• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Asian Journal of Plant Pathology
  2. Vol 2 (1), 2008
  3. 1-14
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Asian Journal of Plant Pathology

Year: 2008 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 1-14
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Cloning and Sequencing of Novel Endophytic Bacillus subtilis from Coconut for the Management of Basal Stem Rot Disease

L. Rajendran, G. Karthikeyan, T. Raguchander and R. Samiyappan

ABSTRACT


In this study, for the management of Basal Stem Rot (BSR) disease sixty endophytic, rhizosphere strains were isolated from coconut, other crops and virgin soils. The strains showed high growth promotion were subjected to Ganoderma mycelium inhibition study in vitro. The strains EPC5 and EPC8 were showed high growth promotion and strong inhibition to Ganoderma pathogen compared to other strains. Both the strains were characterized by biochemical methods and confirmed as Bacillus. The Bacillus ITS region was amplified by specific primers and EPC5, EPC8 showed amplification of 546 bp products in size. Further, the strains were cloned and sequenced, deposited in NCBI, USA. The sequence showed similarity with Bacillus subtilis.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation

How to cite this article

L. Rajendran, G. Karthikeyan, T. Raguchander and R. Samiyappan, 2008. Cloning and Sequencing of Novel Endophytic Bacillus subtilis from Coconut for the Management of Basal Stem Rot Disease . Asian Journal of Plant Pathology, 2: 1-14.

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajppaj.2008.1.14

INTRODUCTION

Basal Stem Rot (BSR) disease caused by Ganoderma lucidum (Leys) Karst. is the most destructive disease and a major limiting factor in coconut production especially in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and other coconut growing states of India (Wilson et al., 1987; Bhaskaran et al., 1989). The disease is also called as Thanjavur wilt, bole rot, Ganoderma disease and Anabe roga in different states of India (Vijayan and Natarajan, 1972; Nambiar and Rethinam, 1986; Bhaskaran et al., 1996; Srinivasulu et al., 2001). Currently, no cost-effective fungicide that gives guaranteed control, although the disease could be delayed by adopting strategic management, which is a labour-intensive procedure. The frequent use of pesticides may lead to the development of tolerance in the target organism. Development of biological control for basal stem rot disease is accepted as a durable and environment friendly alternative for agrochemicals. There is some evidence that endophytes can contribute to the control of plant diseases (Kloepper et al., 1992) promote plant growth and yield, suppress pathogens, may help to remove contaminants, solubilize phosphate or contribute assimilable nitrogen to plants (Rosenblueth and Martínez-Romero, 2006). In plant tissues, bacterial endophytes may originate from seeds (Mundt and Hinkle, 1976; McInroy and Kloepper, 1995b), vegetative material (Sturz, 1995), soil (McInroy and Kloepper, 1995a) and the phylloplane (Raaijmakers et al., 1995). They are found in numerous plant species (Chanway, 1998) with the most being members of common soil bacterial genera such as Pseudomonas, Bacillus and Azospirillum (Chanway, 1996), many strains can promote plant growth (Chanway, 1998; Hallmann et al., 1997). Endophytic bacteria have been shown to control Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum on cotton (Chen et al., 1995), F. oxysporum f.sp. pisi on pea (Benhamou et al., 1996a), Verticillium alboatrum and R. solani on potato (Pleban et al., 1995; Nowak et al., 1995) and rice (Krishnamoorthy and Gnanamanickam, 1997), Sclerotium rolfsii on bean (Pleban et al., 1995) and Urocystis fagacearum on oak (Brooks et al., 1994).

