Evaluating the Performance of Heavy Metals in Surface Ponds among Land-use using Z-score and Coefficient of Variation
Heavy metals have high significance among the inorganic contaminants of surface water (e.g., ponds and streams) due to their non-degradable nature in heighten injurious biological effect. For this reason, therefore, this study examined the influence of the land-uses on the performance of the selected heavy metals using z-score and coefficient of variation. In order to achieve the aim of this study, thirty surface ponds water were sampled across four land uses in Akoko Northeast LGA of Ondo State, Nigeria. The sampled water were assessed for four heavy metals and evaluated using the Z-score and coefficient of variation. The heavy metals are zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn) and copper (Cu) while the land uses comprise of built-up areas, cultivated lands, vegetation and crop plantation. Observed heavy metals results were converted to standardized Z-scores (z) to facilitate objective comparisons and enablement of performance among each parameter in the ponds across the land uses. The predefined water quality result variations were objectively subjected to coefficient of variation (CV) to confirm the level of parameters comparability. Thus, the z-score results of heavy metals identified strong remarkable spatial dependency when p>0.01 or weak remarkable spatial dependency when p<0.01 while performance denote homogeneous when CV<50% or heterogeneous when CV>50%. In conclusion, the study exhibited spatial variation in concentrations of the four heavy metals as a result of different land uses characteristic.
Received: January 16, 2012;
Accepted: March 21, 2012;
Published: May 22, 2012
Foreign substances in form of organic, inorganic, bacteriological or radiological
elements in water are dangerous and capable to vitiate the quality of water
for domestic purposes (Salami, 2003) and water ecosystems
(Tabatabaie et al., 2009; Ndome
et al., 2011). Some of these foreign substances in particular, heavy
metals may influence the levels of other parameters and possibly result into
temporary or permanent impairments of water quality (Eletta,
2007). Presently, the increasing level of heavy metal pollution of surface
water is one of the problems facing global water resources management and monitoring
(Sekabira et al., 2010). This is a serious matter
in developing countries such as Nigeria that lack sensitive tools and mechanisms
to monitor water quality because of sources diversity. For example, the quality
of surface waters may be influenced by the quantity and quality of underlying
groundwater resulting from contaminated land and/or effluents from different
land uses (Ellis et al., 2002; Ato
et al., 2010) such as built-up (domestic waste and sewage), agricultural
(fertilizer and manure) and industrial waste (Linnik and
Zubenko, 2000; Lwanga et al., 2003; Al-Momani,
2009; Pejman et al., 2009; Sekabira
et al., 2010; Karami et al., 2011;
Al-Farraj et al., 2012; Machiraju
et al., 2012). This is because most surface waters used for domestic
purposes and human activities are around human settlements and cut across different
land uses (Ayeni et al., 2006, 2011).
The use of such surface water may expose the user to heavy metal poisoning (Ochieng
et al., 2008; Ayeni et al., 2011).
The spatial relationship between two parameters with respect to their sources
may also lead to increase or decrease in their concentration. This relationship
or association is usually established using widely accepted statistical techniques
such as Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), principal component analysis, coefficient
of variation and Z-score among others (Ogunkoya and Adejuwon,
1990; Ifabiyi, 1997; Jaji et
al., 2007; Adekunle et al., 2007; Ato
et al., 2010). The application of statistical techniques helps in
the interpretation of complex data patterns and gives a better understanding
of the relationship between water quality and ecological systems surrounding
the water under scientific study (Pejman et al.,
The above discussion provides the underlying rationale for this research, i.e.,
to evaluate the performance of heavy metals in pond waters across different
land uses in Akoko Northeast LGA of Ondo State Nigeria. The study focuses on
the influence of the land-uses on the performance of the selected heavy metals
using Z-score and coefficient of variation. This is considered an objective
means of assessing parameters performance and results comparability.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study area: This study was conducted in the Akoko Northeast LGA of Ondo
State Nigeria. Geographically, the area lies between 5°38N and 6°04East
of Greenwich Meridian and 7°26N and 7°42North of the Equator
(Fig. 1, 2). The area is located on Basement
Complex rock with its elevation ranging between 149 and 671 m above sea level.
