|
|
|
|
Research Article
|
|
Effects of Variety and Planting Density on the Incidence of Common Viral Diseases of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in a Southern Guinea Savannah Agro-ecology |
|
Taiye Hussein Aliyu
and
Olusegun Samuel Balogun
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
|
Virus diseases are a limiting factor in cowpea production in all agro-ecological zones of Nigeria and yield reductions of between 80-100% have been reported. Some cowpea varieties show resistance to viruses, cultural practices such as varying plant population have been found useful in the control of these viral pathogens. Field experiments were conducted in the 2009 and 2010 cropping seasons to evaluate the effect of crop variety and varying planting density on the incidence of common viral diseases of cowpea. Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp in the Southern guinea savannah agro-ecology of Nigeria. This is to identify tolerant varieties and an optimum planting density that could lead to lower viral incidence and high crop yields. A split-plot fitted into a randomised complete block experimental design with three replications was established with three cowpea cultivars (IT89KD-288, IAR-48 and Ife brown), in the main plots and three planting densities (25x75, 50x75 and 75x75 cm) in the sub-plots. The results of the study indicated that variety and planting density had significant effect on viral disease incidence. The lowest incidence was in variety IT89KD-288 (10.3%) while the highest was in variety IAR-48 (28.6%). The lowest mean incidence was also in plots under planting density of 25x75 cm. However, planting at a mid-level density of 50x75 cm with variety IT89KD-288 outperformed the other combinations for yields and is therefore, recommended.
|
|
|
|
|
Received: February 23, 2011;
Accepted: August 01, 2011;
Published: September 26, 2011
|
|
INTRODUCTION
Cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp is an important staple in many parts
of the world; United States, South and Central America, the Caribbean, India
and Australia (Quinn and Myers, 2002). It is also the
most economically important indigenous African legume crop (Langyintuo
et al., 2003). It is estimated that over 200 million people in Africa
are dependent on cowpea as a cheap source of protein (Gowda
et al., 2000). Nigeria accounts for over 70% of the total world production
(Singh et al., 2000), with the production of
2,907,091 tonnes in 2001 (FAOSTAT, 2003).
Viruses constitute the major group of pathogens infecting cowpea (Kang
et al., 2005) and over 140 viruses infect cowpeas world-wide but
only nine of these viruses have been reported in Nigeria (Taiwo,
2003). The economically important viruses in Africa include cowpea aphid-borne
mosaic virus potyvirus, cowpea mild mottle virus Carlavirus, cowpea mosaic virus
comovirus, cowpea chlorotic mottle virus carmovirus, cowpea golden mosaic geminivirus,
southern bean mosaic sobemovirus, cucumber mosaic cucumovirus and tobacco mosaic
tobamovirus (Alegbejo and Kashina, 2001).
Most plant viruses are transmitted by vectors from one host to another. Equally,
they are efficiently disseminated by human activities such as vegetative plant
propagation, grafting, global exchange of infected material, changes in cropping
systems and the introduction of novel crops in existing or new agricultural
areas (Andret-Link and Fuchs, 2005).
Irwin et al. (2000) had suggested that the breeding
and adoption of desirable mixtures of crop varieties with resistance to pests
and pathogens for increased production be encouraged. It is believed that if
susceptible plants are scattered among resistant plants within a field, vectors
are less likely to encounter susceptible ones than if they were in pure stands
(Hooks and Fereres, 2006).
The outcome of the interaction between host density and parasitism depends
on the host genotype, which determines the plasticity of life-history traits
and consequently, the host capacity to develop different tolerance mechanism
to the direct or indirect costs of parasitism (Pagan et
al., 2009). The yield and nutritional quality of soybean seed has been
found to be influenced by plant density (Rahman et al.,
2011). Also in an experiment to evaluate the effect of cultivar and plant
population on spotted wilt in Virginia Market-Type Peanut, Hurt
et al. (2004), reported variation in cultivar susceptibility to Spotted
Wilt Virus (SWV) and also that the incidence of SWV increased as plant population
decreased.
Cowpea is growing in importance in Nigeria and efforts are on by breeders to
breed new cultivars that yield more but yet diseases especially those caused
by viruses continue to militate against optimization of yield. It is equally
important to focus research on alternative control strategies which will protect
the environment against chemical pollution (Abdelhamid et
al., 2011), the use of agricultural wastes has been successful in this
regard (Osman et al., 2011) but the use of some
other cultural control strategies looks more promising.
