• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences
  2. Vol 6 (5), 2007
  3. 864-868
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Asian Journal of Plant Sciences

Year: 2007 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 5 | Page No.: 864-868
DOI: 10.3923/ajps.2007.864.868
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Tillage Method and Seed Rate Effects on Dryland Winter Wheat

Ali Salek Zamani and Abolfazl Nasseri

ABSTRACT


Conducted researches showed that seed rate and tillage method could be affecting the yield of dryland wheat. Therefore, the objective of present study is to study tillage method and seed rate effects on grain yield and some yield components for dryland winter wheat at Maragheh located at the north-west of Iran. The Field soil was loamy clay and experiments were conducted for two years. Sixteen treatments were laid out in Completely Randomized Blocks (CRB) with a split-split plots design with four replications. Treatment combinations comprised two cropping years, 2 levels of tillage methods including TM1 = without mold board and TM2 = minimum tillage and 4 levels for seeding rates comprising SR1 = 100, SR2 = 125, SR3 = 150 and SR4 = 175 kg ha-1. Results revealed that interaction of tillage method and seed rate had a significant effect on grain yield. Maximum and minimum yield acquired from TM2xSR3 and TM2xSR2 with yield of 1329 and 1097 kg ha-1. The interaction of year and seed rate was statistically significant on 1000 grain weight, spike length, grains spike-1 and spike m-2. It seems the year effect is originated from rainfall that occurred as 346.3 and 201.70 mm in the consecutive two years. Also, non significant effect was observed due tillage methods, seed rate and its interaction on plant height. Also, results showed that 1000 grain weight, spike length, grains spike-1, spike m-2 and plant height ranged from 37.88 g, 6.323 cm, 21.422, 507.6, 71.144 cm to 27.45 g, 3.142 cm, 7.296, 301.00, 42.094 cm, respectively.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation

How to cite this article

Ali Salek Zamani and Abolfazl Nasseri, 2007. Tillage Method and Seed Rate Effects on Dryland Winter Wheat. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 6: 864-868.

DOI: 10.3923/ajps.2007.864.868

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajps.2007.864.868

Search


INTRODUCTION


Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is the world’s major crop source of calories and protein (Stewart and Nielsen, 1990). Wheat is a main source of nourishment and the principal food grain produced in Iran (Nasseri and Fallahi, 2007) that being grown on some 5.5 million hectares in this country. The potential yield of wheat is depending on optimum seed rate. There will be competition among plants for water and nutrients and sunlight for more seed rate and there will be less number of plants per unit area for less seed rate. As reported by Rajput et al. (1989) the maximum grain yield is obtained with increase in seed rate. Also, Bhatnager et al. (1991) found that grain yield increased with the in crease in the seed rate from 100 to 200 kg ha-1. Also, Ayaz et al. (1997) concluded that biological yield increased with increase in seed rate. With increase in seed rate the number of plants m-2 is increased, while 1000 grain weight was decreased (Kovac, 1978). Planting rate for irrigated winter wheat are mostly in the range of 60 to 100 kg ha-1, plant densities are 120 to 200 m-2 and head densities are 500 to 800 m-2. Spring wheat produce less grain on tiller heads than winter wheat and seeding rate are normally about 50% higher, while head densities tend to 20 to 30% lower (Stewart and Nielsen, 1990). Khan et al. (2002) reported that seed rate and varieties had significant effects on emergence m-2, tillers m-2, number of productive tillers m-2, plant height, days of maturity, grain spike-1, 1000 grain weight and grain yield under irrigated conditions. The maximum (2345.90 kg ha -1) and minimum grain yield (1676.57 kg ha -1) was obtained in those plots which were sown with 150 and 50 kg ha-1. Asrar and Kanemasu (1985) found that reducing planting rate from 67 to 24 kg ha-1 for two cultivars reduce average LAI after joining by 20%, grain yields by 27%, seasonal ET by 17% and WUE by 9%. Asgari-Meidani (2006) reported that maximum grain yield (=1452 kg ha-1) was obtained with treatment of chopping stubble by rotary plow and plowing by chisel plow in fall and ducks foot in spring and planting by seed drill in after fall. Also they concluded that chopping of stubble and chisel plow in autumn and sweep in spring increases soil moisture content, increase crop yield and reduce bulk density of soil. Shamsabadi (2006) reported that application of chisel plow with 140 kg ha-1 seed density with deep drill planting machine are recommended to increase wheat yield in Gonbad located at the north of Iran. The objective of present study is to study influence of tillage methods and seed rates on grain yield and some yield components of dryland winter wheat.

