Biochemical Composition of an Endangered Fish, Labeo bata (Hamilton, 1822) from Bangladesh Waters
M. Belal Hossain
Fish play an important role in Bangladeshi diet, constituting the main and often irreplaceable animal source food in poor rural households. The study focused on the proximate composition of Labeo bata both in moisture and dry matter basis. The established AOAC (Association of Official Agricultural Chemist, USA) methods were followed for nutrient composition of fish. In case of moisture basis the percentage of moisture, protein, lipid, ash and carbohydrate was 72.41±0.81, 18.51±0.31, 3.79±0.25, 4.67±0.18, 0.90±0.03, respectively, while in dry matter basis it was 27.64±0.17, 66.75±0.39, 13.44±0.08, 16.63±0.20, 3.51±0.17, respectively. This result indicates that except moisture all other components are higher in dry matter basis than moisture basis. As the fish contain high level of protein will be helpful to reduce the protein demand of the country.
Received: July 06, 2012;
Accepted: August 18, 2012;
Published: October 09, 2012
The annual fish production in Bangladesh was 2,701,370 metric tons and fish
contributed about 58% to the nations animal protein intake (DoF,
2010; Islam et al., 2012; Minar
et al., 2012). Fish is an essential and irreplaceable food item in
the rural Bangladeshi diet. Fish body composed of mainly water, lipid, ash and
protein though small amounts carbohydrates and non-protein compounds are present
in a small amount (Cui and Wootton, 1988; Love,
1980; Wootton, 1990; Siddique
et al., 2012; Azim et al., 2012).
Most of fish usually consists of water (70-80%), protein (20-30%) and 2-12%
of lipid (Love, 1980; Ali et al.,
2005). But it may change within and between species and also with size,
sexual condition, feeding, time of the year and physical activity (Weatherley
and Gill, 1987).
About 56 freshwater fish species critically or somewhat endangered in Bangladesh
and Labeo bata, locally known as bata, is one of them (Khan
et al., 2000). Being a non migratory fish it remains in one habitat
throughout its life (Mathur, 1973; Mathur
and Robbins, 1971). Earlier reports stated that the fish was commonly distributed
throughout the rivers, haors, baors, beels, jheels, canals and ponds of Bangladesh
(Bhuiyan et al., 1992; Rahman,
A variety of factors such as food, space, temperature, salinity, physical activity
influence the growth of fish (Weatherley and Gill, 1987;
Ahmed et al., 2012) and the fish body elements
may change due to these factors (Kamal et al., 2007).
There are a plenty of literatures on the biochemical and nutritional studies
of some freshwater fish and some prawn and shrimp species of Bangladesh (Kamaluddin
et al., 1977; Gheyasuddin et al., 1979;
Rubbi et al., 1987; Naser
et al., 2007; Chakrabarty et al., 2003)
and in other countries. But no attempt has been found hence forth to determine
the body composition of this endangered fish. More over this fish like other
fish of the cyprinid can help to reduce the nutrient demand of the people.
Therefore, this study was undertaken to know the nutritional composition of Labeo bata.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample collection and processing: The sample of fresh Labeo bata
were collected from the local market of Mymensingh (Fig. 1)
in the early hours of the day and carried to the Fish Nutrition Laboratory of
Bangladesh Agriculture University.
The samples were stored in ice box before laboratory analysis. Then the sample
was cut into very small pieces (2/3 g) for nutrient analysis. Ten samples were
used for dry mater basis nutrient and ten samples for moisture basis analysis.
Established standard methods ere followed for proximate composition analysis.
Proximate composition analysis: Nutrient composition of the raw fish
was conducted by AOAC method (AOAC, 1990). For proximate
composition of the prepared sample, the percentage of moisture, protein, lipid
and ash were determined separately. The crude protein of the fish was determined
by Micro-Kjeldahl method (Pearson, 1999). The estimation
of fat content of experimental raw fish had been accomplished by Bligh and Dryer
method (Bligh and Dyer, 1959). The fresh raw fish sample
(2/3 g) were minced, weighed and ignited in the crucible. Then it was transferred
in the Muffle Furnace held at dark red at a rate of 550-600°C for 6-8 h
until the residue was white. Finally the percentage of moisture, protein, fat
and ash content was calculated according to the following formula:
Calculation of moisture:
Calculation of protein:
N2 (%) = (Titration reading-blank reading)×strength
of acidx100/5×100/weight of the sample
For most routine purpose the % of protein in the sample is the calculated by multiplying the % of N2 with an empirical factor 6.25 for the fish:
Protein (%) = % of total N2×6.25
Calculation of fat:
Calculation of ash:
Statistical analysis: The data were collected from the experiment was
tabulated and the final result was prepared by using both MS Excel and SPSS
11.5 computer based software.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The proximate composition of the fish as in moisture and dry matter condition
are presented in Table 1 and 2, respectively.
In moisture basis, the percentage of moisture, protein, lipid, ash and carbohydrate
was 72.41±0.81, 18.51±0.31, 3.79±0.25, 4.67±0.18,
0.90±0.03, respectively whereas, in dry matter basis it was 27.64±0.17,
66.75±0.39, 13.44±0.08, 16.63±0.20, 3.51±0.17, respectively
(Table 1, 2).
This result indicates that except moisture all other components are higher
in dry matter basis than moisture basis. It indicates that while there was a
decline in water content, fat content evidently increased due to heavy feeding
during this period which is in good agreement with Huss (1988,
Moisture variation: It is observed that the moisture percentage in moisture
condition ranges from 70.92-73.95 and from 27.35-27.88 and average was 72.41±0.81
and 27.64±0.17 (Fig. 2) which was lower than that reported
by Celik (2008) and Osako et
al. (2002). The present study is more or less coincide with the findings
of Ali et al. (2005) where he found that the
water content of some other fish species namely Labeo rohita, Cyprinus
carpio, Cirrhinus mrigala and Catla catla was 72.10, 65.60,
65.60, 69.50 and 68.84, respectively. The variation also observed from species
to species in both test.
Crude protein variation: The crude protein ranges in both moisture basis
and dry matter basis test is from 17.95-18.90 and from 66.40-66.89 where the
average was 18.51±0.31 and 66.75±0.39 (Fig. 3),
respectively and more or less similar to the findings of with the findings of
Nabi and Hossain (1989) in M. aculeatus and of
Salam et al. (1995) in P. gononiotus except
the dry matter basis.
|| Variation of moisture between moisture basis test and dry
matter basis test
Lipid variation: From the study it has been found that the range of
lipid in moisture and dry matter basis test was from 3.14-3.97 and from 13.77-14.01
and average was 3.79±0.25-13.44±0.08 (Fig. 4).
The result is very much higher than some other commercial fish native to Bangladesh
like Shoal (Channa striatus), Lata (Ophiocephalus punctatus) and
Shingi (Heteropneustes fossilis) whose fat content was estimated as 0.64,
1.08 and 1.23%, respectively estimated by Qudrat-I-Khuda
et al. (1962).
Ash variation: The ash percentage ranges from 4.40-4.98 and the average
was 4.67±0.18 in moisture basis but the range from 16.37-16.95 and average
was 16.63±0.20 in dry matter basis test (Fig. 5). Mazumder
et al. (2008) in Ailia coila and in Amblypharyngodon mola
also find similar ash percentage varied within 1.6-3.2%. The ash content
of the fish (O. rubicundus) was also more or less similar to that of
small indigenous species.
|| Variation of lipid between moisture basis test and dry matter
|| Variation of ash between moisture basis test and dry matter
|| Variation of carbohydrate between moisture basis test and
dry matter basis test
Chakwu and Shaba (2009) found higher amount of ash
content in C. gariepinus (3.06%) than the studied fish while Devadsan
et al. (1978) in his experiment found lower amount of ash content in
six freshwater fishes L. rohita (1.31%), Catla catla (0.93%),
Cirrhinus cirrhosus (1.40%), L. calabasu (1.02%), Mystus seenghala
(0.91%) and Wallago attu (0.72%).
Carbohydrate variation: The ash percentage ranges from 0.89-0.99 and the average was 0.90±0.03 in moisture basis but the range from 3.25-3.74 and average was 3.51±0.17 in dry matter basis test (Fig. 6).
