
ABSTRACT
Background and Objective: Cinnamomum bejolghota (Buch.-Ham.) Sweet, belonging to the Cinnamomum genus, was cited as a medicinal plant due to its essential oils. This study aimed to discover the chemical constituents and biological properties of the essential oil from the bark of C. bejolghota collected from Xuan Son National Park, Phu Tho Province, Vietnam. Materials and Methods: The bark essential oils of C. bejolghota were extracted by the hydrodistillation method and investigated by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) and Gas Chromatography-Flame Ionization Detection (GC-FID). The antimicrobial feature of the essential oil was estimated using disc diffusion and microdilution broth assays. Results: The bark essential oils of C. bejolghota grown in Xuan Son National Park, Vietnam were obtained in yields of 1.1% (v/w, ±0.01). Major components of the essential oil were geraniol (26.2%), 1,8-cineole (24.73%), α-terpineol (9.30%) and terpinene-4-ol (3.90%). The bark essential oils of C. bejolghota displayed antimicrobial activity against the yeast S. cerevisiae and filamentous fungi F. oxysporum with minimum inhibitory concentrations of 500 ppm. Conclusion: The present study first represents phytochemical and bioactivity analysis of the essential oil of the C. bejolghota from Northern of Vietnam.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation
How to cite this article
DOI: 10.3923/ajps.2023.337.343
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajps.2023.337.343
INTRODUCTION
By using methods such as steam distillation, extrusion, cold-soaking, or solvent extraction, essential oils, the volatile, fragrant compounds generated spontaneously by plants, are extracted from many organs including flowers, leaves, stems, roots, or fruits. Approximately 3000 essential oils have been extricated from at least 2000 plant species, but only 300 of them are economically significant1. Essential oils are useful due to their antibacterial, antifungal, insecticidal, antiviral, anticancer, antioxidant and many other properties1-4.
The genus Cinnamomum L. (Lauraceae) contains 250 species found in subtropical and tropical parts of Asia, Oceania, North America and Central America4. Belonging to the Cinnamomum genus, Cinnamomum bejolghota (Buch.-Ham.) Sweet is a healing herb5. The bark and its infusions are used to cure coughs, toothaches, liver problems, diabetes, gallstones, bone fracture and wounds6. This species is widely distributed in China, Thailand, Laos, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, India and Vietnam7. Linalool has been reported as a prominent compound in the essential oil from leaf and panicle, whereas E-nerolidol and α-terpineol as the substantial components in the essential oil from the bark of C. bejolghota cultivated in India8,9. However, 1,8-cineole has been identified as the primary component of the essential oil from the bark of C. bejolghota cultivated in Jorhat (India)9 and Thailand10. To date, only one previous study reported that C. bejolghota bark essential oil possessed potent antifungal and antibacterial activities10. Herein, the chemical composition as well as its antimicrobial activities of the essential oil from the bark of C. bejolghota grown in Xuan Son National Park, Vietnam, was reported for the first time.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study area: This work was carried out from July, 2021 to July, 2022 at the Faculty of Natural Sciences, Hung Vuong University and the Institute of Natural Products Chemistry (INPC), Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST).
Plant materials: Stem bark of C. bejolghota (Buch.-Ham.) Sweet was collected from Xuan Son National Park, Phu Tho Province, Vietnam (21°9'N, 104°56'E) in July, 2021.
Research procedure
Isolation of essential oil and chemical component investigation: A total of 500 g dried bark of C. bejolghota (Buch.-Ham.) Sweet was used for hydrodistillation for 3 hrs by a Clevenger-type apparatus. Essential oils were separated, dehydrated and investigated as described by Nguyen et al.11.
Microbial strains: Seven microorganism strains from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) (Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii (ATCC 6633), Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus (ATCC 25923) Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 10145), Aspergillus niger (ATCC 6275), Fusarium oxysporum (ATCC 7601) and Candida albicans (ATCC 10231)) and two strains, Saccharomyces cerevisiae (VTCC-Y-62) and Salmonella enterica (VTCC 12277), from the Vietnam Type Culture Collection (Institute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Vietnam National University, Ha Noi, Vietnam) were used for antimicrobial activity of C. bejolghota bark oils.
The antibacterial property of essential oil was tested using the agar disk diffusion technique12-14. Prior to testing, microorganisms kept at -80°C were switched on by culture medium to a concentration of 1.0×106 CFU mL1. A total of 100 μL of inoculum solution was brought and applied uniformly to the agar surface. The positive (B. subtilis subsp., spizizenii (ATCC 6633) and S. aureus subsp., aureus (ATCC 25923)) and negative Gram bacteria (E. coli (ATCC 25922), Salmonella enterica (VTCC 12277)) were cultured in the Trypcase Soy Broth medium (TSB-Sigma). Using an aseptic approach, three holes (approximately 6 mm in diameter each) were created on agar plates. A pipette was used to place 50 μL of essential oil into each hole. The Petri dishes were kept at 37°C for 18-24 hrs after being incubated at room temperature for 2-4 hrs. On each plate culture, the presence or absence of growth surrounding each hole carrying an antibacterial agent was noted. The ruler with millimeter graduations was used to measure the diameters of the inhibiting growth zones.
The standard liquid dilution method15 was performed to determine the in vitro antimicrobial activity experiments on a 96-well microtiter plate as previous description16. The fungi were grown in the Sabouraud Dextrose Broth medium (SDB- Sigma). After that, the agar plates were kept at 30°C or 37°C for 24 or 48 hrs depending to the fungal species. The MIC (Minimum inhibitory concentration) value was calculated. For respective Gram (+) and Gram (-) bacteria, streptomycin and tetracycline were used as positive controls whereas nystatin was used for fungi and yeasts.
Statistical analysis: Statistical investigation of all data was carried out using the ANOVA and means sorted out by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at the 5% level of significance (p = 0.05).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Composition analysis of essential oil of C. bejolghota (Buch.-Ham.) Sweet: The essential oil obtained by hydrodistillation of C. bejolghota bark with a refractive index of 1.4752 (20°C), was a pale-yellow color liquid with a pleasant odor.
![]() |
Fig. 1: | GC/MS total ion chromatogram of the bark essential oil of C. bejolghota |
The extraction yield was 1.1% (v/w), quantified on a dry weight basis.
The chromatogram of the essential oil from C. bejolghota bark was presented in Fig. 1. A total of 53 compounds, accounting for 99.45 % of the essential oil composition were identified (Table 1). The main classes of compounds found in the essential oil were oxygenated monoterpenes (68.43%), followed by monoterpene hydrocarbons (14.78%), sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (11.32%), oxygenated sesquiterpene (2.42%) and non-terpenes (2.54%). Major components of the essential oil were geraniol (26.2%), 1,8-cineole (24.73%), followed by α-terpineol (9.30%), terpinene-4-ol (3.90%), α-pinene (3.34%), β-pinene (2.40), β-caryophyllene (2.69%), α-copaene (2.11%), respectively.
In comparison to the essential oil components of C. bejolghota reported in the literature, there was a slight difference between the essential oil compositions of C. bejolghota growing in northern of Vietnam and in other regions, including India8,9 and Thailand10 (Table 2). The content of monoterpene hydrocarbons of Vietnamese essential oil samples was lower than in other samples. However, the content oxygenated monoterpene of Vietnamese essential oil samples was quite high, almost equivalent to the Thailand oil sample and was significantly superior to the Indian samples. There were a few interesting points such as α-Terpineol, the chemical composition was detected in lower quantity in this study in comparison with the previous studies8,9. The content of cineole-1,8 (eucalyptol) of C. bejolghota grown in Phu Tho, Vietnam, was significantly higher than C. bejolghota grown in India, but lower than sample collected in Thailand. Especially, the high content of Geraniol was discovered for the first time in our study. Similarities and differences between the study results could be explicated by a variety of factors including the nature and age of the plants as well as depending on growth area and other conditions17.
Bioactivity analysis of essential oil of Cinnamomum bejolghota (Buch.-Ham.) Sweet: The biological activities of C. bejolghota bark essential oil were determined (Fig. 2 and Table 3) with regard to inhibitory zone diameter and MIC. The essential oil from the bark of C. bejolghota inhibited E. coli and S. enterica growth, with inhibitory zone diameters of 6.55±1.10 mm and 4.75±1.20 mm, respectively. The MIC value of the essential oil from the bark of C. bejolghota was 500 μg/mL for S. cerevisiae and F. oxysporum. These MIC values for both fungi were higher for six other examined microorganisms (Table 3).
Although the antibacterial effects of essential oils from Cinnamomum spp., have been extensively documented, the efficiency of C. bejolghota bark oil against pathogenic species has been poorly investigated. Atiphasaworn et al.10, found that the essential oil of C. bejolghota bark from Thailand was efficient against bacterial and fungal infections.