Mguni (1996) isolated a number of strains of Bacillus sp. with antagonistic potential against black rot of cabbage caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Wulff (2000) reported that Bacillus subtilis strain BB have shown promise as a control agent of black rot under field conditions. Bacillus subtilis has great potential uses in agriculture. Its members are able to produce antimicrobial metabolites to control plant pathogens; to fix nitrogen; to form endospores to resist desiccation, heat and UV irradiation and survive in adverse conditions. Endophytic bacillus amended with chitin promotes higher growth and suppresses the bacterial blight incidence in cotton under greenhouse conditions (Rajendran et al., 2006). With this background, the present study was carried out to isolate, screen and characterize the effective endophytic strains for the management of BSR disease in coconut.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolation of Bacterial Endophytes
Coconut root samples, cotton and virgin soil were taken and brought to the laboratory. Root sections (2-3 cm long) were made using a sterile scalpel. Root samples were surface sterilized with 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) in 0.05% triton X-100 for 10 min and rinsed four times in 0.02 M sterile potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.0 (PB). A 0.1 mL aliquot was taken from the final buffer wash and transferred to 9.9 mL Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) to serve as sterility check. Samples were discarded if growth was detected in the sterility check samples (agitating samples in TSB, Hi Media Code No. M 011, at 28±2°C) within 48 h. Each sample (0.5 g) was triturated with a sterile mortar and pestle in 9.5 mL of the final buffer wash. Serial dilutions up to (1010) of the triturate were made in phosphate buffer. Each dilution of every sample was plated (0.1 mL) on three plates each of three different media; Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA-Hi Media, Code No. M290). Nutrient agar (NA g L-1; peptone 5, beef extract 2 and agar 20, pH 5.0) and King`s B Medium (g L-1; proteose peptone 20, K2HPO4 1.5, Mg SO4.7H2O 1.5, glycerol 20 mL and agar 15, pH 7.2) (King et al., 1954). The plates were incubated at 28±2°C for 48-72 h. At each sampling date and for each treatment, one representative of each bacterium, as evident from their colony type and morphology was transferred to fresh King`s B medium plates to establish pure cultures.

Preparation of Bacterial Suspension Inoculum
The endophytic bacteria were grown on KB and NA broth with constant shaking at 150 rpm for 48 h at room temperature (28±2°C). The bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at 10000 rpm for 15 min and bacterial cells were resuspended in phosphate buffer (0.01 M, pH 7.0). The concentration was adjusted using a spectrophotometer to approximately 108 cfu mL-1 (OD595 = 0.3) and used as bacterial inoculum (Thompson, 1996).

Seed Bacterization
Coconut being a perennial crop, growth promotion by endophytic and rhizosphere bacteria was tested on rice crop. Rice seeds (cv. ADT 46) were surface sterilized with two per cent sodium hypochlorite for 30 sec, rinsed in sterile distilled water and dried overnight under sterile air stream. Endophytic bacterial strains inoculated into respective broth were taken in a conical flask. Required quantity of seeds were soaked in bacterial suspension containing 3x10 8 for 2 h and dried under shade.

Plant Growth-Promotion
Plant growth-promoting activity of bacterial endophytic strains were assessed based on the seedling vigour index by the standard roll towel method (ISTA, 1993). Rice seed bacterization was done as described earlier. Twenty seeds were kept over the presoaked germination paper. The seeds were held in position by placing another presoaked germination paper strip and gently pressed. The polythene sheet along with seeds were then rolled and incubated in growth chamber for 14 days. Three replications were maintained for each treatment. The root and shoot length of individual seedlings were measured and the germination percentage of seeds was also calculated. Plant growth promotion also tested in pot culture method. Bacterized seeds were sown in pots. Twenty seeds were maintained for each treatment. The root and shoot length of individual seedlings were measured and the germination percentage of seeds was also calculated. The vigour index was calculated by using the formula as described by Baki and Anderson (1973).

Vigour index = Percent Germination x seedling length (shoot length + root length)

In vitro Testing of Endophytic Bacterial Strains on Inhibition of Mycelial Growth of Ganoderma
Bacterial endophytic strains were tested for their inhibition on mycelial growth of Ganoderma by following the dual culture technique (Dennis and Webster, 1971). The bacterial culture was streaked at one side of Petridish (1 cm from the edge of the plate) plated with PDA medium and mycelial disc (8 mm diameter) of seven days old culture of Ganoderma was placed on the opposite side in the Petridish perpendicular to the bacterial streak. The plates were incubated at room temperature (28±2°C) for four days and the mycelial inhibition of pathogen was measured in millimeter.

Identification of Endophytic Bacterial Isolates
Various biochemical tests were carried out to identify the isolated endophytic bacterial strains. These include morphological, cultural characteristics on agar plate and biochemical tests. The following are the important bio-chemical tests conducted in the laboratory.

• Simple staining.
• Gram staining
• Endospore staining.
• KOH test.
• Utilization of citrate.
• Catalase test.
• Starch hydrolysis.
• Gelatin hydrolysis.
• Methyl red test.
• Growth in 7% NaCl (Aneja, 1993; Schaad, 1992).

Isolation of Bacillus DNA
Endophytic Bacillus sp. was grown in nutrient broth or on nutrient agar plates at 28°C. Total DNA (including chromosomal and plasmid DNA) was extracted as described by Robertson et al. (1990) with slight modifications. Cultures grown for 16 h in nutrient broth were centrifuged into a pellet, washed in TE (10 mM Tris pH 7.5/1 mM EDTA pH 8.0) and suspended in 10% sucrose. Cells were incubated at 37°C in lysozyme solution (5 mg mL-1 lysozyme, 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 10 mM EDTA pH 8.0), followed by addition of 20% SDS containing 0.3% beta-mercaptoethanol. DNA was purified by organic extraction and ethanol precipitation. Purified DNA was quantified by UV spectrophotometry.

Detection of Bacillus Species Specific Loci in the Endophytic Strains
To confirm strains as Bacillus sp., 16S rRNA intervening sequence specific BCF1 (CGGGAGG CAGCAGTAGGGAAT); BCR2 (CTCCCCAGGCGGAGTGCTTAAT) primers were used to get an amplicon size of 546 bp (Cano et al., 1994). PCR reactions were carried out in 20 μL reaction mixture containing 10X buffer (with 2.5 mM MgCl2), 2 μL; 2 mM dNTP mixture, 2 μL; 2 M primer, 5 μL; Taq DNA polymerase, 3 U; H2O, 8 μL and 50 ng of template DNA samples were amplified on DNA thermalcycler (Eppendorf Master Cycler Gradient, Westbury, New York) using the PCR conditions 94°C for 1 min, 58°C for 1 min and 72°C for 1 min. The total number of cycles was 40 with the final extension time of 10 min. The PCR products were resolved on 2% agarose at 50 V stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg mL-1), photographed and analysed using gel documentation system (Alpha Innotech Corporation, USA).

Cloning and Sequencing of 16S rDNA of Bacillus sp.
The 16S-23S rDNA of EPC5 and EPC8 were amplified with intervening sequence specific primers, BCF1 (CGGGAGGCAGCAGTAGGGAAT); BCR2 (CTCCCCAGGCGGAGTGCT TAAT) primers were used to get an amplicon size of 546 bp (Cano et al., 1994). Amplified 16S rDNA was purified from each reaction mixture by agarose (1.2%, w/v) gel electrophoresis in TBE buffer containing 0.5 μg of ethidium bromide per mL. A small agarose slice containing the band of interest (observed under long-wavelength [312 nm] UV light) was excised from the gel and purified by using a QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Inc., Chatsworth, California) according to the supplier`s instructions. This purification was performed to remove primer dimers and other residues from the PCR amplification. Fragments were cloned into the T/A vector pCR2.1 (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) and transformed into Escherichia coli strain DH5α according to the procedure recommended by the manufacturer. Transformants were selected on LB agar amended with ampicillin (75 mg mL-1) and X-Gal (20 mg mL-1). Clones were randomly selected and used as templates in PCR to produce products of required size 546 bp in agarose gel. Clones producing PCR fragments of the appropriate size were then subjected to sequencing. DNA sequencing was performed at Genei Pvt Ltd, Bangalore, India. For sequence determination of the cloned PCR products, a generally applicable sequencing strategy was developed. The sequences for entire cloned PCR products, approximately 546 bp in length were determined by using vector-encoded M13 sequencing primer sites, forward primer (5`-CACGACGTTGTAAAACGAC-3`) and reverse primer (5`-GGATAACAATTTCACACAGG-3`).

Assignment of Cloned Sequences to Establish Phylogenetic Divisions
Sequence identities of the GenBank database were performed with BLAST analyses (Altschul et al., 1990). Average linkage cluster analysis of aligned sequences for construction of phylogenetic trees was performed with Treecon version 1.15. Clustering was determined by UPGMA analysis of pairwise genetic distance values. Amino acid and nucleotide sequences were aligned by using the CLUSTAL X 1.81. Newly obtained sequences were deposited with GenBank database, GenBank, New York, USA.

Statistical Analysis
All the experiments were performed twice with required replicates and arranged in a randomized complete block design for greenhouse experiment. The data were statistically analyzed (Rangasamy, 1995) using the IRRISTAT version 92 developed by the International Rice Research Institute Biometrics unit, the Philippines (Gomez and Gomez, 1984). The percentage values of the disease index were arcsine transformed. Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) at two significant levels (p<0.05 and p<0.01) and means were compared by Duncan`s Multiple Range Test (DMRT).

RESULTS

Isolation of Endophytic and Rhizosphere Bacteria
Totally sixty isolates of endophytic and rhizosphere bacteria were isolated from healthy coconut roots, cotton stem and root and virgin soils of Periyar reserve and Ooty forest soil (Table 1).

Table 1: List of endophytic bacterial strains and source
Image for - Cloning and Sequencing of Novel Endophytic Bacillus subtilis from  Coconut for the Management of Basal Stem Rot Disease

Table 2: Effect of bacterial endophytes on Rice seedling growth
Image for - Cloning and Sequencing of Novel Endophytic Bacillus subtilis from  Coconut for the Management of Basal Stem Rot Disease
Values are mean of two replications; Data followed by the same letter(s) in a column are not significantly different from each other according to Duncan`s multiple range test at p = 0.05

Table 3: In vitro antagonistic activity of bacterial endophytic isolates of Coconut against Ganoderma
Image for - Cloning and Sequencing of Novel Endophytic Bacillus subtilis from  Coconut for the Management of Basal Stem Rot Disease
Values are means of three replications; Data followed by the same letter(s) in a column are not significantly different from each other according to Duncan`s multiple range test at p = 0.05; Values in parentheses are arcsine transformed

Table 4: Identification and characterization of bacterial endophytic strains by biochemical characteristics
Image for - Cloning and Sequencing of Novel Endophytic Bacillus subtilis from  Coconut for the Management of Basal Stem Rot Disease

Efficacy of Bacterial Endophytic Strains on Plant Growth Promotion
Coconut being a perennial crop, growth promotion by endophytic and rhizosphere bacteria was tested on rice crop. The growth promotion by bacterial endophytes and rhizosphere isolates was assessed by treating the rice seeds with all the 60 bacterial isolates separately by their suspension. Endophytic bacterial isolates EPC5, EPC8, EPC12, EPC13, EPC15, EPC21, EPC29, EPC32, EPC52 and Pseudomonas fluorescens strain Pf1 were found to increase the vigour index of rice seedlings significantly when compared to untreated control (Table 2).

In vitro Screening of the Endophytic Bacterial Strains Against the Pathogen
Out of 60 endophytic and rhizosphere bacterial strains, ten isolates were selected in preliminary screening for growth promotion. These isolates were tested for their efficacy by dual plate technique against G. lucidum along with Pf1. Among the ten isolates, five strains were found to inhibit the growth of G. lucidum in vitro. The strain, Pf1 showed high inhibition to G. lucidum followed by EPC5 (coconut root isolate) and EPC8 (coconut root isolate). The per cent inhibition was significantly higher in plates streaked with Pf1 (40.67 %), EPC5 (33.80 %) and EPC8 (29.16 %) against control plates (Table 3).

Biochemical Tests for Endophytic Bacteria
The isolates which promoted plant growth and inhibitory to G. lucidum were characterized by biochemical methods for identification. The methods viz., Gram`s staining, Endospore staining, Catalase test, Starch hydrolysis, Gelatin liquefaction, Growth at 7% NaCl and HCN test were carried out (Table 4).

PCR Amplification of Endophytic Bacillus Genus Specific Loci
For the further confirmation of Bacillus strains, polymerase chain reaction was performed using gene specific primers. The ITS primers amplified a fragment size of 546 bp corresponding to the region of the 16s-23s rRNA intervening sequence for Bacillus sp. Best isolates from different ecosystems of Tamil Nadu were examined for the amplification of the 16s-23s rRNA region and EPC5 and EPC8 isolates of endophytic bacterial collection showed amplified product with the size of 546 bp. The results of PCR amplification has further confirmed that these isolates were pertaining to the group of Bacillus (Fig. 1).

Image for - Cloning and Sequencing of Novel Endophytic Bacillus subtilis from  Coconut for the Management of Basal Stem Rot Disease
Fig. 1: Detection of endophytic Bacillus by gene specific primer

Image for - Cloning and Sequencing of Novel Endophytic Bacillus subtilis from  Coconut for the Management of Basal Stem Rot Disease
Fig. 2: Colony PCR for Bacillus

Cloning and Sequencing of 16s rDNA of Bacillus sp.
The 16s-23s rDNA fragments of EPC5, EPC8 were cloned into the T/A vector pTZ57R/T and transformed into Escherichia coli strain DH5α. Transformants on LB agar amended with ampicillin were randomly selected and used as templates in PCR to produce the products of required size of 546 bp in agarose gel (Fig. 2). Complete sequence of Bacillus ITS region was obtained and submitted in the NCBI, GenBank, New York, USA. They were compared with nucleotide and aminoacid sequences from the GenBank database of different Bacillus isolates from various countries (Table 5).

Image for - Cloning and Sequencing of Novel Endophytic Bacillus subtilis from  Coconut for the Management of Basal Stem Rot Disease
Fig. 3: UPGMA tree of 16s rDNA of Bacillus with other nucleotide sequences form GenBank

Table 5: Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) sequences of Bacillus isolates used in this study
Image for - Cloning and Sequencing of Novel Endophytic Bacillus subtilis from  Coconut for the Management of Basal Stem Rot Disease

The unweighted pair group method with arithmetic means (UPGMA) tree resulting from the analysis of nucleotide and aminoacid sequences of DNA gene using the sequences from the GenBank were compared shown in Fig. 3. Genetic distance among the sequences from the GenBank and from the cloned sequences of DNA based on UPGMA was shown in Table 6.

DISCUSSION

Coconut palms were affected by many pests and diseases. Among them, BSR disease caused by Ganoderma lucidum is the most destructive one which is widespread in nature. Basal stem rot in coconut is a serious disease in India and in severely infected areas, incidence as high as 80% was recorded (Ramadoss, 1991). Basal stem rot can be contained effectively by management practices in the early stages of disease development. The use of cultural practices and toxic chemicals has both advantages and disadvantages. Managing this disease by biological methods has become increasingly important. Among biological control methods, endophytic bacteria are an alternative to chemical pesticides that can be more reliable and ecologically as well as economically sustainable. The efficacies of the biocontrol agents Pf1 and T. viride has been studied individually for the management of Ganoderma (Karunanithi et al., 2004). Sixty endophytes were isolated from coconut root, cotton stem and roots. Colonization of plant roots with certain beneficial microbes causes the induction of a unique physiological and biochemical state in plants called priming. Primed plants display either faster, stronger or both activation of the various cellular defense responses that are induced following attack by either pathogens or insects or in response to abiotic stress (Conrath et al., 2006). Similar reports obtained by Cho et al. (2003) stated that endophytic colonization of balloon flower by Bacillus sp. CY22 without any harm to the root. The endophytes could actively dissolve the cell wall components to gain entry (Zinniel et al., 2002). In the present study, endophytic bacteria from the roots of coconut palms EPC5, EPC8, EPC15, EPC29 and EPC52 were found to increase the vigour index of rice seedlings significantly when compared to untreated control. Hallmann et al. (1997) reported that most of the endophytic bacterial strains are capable of promoting plant growth. Endophytic bacteria colonize a broad spectrum of plant species and plant parts (Sturz et al., 1997). Bacillus species are among the most common bacteria found to colonize plants endophytically (Lilley et al., 1996; Mahafee and Kloepper, 1997) and it is likely that their endophytic ability could play an important role in the biocontrol of vascular plant pathogens. In our study, most of the isolates were characterized as Bacillus sp. whereas some Pseudomonas sp. has also been identified. Several reports indicate the role of bacterial endophytes in the management of plant pathogens. Barka et al. (2002) reported that in vitro bacterization of grapevine with plant growth promoting rhizobacterium, Pseudomonas strain PSJN reduced the incidence of grey mold caused by Botrytis cinerea when compared to non bacterized controls. In the present study, Pf1 and endophytic bacterial strain EPC5 showed maximum mycelial inhibition of G. lucidum. Antagonistic strain of Pseudomonas putida (B0) isolated from a sub-alpine exhibited antifungal activity against phytopathogenic fungi in Petri dish assays and produced chitinase, β-l,3-glucanase, salicylic acid, siderophore and hydrogen cyanide (Pandey et al., 2006). The inhibitory action may be due to the production of antifungal or antibacterial agents (Maurhofer et al., 1998). Out of 905 bacterial isolates from rhizosphere of healthy avocado trees, eight strains produced antibiotics viz., phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA), phenazine-1-carboxamide (PCN) inhibitory to Dematophora necatria white root rot (Cazorla et al., 2006). EPC5 and EPC8 isolates were Gram-positive, spore forming bacteria, able to grow at 45°C and in the presence of 7% NaCl. They utilize citrate as sole carbon source. Both strains were catalase positive, efficiently hydrolyzed starch and gelatin. The result obtained by analyzing primary character and carbon source utilization of different endophytic bacteria revealed that they belong to Bacillus spp. Rapid, sensitive and selective methods are necessary for identification and characterization of bacteria at the species and strain level. In order to overcome the problem involved in phenotypic characterization, some of the molecular methods are utilized nowadays. The use of FAME and UP-PCR fingerprinting profiles were generally helpful in the identification of Bacillus spp., making these features useful for the classification of genus at species level. Tilak and Reddy (2006) identified isolates from maize as Bacillus cereus and B. circulans by biochemical characteristics and profile of fatty acids. Wulff et al. (2002) characterized fifty one Bacillus isolates by universal primer polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting and clustered into three different groups viz., Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, B. subtilis and B. pumilus. EPC5 produced endospore in stress condition which supports the work of Ongena et al. (2005) where B. subtilis M4 produced endospore which are tolerant to extreme pH values, more resistant to drying process for powder formulation and provided control against Colletotrichum lagenarium in cucumber. Our study confirms the strains as Bacillus subtilis by cloning and sequencing. Hill et al. (2004) characterized more than 300 Bacillus isolates by fluorescent Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) which revealed extensive diversity within B. thuringiensis and B. cereus compared to B. anthracis. Thus molecular tools such as PCR and sequencing of 16SrDNA genes proved to be powerful tools for a rapid characterization of microbial communities for the management of destructive diseases.

Table 6: Sequence identity similarity matrix for Bacillus EPC5 and EPC8 isolates based on 16S rDNA ITS sequence data with GenBank database reference isolates
Image for - Cloning and Sequencing of Novel Endophytic Bacillus subtilis from  Coconut for the Management of Basal Stem Rot Disease

REFERENCES


  1. Altschul, S.F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E.W. Myers and D.J. Lipman, 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 215: 403-410.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  2. Aneja, K.R., 1993. Experiments in Microbiology, Plant Pathology and Tissue Culture. Wishwa Prakasham, New Delhi.

  3. Abdul-Baki, A.A. and J.D. Anderson, 1973. Vigor determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Sci., 13: 630-633.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  4. Barka, E.A., S. Gognies, J. Nowak, J.C. Audran and A. Belarbi, 2002. Inhibitory effect of endophyte bacteria on Botrytis cinerea and its influence to promote the grapevine growth. Biol. Control, 24: 135-142.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  5. Benhamou, N., R.R. Belanger and T.C. Paulitz, 1996. Induction of differential host responses by Pseudomonas fluorescens in Ri T-DNA-transformed pea roots after challenge with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi and Pythium ultimum. Phytopathology, 86: 1174-1185.
    Direct Link

  6. Bhaskaran, R., P. Rethinam and K.K.N. Nambiar, 1989. Thanjavur wilt of coconut. J. Plant. Crops, 17: 69-79.
    Direct Link

  7. Bhaskaran, R., M. Rajamannar and S.N.S. Kumar, 1996. Basal stem rot disease of coconut. Technical Bulletin No.30, Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod, pp: 15.

  8. Brooks, D.S., C.F. Gonzalez, D.N. Appel and T.H. Filer, 1994. Evaluation of endophytic bacteria as potential biological-control agents for oak wilt. Biol. Control, 4: 373-381.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  9. Cano, R.J., M.K. Borucki, M. Higby-Schweitzer, H.N. Poinar, G.O. Jr. Poinar and K.J. Pollard, 1994. Bacillus DNA in fossil bees: An ancient symbiosis? Applied Environ. Microbiol., 60: 2164-2167.
    Direct Link

  10. Cazorla, M.F., S.B. Duckett, E.T. Bergstrom, S. Noreen and R. Odijk et al., 2006. Biocontrol of avocado Dematophora root rot by antagonistic Pseudomonas fluorescens PCL 1606 correlates with the production of 2-Hexyl 5-Propyl resorcinol. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact., 19: 418-428.
    CrossRef

  11. Chanway, C.P., 1996. Endophytes: They're not just fungi? Can. J. Bot., 74: 321-322.

  12. Chanway, C.P., 1998. Bacterial endophytes: Ecological and practical implications. Sydowia, 50: 149-170.
    Direct Link

  13. Chen, C., E.M. Bauske, G. Musson, R. Rodriguez-Kabana and J.W. Kloepper, 1995. Biological control of Fusarium wilt on cotton by use of endophytic bacteria. Biol. Control, 5: 83-91.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  14. Cho, S.J., W.J. Lim, S.Y. Hong, S.R. Park and H.D. Yun, 2003. Endophytic colonization of balloon flower by antifungal strain Bacillus sp. CY22. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 67: 2132-2138.
    CrossRefPubMed

  15. Conrath, U., G.J.M. Beckers, V. Flors, P. Garcia-Agustin and G. Jakab et al., 2006. Priming: Getting ready for battle. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact., 19: 1062-1071.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  16. Dennis, C. and J. Webster, 1971. Antagonistic properties of species-groups of Trichoderma: I. Production of non-volatile antibiotics. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc., 57: 25-39.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  17. Gomez, K.A. and A.A. Gomez, 1984. Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. 1st Edn., John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp: 28-291.

  18. Hallmann, J., A. Quadt-Hallmann, W.F. Mahaffee and J.W. Kloepper, 1997. Bacterial endophytcs in agricultural crops. Can. J. Microbiol., 43: 895-914.

  19. Hill, K.H., L.O. Ticknor, R.T. Okinaka, M. Asay and H. Blair et al., 2004. Fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis of Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis isolates. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 70: 1068-1080.
    CrossRef

  20. ISTA, 1993. International rules for seed testing. Seed Sci. Technol., 21: 25-30.

  21. Karunanithi, K., L. Sarala, R. Rabindran, T. Kalaimani and G. Manickam, 2004. Effect of biocontrol agents on the management of basal stem rot (BSR) of coconut. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of ISMPP and National Symposium on Advances in Fungal Diversity and Host Pathogen Interactions, October 7-9, 2004, Goa University, pp: 53-53.

  22. King, E.O., M.K. Ward and D.E. Raney, 1954. Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. Transl. Res., 44: 301-307.
    PubMedDirect Link

  23. Kloepper, J.W., G. Wei and S. Tuzun, 1992. Rhizosphere Population Dynamics and Internal Colonization of Cucumber by Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Which Induce Systemic Resistance to Colletotrichum orbiculare. In: Biological Control of Plant Diseases, Tjamos, E.S. (Ed.). Plenum Press, New York, pp: 185-191.

  24. Jacobs, M.J., W.M. Bugbee and D.A. Gabrielson, 1997. Enumeration, location and characterization of endophytic bacteria within sugar beet roots. Can. J. Bot., 63: 1262-1265.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  25. Lilley, A.K., J.C. Fry, M.J. Bailey and M.J. Day, 1996. Comparison of aerobic heterotrophic tax isolated from root domains of mature sugar beet. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 21: 231-242.

  26. Mahafee, W.F. and J.W. Kloepper, 1997. Temporal changes in the bacterial communities of soil, rhizosphere and endorhiza associated with field-grown cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Microbial. Ecol., 34: 210-223.
    Direct Link

  27. Maurhofer, M., C. Reimmann, S.P. Sacherer, S. Heeb, D. Haas and G. Defago, 1998. Salicylic acid biosynthetic genes expressed in Pseudomonas fluorescens strain P3 improve the induction of systemic resistance in tobacco against tobacco necrosis virus. Phytopathology, 88: 678-684.
    PubMedDirect Link

  28. McInroy, J.A. and J.W. Kloepper, 1995. Survey of indigenous bacterial endophytes from cotton and sweet corn. Plant Soil, 173: 337-342.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  29. McInroy, J.A. and J.W. Kloepper, 1995. Population dynamics of endophytic bacteria in field-grown sweet corn and cotton. Can. J. Microbiol., 41: 895-901.
    Direct Link

  30. Mguni, C.M., 1996. Bacterial black rot (Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris) of vegetable Brassicas in Zimbabwe. Ph.D. Thesis. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University/Danish Government Institute of Seed Pathology for Developing Countries, Copenhagen, Denmark.

  31. Mundt, J.O. and N.F. Hinkle, 1976. Bacteria within ovules and seeds. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 32: 694-698.
    Direct Link

  32. Nambiar, K.K.N. and P. Rethinam, 1986. Thanjavur wilt/Ganoderma disease of coconut. Pamphlet No. 30. Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod.

  33. Nowak, J., S.K. Asiadu, G. Lazarovits, V. Pillay, A. Stewart, C. Smith and Z. Liu, 1995. Enhancement of In vitro Growth and Transplant Stress Tolerance of Potato and Vegetable Plantlets Co-Cultured with a Plant Growth Promoting Pseudomonad bacterium. In: Ecophysiology and Photosynthetic In vitro Cultures, Carre, F. and P. Chagvardieff (Eds.). Commissariat Lenergie Atomique, France, pp: 173-179.