According to Stansby (1954) and Salam
et al. (1995), variation in proximate composition of fish flesh may
vary with species variation, season, age and feeding habit of the fish (Islam
and Joadder, 2005). Generally moisture content shows inverse relationship
with lipid content. The inverse relationship has also been reported in marine
fishes such as Mugil cephalus (Das, 1978).
The present findings describe the major nutritional composition of Labeo bata. The fish contains comparatively high amount of protein. Excepting moisture, all other nutrients were higher in dry matter samples. Increasing production of the species can reduce the animal protein requirements of Bangladesh. This study only looked at the major nutritional composition of the species so further study should be carried to know the mineral, vitamins and essential fatty acid compounds of the species. As the fish contain high amount of protein, necessary steps should be taken to increase the production of the species by aquafarming and proper management of natural habitat of the species. Artificial breeding of the species can increase the supply of fry for culture.
1: Ali, M., F. Igbal, A. Salam, S. Iram and M. Athar, 2005. Comparative study of body composition of different fish species from brackish water pond. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2: 229-232.
Direct Link |
2: AOAC, 1990. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemist. 15th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc., Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia, Pages: 1200..
3: Banglapedia, 2006. Mymensingh district. http://www.banglapedia.org/httpdocs/HT/M_0433.HTM.
4: Bhuiyan, A.S., M.N. Islam and T. Hossain, 1992. A check list of the fishes of Rajshahi. Rajshahi Univ. Stud., 20: 287-306.
5: Bligh, E.G. and W. Dyer, 1959. Total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol., 37: 99-110.
6: Celik, M., 2008. Seasonal changes in the proximate chemical compositions and fatty acids of chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus) and horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) from the North Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 43: 933-938.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
7: Chakrabarty, S.C., M.B. Uddinand M.N. Islam, 2003. A study on the composition of common freshwater fishes of Bangladesh. Bangla. J. Fish., 26: 23-26.
8: Chakwu, O. and I.M. Shaba, 2009. Effect of drying method on proximate composition of cat fish (Clarial gariepinus). J. World Agric. Sci., 5: 114-116.
9: Cui, Y. and R.J. Wootton, 1988. Effects of ration, temperature and body size on the body composition, energy content and condition of theminnow, Phoxinus phoxinus (L.). J. Fish Biol., 32: 749-764.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
10: Das, H.P., 1978. Studies on the Grey Mullet, Mugil cephalus (Linnaeus) from the Goa waters. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bombay, Bombay, India.
11: Devadasan, K., P.R.G. Varma and R. Venkataraman, 1978. Studies on frozen storage characteristics of fillets from six species of fresh water fish. Fish. Technol., 15: 1-6.
Direct Link |
12: DoF, 2010. Saranica, Matsya Pakhya Sankalan. Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, The Government of Peoples Republic of Bangladesh.
13: Gheyasuddin, S., A. Rahmanand and M. Mumtazuddin, 1979. Biochemical composition of shellfishes of Bangladesh. Bangla. J. Sci. Res., 2: 15-23.
14: Huss, H.H., 1988. Fresh Fish Quality and Quality Changes. FAO, Rome, Italy, Pages: 1321.
15: Huss, H.H., 1995. Quality and Quality Changes in Fresh Fish. FAO., Rome, Italy, pp: 348.
16: Islam, M.N. and M.A.R. Joadder, 2005. Seasonal variation of the proximate composition of freshwater Gobi, Glossogobius giuris (Hamilton) from the River Padma. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 8: 532-536.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
17: Kamal, D., A.N. Khan, M.A. Rahman and F. Ahamed, 2007. Biochemical composition of some small indigenous fresh water fishes from the river Mouri, Khulna, Bangladesh. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 10: 1559-1561.
CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
18: Kamaluddin, A., M.A. Malek and M. Sanaullah, 1977. Deshio khaddeer pustiman. Ins. Nutr. Fd. SCI. Dhaka University.
19: Khan, S.M.M.H., M.M.H. Khan, M. Ameen, M.D.A. Islam and A. Nishat, 2000. Red Book of Threatened Fishes of Bangladesh. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)-The World Conservation Union, Bangladesh, Pages: 116..
20: Love, R.M., 1980. The Chemical Biology of Fishes. Academic Press, London.
21: Azim, M.A., M.R. Islam, M.B. Hossain and M.H. Minar, 2012. Seasonal variations in the proximate composition of gangetic sillago, Sillaginopsis panijus (Perciformes: Sillaginidae). Middle-East J. Sci. Res., 11: 559-562.
22: Islam, M.R., N. Sultana, M.B. Hossain and S. Mondal, 2012. Estimation of fecundity and gonadosomatic index (GSI) of gangetic whiting, Sillaginopsis panijus (Hamilton, 1822) from the Meghna River Estuary, Bangladesh. World Applied Sci. J., 17: 1253-1260.
Direct Link |
23: Mathur, D., 1973. Food habits and feeding chronology of the blackbanded darter, Percina nigrofasciata (Agassiz) in Halawakee Creek, Alabama. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 102: 48-55.
24: Mathur, D. and T.W. Robbins, 1971. Food habits and feeding chronology of young white crappie, Pomoxis annularis rafinesque, in conowingo reservoir. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 100: 307-311.
25: Mazumder, M.S.A., M.M. Rahman, A.T.A. Ahmed, M. Begum and M.A. Hossain, 2008. Proximate composition of some Small Indigenous fish Species (SIS) in Bangladesh. Int. J. Sustain. Crop Prod., 3: 18-23.
Direct Link |
26: Minar, M.H., R.K. Adhikary, M. Begum, M.R. Islam and T. Akter, 2012. Proximate composition of Hilsa (Tenualosa Ilisha) in laboratory condition. Bangla. J. Progres. Sci. Technol., Vol. 10.
27: Nabi, R.M. and M.A. Hossain, 1989. Seasonal variation in the chemical composition and caloric content of Macrognathus aculeatus (Bloch) from the Chalan Beel water. J. Asiatic Soc. Bangladesh (Sc.), 15: 103-110.
28: Naser, M.N., G.W. Chowdhury, M.M. Begum and W. Haque, 2007. Proximate composition of prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii and shrimp, Penaeus monodon. Dhaka Univ. J. Biol. Sci., 16: 61-66.
29: Osako, K., A. Yamaguchi, T. Kurokawa, K. Kuwahara, H. Saito and Y. Nozaki, 2002. Chemical components and body color of horse mackerel caught in different areas. Fish. Sci., 68: 587-594.
30: Pearson, D., 1999. Pearson's Composition and Analysis of Foods. Longman Scientific and Technical, UK..
31: Qudrat-I-Khuda, M., H.N. De, N.H. Khan and J.C. Debnath, 1962. Biochemical and nutritional studies on Pakistan fish. Part 7. chemical composition and quality of the traditionally processed fish. Pak. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 5: 67-69.
32: Rahman, A.K.A., 1989. Freshwater Fishes of Bangladesh. Zoological Society of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh, Pages: 364.
33: Rubbi, S.F., M.M. Rahman, A.R. Khan, S.S. Jahan and M. Begum, 1987. Proximate composition and quality of some commercial species of fresh water fish. Bangladesh J. Sci., 5: 1-20.
34: Salam, M.A., N. Alam, M. Nasiruddin, R. Nabi and M.Z.H. Howlader, 1995. Biochemical composition of body muscles and its caloric contents of tawes (Puntius gonionotius, Bleeder). J. Bangladesh Sci. Res., 13: 205-211.
35: Ahmed, S., A.F.M. Arifur Rahman, M.G. Mustafa, M.B. Hossain and N. Nahar, 2012. Nutrient composition of indigenous and exotic fishes of rainfed waterlogged paddy fields in Lakshmipur, Bangladesh. World J. Zool., 7: 135-140.
Direct Link |
36: Siddique, M.A.M., P. Mojumder and H. Zamal, 2012. Proximate composition of three commercially available marine dry fishes (Harpodon nehereus, Johnius dussumieri and Lepturacanthus savala). Am. J. Food Technol., 7: 429-436.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
37: Stansby, M.E., 1954. Composition of certain species of fresh-water fish. J. Food Sci., 19: 231-234.
38: Weatherley, A.H. and H.S. Gill, 1987. The Biology of Fish Growth. Academic Press, London, Pages: 443.
39: Wootton, R.J., 1990. Ecology of Teleost Fishes. 1st Edn., Chapman and Hall, London, UK., ISBN-13: 9780412317200, Pages: 404.