Table 1: | Compositions of the essential oil from the bark of C. bejolghota grown in Xuan Son National Park, Vietnam |
Rt (min) | Class/compound | RI | FID (%) |
Monoterpene hydrocarbons | 14.78 | ||
10.22 | α-Thujene | 930 | 0.23 |
10.50 | α-Pinene | 939 | 3.34 |
11.00 | Camphene | 956 | 0.41 |
11.70 | Sabinene | 978 | 1.16 |
11.89 | β-Pinene | 984 | 2.40 |
12.10 | Myrcene | 991 | 1.12 |
12.70 | α-Phellandrene | 1010 | 0.16 |
13.10 | α-Terpinene | 1022 | 1.14 |
13.36 | o-Cymene | 1029 | 0.49 |
13.53 | Limonene | 1034 | 1.06 |
13.57 | β-Phellandrene | 1035 | 0.61 |
14.03 | Z- β-Ocimene | 1049 | 0.10 |
14.53 | γ-Terpinene | 1063 | 1.95 |
15.59 | Terpinolene | 1094 | 0.61 |
Oxygenated monoterpene | 68.43 | ||
13.68 | 1,8-Cineole (Eucalyptol) | 1038 | 24.73 |
15.83 | Linalool | 1101 | 1.47 |
18.40 | δ-Terpineol | 1174 | 0.49 |
18.44 | Borneol (endo-Borneol) | 1175 | 0.58 |
18.81 | Terpinen-4-ol | 1186 | 3.90 |
19.26 | α-Terpineol | 1199 | 9.30 |
20.38 | Nerol | 1231 | 0.50 |
20.87 | Neral | 1245 | 0.51 |
21.29 | Geraniol | 1258 | 26.20 |
21.86 | Geranial | 1274 | 0.75 |
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons | 11.32 | ||
24.76 | α-Cubebene | 1361 | 0.64 |
25.47 | Cyclosativene | 1382 | 0.25 |
25.71 | α-Copaene | 1390 | 2.11 |
26.16 | cis-β-Elemene | 1404 | 0.28 |
27.23 | E-Caryophyllene (β-Caryophyllene) | 1437 | 2.69 |
28.31 | α-Humulene (α-Caryophyllene) | 1472 | 0.33 |
28.81 | trans-Cadina-1(6),4-diene | 1488 | 0.17 |
28.89 | γ-Muurolene | 1490 | 0.48 |
29.34 | β-Selinene | 1505 | 0.28 |
29.60 | α-Muurolene | 1514 | 1.34 |
30.29 | δ-Cadinene | 1537 | 1.62 |
30.34 | trans-Calamenene | 1538 | 0.27 |
30.42 | Zonarene | 1541 | 0.24 |
30.63 | trans-Cadina-1,4-diene | 1548 | 0.37 |
30.98 | α-Calacorene | 1560 | 0.25 |
Oxygenated sesquiterpene | 2.42 | ||
31.07 | Elemol | 1563 | 0.30 |
32.54 | Guaiol (Champacol) | 1613 | 0.19 |
33.50 | 1-epi-Cubenol | 1647 | 0.19 |
33.61 | γ-Eudesmol | 1651 | 0.20 |
33.86 | epi-α-Muurolol | 1660 | 0.20 |
33.96 | α-Muurolol (δ-Cadinol) | 1663 | 0.16 |
34.21 | β-Eudesmol | 1672 | 0.17 |
34.28 | α-Eudesmol | 1675 | 0.24 |
34.61 | Bulnesol | 1686 | 0.15 |
34.66 | Patchoulol | 1688 | 0.62 |
Non-terpenes | 2.54 | ||
24.88 | Chavibetol (m-Eugenol) | 1365 | 0.42 |
32.46 | 4-Allyl-2,6-dimethoxyphenol | 1610 | 0.21 |
32.60 | Tetradecanal | 1615 | 0.27 |
37.17 | Benzyl benzoate | 1781 | 1.64 |
Total | 99.49 |
![]() |
Fig. 2: | Antibacterial property of essential oils from barks of C. bejolghota (mean±standard deviation and n = 3) |
Table 2: | Majority compounds in bark essential oil of C. bejolghota collected from Vietnam, Thailand and India: A comparative study with literature |
Class/compound | C. bejolghota bark oil in Vietnam (this study) | C. bejolghota bark oil in Jorhat, Assam India8 | C. bejolghota bark oil in Sibsagar, Assam India9 | C. bejolghota bark oil in Jorhat, Assam India9 | C. bejolghota bark oil in Thailand10 |
Extraction yield | 1,1% | 0,1% | 0,08% | 0,08% | 1.01% |
Total compounds | 53 (99.49%) | 18 (61%) | 54 (99.7) | 32 (92%) | 36 (97.96) |
(representing % total oil) | |||||
Monoterpene hydrocarbons | 14.78 | - | 17.8 | 5.7 | 16.44 |
α-Pinene | 3.34 | 2.9 | 0.7 | 6.58 | |
α-Phellandrene | 0.16 | 0.3 | - | - | |
p-Cymene | - | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.09 | |
Oxygenated monoterpene | 68.43 | 37.9 | 49.1 | 76.5 | 73.41 |
Cineole-1,8 (Eucalyptol) | 24.73 | 1.07 | 7.2 | 31.3 | 40.24 |
Linalool | 1.47 | 8.20 | 19.9 | 20.0 | 0.11 |
α-Terpineol | 9.30 | 18.20 | 12.7 | 21.3 | - |
γ-Terpineol | - | - | - | 15.41 | |
Terpinen-4-ol | 3.90 | 1.8 | 8.3 | 3.2 | 7.55 |
Geraniol | 26.20 | - | - | - | |
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons | 11.32 | 9.5 | 2.15 | ||
α-Copaene | 2.11 | 2.5 | 0.6 | - | |
E-Caryophyllene (β-Caryophyllene) | 2.69 | 0.4 | 0.2 | - | |
Oxygenated sesquiterpene | 2.42 | 15.3 | 21.0 | 11.2 | 3.23 |
epi-α-Cadinol | - | 4.6 | 3.3 | 0.48 | |
Caryophyllene oxide | - | 0.7 | - | - | |
Patchoulol | 0.62 | - | - | - | |
(E)-Nerolidol | 15.30 | - | - |
Table 3: | MIC values of bark essential oil of C. bejolghota |
Microorganisms | MIC (μg mL1) | |
Gram-positive bacteria | B. subtilis subsp., spizizenii (ATCC 6633) | >500 |
S. aureus subsp., aureus (ATCC 25923) | >500 | |
Gram-negative bacteria | E. coli (ATCC 25922) | >500 |
P. aeruginosa (ATCC 10145) | >500 | |
Yeast | C. albicans (ATCC 10231) | >500 |
S. cerevisiae (VTCC–Y–62) | 500 | |
Fungus | A. niger (ATCC 6275) | >500 |
F. oxysporum (ATCC 7601) | 500 |
The antibacterial and antifungal effects of C. bejolghota bark essential oil might be attributed to the range of its bioactive compounds. Geraniol (26.20%) and 1,8-cineole (24.73%), the two principal components of C. bejolghota bark essential oils, exhibit many biological activities, including antibacteria18, fungicidal18,19, anti-inflammatory, anticarcinogenic and antioxidant20. The antimicrobial activity (lipophilic character) of Geraniol may be explained by its capacity to cling to the microorganism's cell membrane lipids, join with its components, making it more permeable and adhering important intracellular spots, thereby destroying their structures.
CONCLUSION
This work surveyed the components and biological activities of the essential oil from the bark of C. bejolghota grown in Xuan Son National Park in Vietnam. The main chemical classes of components were oxygenated monoterpene (68.43%), monoterpene hydrocarbons (14.78%), sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (11.32%), oxygenated sesquiterpene (2.42%) and non-terpenes (2.54%), respectively. The dominant compounds of the essential oil were geraniol (26.2%) and 1,8-cineole (24.73%). Biological activity analysis demonstrated that C. bejolghota bark essential oil has potent antibacterial and antifungal properties. From the foregoing, the essential oil of C. bejolghota might be a source of potential antimicrobial agents.
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT
The phytochemical compositions and antibacterial activity of the essential oil from the bark of C. bejolghota grown in Northern Vietnam were first investigated in this work. Some components, such as geraniol and other chemicals in trace amounts, were discovered in C. bejolghota essential oil for the first time. As a result, the essential oil of C. bejolghota might be considered a bioactive natural product which had many potential applications in aesthetic or postharvest conservation. This work helps to reveal the components and biological activities of the essential oil of C. bejolghota grown in northern Vietnam that many other researchers did not explore.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by Hung Vuong University (Project grant No. 04/2021/HĐKH).
REFERENCES
- Mancianti, F. and V.V. Ebani, 2020. Biological activity of essential oils. Molecules, Vol. 25.
CrossRefDirect Link - Raut, J.S. and S.M. Karuppayil, 2014. A status review on the medicinal properties of essential oils. Ind. Crops Prod., 62: 250-264.
CrossRefDirect Link - Bakkali, F., S. Averbeck, D. Averbeck and M. Idaomar, 2008. Biological effects of essential oils-A review. Food Chem. Toxicol., 46: 446-475.
CrossRefPubMedDirect Link - Wang, J., B. Su, H. Jiang, N. Cui, Z. Yu, Y. Yang and Y. Sun, 2020. Traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacological activities of the genus Cinnamomum (Lauraceae): A review. Fitoterapia, Vol. 146.
CrossRefDirect Link - Gogoi, B., K.J. Tamuli, Neipihoi, M. Bordoloi and H.K. Sharma, 2021. Isolation and characterization of chemical constituents with in vitro anti-hypertensive and anthelmintic activities of Cinnamomum bejolghota (Buch.-Ham.) Sweet leaves: An ethno medicinal plant of North East India. South Afr. J. Bot., 140: 161-166.
CrossRefDirect Link - Gogoi, B., B.B. Kakoti, S. Borah, and N.S. Borah, 2014. Antihyperglycemic and in vivo antioxidative activity evaluation of Cinnamomum bejolghota (Buch.-Ham.) in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats: An ethnomedicinal plant in Assam. Asia Pac. J. Trop. Med., 7: S427-S434.
CrossRefDirect Link - Kittiwattanokhun, A., S. Innajak, E. Tashiro, M. Imoto, and R. Watanapokasin, 2022. Cinnamomum bejolghota extract inhibits colorectal cancer cell metastasis and TGF-β1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition via smad and non-smad signaling pathway. Sci. Pharm., Vol. 90.
CrossRefDirect Link - Baruah, A., S.C. Nath, A.K. Hazarika and T.C. Sarma, 1997. Essential oils of the leaf, stem bark and panicle of Cinnamomum bejolghota (Buch.-Ham.) Sweet. J. Essent. Oil Res., 9: 243-245.
CrossRefDirect Link - Choudhury, S., R. Ahmed, A. Barthel and P.A. Leclercq, 1998. Composition of the bark and flower oils of Cinnamomum bejolghota (Buch. - Ham.) Sweet from two locations of Assam, India. J. Essent. Oil Res., 10: 245-250.
CrossRefDirect Link - Atiphasaworn, P., S. Monggoot and P. Pripdeevech, 2017. Chemical composition, antibacterial and antifungal activities of Cinnamomum bejolghota bark oil from Thailand. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci., 7: 69-73.
CrossRefDirect Link - Nguyen, T.B.Y., T.L.H. Phung, M.H. Nguyen, T.T.T. Nguyen and T.T.H. Pham, et al., 2022. Hydrodistillation essential oil of Michelia balansae and its characteristics from Xuan Son National Park, Vietnam. Asian J. Plant Sci., 21: 453-459.
CrossRefDirect Link - Reller, L.B., M. Weinstein, J.H. Jorgensen and M.J. Ferraro, 2009. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: A review of general principles and contemporary practices. Clin. Infect. Dis., 49: 1749-1755.
CrossRefDirect Link - Balouiri, M., M. Sadiki and S.K. Ibnsouda, 2016. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. J. Pharm. Anal., 6: 71-79.
CrossRefDirect Link - Ramdhani, D., S.A.F. Kusuma, D. Sediana, A.P.H. Bima and I. Khumairo, 2021. Comparative study of cefixime and tetracycline as an evaluation policy driven by the antibiotic resistance crisis in Indonesia. Sci. Rep., Vol. 11.
CrossRefDirect Link - Sarker, S.D., L. Nahar and Y. Kumarasamy, 2007. Microtitre plate-based antibacterial assay incorporating resazurin as an indicator of cell growth and its application in the in vitro antibacterial screening of phytochemicals. Methods, 42: 321-324.
CrossRefDirect Link - Harvey, A.L., 2012. Screening Methods for Drug Discovery from Plants. In: Plant Bioactives and Drug Discovery: Principles, Practice, and Perspectives, Cechinel-Filho, V. (Ed.), John Wiley Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, ISBN: 9780470582268, pp: 489-498.
CrossRefDirect Link - Heikal, A.A.E.M., 2017. Variation in the essential oil content and its composition in Eucalyptus cinerea leaves and its relation to some environmental factors. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants, 20: 995-1005.
CrossRefDirect Link - de Lira, M.H.P., F.P. de Andrade Júnior, G.F.Q. Moraes, G. da Silva Macena, F. de Oliveira Pereira and I.O. Lima, 2020. Antimicrobial activity of geraniol: An integrative review. J. Essent. Oil Res., 32: 187-197.
CrossRefDirect Link - Marei, G.I.K., M.A.A. Rasoul and S.A.M. Abdelgaleil, 2012. Comparative antifungal activities and biochemical effects of monoterpenes on plant pathogenic fungi. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 103: 56-61.
CrossRefDirect Link - Cai, Z.M., J.Q. Peng, Y. Chen, L. Tao and Y.Y. Zhang et al., 2021. 1,8-Cineole: A review of source, biological activities, and application. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res., 23: 938-954.
CrossRefDirect Link