It has a sub-tropical climate that is attributed to high rainfall of over 1500
mm annum-1 with characteristic of warm temperatures ranging from
30 to 38°C.
|| The study area, (a) Akoko northeast in Ondo state, Nigeria
and (b) Land uses
|| Studied ponds in the selected area
Methods: Water samples were collected from 30 different ponds (Fig. 2) used for domestic purposes in the study area using new polyethylene plastic bottles. The bottles were rinsed many times with distilled water and finally rinsed with ultrapure water. The samples were collected by dipping the covered plastic bottle about 20-30 cm below the water surface; opened and filled up and covered with the cap before being taken out of the water. All water samples were given identification code to avoid error of handling and stored in insulated cooler containing ice and delivered on the same day to laboratory. Samples were kept at 4°C in the analytical laboratory until processing and analysis. The water samples were collected and analysed on monthly basis between December 2008 and December 2009. The results of the laboratory analysis were analysed for Z-score and coefficient of variation and then discussed.
Standard score (Z-score): Z-score is adopted in this study to facilitate comparisons of parameters mean to enable the assessment of their performance among land-use types in the study area. Z-score is given by the formula:
|| Stand and score
|| Individual mean
||Σ(x) = The mean of the population
|| The standard deviation of the probability distribution of x
Coefficient of variation (CV): CV is adopted in this study to determine and compare the spread of the parameters mean and variation i.e., if either homogeneous or heterogeneous. It is given by the formula:
|| Coefficient of variation
|| Standard deviation
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Landuse concept was used on the assumption that different types of land have
different impact on water parameters. The Zn detected in sampled ponds ranges
between 0.01 and 0.66 mg L-1 (Fig. 3), indicative
of low Zn content when compared with WHO (2006) regulatory
limit of 5.0 mg L-1 (Fig. 4). Iron (Fe) in all
sampled ponds ranges between 0.4 and 4.7 mg L-1 (Fig.
3). On the average, the mean of Fe detected in all land uses are higher
than the WHO (2006) and the SON (2007)
regulatory limit of 0.3 mg L-1 (Fig. 4). Manganese
(Mn) was detected in the 17 ponds with concentration values ranging between
0.01 and 1.15 mg L-1.
|| Comparison of heavy metals concentrations mean with regulatory
Of these 17 ponds, Mn contents in Omi-Olokungboye and Oroki (built-up); Isemo
(cultivated land) and Agboomi (crop plantation) are higher than WHO
(2006) limits of 0.05 and 0.1 mg L-1 and SON
(2007) limit of 0.2 mg L-1 (Fig. 3, 4).
Copper (Cu) in the sampled ponds ranges between 0.0 and 2.10 mg L-1.
From the findings, Cu contents in 7 ponds within three different land uses,
e.g., built-up (Gurusi, Arae, Omi-Alagoke and Odewo), cultivated land (Agbo-Ilepa)
and vegetation (Ogbogi and Otunshoe) are above both the WHO
(2006) regulatory limit of 1.0 mg L-1 and SON
(2007) regulatory limit of 0.1 mg L-1 (Fig. 3,
4). The mean values of Cu across the land uses shown that
only crop plantation Cu found above the WHO (2006) and
SON (2007) regulatory limits of 1.0 mg L-1
The variation in the heavy metals, most especially in built-up area could be
attributed to various urban activities (Ifabiyi, 1997;
Obire and Aguda, 2006) while in cultivated land, it
could be attributed to farming activities, the topography, rock composition,
hydro-geological controls of the amplitude and the periodicity of water table
fluctuations (Petrone et al., 2005). The disparity
in the vegetation land use could result from the nature of the vegetation (disturbed),
human interference and geological composition of the area (Chudaeva,
1988; Ogunkoya and Adejuwon, 1990). Various crop
farming activities such as seasonal clearing, types and quantity of insecticide
and fertilizer applied and the topography of the area in which the ponds are
located must have influenced the heavy metals contents in the crop plantation
land use (Ifabiyi, 1997).
Evaluation of the mean across land uses: The mean of Zn among land uses is moderately homogeneous and comparable as indicated by a coefficient of variation of 16.73% (>10% and <50%). Observation made on Zn concentration in ponds across all the four land uses shows strong level of spatial dependency with a Z-score of 24.98 (p>0.01). The results suggest that Zn in the studied ponds are not randomly dispersed but instead are spatially correlated within the land uses. A comparison of the mean of Fe among land uses shows that Fe is homogeneous in its spread, hence comparable as demonstrated by a coefficient of variation of 23.23% (>10% and <50%). Fe in land uses ponds reveals a weak level of spatial dependency with a Z-score of -1.33 (p<0.01). The results indicate that Fe in the ponds water is not spatially correlated but dispersed randomly across the land uses. It also indicates no remarkable differences in the variability of Fe across land use.
The mean of Mn among land uses is spatially heterogeneous and highly comparable as demonstrated by a coefficient of variation of 109.72% (>100%). There are no remarkable difference in the variability of Mn across the land uses with a Z-score of -0.68 (p<0.01). The result suggests that Mn is highly dispersed but does not correlate with land uses, hence it posted a weak level of spatial dependency. Mean of Cu concentration among land uses is averagely homogeneous and comparable as indicated by a coefficient of variation of 29.03% (>10% and <50%). Slight differences are observed in Cu variability with a Z-score of 0.04 (p>0.01). The result suggests that Cu disperses consistently and slightly spatially correlates with land uses with a moderate level of spatial dependency.
The variability in the spatial dependency of the four studied heavy metals
could result from different factors. For instance, Zn and Fe are commonly found
in surface water like ponds and their occurrence could be natural (Ojosipe,
2007). Fe may result from dissolved rock and soil as well as anthropogenic
sources such as leached corrosive iron materials in the urban environment and
rural settlement (Jaji et al., 2007). The level
and variation of Mn and Cu in the sampled ponds could be attributed to the geological
composition of the parent rock on which the ponds are located (Chudaeva,
1988; Ogunkoya and Adejuwon, 1990; Biasioli
et al., 2007). Cu occurrence in natural water could also be attributed
to soluble copper salts or precipitated copper compounds of suspended solid
Spatial dependency was observed for Zn and Cu in their variability. Across the land uses, however, Zn has strong levels of correlation and homogeneity while Cu posts low correlation. Fe and Mn show weak and low level of spatial dependency as reflected in their Z-scores (p<0.01). In general, the four heavy metals assessed in the surface ponds show variation in concentrations as a result of different land uses and characteristic e.g., anthropogenic activities, effluent injections, parent rock chemistry.
1: Adekunle, I.M., M.T. Adetunji, A.M. Gbadebo and O.B. Banjoko, 2007. Assessment of groundwater quality in a typical rural settlement in Southwest Nigeria. Int. J. Environ. Public Health, 4: 307-318.
CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
2: Al-Farraj, S., A. El-Gendy, S. Al Kahtani and M. El-Hedeny, 2012. The Impact of Sewage Pollution on Polychaetes of Al Khumrah, South of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Res. J. Environ. Sci., 6: 77-87.
3: Ato, A.F., O. Samuel, Y.D. Oscar, P.A.N. Moi and B. Akoto, 2010. Mining and heavy metal pollution: Assessment of aquatic environments in Tarkwa (Ghana) using multivariate statistical analysis. J. Environ. Stat., 1: 1-13.
Direct Link |
4: Ayeni, A.O., I.I. Balogun and O.A. Adeaga, 2006. Impact of selected landuse types on surface water quality downstream of Asa Dam in Kwara State, Nigeria. J. Environ. Syst., 32: 221-238.
Direct Link |
5: Ayeni, A.O., I.I. Balogun and A.S.O. Soneye, 2011. Seasonal assessment of physico-chemical concentration of polluted Urban river: A case of Ala river in Southwestern-Nigeria. Res. J. Environ. Sci., 5: 22-35.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
6: Biasioli, M., H. Grcman, T. Kralj, F. Madrid, E. Diaz-Barrientos and F. Ajmone-Marsan, 2007. Potentially toxic elements contamination in Urban Soils: A comparison of three European Cities. J. Environ. Qual., 36: 70-79.
7: Chudaeva, V.A., 1988. Distribution of certain metals in river run-off in various region of the Far East. J. Water Resour., 6: 86-95.
8: Eletta, O.A.A., 2007. Determination of some trace metal levels in Asa river using AAS and XRF techniques. Int. J. Phys. Sci., 2: 056-060.
Direct Link |
9: Ellis, P.A., M.O. Rivett, J.E. Henstock, J.W. Dowle, R. Mackay, R.S. Ward and R.C. Harris, 2002. Impacts of contaminated groundwater on urban river quality-Birmingham, UK. Proceedings of the Groundwater Quality 2001 Conference, June 17-21, 2002, Sheffield, UK., pp: 71-77.
10: Al-Momani, I.F., 2009. Assessment of trace metal distribution and contamination in surface soils of Amman, Jordan. Jordan J. Chem., 4: 77-87.
Direct Link |
11: Ifabiyi, I.P., 1997. Variation in water gravity with rainfall incidences: A case study of Ogbe Stream Ile-Ife. Res. Publ. Geography, 6: 139-144.
12: Jaji, M., O.O. Bamgbose, O.O. Odukoya and T.A. Arowolo, 2007. Water quality assessment of Ogun river, South West Nigeria. Environ. Monit. Assess., 133: 473-482.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
13: Karami, K., H. Zolgharnein, M.M. Assadi, A. Savari and S. Dadollahi, 2011. New report on the occurrence of Exiguobacterium sp. AT1b in the persian gulf and its resistance to mercury pollution. Curr. Res. Bacteriol., 4: 23-27.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
14: Linnik, P.M. and I.B. Zubenko, 2000. Role of bottom sediments in the secondary pollution of aquatic environments by heavy-metal compounds. Lakes Reservoirs: Res. Manage., 5: 11-21.
15: Lwanga, M.S., F. Kansiime, P. Denny and J. Scullion, 2003. Heavy metals in Lake George, Uganda with relation to metal concentrations in tissues of common fish species. Hydrobiologia, 499: 83-93.
Direct Link |
16: Machiraju, P.V.S., G.V.S. Prasad, T.V. Prasad, D.R. Rao, 2012. Assessment of Suitability of Distillery Liquid Effluent for End use Applications Res. J. Environ. Sci., 6: 88-92.
17: Ndome, C.B., I.U. Udo, I.I. Akpan and C. Udom, 2011. Effect of water quality and bottom soil properties on the diversity and abundance of macrobenthic Fauna in some tropical frow-out earthen fish ponds. Ecologia, 2: 12-22.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
18: Obire, O. and M. Aguda, 2006. Impact of human activities on the bacteriological quality of Kolo Creek in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. Proceedings of the International Conference on Infrastructure Development and the Environment, September 10-15, 2006, Abuja, Nigeria -.
19: Ochieng, H., E.S. Steveninck and F.M. Wanda, 2008. Mouthparts deformities in chironomides (dipteral) as indicators of heavy metal pollution in northern Lake Victoria, Uganda. Afr. J. Aqua. Sci., 33: 135-142.
20: Ogunkoya, O.O. and J.O. Adejuwon, 1990. Water chemistry of some rivers draining the basement complex in Southwestern Nigeria. Hydrobiol. Trop., 23: 3-10.
21: Ojosipe, B.A., 2007. Water and waste water analysis. Proceedings of the Mandatory Training Workshop on Water. June, 2007 Institute of Public Analysist of Nigeria (IPAN).
22: Pejman, A.H., G.R.N. Bidhendi, N. Mehrdadi, M.E. Bidhendi and A.R. Karbassi, 2009. Evaluation of spatial and seasonal variations in surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 6: 467-476.
Direct Link |
23: Petrone, R.M., K.J. Devito, S. Kaufman, M.L. Macrae and J.M. Waddington, 2005. Potential carbon losses from boreal pond and riparian areas: Influence of temperature and drought: Dynamics and biogeochemistry of river corridors and wetlands. Preceedings of 7th IAHS Scientific Assembly, April 4-9, 2005, Foz do Iguassu, Brazil, pp:10-18.
24: Salami, A.W., 2003. Assessment of the level of water pollution along Asa River channel, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria. Niger. J. Pure Applied Sci., 18:: 1423-1429.
25: Sekabira, K., H.O. Origa, T.A. Basamba, G. Mutumba and E. Kakudidi, 2010. Assessment of heavy metal pollution stream sediments and its tributaries. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 7: 435-446.
Direct Link |
26: SON, 2007. Nigerian Standard for Drinking Water Quality: ICS 13.060.20, Approved by Standards Organization of Nigeria. Standards Organization of Nigeria, Governing Council, Lagos, Abuja, Nigeria, Pages: 30.
27: Tabatabaie, T., F. Amiri, M.B. Nabavi, M.S. Fazeli and M. Afkhami, 2009. Study on the effect of sewage pollutant of bandar imam petrochemical company on benthic macrofauna community mossa creek using biodiversity indices and bioindicators. Asian J. Biotechnol., 1: 20-28.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
28: WHO, 2006. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. 3rd Edn. Vol. 1, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, pp: 5.