  34. Ongena, M., F. Duby, E. Jourdan, T. Beaudry, V. Jadin, J. Dommes and P. Thonart, 2005. Bacillus subtilis M4 decreases host resistance associated with differential gene expression. Applied Microbiol. Biotechnol., 67: 692-698.
    CrossRef

  35. Pandey, A., P. Trivedi, B. Kumar and L.M.S. Palni, 2006. Characterization of a phosphate solubilizing and antagonistic strain of Pseudomonas putida (B0) isolated from a sub-alpine location in the Indian central Himalaya. Curr. Microbiol., 53: 102-107.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  36. Pleban, S., F. Ingel and I. Chet, 1995. Control of Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii in the greenhouse using endophytic Bacillus spp. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 101: 665-672.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  37. Raaijmakers, J.M., I. van der Sluis, M. Van den Hout, P.A.H.M. Bakker and B. Schippers, 1995. Dispersal of wild-type and genetically-modified Pseudomonas spp. from treated seeds or soil to aerial parts of radish plants. Soil Biol. Biochem., 27: 1473-1478.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  38. Rajendran, L., D. Saravanakumar, T.G. Raguchander and R. Samiyappan, 2006. Endophytic bacterial induction of defence enzymes against bacterial blight of cotton. Phytopathol. Mediterr., 45: 203-214.
    Direct Link

  39. Ramadoss, N., 1991. Studies on the epidemiology, pathophysiology and management of Thanjavur wilt of coconut. Ph.D. Thesis. Tamil Nadu Agric. University Coimbatore.

  40. Rangasamy, R., 1995. A Text Book of Agricultural Statistics. New Age International publisher Ltd., New Delhi, India, ISBN: 81-224-0758-7.

  41. Robertson, D.L., T.S. Bragg, S. Simpson, R. Kaspar, W. Xie and M.T. Tippets, 1990. Mapping and characterization of the Bacillus anthracis plasmids pX01 and pX02. Salisbury Med. Bull., 68: 55-58.

  42. Rosenblueth, M. and E. Martinez-Romero, 2006. Bacterial endophytes and their interactions with hosts. Mol. Pant-Microbe Interactions, 19: 827-837.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  43. Schaad, N.W., 1992. Laboratory Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogen Bacteria. 2nd Edn., International Book Distributing Co., Lucknow, India, ISBN-10: 0-89054-263-5, pp: 44-58.

  44. Srinivasulu, B., K. Aruna and D.V.R. Rao, 2001. Biocontrol of Ganoderma wilt of coconut palm. S. Indian Hortic., 49: 240-242.
    Direct Link

  45. Sturz, A.V., 1995. The role of endophytic bacteria during seed piece decay and potato tuberization. Plant Soil, 175: 257-263.
    Direct Link

  46. Sturz, A.V., H.R. Christie, B.G. Matheson, W.J. Arsenault and N.A. Buchman, 1997. Biodiversity of endophytic bacteria which colonize red clover nodules, roots, stems and foliage and their influence on host growth. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 25: 13-19.
    Direct Link

  47. Thompson, D.C., B.B. Clarke and D.Y. Kobayashi, 1996. Evaluation of bacterial antagonist for reduction of summer patch symptoms in Kentucky blue grass. Plant Dis., 80: 856-862.
    Direct Link

  48. Tilak, K.V.B.R. and B.S. Reddy, 2006. Bacillus cereus and B. circulans-novel inoculants for crops. Curr. Sci., 90: 642-644.
    Direct Link

  49. Vijayan, K.M. and S. Natarajan, 1972. Some observations on the coconut wilt disease of Tamil Nadu. Coconut Bull., 2: 2-4.
    Direct Link

  50. Wilson, K.I., K.M. Rajan, M.C. Nair and S. Balakrishnan, 1987. Ganoderma disease of coconut in Kerala. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Ganoderma Wilt Diseases on Palms and other Perennial Crops, (GWDPPC'87), University Coimbatore, pp: 4-5.

  51. Wulff, E.G., 2000. The use of antagonistic endophytic bacteria for controlling black rot of Brassica in Zimbabwe. Ph.D. Thesis. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp: 134.

  52. Wulff, E.G., C.M. Mguni, K. Mansfeld-Giese, J. Fels, M. Lubeck and J. Hockenhull, 2002. Biochemical and molecular characterization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, B. subtilis and B. pumilus isolates with distinct antagonistic potential against Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Plant Pathol., 51: 574-584.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  53. Zinniel, D.K., P. Lambrecht, N.B. Harris, Z. Feng and D. Kuczmarski et al., 2002. Isolation and characterization of endophytic colonizing bacteria from agronomic crops and prairie plants. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 68: 2198-2208.
    CrossRefDirect Link

Related Articles

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved