• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Asian Journal of Plant Pathology
  2. Vol 9 (4), 2015
  3. 167-174
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Asian Journal of Plant Pathology

Year: 2015 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 4 | Page No.: 167-174
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Field Application of Humic Acid and Thyme Essential Oil for Controlling Late Blight Disease of Tomato Plants under Field Conditions

Riad S.R. El- Mohamedy and Faten M. Abd-El- latif

ABSTRACT


Effects of humic acid and thyme essential oil alone or in combination for controlling late blight diseased of tomato plants was tested under field conditions. The tested concentrations of humic acid had no inhibitory effect on Phytophthora infestans. While, thyme at concentrations 8.0 mL L–1 caused complete inhibition in linear growth of P. infestans. The highest inhibition in linear growth was obtained with thyme at 6.0 mL L–1 which reduced the linear growth by 92.2%. Moreover, under field conditions, results revealed that the most effective treatments are humic acid at 6.0 or 8.0 g L–1 combined with thyme at 6.0 or 8.0 mL L–1 which reduced the late blight incidence more than 81.3 and 78.4% during first and second growing seasons, respectively. Meanwhile, single treatments of thyme at 6.0 or 8.0 mL L–1 showed moderate effect. The highest increase in tomato yield was obtained with humic acid at 6.0 or 8.0 g L–1 combined with thyme at 6.0 or 8.0 mL L–1 which increased the tomato yield more than 53.3 and 46.9% during first and second growing seasons, respectively. Meanwhile, single treatments of humic acid at 6.0 or 8.0 mL L–1 showed moderate increase. The highest increase in β,1-3-glucanase activity was obtained with humic acid at 6.0 or 8.0 g L–1 when applied as single or combined with thyme at 6.0 or 8.0 g L–1 which increased the β,1-3-glucanase activity of tomato plants more than 137.0%.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation
Received: August 01, 2015;   Accepted: September 28, 2015;   Published: May 03, 2019

How to cite this article

Riad S.R. El- Mohamedy and Faten M. Abd-El- latif, 2015. Field Application of Humic Acid and Thyme Essential Oil for Controlling Late Blight Disease of Tomato Plants under Field Conditions. Asian Journal of Plant Pathology, 9: 167-174.

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajppaj.2015.167.174

INTRODUCTION


Late blight, caused by Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary, is an economically important disease of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Disease management strategies primarily depend on sanitary practices and well-timed fungicide applications (Winton et al., 2007; Shtienberg et al., 2010; Blandon-Diaz et al., 2012). However, development of fungicide resistance within populations of P. infestans alternative approaches that can be incorporated into integrated pest management of this pathogen (Blandon-Diaz et al., 2012).

Humic acid is a suspension, based on potassium-humates, which can be applied successfully in many areas of plant production as a plant growth stimulant or soil conditioner for enhancing natural resistance against plant diseases and pests (Scheuerell and Mahaffee, 2004, 2006; Abd-El-Kareem, 2007a; Abd-El-Kareem et al., 2009). It also, stimulate plant growth through increased cell division, as well as optimized uptake of nutrients and water (Atiyeh et al., 2002; Chen et al., 2004). Moreover, humic acid stimulated the soil microorganisms (Atiyeh et al., 2002; Qualls, 2004; Chen et al., 2004). Furthermore, Abd-El-Kareem et al. (2009) reported that humic acid treatment in potato plants induced resistance against early blight in addition to increased potato yield under field conditions.

The essential oil of thyme and its major component, thymol had antifungal activity against plant pathogenic fungi (Plaza et al., 2004; Angelini et al., 2006) as well as plant diseases of several fruits and vegetables (El Sherbieny et al., 2002; Sergvic-Klaric et al., 2007).

The purpose of the present study is evaluating the effects of humic acid and thyme alone or in combination for controlling late blight diseased of tomato plants under field conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS


Source of pathogenic fungus and tomato transplants: Pathogenic isolate of Phytophthora infestans the causal agent of late blight disease was procured by Department of Plant Pathology, (Project integrated management for controlling tomato fungal diseases under Egyptian and Tunisian conditions), Giza Egypt. Tomato transplants cv. Kastel rock were obtained from the Department of Vegetable Crop Research, Agricultural Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.

Laboratory experiments
Testing of different concentrations of humic acid and thyme essential oil on linear growth of Phytophthora infestans: Five concentrations of humic acid and thyme essential oil were tested to evaluate their inhibitory effect on radial growth of P. infestans. For this 0.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0 and 8.0 mL L–1 of humic acid and thyme essential oil were added individually to conical flasks containing sterilized PDA medium to obtain the proposed concentrations, then mixed gently and poured in sterilized petri plates (9 cm diameter). Plates were inoculated at the center with disks of 10 days old culture of P. infestans and incubated at 25±2. Five replicates were used for each. The average radial growth of fungus was measured after 10 days.

Field experiments
Testing of combined treatments between humic acid and thyme on late blight severity and tuber yield of tomato plants under field conditions: Experiments were carried out, at the Experimental Farm of National Research Centre at El-Noubareia, Behera Governorate, Egypt.

The promising treatments were applied under field conditions to study their effect against late blight disease in addition to their effect on tomato yield during two growing seasons. Field experiments were conducted under natural infection in plots (4×10 m) each comprised of 8 rows (40 transplants/row) in a randomized complete block design with three replicates (plots) for each treatment.

Treatments: Humic acid and thyme essential oil at concentrations 6.0 and 8.0 mL L–1 were tested alone or in combination in addition to the Fungicides (Redomil-plus at 2 g L–1) were applied as in Table 1.

Table 1: Testing of combined treatment between humic acid and signal and thyme at two concentrations
Image for - Field Application of Humic Acid and Thyme Essential Oil for Controlling Late Blight Disease of Tomato Plants under Field Conditions

Application: Single or combined treatments were applied as foliar application on tomato plants which had 4-7 leaves and every 15 days up to 90 days of transplanting. Combined treatments between humic acid and thyme was carried out by spraying tomato plants with humic acid at 6 or 8 mL L–1 followed by thyme at 6 or 8 mL L–1 with 3 days interval.

Disease assessment: Late blight scale according to Yan et al. (2002) based on the leaf area infected was modified as follows:

0 = No leaf lesions
1 = 25% or less
2 = 26-50
3 = 51-75
4 = 76-100% infected leaf area

Disease was recorded up to 90 days of transplanting.

Determination of tomato yield: Accumulation of tomato yield (kg m–2) for each treatment was determined.

Determination of β-1,3-glucanase activity activities: Two concentrations of humic acid or thyme essential oil, i.e., 6.0 and 8.0 mL L–1 were applied alone or in combination to study their effect on β,1-3-glucanase activity of tomato yield under filed conditions. Tomato plants after 70 days of transplanting were used as samples to determine β-1,3-glucanase activity.

Extraction of enzymes: Plant leaves (g) were homogenized with 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.1) (Goldschmidt et al., 1966) at the rate of 1/3 w/v. The homogenate was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant was used to determine enzyme activity.

β-1,3-glucanase assay: The method of Abeles and Forrence (1970) was used to determine β-1,3-glucanase activity. Laminarin was used as substrate and dinitrosalicylic acid as reagent to measure reducing sugars. The method was carried out as 0.5 mL of enzyme extract was added to 0.5 mL of 0.05 M of potassium acetate buffer (pH 5) containing 2% laminarin. The mixture was incubated at 40°C for 60 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 1 mL of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent and heating the tubes for 5 min at 100°C. The tubes were cooled and 3 mL of distilled water were added before assay. The optical density was read at 500 nm. The β-1,3-glucanase activity was expressed as millimolar glucose equivalent released/gram fresh weight tissues/60 min.

Statistical analysis: Tukey test for multiple comparisons among means was utilized (Neter et al., 1985).

RESULTS


Effect of different concentrations of humic acid and thyme essential oil on radial growth of Phytophthora infestans: Five concentrations of humic acid and thyme essential oil i.e., 0.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0 and 8.0 mL L–1 were tested to study their inhibitory effect against Phytophthora infestans. Results in Table 2 indicate that all tested concentrations of humic acid had no inhibitory effect on Phytophthora infestans.

Table 2: Effect of humic acid and thyme essential oil solution on radial growth of Phytophthora infestans
Image for - Field Application of Humic Acid and Thyme Essential Oil for Controlling Late Blight Disease of Tomato Plants under Field Conditions
(1)Values with the same letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05)

Table 3:Late blight incidence of tomato plants as affected with integrated treatments between humic acid and thyme under field conditions
Image for - Field Application of Humic Acid and Thyme Essential Oil for Controlling Late Blight Disease of Tomato Plants under Field Conditions
(1)Values with the same letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05), 2: Late blight scale from 0-4 according to Yan et al. (2002)

Meanwhile, thyme at concentrations 8.0 mL L–1 caused complete reduction in linear growth of Phytophthora infestans. The highest growth inhibition was obtained with thyme at 6.0 mL L–1 which reduced the radial growth by 92.2%.

Field experiments
Effect of combined treatment between humic acid and thyme essential oil on late blight incidence of tomato plants under field conditions: Two concentrations of humic acid or thyme essential oil, i.e., 6.0 and 8.0 mL L–1 were applied alone or in combination to study their effect on late blight disease of tomato plants under filed conditions. Results in Table 3 reveal that both concentration of each treatment significantly reduced the disease incidence of tomato plants during two growing seasons. The most effective treatments are humic acid at 6.0 or 8.0 mL L–1 combined with thyme at 6.0 or 8.0 mL L–1 which reduced the late blight severity more than 81.3 and 78.4% during first and second growing seasons, respectively. Meanwhile, single treatments of thyme at 6.0 or 8.0 mL L–1 showed moderate effect.

Effect of combined treatment between humic acid and thyme essential oil on tomato yield under field conditions: Two concentrations of humic acid or thyme essential oil, i.e., 6 and 8.0 mL L–1 were applied alone or in combination to study their effect on tomato yield under filed conditions. Results in Table 4 indicate that both concentration of each treatment significantly increase the tomato yield during two growing seasons.

Table 4: Effect of integrated treatments between humic acid and thyme on tuber yield of tomato plants under field conditions
Image for - Field Application of Humic Acid and Thyme Essential Oil for Controlling Late Blight Disease of Tomato Plants under Field Conditions
(1)Values with the same letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05)

Table 5: Effect of integrated treatments between humic acid and thyme on β,1-3-glucanase activity of tomato plants under field conditions
Image for - Field Application of Humic Acid and Thyme Essential Oil for Controlling Late Blight Disease of Tomato Plants under Field Conditions
(1)Values with the same letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05), 2: β,1-3-glucanase activity expressed as millimolar glucose equivalent released/gram fresh weight/60 min

The highest increase was obtained with humic acid at 6.0 or 8.0 mL L–1 combined with thyme at 6.0 or 8.0 mL L–1 which increased the tomato yield more than 53.3 and 46.9% during first and second growing seasons, respectively. Meanwhile, single treatments of humic acid at 6.0 or 8.0 mL L–1 showed moderate increase.

Effect of combined treatment between humic acid and thyme on β,1-3-glucanase activity of tomato plants under field conditions: Two concentrations of humic acid or thyme essential oil, i.e., 4.0 and 60.0 mL L–1 were applied alone or in combination to study their effect on β,1-3-glucanase activity of tomato yield under filed conditions. Results in Table 5 indicate that both concentration of each treatment significantly increase the β,1-3-glucanase activity of tomato plants. The highest increase was obtained with humic acid at 6.0 or 8.0 mL L–1 when applied as single or combined with thyme at 6.0 or 8.0 mL L–1 which increased the β,1-3-glucanase activity of tomato plants more than 137.0%. Meanwhile, single treatments of thyme at 6.0 or 8.0 mL L–1 were less effective.

DISCUSSION


Late blight, caused by Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary, is an economically important disease of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) (Winton et al., 2007; Shtienberg et al., 2010; Blandon-Diaz et al., 2012). However, development of fungicide resistance within populations of P. infestans has become a problem and alternative approaches that can be incorporated into integrated pest management of tomato late blight disease are needed (Blandon-Diaz et al., 2012). In present study integrated treatments between humic acid as resistance inducer and thyme as protective safe chemical against late blight disease of tomato plants was evaluated.

Humic acid can be applied successfully in many areas of plant production as a plant growth stimulant, soil conditioner, i.e., enhanced natural resistance against plant diseases and pests (Scheuerell and Mahaffee, 2004, 2006; Abd-El-Kareem et al., 2009). In the present results indicated that all tested concentrations of humic acid had no inhibitory effect against Phytophthora infestans but it reduced late blight disease of tomato plants under field conditions. In this respect, Scheuerell and Mahaffee (2004, 2006) reported that the most effective treatments for suppression damping off in many plants and gray mould in Geranium was compost tea plus kelp extract and humic acid. The role of humic acid for reducing late blight diseases in addition to increase yield of tomato plants may be due to enhanced natural resistance against plant diseases and pests (Scheuerell and Mahaffee, 2004, 2006). In the present study results indicated the highest increase was obtained with humic acid at 6.0 or 8.0 mL L–1, when applied as single or combined with thyme at 6.0 or 8.0 mL L–1 which increased the β,1-3-glucanase activity of tomato plants more than 137.0%. In this respect, B-1,3-glucanases and chitinases are able to hydrolyze B-1,3-glucan and chitin, respectively, the major components of fungal cell walls (Kauffman et al., 1987; Legrand et al., 1987; Abd-El-Kareem et al., 2006; Abd-El-Kareem, 2007a). Abd-El-Kareem (2007b) reported that bean plants treated with humic acid induced resistance against root rot and Alternaria leaf spot in addition to increased bean yield under field conditions. Moreover, Abd-El-Kareem et al. (2009) reported that potato plants treated with humic acid induced resistance against early blight in addition to increased potato yield under field conditions.

On the other hand, humic acid stimulated plant growth through increased cell division, as well as optimized uptake of nutrients and water (Atiyeh et al., 2002; Delgado et al., 2002; Chen et al., 2004) and stimulated the soil microorganisms (Atiyeh et al., 2002; Chen et al., 2004; Garcia-Gil et al., 2004).

The essential oil of thyme and its major component, thymol, had antifungal activity against plant pathogenic fungi (Plaza et al., 2004; Angelini et al., 2006). In the present study results indicated that thyme at concentrations 8.0 mL L–1 caused complete reduction in linear growth of Phytophthora infestans. The highest reduction in linear growth was obtained with thyme at 6.0 mL L–1 which reduced the linear growth by 92.2%. While, under field conditions results revealed that he most effective treatments are humic acid at 6.0 or 8.0 mL L–1 combined with thyme at 6.0 or 8.0 mL L–1 which reduced the late blight severity more than 81.3 and 78.4% during first and second growing seasons, respectively. Meanwhile, single treatments of thyme at 6.0 or 8.0 mL L–1 showed moderate effect. These treatments significantly increased the tomato yield. In this respect Soliman and Badeaa (2002) reported that thyme was tested for its inhibitory effect against Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus, A. ochraceus and F. moniliform. Results indicated that thyme at concentrations 500 ppm completely inhibited all tested fungi. Similar results was obtained by Daferera et al. (2003), they reported that thyme, clove and cinnamon essential oils completely inhibited P. digitatum and P. italicum growth either when added into the medium or by their volatiles. Moreover, Omidbaigi et al. (2007) reported that the fungistatic and fungicidal activities of the essential oils of thyme, myrtle, clove and lime against A. flavus and showed that the most effective essential oils were found from those of thyme and clove. Thyme and clove oils completely inhibited growth of A. flavus. Furthermore, thyme essential oil possesses a wide range spectrum of fungicidal activity against plant pathogenic fungi Aspergillus, Penicillium, Alternaria, Cladosporium pythium sp., F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi, Verticilium albo-atrum, Rhizoctonia sp. and Clavibacter michiganensis sub sp. michiganesis (Tanovic et al., 2007). On the other hand, Liu et al. (2002) found that thymol was more effective for controlling brown rot symptoms on apricots and fumigation of plumus with relatively low concentrations such as 2 or 4 mg L–1 can greatly reduce postharvest decay without causing any phytotoxicity. Also, Daferera et al. (2003) reported that thyme and cinnamon essential oils applied at 5 mL L–1 significantly reduced the incidence of green and blue moulds caused by P. digitatum and P. italicum respectively.

Sergvic-Klaric et al. (2007) reported that antifungal activities of the thyme essential oil, which contains p-cymene (36.5%), thymol (33.0%) and 1.8 cineole (11.3%) as a main components and pure thymol were determined by the dilution method and exposure to vaporous phase of the oil. Thymol exhibited approximately three times stronger inhibition than essential oil of thyme. Moreover, thyme essential oils was reported against plant diseases of several fruits and vegetables (El Sherbieny et al., 2002; Sergvic-Klaric et al., 2007).

It could be suggested that combined treatment between humic acid and thyme might be used commercially for controlling late blight disease of tomato plants under field conditions.

REFERENCES


  1. Abd-El-Kareem, F., 2007. Potassium or sodium bicarbonates in combination with Nerol for controlling early blight disease of potato plants under laboratory, greenhouse and field conditions. Egypt. J. Phytopathol., 35: 73-86.
    Direct Link

  2. Abd-El-Kareem, F., 2007. Induced resistance in bean plants against root rot and alternaria leaf spot diseases using biotic and abiotic inducers under field conditions. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 3: 767-774.
    Direct Link

  3. Abeles, F.B. and L.E. Forrence, 1970. Temporal and hormonal control of β-1,3-glucanase in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Physiol., 45: 395-400.
    PubMedDirect Link

  4. Atiyeh, R.M., S. Lee, C.A. Edwards, N.Q. Arancon and J.D. Metzger, 2002. The influence of humic acids derived from earthworm-processed organic wastes on plant growth. Bioresour. Technol., 84: 7-14.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  5. Angelini, P., R. Pagiotti, A. Menghini and B. Vianello, 2006. Antimicrobial activities of various essential oils against foodborne pathogenic or spoilage moulds. Ann. Microbiol., 56: 65-69.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  6. Daferera, D.J., B.N. Ziogas and M.G. Polissiou, 2003. The effectiveness of plant essential oils on the growth of Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium sp. and Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis. Crop Prot., 22: 39-44.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  7. Chen, Y., M. De-Nobili and T. Aviad, 2004. Stimulatory Effect of Humic Substances on Plant Growth. In: Soil Organic Matter in Sustainable Agriculture, Magdoft, F. and R. Ray (Eds.). CRC Press, Washington, DC., ISBN: 0849312949, pp: 103-130.

  8. Delgado, A., A. Madrid, S. Kassem, L. Andreu and M.C. del Campillo, 2002. Phosphorus fertilizer recovery from calcareous soils amended with humic and fulvic acids. Plant Soil, 245: 277-286.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  9. Garcia-Gil, J.C., C. Plaza, N. Senesi, G. Brunetti and A. Polo, 2004. Effects of sewage sludge amendment on humic acids and microbiological properties of a semiarid Mediterranean soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 39: 320-328.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  10. Goldschmidt, E.E., R. Goren and S.P. Monselise, 1966. The IAA-oxidase system of citrus roots. Planta, 72: 213-222.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  11. Kauffman, S., M. Legrand, P. Geoffroy and B. Friting, 1987. Biological function of pathogenesis-related proteins: Four PR proteins of tobacco have 1,3-β-glucanase activity. EMBO J., 6: 3209-3212.
    Direct Link

  12. Klaric, M.S., I. Kosalec, J. Mastelic, E. Pieckova and S. Pepeljnak, 2007. Antifungal activity of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) essential oil and thymol against moulds from damp dwellings. Lett. Applied Microbiol., 44: 36-42.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  13. Legrand, M., S. Kauffmann, P. Geoffroy and B. Fritig, 1987. Biological function of pathogenesis-related proteins: Four tobacco pathogenesis-related proteins are chitinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 84: 6750-6754.
    Direct Link

  14. Liu, W.T., C.L. Chu and T. Zhou, 2002. Thymol and acetic acid vapors reduce postharvest brown rot of apricots and plums. HortScience, 137: 151-156.
    Direct Link

  15. Neter, J., W. Wasserman and M.H. Kutner, 1985. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 2nd Edn., Richard D. Irwin Inc., Homewood, IL.

  16. Qualls, R.G., 2004. Biodegradability of humic substances and other fractions of decomposing leaf litter. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 68: 1705-1712.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  17. Omidbaigi, R., M. Yahyazadeh, R. Zare and H. Taheri, 2007. The in vitro action of essential oils on Aspergillus flavus. J. Essent. Oil Bearing Plants, 10: 46-52.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  18. Plaza, P., R. Torres, J. Usall, N. Lamarca and I. Vinas, 2004. Evaluation of the potential of commercial post-harvest application of essential oils to control citrus decay. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol., 79: 935-940.
    Direct Link

  19. Scheuerell, S.J. and W.F. Mahaffee, 2004. Compost tea as a container medium drench for suppressing seedling damping-off caused by Pythium ultimum. Phytopathology, 94: 1156-1163.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  20. Scheuerell, S.J. and W.F. Mahaffee, 2006. Variability associated with suppression of gray mold (Botrytis cinerea) on Geranium by foliar applications of nonaerated and aerated compost teas. Plant Dis., 90: 1201-1208.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  21. Shtienberg, D., Y. Elad, M. Bornstein, G. Ziv, A. Grava and S. Cohen, 2010. Polyethylene mulch modifies greenhouse microclimate and reduces infection of Phytophthora infestans in tomato and Pseudoperonospora cubensis in cucumber. Phytopathology, 100: 97-104.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  22. Soliman, K.M. and R.I. Badeaa, 2002. Effect of oil extracted from some medicinal plants on different mycotoxigenic fungi. Food Chem. Toxicol., 40: 1669-1675.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  23. Tanovic, B., S. Milijasevic and A. Obradovic, 2007. In vitro effect of plant essential oils on growth of some soil-borne pathogens. Acta Hortic., 729: 467-471.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  24. Winton, L.M., R.H. Leiner, A.L. Krohn and K.L. Deahl, 2007. Occurrence of late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans on potato and tomato in Alaska. Plant Dis., 91: 634-634.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  25. Yan, Z., M.S. Reddy, C.M. Ryu, J.A. McInroy, M. Wilson and J.W. Kloepper, 2002. Induced systemic protection against tomato late blight elicited by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Phytopathology, 92: 1329-1333.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  26. Abd-El-Kareem, F., F.M. Abd-El-Latif and Y.O. Fotouh, 2009. Integrated treatments between humic acid and sulfur for controlling early blight disease of potato plants under field infection. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 5: 1036-1045.
    Direct Link

  27. Abd-El-Kareem, F., N.S. El-Mougy, N.G. El-Gamal and Y.O. Fotouh, 2006. Use of chitin and chitosan against tomato root rot disease under greenhouse conditions. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 2: 147-152.
    Direct Link

  28. Blandon-Diaz, J.U., A.K. Widmark, A. Hannukkala, B. Andersson, N. Hogberg and J.E. Yuen, 2012. Phenotypic variation within a clonal lineage of Phytophthora infestans infecting both tomato and potato in Nicaragua. Popul Biol., 102: 323-330.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  29. El Sherbieny, S.N., W.H. Zakey and S.M. Abdul-Ghafor, 2002. Antifungal action of some essential oils against fungi causing cotton seedling damping-off disease. Ann. Agric. Sci. Cairo, 47: 1009-1020.

Related Articles

Field Application of Chitosan and Moringa oleifera Extracts as Fungicides Alternatives to Control Early Blight and Improvement Growth and Yield Quality of Potato

Leave a Reply


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved