4.9 cm) were significantly taller than the women (p<0.05) (Table 1). Male players had a substantially lower mean %BF (9.3±1.2%) than the female players (12.6±1.5%) (t = 6.5; p<0.05). There was a significant difference (p = 0.00) in BMI between the male (19.1±2.3 kg m2) and female (23.2±1.9 kg m2) players, with the females having higher BMI values.

The males (140.0±6.3 cm) had a higher mean AAL than the females (129.2±3.5 cm), thus, indicating a significant difference (t = 4.78; p<0.05). Similarly, the national (138.2±9.6 cm) players had higher AAL values than the provincial (136.3±7.1 cm) players, respectively. There was no significant gender difference (t = 0.7; p = 0.43) in SR. The male (4.6±0.3 sec) players had a significantly (t = 4.3; p<0.05) faster RS than the female (5.3±0.4 sec) players. Likewise, the male (42.8±13.3 ×/1 min for PU and 80.4±18.3 ×/2 min for SU) players had significantly (p<0.05) superior performances in the PU and SU tests than the female (27.3±10.7 ×/1 min for PU and 58.8±16.7 ×/2 min for SU) players. The male (4104.6±1081.7 and 3946.8±1294.2 W) players had a mean higher VJ and LJ power value than the females (1294.2±978.4 and 3885.9±1209 W). The male players had significantly higher VJ scores than the female players (t = 7.3; p<0.05) (Table 1).

The mean values between national and provincial level badminton players (Table 2) demonstrated no significant difference (t = 0.03; p = 0.97) between the national (173.3±13.0 cm) and provincial (173.1±7.6 cm) players. Similarly, there was no significant difference (t = 0.13; p>0.05) between the national and provincial players according to playing status. The national (16.5±2.5 cm) players were more flexible compared to the provincial (13.7±3.7 cm) players (Table 2).

Also, the national (57.2±11.6 ×/1 min for PU and 94.0±15.6 ×/2 min for SU) players had substantially better PU and SU performances than the provincial (33.0±10.3 ×/1 min for PU and 68.3±18.0 ×/2 min for SU) players (p<0.05). However, their LJ performances were not substantially different (t = 0.4; p>0.05). The national (4215.4±1453.6 and 4701.0±1144.0 W) players had significantly (p<0.05) higher mean VJ and LJ power than the provincial (3669.0±1222.8 and 3717.6±1071.1 W) players (Table 2).

Correlation between anthropometric and motor performance characteristics of the participants as shown in Table 3. Comparatively, there was a significant correlation between height and motor performance characteristics on all the variables with the exception of SR (0.07) and LJ (0.06) (p>0.05). Except, LJ (0.26; p = 0.18), there was significant correlations between %BF and motor performance characteristics in all the variables. A correlation was also found between AAL and motor performance characteristics, with the exception of SR (r = 0.05) and LJ (r = 021).

There was no significant correlation between weight and motor performance characteristics (SR, RS, PU, SU, VJ and LJ) (r = 0.07, 0.04, 0.99, 0.12, 0.11 and 0.24; p>0.05). Similarly, there was no significant correlation between BMI and motor performance characteristics on all the variables. However, a significant correlation exist between BMI and VJ power (0.59; p<0.00) (Table 3).

Table 1:Anthropometric and motor performance characteristics of the participants stratified by gender
*Significant at 0 .05 levels, SR: Sit and reach, BMI: Body mass index, AAL: Average arm length, PU: Push-up, VJ: Vertical jump, LJ: Long jump, RS: Running speed, SU: Sit-up, DF: Degree of freedom

Table 2:Mean values between national and provincial level badminton players
*Significant at 0.05 level, SR: Sit and reach, BMI: Body mass index, AAL: Average arm length, PU: Push-up, VJ: Vertical jump, LJ: Long jump, RS: Running speed and SU: Sit-up, DF: Degree of freedom

Table 3: Correlation values between anthropometric and motor performance characteristics
*Significant at 0.05 level, %BF: Percentage of body fat, BMI: Body mass index, AAL: Average arm length


The study revealed that the average heights of badminton players are higher than the standard badminton net height; and had lower body weight; therefore, the players could be described as having a height and weight advantage for better performance. The height of the badminton players obtained in this present study is consistent with elite females’ badminton players studied elsewhere25-27. Similarly, the values obtained for the male players mimic those of elite players in Abian-Vicen et al.25 study (177.94±6.0) but are lower than that of elite players with values of 184.6±6.01 and 182.0±4.6 cm, reported elsewhere10,28, respectively. The male players were taller than elite players and junior players reported mean heights in other studies: 172.4±5.329, 160.4±6.830, 166.4±5.625 and 165.5±5.3cm31. Therefore, the players in this study could be described as having a height advantage.

The weight of the male badminton players in this study is lower than that of elite badminton players reported in several studies10,29,32 whose values were 67.9±3.6, 71.65±5.7 and 80.7±9.05 kg, respectively. The players’ weight in the current study is also lower than those obtained in studies on sub-elite male badminton players who weighted 77.5±5.9 kg28 and junior players whose body mass were 61.1±16.6 and 63.5±4.9 kg27,31, respectively. Similarly, the weight of the female badminton players in this study is similar to that reported for elite female badminton players25,26. Excess body weight would be detrimental in moving swiftly around the court as well as when jumping to smash the shuttle.

Also, the BMI and %BF of the players are in a normal range for good performance. The BMI of the male badminton players in this study is lower than that of elite badminton players10,25,28, with reported mean values of 23.6±1.96, 21.5±2.7 and 23.4±1.6 kg m2, respectively and junior players27 (20.56±3.39 kg m2) but comparable to the value30 of 18.9±2.05 kg m2. Previous studies25,27 have reported the BMI of female players as 22.3±2.2, 21.63±1.25 kg m2, respectively. The finding of this study demonstrates a significant gender difference (t = 4.58, p = 0.00) in BMI, with no corresponding difference observed between national and provincial players. Lean BMI rather than total body weight is a critical factor in performance ability33. Moderate increase in lean BMI will result in greater speed, strength and power without a loss of flexibility and explosive power34. Therefore, badminton players with a high lean muscle mass would be able to generate higher force for jumping while playing14. The BMI plays an important role in sports like badminton which require repeated lifting of the body against gravity in movement during play35. The %BF value obtained among the male players in this present study is similar to that of elite players reported in another study (9.59±3.31%)10, but higher than the BMI values of 8.2±1.729 and 8.35±1.44%26. Other studies25,27,28,31 have reported higher values than those obtained in this study. Top competitive players tend to have low %BF as the negative impact of excess %BF would increase the energy expended in moving around the court14. Similarly, few studies have assessed the length and circumference of the arm and legs, which could be advantageous in the ability to cover the court17,28,36.

The present study revealed a strong disparity between the male and female (t = 4.78, p = 0.00) in AAL, but there was no difference between the national and provincial players (t = 0.55, p = 0.58) in this regard. Although, data on AAL tend to be scarce, especially for badminton players, the AAL for national and international badminton and squash players ranged from 1.2-1.56 and 1.1-1.47 m for male and female, respectively14. The values obtained in the current study falls within these ranges.

In this study, the players’ trunk flexibility values were 15.1±4.3, 13.9±3.3, 13.7±3.7 and 16.5±2.5%, respectively for female, male, provincial and national badminton players, with no significant differences across the various categories. Flexibility is relevant to jumping, swimming, racket and most team sports37. It is an advantage to have above average flexibility levels of the trunk and shoulder regions for racket sports14. Greater flexibility of the trunk and stroke arm is undoubtedly an important factor as well as hip and hamstring flexibility38. High levels of flexibility are also needed so that the players are able to position themselves to hit the shuttlecock more powerfully25. Adequate levels of flexibility would allow a player to perform the various strokes efficiently as much retrieval are made with the spine and shoulder joint in hyperextension and the hips and hamstrings fully flexed when lunge jumps are made at the net. It also allows for more fluent stroking when forced to stretch13 and facilitates explosive power on the court35.

The running distances covered in this study was 35 m in 4.6±0.3, 5.3±0.4, 4.3±0.3 and 4.9±0.4 sec for male, female, national and provincial players, respectively. The results further indicated significant gender differences as male players had superior speed compared to the female (t = 4.3, p = 0.00). Running speed and peak speed is needed in badminton for moving to and from the shuttle; and to cover short distances quickly are of great advantage for the badminton player16,39. Compared to normative data40 on tennis players, the females were below average in PU’s and above average in SU’s whereas the males were above average for both PU’s and SU’s. Further, this normative data40 reported push-up values ranging from 36-42 for males and 33-38 for females and the sit-up values ranged from 44-52 for males and 38-46 for females. The PU and SU values for males were lower compared to the squash racket players mean values of 45 and 80 repetitions for PU’s and SU’s, respectively41. Dynamic and strong upper body endurance are required to withstand the repetitive nature of striking the shuttle15.

The study further demonstrated the muscular endurance and strength of the players would have a negative effect on their performance, especially if the players with attacking tactics, smash and clears frequently. Well-developed strength and endurance of the trunk muscles plays an important role in badminton as trunk movements are large, repetitive and varies. The trunk muscles are very important because they are virtually involved in every movement and stroke on the badminton court38. They performed an important stabilizing and balancing function for all braking and PU’s and are directly involved in stroke production. Without sufficient trunk development in terms of strength and endurance, strokes will lack power and control42. A vital aspect of badminton is player’s ability to exert muscular force at high speed35 and badminton places a great demand on explosive power38. An explosive player will typically be able to jump high, change direction quickly and will generally appear to be swift and mobile on the badminton court, due to ability to combine coordination and muscular properties38 and will have a significantly improved and reduced reaction in the response-time during movements.

The vertical jump of the players in this present study is judged to be satisfactory in comparison with previous studies36,38. The VJ value in the study, corresponds with those obtained from local league, national league and elite level badminton players, which ranged from 55-75 cm38, whereas 60-70 cm is the minimum range for the lunge jump for male badminton players38, however, the females had lower values in comparison. The minimum range for the lunge jump for female players is 35-45 cm38, which is consistent with the data observed for the female participants in this study. The female players would not be at a great disadvantage with regards to their LJ power performance as their value only falls within the normal range for female badminton players. It would be rather advantageous for the male players as horizontal explosiveness is important in taking lunge jumps to execute net shots. A greater horizontal explosiveness will result in the player being able to reach the shuttlecock faster and thus force a speedier pace of play. Explosive power also helps in reaching un-anticipated shots, where a quick, explosive movement to a relatively far distance has to be executed.


A significant correlation exists between some anthropometric characteristics’ and motor performance characteristics in badminton players. The male players had superior anthropometric and motor performance qualities than the female players. However, the female players were more flexible, which could be attributed to either bone structure or genetic difference. A similar beneficial trend was noted for the national players, in contrast to the provincial badminton players. The badminton trainers, coaches, sport scientists and team involved with designing the badminton training programme should take cognizance of the players’ anthropometric and motor performance variables into consideration in order to achieve high performance.


This study reveals significant correlation exists between selected anthropometric characteristics and body composition (height and percentage of body fat) and motoric performance (running-speed, vertical-jump, push-up, sit-up and sit-and-reach) in badminton players. Future research should examine the likely factors responsible for the gendered dimension in anthropometric and motor performance of badminton players. The finding of this study further confirm that scientific physical conditioning and training principles are important for optimal performance in badminton; and thus, should be followed in designing the training protocol for badminton players.


The authors would like to thank all the badminton players for their voluntary participation in the study. Deep gratitude is extended to people who contributed toward the successful conduct of the study, most especially Coach Muhammad Bako (ABC), Coach Usman Usman, Oluwole Desmond Oni, Eneojo Abah and the entire Nigeria Badminton Federation staff.

Abian, P., J. Abian-Vicen and J. Sampedro, 2012. Anthropometric analysis of body symmetry in badminton players. Int. J. Morphol., 30: 945-951.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Abian-Vicen, J., J. Del Coso, C. Gonzalez-Millan, J.J. Salinero and P. Abian, 2012. Analysis of dehydration and strength in elite badminton players. PLoS ONE, Vol. 7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0037821

Alvarez, J.J.R., M.J.D.C. Campos, C.P. Portes, M.R. Rey and A.B. Martin, 2016. [Analysis of the physiological parameters of young spanish badminton players]. Rev. Int. Med. Cienc. Act. Fis. Deporte, 16: 45-54.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Carter, J.E.L. and B.H. Heath, 1990. Somatotyping: Development and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN: 9780521351171, Pages: 503.

Chansrisukot, G., S. Suwanthada and C. Intiraporn, 2015. Cognitive psychological training in combination with explosive power training can significantly enhance responsiveness of badminton players. J. Exerc. Physiol. Online, 18: 17-32.
Direct Link  |  

Chin, M.K., A.S. Wong, R.C. So, O.T. Siu, K. Steininger and D.T. Lo, 1995. Sport specific fitness testing of elite badminton players. Br. J. Sports Med., 29: 153-157.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Claessens, A.L., G. Beunen and R.M. Malina, 2000. Anthropometry, Physique, Body Composition and Maturity. In: Paediatric Exercise Science and Medicine, Armstrong, N. and W. van Mechelen (Eds.). Oxford University Press Inc., New York, USA., ISBN-13: 9780192629777, pp: 11-22.

Dowson, M.N., M.E. Nevill, H.K.A. Lakomy, A.M. Nevill and R.J. Hazeldine, 1998. Modelling the relationship between isokinetic muscle strength and sprint running performance. J. Sports Sci., 16: 257-265.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Durandt, J., 1998. Squash SISA protocols. Module four.

Elliot, B.C., T.R. Ackland, B.A. Blanksby, K.P. Hood and J. Bloomfield, 1989. Profiling junior tennis and badminton players part 1: Morphological, physiological and psychological normative data. Aust. J. Sci. Med. Sport, 21: 14-21.

Groppel, J.L. and E.P. Roetert, 1992. Applied physiology of tennis. Sports Med., 14: 260-268.
PubMed  |  

Haff, G.G. and N.T. Triplett, 2016. Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. 4th Edn., Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL., USA., ISBN-13: 978-1492501626, Pages: 752.

Hussain, S., 2013. Somatotype and body composition of adolescent badminton players in Kerala. Int. J. Adv. Scient. Technol. Res., 6: 105-111.
Direct Link  |  

Ismail, M.S.H., A. Boon-Suen, C.N. Othman, A. Ahmad and R. Singh, 1993. Comparison of anthropometric variables and leg strength of volleyball, basketball and badminton players. Malaysian J. Med. Lab. Sci., 10: 26-30.

Jaski, A. and P. Bale, 1987. The physique and body composition of top class squash players. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness, 27: 114-118.
PubMed  |  

Jeyaraman, R., E. District and T. Nadu, 2012. Prediction of playing ability in badminton from selected anthropometrical physical and physiological characteristics among inter collegiate players. Int. J. Adv. Innov. Res., 2: 47-58.
Direct Link  |  

Kibler, W.B., C. McQueen and T. Uhl, 1988. Fitness evaluations and fitness findings in competitive junior tennis players. Clin. Sports Med., 7: 403-416.
PubMed  |  

Lei, R., S.X. Deng and L.F. Lu, 1993. Study on the physiological function, physical quality and mental characteristics of the Chinese badminton players. China Sport Sci. Technol., 29: 28-38.

Leone, M., G. Lariviere and A.S. Comtois, 2002. Discriminant analysis of anthropometric and biomotor variables among elite adolescent female athletes in four sports. J. Sports Sci., 20: 443-449.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

MacDougall, J.D., H.A. Wenger and H.J. Green, 1991. Physiological Testing of the High Performance Athlete. Human Kinetics Books, Illinois, USA.

Mathur, D.N., A.L. Toriola and N.U. Igbokwe, 1985. Somatotypes of Nigerian athletes of several sports. Br. J. Sports Med., 19: 219-220.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Nordstrom, A., M. Hogstrom and P. Nordstrom, 2008. Effects of different types of weight-bearing loading on bone mass and size in young males: A longitudinal study. Bone, 42: 565-571.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Nowak, I., 1998. Badminton SISA protocols. Module Ten/Exploring Africa, African Studies Center (ASC) at Michigan State University.

Omosegaard, B. and L. Tinholdt, 1996. Physical Training for Badminton. Forlag Malling Beck, Denmark, ISBN-13: 9781872850016, Pages: 179.

Poliszczuk, T. and M. Mosakowska, 2010. Anthropometric profile of Polish elite badminton players. Polish J. Sports Med., 26: 45-55.
Direct Link  |  

Powers, S.K. and E.T. Howley, 2014. Exercise Physiology: Theory and Application to Fitness and Performance. 9th Edn., McGraw-Hill, USA., ISBN-13: 978-0073523538, Pages: 640.

Rahmawati, N.T., S. Budiharjo and K. Ashizawa, 2007. Somatotypes of young male athletes and non-athlete students in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Anthropol. Sci., 115: 1-7.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Raman, D. and A.S. Nageswaran, 2013. Effect of game-specific strength training on selected physiological variables among badminton players. Int. J. Scient. Res., Vol. 2, No. 10.

Raschka, C. and K. Schmidt, 2013. Sports anthropological and somatotypical comparison between higher class male and female badminton and tennis players. Pap. Anthropol., 22: 153-161.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Reilly, T. and G. Stratton, 1995. Children and adolescents in sport: Physiological considerations. Sports Exerc. Injury, 1: 207-213.

Reilly, T. and J. Palmer, 1995. Investigation of Exercise Intensity in Male Singles Lawn Tennis. In: Science and Racket Sports, Reilly, T., M. Hughes and A. Lees (Eds.). Chapter 2, E & FN Spon Press, London, UK., ISBN-13: 9780419185000, pp: 10-13.

Reilly, T., 1990. The Racquet Sports. In: Physiology of Sports, Reilly, T., N. Secher, P. Snell and C. Williams (Eds.). Chapman & Hall, London, UK., ISBN-13: 978-0419135906, pp: 337-369.

Reilly, T., N. Secher, P. Snell and C. Williams, 1990. Physiology of Sports. Routledge, USA., ISBN-13: 9781135921217, Pages: 512.

Revan, S., M. Aydogmus, P.P. Balci, H. Pepe and H. Eroglu, 2007. The evaluation of some physical and physiological characteristics of Turkish and foreign national badminton team players. J. Phys. Educ. Sport Sci., 1: 63-70.

Roetert, E.P., T.J. McCormick, S.W. Brown and T.S. Ellenbecker, 1996. Relationship between isokinetic and functional trunk strength in elite junior tennis players. Isokinet. Exerc. Sci., 6: 15-20.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Sayers, S.P., D.V. Harackiewicz, E.A. Harman, P.N. Frykman and M.T. Rosenstein, 1999. Cross-validation of three jump power equations. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 31: 572-577.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Stewart, A., M. Marfell-Jones, T. Olds and H. de Ridder, 2011. International standards for anthropometric assessment. The International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry, New Zealand.

Subramanian, A., 2013. Investigation of the factors predominent to badminton playing ability. Acad. Sports Scholar, 2: 1-6.
Direct Link  |  

Tervo, T., P. Nordstrom and A. Nordstrom, 2010. Effects of badminton and ice hockey on bone mass in young males: A 12-year follow-up. Bone, 47: 666-672.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Thompson, P.D., D. Riebe, L.S. Pescatello and R. Arena, 2013. ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 2nd Edn., Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA., USA., ISBN-13: 9781609136055, Pages: 456.

Todd, M.K. and C.A. Mahoney, 1995. Determination of Pre-Season Physiological Characteristics of Elite Male Squash Players. In: Science and Racket Sports, Reilly, T., M. Hughes and A. Lees (Eds.). Taylor & Francis, USA., ISBN-13: 9781136739125, pp: 81-86.

Yasin, A., S. Omer, Y. Ibrahim, B.M. Akif and Cengiz, 2010. Comparison of some anthropometric characteristics of elite badminton and tennis players. Sci. Mov. Health, 2: 400S-405S.
Direct Link  |  

©  2018 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved
Fulltext PDF References Abstract