The objective of this study therefore, was to evaluate the use of varietal difference and plant population in the control of virus diseases of cowpea. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was conducted at the University of Ilorin, Teaching and Research Farm during the 2008 and 2009 cropping seasons. The Research farm is approximately 307 m above sea level and is located within the Southern Guinea savannah ecological zone (9°29' N, 4° 35' E) of Nigeria. The annual rainfall is between 1250-1500 mm which peaks between June and September with a characteristic dry spell in mid July/early August. The mean temperature range for the area is between 20-35°C. The soil type is well drained sandy-loam. Experimental design and field layout: A split-plot treatment fitted into randomised complete block experiment with three replications was established with three cowpea cultivars (IT89KD-288, IAR-48 and Ife brown), in the main plots and three planting densities (25x75, 50x75 and 75x75 cm) in the sub-plots. Each experimental plot consisted of nine (9) ridges, each 25 m long. Land preparation followed the conventional method of ploughing, harrowing and ridging. The cowpea cultivars were obtained from the National Seed Service Centre Ilorin, Kwara State Nigeria. The seeds were planted at the rate of three seeds per hole and thinning to two plants per stand was done some fourteen days later. Cypermethrin dimethrate at the rate of 50 g a.i ha-1 was sprayed at 4 weeks after seedling emergence and twice after flowering to control insects. Weeding was done manually as and when due. Data collection: Data collected were on number of plants per plot, number of infected plants per plot, plant height, number of pods using 10 plants from each sub-plot, pod weight and grain weight.
Percentage disease incidence was calculated from collected primary data as
follows:
Harvesting: The cowpea pods harvested at maturity from each plot at 75-80 days after planting were manually threshed and weight of pods and grains appropriately measured using electronic weighing balance (Model Kerro No. Ka-3002 c). Statistical analysis: All collected data were subjected to analysis of variance using the statistical package for the social sciences SPSS version 15.0. Treatment means, where significant, were separated using the New Duncans multiple range test at 5% level of probability.
RESULTS
Percentage disease incidence: Table 1a and b
are the results of the analysis of variance on percentage disease incidence
for the 2008 and 2009 seasons. The results indicated that variety, density and
a combination of these two factors had significant effect on incidence of viral
disease. An assessment of the results for 2008 season on varietal basis (Table
1a) showed that by the 8th week after planting, variety IT89KD-288 had the
lowest viral incidence (10.3%) while variety IAR-48 had the highest viral incidence
of 28.6%. Analysis of results on the effect of planting density showed that
planting density at 25x75 cm consistently produced the lowest viral disease
incidence.
Table 1a: |
Main and interactive effects of variety and planting density
on percentage viral disease incidence in cowpea during the 2008 cropping
season |
 |
Means with the same letter. (s) within each segment of a column
are not significantly different at p = 0.05 level using Duncans multiple
range test |
Table 1b: |
Main and interactive effects of variety and planting density
on percentage viral disease incidence in cowpea during the 2009 cropping
season |
 |
Means with the same letter. (s) within each segment of a column
are not significantly different at p = 0.05 level using Duncans multiple
range test |
The percentage disease incidence at the 8th week was 11.3%. The lowest plant
population density (i.e., spacing at 75x75 cm) led to the highest viral disease
incidence (28.4%). Analysis of the effect of variety and density on viral incidence
at flowering showed that variety IT89KD-288 at planting density 50x75 cm had
the lowest incidence of viral disease (19.8%). The highest incidence (43.7%)
was attained when variety IAR-48 was planted at a density of 75x75 cm.
Infection levels were generally higher for the 2009 season (Table
1b). However, the results obtained followed the same trend that was observed
in the 2008 season. An analysis of varietal effect per sec showed that variety
IAR-48 cumulatively manifested the highest infection levels from the 4th to
the 8th week. It attained an incidence rate of 52.3% which was significantly
higher compared with the variety IT89KD-288 which had the lowest value of 34.5%.
Consideration of planting density as a main effect showed that at 25x75 cm,
significantly lower viral infection was recorded compared to other density regimes.
However, the combination of variety IT89KD-288 at the planting density of 50x75
cm produced the significantly lowest viral disease incidence (17.3%).
Growth attributes
Plant height: The results showed that variety and planting density interaction
significantly influenced plant heights. At flowering (8th week) in the 2008
season as shown in Table 2a, variety Ife-brown at a density
of 25x75 cm produced the significantly tallest plants (44.7 cm) while the combination
of variety IAR-48 at density 75x75 cm had the shortest plants (29.9 cm). In
the 2009 season (Table 2b) the effect of the combinations
showed that there was a higher growth rate for the year compared to 2008. An
analysis of the results, however, showed a pattern that was not different from
the 2008 season.
Table 2a: |
Combination effect of variety and planting density on plant
height of Cowpea during the 2008 cropping Season |
 |
Means with the same letter (s) within each column are not
significantly different at p = 0.05 level using Duncans multiple range
test |
Table 2b: |
Combination effect of variety and planting density on plant
height during the 2009 cropping season |
 |
Means with the same letter (s) within each column are not
significantly different at p = 0.05 level using Duncans Multiple Range
Test |
Table 3: |
Combination effect of variety and planting density on yield
attributes |
 |
Means with the same letter (s) within each column are not
significantly different at p = 0.05 level using Duncans multiple range
test |
The results shown in the Table 2b, indicate that at the
flowering stage (8th week after planting), the combination of variety Ife-brown
at density 25x75 cm produced the tallest plants (58.1 cm) while the combination
of variety IAR-48 planted at a density of 75x75 cm had the shortest plants (46.3
cm).
Yield attributes: Table 3 shows the results of analysis
of the combination of variety and planting density on some yield attributes
for the two years of the experiment. In both seasons of the study, cowpea variety
IT89KD-288 at density 50x75 cm produced the significantly highest yields per
plant. In the first year (2008) for example, the number of pods, weight of dry
pods and weight of dry seeds averaged 32.8, 59.0 and 51.6 g per plant, respectively
while variety IAR-48 at density 50x75 cm had the lowest yields. In the second
year of the experiment (2009), though yields were slightly higher than in the
preceding year, the observations were similar to that of the first year, with
variety IT89KD-288 at density 50x75 cm also having the highest yield attribute
values while variety IAR-48 at density 50x75 cm the lowest.
DISCUSSION
The identification of tolerant cowpea varieties is a crucial step towards achieving
the objective of economic control of viral diseases. Tolerance in this case
can be defined as the ability of a genotype to produce a good crop even when
it is infected with a pathogen (Agrios, 2005). Nevertheless,
different sources of resistance is recommended for enhanced durability of resistance
(Ochola and Tusiime, 2011). The present study showed
that the incidence of virus diseases was highest in variety IAR-48 and lowest
in variety IT89KD-288. The ability of variety ITKD-288 to have less virus incidence
could be attributed to the genetic inherencies in the variety. This assertion
is in agreement with Goenaga et al. (2008) who
reported that the different yield potential of cowpea genotypes grown under
virus pressure was due to the genetic diversity. Alsemaan
et al. (2011), likewise reported the existence of genetic diversity
within Rosa damascene accessions used to broaden the production of rose
oil.
Virus disease incidence was observed to be highest at a plant population density
of 75x75 cm, and lowest at a population density of 25x75 cm, this implied that
low virus incidence existed under high plant population. It has long been known
(Matthews, 1991) that half of all known plant viruses
are transmitted by aphids. Allarangaye et al. (2007)
reported that the transmission of Rice Yellow Mosaic Virus (RYMV) was by coleopterous
insects. One factor which governs the rate of virus epidemics, is the interaction
of the aphid vector with the plant environment especially plant density (INHS,
1995). It can therefore be inferred that the low virus incidence recorded
at high plant population is attributable to reduced aphid infestations which
hitherto would have served as vectors of the virus pathogens.
This study also showed that cowpea variety IT89KD-288 planted at a density
of 50x50 cm produced the highest yield parameters. This suggests that although
planting density could be effective in viral disease control, it is better determined
on varietal basis. Findings by Payne (2000) corroborates
the point that competition for space can become very intense when plant population
is high which could then predispose plants to mechanical inoculation of virus
pathogens occasioned by leaf contact.
CONCLUSION This study concludes that moderately high plant population could be an effective tool in the control of viral diseases of cowpea especially in combination with the right variety. To this end variety IT89KD-288 at a planting density of 50x75 cm which performed best in this study is recommended to help control yield losses due to virus attack in this ecological zone.
|
REFERENCES |
1: Abdelhamid, M.T., E.M. Selim and A.M. EL-Ghamry, 2011. Integrated effects of bio and mineral fertilizers and humic substances on growth, yield and nutrient contents of fertigated cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) grown on sandy soils. J. Agron., 10: 34-39. CrossRef |
2: Agrios, G.N., 2005. Plant Pathology. Elsevier Academic Press, Boston, MA. pp: 134-139
3: Alegbejo, M.D. and B.D. Kashina, 2001. Status of legume viruses in Nigeria. J. Sustainable Agric., 18: 55-69. CrossRef |
4: Allarangaye, M.D., O. Traore, E.V.S. Traore, R.J. Millogo, S. Guinko and G. Konate, 2007. Host range of rice yellow mottle virus in Sudano-Sahelian Savannahs. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 10: 1414-1421. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
5: Andret-Link, P. and M. Fuchs, 2005. Transmission specificity of plant viruses by vectors. J. Plant Pathol., 87: 153-165. Direct Link |
6: Alsemaan, T., N. Albatal, H. Baydar and K. Almaarri, 2011. Genetic diversity and qualitative variation of Rosa damascene in Syria. Int. J. Agric. Res., 6: 429-436. CrossRef | Direct Link |
7: Kang, B.C., I. Yeam and M.M. Jahn, 2005. Genetics of plant virus resistance. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol., 43: 581-621. CrossRef |
8: FAOSTAT, 2003. FAOSTAT Agriculture Data. Food and Agriculture Organization Statistics, Rome, Italy
9: Gowda, B.S., J.L. Miller, S.S. Rubin, D.L. Sharma and M.P. Timko, 2000. Isolation, sequencing and mapping of resistance gene analogs from cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Proceedings of the World Cowpea Conference III held at the International Institutes of Tropical Agriculture, Sept. 4-8, Ibadan, Nigeria, pp: 167-184
10: Hooks, C.R.R. and A. Fereres, 2006. Protecting crops from non-persistently aphid-transmitted viruses: A review on the use of barrier plants as a management tool. Virus Res., 120: 1-16. CrossRef | Direct Link |
11: Hurt, C.A., D.L. Brandenburg, G.G. Jordan, G.G. Kennedy and J.E. Bailey, 2004. Effect of cultivar and plant population on spotted wilt in Virginia market-type peanut. Peanut Sci., 31: 101-107. Direct Link |
12: Irwin, M.E., W.G. Ruesink, S.A. Isard and G.E. Kampmeier, 2000. Mitigating epidemics caused by non-persistently transmitted aphid-borne viruses: The role of the plant environment. Virus Res., 71: 185-211. CrossRef |
13: Langyintuo, A.S., J. Lowenberg-DeBoer, M. Faye, D. Lambert and G. Ibro et al., 2003. Cowpea supply and demand in West and Central Africa. Field Crops Res., 82: 215-231. CrossRef | Direct Link |
14: Matthews, R.E.F., 1991. Plant Virology. 3rd Edn., Academic Press, San Diego, Pages: 835
15: Ochola, D. and G. Tusiime, 2011. Pathogenicity of rice yellow mottle virus and the potential sources of resistance against the disease in Eastern Uganda. Asian J. Plant Pathol., 5: 1-15. CrossRef |
16: INHS, 1995. INHS reports November-December 1995. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL.
17: Pagan, I., C. Alonso-Blanco and F. Garcia-Arenal, 2009. Differential tolerance to direct and indirect density-dependent costs of viral infection in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Pathog., Vol. 5, No. 7. CrossRef | Direct Link |
18: Payne, W.A., 2000. Optimizing crop water use in sparse stands of pearl millet. Agron. J., 92: 808-814. Direct Link |
19: Quinn, J. and R. Myers, 2002. Cowpea: A versatile legume for hot, dry conditions. Alternative Crop Guide, Jefferson Institute, pp: 4. http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/articles/ji-cowpea.html.
20: Rahman, M.M., M.M. Hossain, M.P. Anwar and A.S. Juraimi, 2011. Plant density influence on yield and nutritional quality of soybean seed. Asian J. Plant Sci., 10: 125-132. CrossRef | Direct Link |
21: Goenaga, R.J., A.G. Gillaspie Jr. and A. Quiles-Belen, 2008. Assessing yield potential of cowpea genotypes grown under virus pressure. HortScience, 43: 673-676. Direct Link |
22: Singh, B.B., J.D. Ehlers, B. Sharma and F.R. Freire Filho, 2000. Recent progress in cowpea breeding. Proceedings of the World Cowpea Conference, September 4-8, 2000, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria, pp: 22-40
23: Taiwo, M.A., 2003. Viruses Infecting Legumes in Nigeria: Case History. In: Plant Virology in Sub-Saharan Africa, Hughes, J.A. and J. Odu (Eds.). Intl. Inst. Trop. Agric. Ibadan, Nigeria pp: 364-378
24: Osman, M.E.H., M.M. El-Sheekh, M.A. Metwally, A.A. Ismail and M.M. Ismail, 2011. Efficacy of some agriculture wastes in controlling root rot of Glycine max L. induced by Rhizoctonia solani. Asian J. Plant Pathol., 5: 16-27. CrossRef | Direct Link |
|
|
|
 |