MATERIALS AND METHODS


The field experiments were conducted during 1997-1998 and 1998-99 at the Agricultural Research Institute of Maragheh, Iran (latitude 37°15’ N, longitude 46°22’ E and 1720 m above mean sea level). The maximum and minimum temperature averaged as 36.7 and 4.8°C, respectively. The field soil was loamy-clay. During the crop growing season of 1997-98, cumulative pan evaporation and rainfall were 1223 and 346.3 mm, respectively. During 1998-1999 these factors were 1133 and 201.7 mm, respectively (Fig. 1).

Wheat was sown during the early days of the Oct. of two cropping years on six rows 5.5 m long and 20 cm apart (5.5x1.2 m2 plots). Sixteen treatments were laid out in completely randomized blocks with a split-split plots design with four replications. Treatment combinations comprised 2 cropping years, 2 levels of tillage methods and 4 levels for seeding rates of wheat. Tillage methods including TM1 = without mold board and TM2 = minimum tillage with plot size of 30x5.5 m2, tillage practices were done by a tractor with power of 65 hp. Tillage practices were done in the fall of year whose land was fallow.

Image for - Tillage Method and Seed Rate Effects on Dryland Winter Wheat
Fig. 1: Occurred rainfall (mm) during two cropping years. cumulative rainfall was 346.3 and 201.70 mm in the two cropping years

Seeding rates treatments including SR1 = 100, SR2 = 125, SR3 = 150 and SR4 = 175 kg ha-1 with plot size of 7x5.5 m2. N up to 30 kg ha-1 in the form of urea was applied to the soil in the sowing time and spring. P up to 60 kg ha-1 was applied to the soil in the sowing time. The crop was managed well with respect to weed and disease control. Plant height was measured by 15 plant and spike length, number of grain in the spike and 1000 grain weight was measured by 15 spikes at each plot. After maturity for border effect, 50 cm from the both sides of plots was omitted, therefore plots in 4.5x1.2 m2 were harvested for grain. The collected data during the experiment was analyzed according to RCB design and mean values compared with Least Significant Differences (LSD) test (Steel and Torrie, 1980).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


The grain yield is significantly affected by year at 5% level of probability. The acquired grain yield in the 1st and 2nd years averaged as 1755.313 and 642.594 kg ha-1. It seems the difference was originated from rainfall that occurred as 346.3 and 201.70 mm in the consecutive two years. Analysis of data (Table 1) revealed that interaction of tillage method and seed rate had a significant (p = 0.07) effect on grain yield. The grain yield resulted from TM2xSR3 (=1329 kg ha-1) and TM1xSR2 (= 1291 kg ha-1) had the fist position relative other yields.

Maximum and minimum yield acquired from TM2xSR3 (=1329 kg ha-1) and TM2xSR2 (=1097 kg ha-1). This finding is differ with those find by Rajput et al. (1989) and Bhatnager et al. (1991) that have reported maximum grain yield is obtained with increase in seed rate. The obtained yield from TM1xSR3, TM1xSR4 and TM2xSR4 and on the other hand TM1xSR1, TM2xSR1 and TM2xSR2 are in similar groups (Fig. 2). For acquiring the maximum yield minimum tillage with seed rate of 150 kg ha-1 or without mold board operation with seed rate of 125 kg ha-1 can be recommended.

Table 1: Mean squares and significance levels from the analysis of variance on grain yield and some yield components of dryland winter wheat
Image for - Tillage Method and Seed Rate Effects on Dryland Winter Wheat
**,*, + and ns: Significantly different at 1, 5 and 10% and nonsignificantly different at 10% level of probability, respectively

Image for - Tillage Method and Seed Rate Effects on Dryland Winter Wheat
Fig. 2: Mean value of grain yield (kg ha-1) versus applied seed rate (kg ha-1) and soil tillage methods

A Weibull model were worked out for measured mean value of grain yield (kg ha-1) versus applied seed rate (kg ha-1) with applied soil tillage methods of TM1 and TM2, by multiple regression and the least squares procedure (Moghaddam, 1999). Acquired-models were as follow:

GY = 1262.46-206543.8 Exp (-0.235 SR 0.745)
(1)

R2 = 0.99 for TM1

GY = 1300.76-1198.48 Exp (-0.008 SR 1.152)
(2)

R2 = 0.99 for TM2

where GY, SR and TM are grain yield (kg ha-1), applied seed rate (kg ha-1) with soil tillage methods. TM1 and TM2 are treatments of without mold board and minimum tillage, respectively.

The R2 of models indicating that fitted models explain all of the variability in the grain yields under conditions of conducted experiments in two cropping years. The grain yield from developed models compared with measured values and displayed in Fig. 3. The agreements were satisfactory. Bhatnager et al. (1991) reported that grain yield increased with the in crease in the seed rate from 100 to 200 kg ha-1. This research finding is agreed with those find by Bhatnager et al. (1991).

The effect of tillage method and interaction of year with seed rate on 1000 grain weight is statistically significant at 5 and 10% level, respectively. Maximum and minimum 1000 grain weight acquired from plots applied Y1xSR1 (=37.88 g) and Y2xSR1 (= 27.45 g) treatments. The obtained 1000 grain weight from applying Y1xSR2 and Y2xSR3 and on the other hand SR1 to SR4 in the 2nd year are in similar groups (Fig. 4). This finding is consistent with those reported by Khan et al. (2002).

Analysis of data (Table 1) revealed that spike length was significantly (p = 0.05) affected by interaction of year and seed rate, while non significant effect was observed due tillage methods.

Image for - Tillage Method and Seed Rate Effects on Dryland Winter Wheat
Fig. 3: Variation of mean value of grain yield (GY in kg ha-1) versus applied seed rate (SR in kg ha-1) with soil tillage methods. TM1 and TM2 are treatments of without mold board and minimum tillage, respectively

Image for - Tillage Method and Seed Rate Effects on Dryland Winter Wheat
Fig. 4: Mean value of 1000 grain weight (g) versus applied seed rate during cropping years of 1997-98 and 1998-99

Mean values indicated that maximum spike length were taken by those plots which ware sown in the 1997-98 year at the rate of 100 kg ha-1 while minimum spike length were recorded in plots that sown at the 175 kg ha-1 in the 2nd year. In general, plots sown in the 2nd year that grouped in similar class produced low spike length relative plots sown in the 1st year.

Image for - Tillage Method and Seed Rate Effects on Dryland Winter Wheat
Fig. 5: Mean value of spike length (cm) versus applied seed rate (kg ha-1) during cropping years of 1997-98 and 1998-99

Image for - Tillage Method and Seed Rate Effects on Dryland Winter Wheat
Fig. 6: Mean value of grains per spike versus applied seed rate (kg ha-1) during cropping years of 1997-98 and 1998-99

Image for - Tillage Method and Seed Rate Effects on Dryland Winter Wheat
Fig. 7: Mean value of spike m-2 versus applied seed rate (kg ha-1) during cropping years of 1997-98 and 1998-99

Spike lengths produced by plots sown at the rate of 125 and 150 kg ha-1 are in similar groups (Fig. 5)

Table 1 demonstrated that interaction of year and seed rate had a significant (p≤0.05) effect on grains spike-1, while non significant effect was observed due tillage methods. Mean values indicated that, maximum grains spike-1 (= 21.422) were taken by those plots which ware sown in the 1997-98 year at the rate of 100 kg ha-1 while minimum grains spike-1 (= 7.296) were recorded in plots that sown at the 175 kg ha-1 in the 2nd year (Fig. 6). Grains spike-1 produced by plots sown in the 1st year at the rate of 125, 150 and 175 kg ha-1 are in similar groups. Also, grains spike-1 produced by plots sown in the 2nd year at the rate of 100 and 150 kg ha-1 are in similar groups. This result is consistent with those find by Khan et al. (2002).

Analysis of data (Table 1) revealed that interaction of year and seed rate had a significant (p≤0.05) effect on spike m-2, while non significant effect was observed due tillage method. Mean values indicated that, maximum spike m-2 (= 507.6) were taken by those plots which were taken by those plots which ware sown in the 1998-99 year at the rate of 175 kg ha-1 while minimum grains spike-1 (= 301.00) were recorded in plots that sown at the 100 kg ha-1 in the 2nd year. Spike m-2 produced by plots sown in the two consecutive years at the rate of 100 and 125 kg ha-1 are in similar groups (Fig. 7).

Analysis of data (Table 1) indicated that cropping years had a significant effect on plant height, while non significant effect was observed due tillage methods, seed rate and its interaction. Khan et al. (2002) found that seed rate had significant effect on plant height. The finding in the present study is differing with those reported by Khan et al. (2002). Mean values indicated that, maximum and minimum plant height were as 71.144 and 42.094 cm taken by those plots which were sown in the 1997-98 and 1998-99.

CONCLUSION


The influence of tillage methods and seed rates on grain yield and some yield components of dryland winter wheat were studied. The present study supports the following conclusions:

• Interaction of tillage method and seed rate had a significant effect on grain yield. Maximum grain yield obtained from TM2xSR3 with yield of 1329 kg ha-1.
• The interaction of seed rate and cropping year was statistically significant on 1000 grain weight, spike length, grains spike-1 and spike m-2. It seems the cropping year effect is originated from rainfall that occurred as 346.3 and 201.70 mm in the consecutive two years.
• Maximum 1000 grain weight, spike length, grains spike-1 and spike m-2 and plant height acquired as 37.88 g, 6.323 cm, 21.422 and 507.6, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS


We thank the Iranian Agricultural Engineering Research Institute (IAERI) and Agricultural Research Institute of Maragheh for supporting this research.

REFERENCES


  1. Asgari-Meidani, J., 2006. Study on the effects of soil tillage methods and crop residue management on wheat grain yield in dryland. Proceedings of the 4th National Congress on Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization, August 29-30, 2006, Tabriz University, Iran, pp: 14-15.

  2. Asrar, G. and E.T. Kanemasu, 1985. Seasonal distribution of water use and photosynthetic efficiencies in winter wheat. Proceedings of the International Conference Crop Water Requirements, September 1985, Paris, pp: 11-14.

  3. Ayaz, S., P. Shah and M. Ali, 1997. Influence of seeding density and geometry of planting on emergence, tillering and biological yield of wheat. Sarhad J. Agric., 13: 219-222.
    Direct Link

  4. Bhatnager, G.S., M.K. Porwal and L.L. Dhakar, 1991. Response of wheat to different crop geometries and rates in southern Rajesthan. Indian J. Trop. Agric., 8: 214-216.

  5. Khan, I.A., J. Bakht, W.A. Shah, N. Khan and I. Ullah, 2002. Effect of seed rate on the yield and yield components of wheat under irrigated conditions of Peshawar. Asian J. Plant Sci., 1: 513-515.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  6. Kovac, K., 1978. The effect of plant density of winter wheat on growth, fertility components and biological yield of grain. ACTA FYTO Teernical, 34: 50-57.

  7. Moghaddam, M., 1999. Advanced engineering statistics. Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz University (in Farsi).

  8. Nasseri, A. and H.A. Fallahi, 2007. Water use efficiency of winter wheat under deficit irrigation. J. Biol. Sci., 7: 19-26.
    Direct Link

  9. Rajput, F.K., M.M.J. Rajput, S.M. Aslam and A.W. Baloch, 1989. The growth and yield of wheat as affected by different seed rates and raw spacing. Sarhad J. Agric., 5: 479-482.

  10. Shamsabadi, H.A., 2006. Study of the effect of primary tillage practices, planting machines and different seed densities on yield of dryland wheat. Proceedings of the 4th National Congress on Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization, August 29-30, 2006, Tabriz University, Iran, pp: 128-129.

  11. Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie, 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd Edn., McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, USA., ISBN-13: 9780070609266, Pages: 633.
    Direct Link

  12. Stewart, B.A. and D.R. Nielsen, 1990. Irrigation of Agricultural Crops. Agronomy Monograph No. 30. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Sciences Society of America and the Soil Science Society of America, Wisconsin, USA., ISBN: 0-89118-102-4.

Search


Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved