Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Ichnology of the Enugu Formation: Implications for Campanian Sea Movements in Southeastern Nigeria



E.N. Onuigbo and A.U. Okoro
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Trace fossils from the outcrop section of the Enugu Formation in Anambra Basin, southeastern Nigeria, have been studied based on the varieties, types, mode of occurrence, orientation of the burrows, wall structures and fills. Five ichnogenera identified belong to the Skolithos and Cruziana ichnofacies and include; Skolithos isp. Thalassinoides isp., Planolites isp., Teichichnus isp. and Chondrites isp. The assemblage is suggestive of deposition in a nearshore setting influenced by stressed environmental conditions due to the mixture of marine and fresh water inflows. The lithologic characteristics, physical sedimentary structures, the distribution and the style of the bioturbation from the base to the top of the sequence, as well as the general absence of deeper marine ichnofacies suggest moderate to high energy conditions in a prograding shoreline and shallow marine environments.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

E.N. Onuigbo and A.U. Okoro, 2014. Ichnology of the Enugu Formation: Implications for Campanian Sea Movements in Southeastern Nigeria. Asian Journal of Earth Sciences, 7: 40-50.

DOI: 10.3923/ajes.2014.40.50

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajes.2014.40.50
 
Received: February 04, 2014; Accepted: March 22, 2014; Published: May 24, 2014



INTRODUCTION

Ichnology, the branch of geology that studies traces of organismal behaviour such as burrows, tracks and trails made in various substrates, has grown tremendously in the last five decades as researchers have continued to expand its importance in sedimentologic studies (Egbu et al., 2009). Trace fossils are very useful in the interpretation of paleobathymetry, paleoenvironments and paleoecological stress (Seilacher, 1967). It also has its application in allostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy for delineation of key stratal surfaces (Pemberton et al., 1992a, b; MacEachem et al., 1992; Taylor and Gawthorpe, 1993; Pemberton and MacEachem, 1995).

The sedimentology, stratigraphy and petroleum potential of the Enugu Formation have been studied by various scholars including (Nwajide and Reijers, 1996; Nwajide, 2005; Akaegbobi et al., 2009; Ojo et al., 2009).

Though Nwajide and Reijers (1996) noted the occurrence of many burrows such as planolites on the siltstone and fine sandstone members of the formation but none of the researchers gave serious attention to these ichnofossils.

This study therefore is aimed at documenting findings from the study of the ichnofossils of the Enugu Formation. The ichnofacies assemblages, distribution and the styles of bioturbation, physical sedimentary structures as well as the lithologic characteristics were employed in the interpretation of the depositional environment and the paleogeography of the Campanian in the southeastern Nigeria.

REGIONAL TECTONIC AND STRATIGRAPHIC SETTING

The origin of the Anambra Basin is intimately related to the development of the Benue Rift. The Benue Rift was installed as the failed arm of a trilate fracture (rift) system during the breakup of the Gondwana supercontinent and the opening up of the southern Atlantic and Indian Oceans in the Jurassic (Burke et al., 1972; Olade, 1975; Benkhelil, 1982, 1989; Hoque and Nwajide, 1984; Fairhead, 1988). The initial synrift sedimentation in the embryonic trough occurred during the Aptian to early Albian and comprised of alluvial fans and lacustrine sediments of the Mamfe formation in the southern Benue Trough. Two cycles of marine transgressions and regressions from the middle Albian to the Coniacian filled this ancestral trough with mudrocks, sandstones and limestones with an estimated thickness of 3,500 m (Murat, 1972; Hoque, 1977). These sediments belong to the Asu River group (Albian), the Odukpani formation (Cenomanian), the Ezeaku group (Turonian) and the Awgu Shale (Coniacian). During the Santonian, epeirogenic tectonics, these sediments underwent folding and uplift into the Abakaliki-Benue Anticlinorium (Murat, 1972) with simultaneous subsidence of the Anambra Basin and the Afikpo Sub-basins to the northwest and southeast of the folded belt, respectively (Murat, 1972; Burke, 1972; Mode and Onuoha, 2001). The Abakaliki Anticlinorium later served as a sediment dispersal centre from which sediments were shifted into the Anambra Basin and Afikpo Syncline (Hoque, 1977). The Oban Masif, southwestern Nigeria basement craton and the Cameroon basement complex also served as sources for the sediments of the Anambra Basin (Hoque and Ezepue, 1977; Amajor, 1987; Nwajide and Reijers, 1996). Figure 1 shows the structural units of the southeastern Nigeria sedimentary Basins and the Anambra Basin.

After the installation of the Anambra Basin following the Santonian epeirogeny, the Campanian-Early Maastrichtian transgression deposited the Nkporo Group (the Enugu Formation, Owelli Sandstone, Nkporo Shale, Afikpo Sandstone, Otobi Sandstone and Lafia Sandstone) the basal unit of the basin, unconformably overstepping the basement complex, the Asu River, the Eze-Aku and Awgu Formation in places. This was followed by the Maastrichtian regressive event during which the coal measures (the Mamu, Ajali and Nsukka Formations) were deposited.

Figure 1 is the geologic map of southeastern Nigeria showing the study area.

Stratigraphy: Many authors have described the stratigraphic successions in the Anambra Basin (Simpson, 1954; Reyment, 1965; Agagu et al., 1985; Amajor, 1989; Nwajide and Reijers, 1996; Nwajide, 2005). The Nkporo Group constitutes the basal lithostratigraphic unit in the Anambra Basin and was deposited during Late Campanian-early Maastrichtian period. The Nkporo Formation consists of dark shales and mudstones with subordinate sandstones, oolitic ironstone and shelly limestone with commonly burrows of Skolithos isp., Ophiomorpha isp. and Thalassinoides isp. The Enugu Formation, a lateral equivalent of the Nkporo Formation, consists of grey, blue or dark shale, occasional white sandstones and striped sandy shale beds. The Owelli Sandstone comprises of fining upward successions of hard ferruginous sandstones, cross-bedded sandstone, shale, siltstone, coal, kaolinitic clay, vitrinite and wood fragments. The Mamu Formation, the Ajali Sandstone and the lower Nsukka Formation were deposited conformably during the Maastrichtian stage over the Nkporo Group. The Mamu Formation (lower coal measure of geological survey of Nigeria) overlies the Nkporo Group and consists of shale, heteroliths, sandstones and coal (Kogbe, 1989). The Ajali Sandstone is dominated by sandstones in which kaolinitic clay interbeds are common and overlies the Mamu Formation. The Nsukka Formation (Reyment, 1965) overlies the Ajali Sandstone. It consists of an alternating succession of sandstones and shales with thin coal seams. Table 1 shows the stratigraphic framework of the Anambra Basin and the position of the Enugu Formations within the stratigraphic column.

Image for - Ichnology of the Enugu Formation: Implications for Campanian Sea Movements 
  in Southeastern Nigeria
Fig. 1: Geologic map of Southeastern Nigeria showing the study area (Modified from Hoque, 1976)

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The outcrop of the Enugu formation studied was logged from the base to the top (Fig. 2 and 3). Trace fossils found in the outcrop were studied based on the following:

Variety, types and mode of occurrence
Attitude/orientation of burrows
Wall structure, fills and dimensions of burrow cross-sections

Table 1: Stratigraphic Sequences in the Anambra Basin (after Nwajide, 2005)
Image for - Ichnology of the Enugu Formation: Implications for Campanian Sea Movements 
  in Southeastern Nigeria

Image for - Ichnology of the Enugu Formation: Implications for Campanian Sea Movements 
  in Southeastern Nigeria
Fig. 2(a-b):
Outcrop of the Enugu Formation near flyover about 200 m away from, (a) NNPC filling station and (b) Heterolithic unit at the middle part of the outcrop

The ichnofacies assemblages in the formation were established. The ichnofacies assemblages together with the lithological characteristics and physical sedimentary structures in the Enugu formation formed the bases for the interpretation of the depositional environment and paleogeography of the Campanian in the southeastern Nigeria.

RESULT

Lithostratigraphy and Ichnostratigraphy: The outcrop is about 40 m thick and a road cut exposure. The base of the outcrop comprises of grayish shale of about 5.3 m thick. Upwards there are thin interbeds of carbonaceous and ferruginous sandstone, siltstone and gypsum. The ferruginized sandstone beds are yellowish brown in colour. The carbonaceous sandstones are dark, massive, well indurated and contain some concretions. The beds generally thicken upwards. The section is capped by light grey and indurated shale intercalated with white sandstone (Fig. 3). Burrows are abundant on the heterolithic units especially the shale and consist dominantly of Skolithos isp., Thalassinoides isp., Planolites isp., Chondrites isp. and Teichichnus isp. (Fig. 4). Physical sedimentary structures include parallel laminations (shale) and wave ripple lamination (the heterolithic unit).

Image for - Ichnology of the Enugu Formation: Implications for Campanian Sea Movements 
  in Southeastern Nigeria
Fig. 3: Stratigraphic section of the Enugu formation exposed near flyover about 200 m away from NNPC filling station, Enugu

Ichnology: Ichnology is considered a relatively young branch of the earth sciences. It can be defined as the branch of geology that deals with traces of organismal behaviour such as burrows, fossilized footprints, tracks or other traces.

The ichnofossils documented from the Enugu formation include Skolithos isp., Planolites isp., Teichichnus isp., Thalassinoides isp. and Chondrites isp. (Fig. 4). The ichnogenera belong to two ethological classes (fodnichnia and domichnia, Table 3) and two ichnofacies (Skolithos and Cruziana).

Classification of ichnofossils: Seilacher (1964) established six categories into which animal traces may be grouped based on their ethology or behaviour (Table 2). This is hinged on the fact that different groups of animals with similar life habits produce traces with similar basic characteristics even though the animals may be morphologically quite different.

Ichnofacies: The two ichnofacies identified on the outcrops of the formation includ:

Skolithos ichnofacies e.g., Skolithos and Chondrites (Nwajide and Hoque, 1979; Amajor, 1984; Mbuk et al., 1985; Anyanwu and Arua, 1990; Mode, 1993)
Cruziana ichnofacies e.g., Planolites, Thalassinoides and Teichichnus (Banerjee, 1982; Mode, 1993)

Mode of occurrence: The Skolithos isp. and Planolites isp., occur in the fine sandstone while the shale beds of the heterolithic units at the middle and towards the upper part of the outcrop document the assemblage that include; Thalassinoides isp., Teichichnus isp. and Chondrites isp., Thalassinoides sp., are sparsely distributed within the basal shale in the area:

Planolites: Occur on the heterolithic (fine sandstone) unit as tunnel of uniform diameter (generally not up to 30 mm), horizontal to sub vertical and commonly sand-filled with unlined smooth walls
Thalassinoides: Display an irregular network of tunnels, commonly branched with variable diameters (Fig. 4). The burrows are horizontal, mud- filled and have smooth unlined walls
Skolithos: Consist of tunnel of uniform diameters, vertical and have smooth walls. The ichnogenera occur mostly on the fine sandstones
Chondrites: This occurs on the shale as branched burrow of equal diameter, generally less than 3 mm, vertical and mud filled
Teichichnus: Occur on the shale (heterolithic unit) as horizontal to sub-vertical mud filled burrows

Table 2: Major categories of ichnofossils ethological classes (after Frey, 1978)
Image for - Ichnology of the Enugu Formation: Implications for Campanian Sea Movements 
  in Southeastern Nigeria

Table 3: Ethological classification of the trace fossils from the Enugu formation
Image for - Ichnology of the Enugu Formation: Implications for Campanian Sea Movements 
  in Southeastern Nigeria

Image for - Ichnology of the Enugu Formation: Implications for Campanian Sea Movements 
  in Southeastern Nigeria
Fig. 4(a-f):
Ichnofossil assemblages from the Enugu formation exposed 200 m away from NNPC filling station near flyover, Enugu

IMPLICATION FOR DEPOSITIONAL ENVIRONMENT AND PALEOGEOGRAPHY

The ichnofacies concept pioneered by Seilacher (1954, 1958, 1963, 1967) is based upon the observation that certain ichnofossil assemblages tend to occur under particular set of environmental conditions. The assemblages are controlled by physical, chemical and biological factors of the environment which include rate of deposition, oxygen availability, hydraulic energy, substrate consistency, salinity level, turbidity and quality of suspended or deposited food materials (Mode, 1997). According to Seilacher (1963, 1964, 1967), the skolithos-cruziana-zoophycos-nereites ichnofacies succession can be useful in the reconstruction of shallow to deep water sedimentary successions. Since, bathymetry is not the governing factor in determining ichnofacies, the study employed both lithologic characteristics, physical sedimentary structures as well as the ichnofacies in the interpretation of the depositional environment and the paleogeography of the Campano-maastrichtian in the southeastern Nigeria.

The ichnological assemblages consisting of Thalassinoides isp., Planolites sp., Teichichnus sp. and Skolithos sp., have been attributed to deposition in a coastal (nearshore) setting influenced by stressed environmental conditions due to the mixture of marine and fresh water inflows (Benynon and Pemberton, 1992; Pemberton et al., 2001; Uchman et al., 2004). Such assemblage reflects the fluctuating environmental parameters being characterized by low diversity, presence of typical marine forms (Skolithos, Thalassinoides, Planolites, Teichichnus and Chondrites) and the mixtures of traces characteristic to both Skolithos and Cruziana ichnogenera (Bromley, 1996). The ichnofacies assemblage that consists entirely of dispersed traces of Thalassinoides as documented by the lower shale unit is suggestive of nearshore area that has undergone episodic or constant environmental changes (Maceachern and Pemberton, 1992; Pollard et al., 1993). It could also be attributed to poorly aerated bottom waters which were inhospitable to almost all trace making organisms (Mode, 1993). The change in the depositional energy is confirmed by the transition from the horizontal (low energy) to sub vertical and vertical (higher energy) burrows from the lower shale to the heterolithics at the upper part of the outcrop. The outcrop documents only skolithos-cruziana ichnogenera (shallow water ichnofacies). There is general absence of deeper water ichnofacies (zoophycos-nereites), suggesting that the Campanian epeiric sea was shallow. Skolithos is suggestive of high energy (intertidal or shallow subtidal marine) environments. It is also typical of areas subjected to high sedimentation mobility (Benton and Harper, 1997; Zonneveld et al., 2001; Mapals et al., 2005; Savary et al., 2004). This normally occurs in shallow marine shales/silt and storm sand. The coarsening upward succession of the lithofacies, physical sedimentary structures (parallel and wave ripple laminations) and the ichnofacies assemblage in the study area suggests deposition in a low to high energy prograding shallow marine setting.

CONCLUSION

The shallow water ichnofacies (Skolithos and Cruziana) were identified on the study area and include; the Skolithos isp., Thalassinoides isp., Planolites isp., Teichichnus isp. and Chondrites isp. Such assemblage is a characteristic of nearshore environment prone to stress due to the influx of fresh water. The coarsening upward succession of lithology, physical sedimentary structures as well as the distribution and the style of bioturbation are suggestive of deposition in a prograding shallow marine environment. The dispersed traces of Thalassinoides at the basal shale unit could suggest anoxic bottom condition.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Special thanks to Prof. C.S. Nwajide for fruitful discussions of the study.

REFERENCES

1:  Agagu, O.K., E.A. Fayose and S.W. Petter, 1985. Stratigraphy and sedimentation in the Senonian Anambra Basin of the Eastern Nigeria. J. Mineral Geol., 22: 25-36.

2:  Amajor, L.C., 1984. Sedimentary facies analysis of the Ajali Sandstone (Upper Cretaceous), Southern Benue trough. J. Mining Geol., 28: 7-17.

3:  Amajor, L.C., 1987. Paleocurrent, petrography and provenance analysis of the Ajali Sandstone (Upper Cretaceous). Southern Benue Trough, Nigeria. Sed. Geol., 54: 47-60.

4:  Amajor, L.C., 1989. Grain size characteristics and geologic controls on the bedload sediments: A case study from the Imo River in southeastern Nigeria. J. Afr. Earth Sci., 9: 507-515.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

5:  Anyanwu, N.P.C. and I. Arua, 1990. Ichnofossils from the Imo formation and their paleoenvironmental significance. J. Mining Geol., 26: 1-4.

6:  Banerjee, I., 1982. Trace fossils of the bioturbated sandstone facies of the Eze-Aku formation. Indian J. Earth Sci., 9: 93-98.

7:  Benkhelil, J., 1982. Benue trough and benue Chain. Geol. Mag., 119: 155-168.

8:  Benkhelil, J., 1989. The origin and evolution of the Cretaceous Benue Trough (Nigeria). J. Afr. Earth Sci., 8: 251-282.
Direct Link  |  

9:  Benton, M. and D. Harper, 1997. Basic Paleontology. Longman, New York, ISBN: 0582228573, Pages: 342

10:  Benynon, B.M. and S.G. Pemberton, 1992. Ichnological signature of a brackish water deposit: An example from the lower cretaceous grand rapids formation, gold lake oil sands area, Alberta. Proceedings of the SEPM Core Workshops on Applications of Ichnology to Petroleum Exploration, June 21, 1992, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, pp: 199--221

11:  Burke, K., 1972. Longshore drift, submarine canyons and submarine fans in development of Niger Delta. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull., 56: 1975-1983.
Direct Link  |  

12:  Burke, K.C., T.F.J. Dessauvagie and A.J. Whiteman, 1972. Geological History of the Benue Valley and its Adjacent Areas. In: African Geology, Dessauvagie, T.F.J. and A.J. Whiteman (Eds.). University of Ibadan Press, Ibadan, pp: 187-205

13:  Egbu, O.C., G.C. Obi, C.O. Okogbue and A.W. Mode, 2009. Ichnofacies and reservoir properties of shoreline deposit in the coastal swamp Depobelt of the Niger Delta. Search and Discovery Article No. 40412. http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/documents/2009/40412egbu/images/egbu.pdf.

14:  Fairhead, J.D., 1988. Mesozoic plate tectonic reconstruction of the central south Atlantic Ocean: The role of the West and Central African rift systems. Tectonophysics, 155: 181-191.

15:  Frey, R.W., 1978. Behavioral and Ethological Implications of Trace Fossils. In: Trace Fossil Concepts, Basan, P.B. (Ed.). Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, USA., pp: 51

16:  Hoque, M., 1977. Petrographic differentiation of tectonically controlled Cretaceous sedimentary cycles, southeastern Nigeria. Sed. Geol., 17: 235-245.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

17:  Hoque, M. and M.C. Ezepue, 1977. Petrology and paleogeography of the ajali sandstone Nigeria. J. Min. Geol., 14: 16-22.

18:  Hoque, M. and C.S. Nwajide, 1984. Tectono- sedimentological evolution of an elongate intracratonic basin (aulacogen): The case of the Benue Trough of Nigeria. J. Min. Geol., 21: 19-26.

19:  Kogbe, C.A., 1989. The Cretaceous and Paleocene sediments of Southern Nigeria. In: Geology of Nigeria, Kogbe, C.A. (Ed.). Elizabethan Publication, Lagos, Nigeria, pp: 273-286

20:  Maceachern, J.A. and S.G. Pemberton, 1992. Ichnological Aspects of Cretaceous shoreface Successions and Shoreface Variability in the Western Interior Seaway of North America. In: Applications of Ichnology to Petroleum Exploration, A Core Workshop, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pemberton, S.G. (Ed.). Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Tulsa, OK., pp: 57-84

21:  Mapals, J.A., R.L. Gawthorpe, J.E. Pollard and I.R. Sharp, 2005. Ichnofabric analysis of the shallow marine nukhut formation (Miocene), Suez Rift, Egypt: Implications for depositional processes and sequence stratigraphic evolution. Paleogeogr. Paleoclimatol. Paleoecol., 215: 239-264.
CrossRef  |  

22:  Mbuk, I.N., V.R. Rao and K.P.N. Kumaran, 1985. The upper cretaceous-paleocene boundary in the Ohafia Ozu Abam area, Imo State, Nigeria. J. Mining Geol., 22: 105-119.

23:  Mode, A.W., 1993. Ethology and Paleoenvironmental significance of trace fossils from Cenomanian-Turonian sediments in the upper Benue Trough, Nigeria. J. Mining Geol., 29: 102-109.

24:  Mode, A.W., 1997. Ichnostratigraphy and Paleoenvironment of the Benue Trough, Nigeria. J. Mining Geol., 33: 115-126.

25:  Mode, A.W. and K.M. Onucha, 2001. Organic matter evaluation of the Nkporo shale, Anambra basin, from wireline logs. Global J. Applied Sci., 7: 103-107.
Direct Link  |  

26:  Murat, C., 1972. Stratigraphy and Paleogeography of the Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary in South-Eastern Nigeria. In: African Geology, Dessauvagie, T.F.J. and A.J. Whiteman (Eds.). University of Ibadan Press, Nigeria, pp: 251-266

27:  Nwajide, C.S., 2005. Anambra Basin of Nigeria: Synoptic Basin Analysis as a Basis for Evaluating its Hydrocarbon Prospectivity. In: Hydrocarbon Potentials of the Anambra Basin, Okogbue, C.O. (Ed.). Great AP Express Publishers Ltd., Nigeria, pp: 1-46

28:  Nwajide, C.S. and M. Hoque, 1979. Trace fossils from the Nanka formation, Southeastern Nigeria. Geologie en Mijnbouw, 58: 85-88.

29:  Nwajide, C.S. and T.J.A. Reijers, 1996. Geology of the Southern Anambra Basin. In: Selected Chapters on Geology, Reijers, T.J.A. (Ed.). SPDC, Warri, Nigeria, pp: 133-147

30:  Olade, M.A., 1975. Evolution of Nigeria's benue trough (aulocogen): A tectonic model. Geo. Mag., 112: 575-581.

31:  Pemberton, S.G., J.C. van Wagoner and G.D. Wach, 1992. Ichnofacies of a wave- dominated shoreline. Proceedings of the SEPM Core Workshops on Applications of Ichnology to Petroleum Exploration, June 21, 1992, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, pp: 339-382

32:  Pemberton, S.G., J.A. MacEachern and R.W., Frey, 1992. Trace Fossil Facies Model: Environmental and Allostratigraphic Significance. In: Facies Models: Response to Sea Level Change: Geological Association of Canada, Walker, R.G. and N.P. James (Ed.). St John's, Newfoundland, pp: 47-72

33:  Pemberton, S.G., M. Spila, A.J. Pulham, T. Saunders, J.A. MacEachern, D. Robbins and I.K. Sinclair, 2001. Ichnology and sedimentology of shallow to marginal marine systems: Ben Nevis and Avalon Reservoirs, Jeanne d'Arc Basin. Short Course Notes 15, Geological Association of Canada, St. John's, Newfoundland, pp: 343.

34:  Pollard, J.E., R. Goldring and S.G. Buck, 1993. Ichnofabrics containing Ophiomorpha: Significance in shallow-water facies interpretation. J. Geol. Soc., 150: 149-164.
CrossRef  |  

35:  Reyment, R.A., 1965. Aspect of the Geology of Nigeria. Ibadan University Press, Ibadan, Nigeria

36:  Savary, B., D. Olivero and C. Gaillard, 2004. Calciturbidite dynamics and endobenthic colonisation: Example from a late Barremian (Early Cretaceous) succession in Southeastern France. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 211: 221-239.
CrossRef  |  

37:  Seilacher, A., 1954. Die geologische bedeutung fossiler lebensspuren. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 1052: 214-227.

38:  Seilacher, A., 1958. Zur okologischen charakteristik von flysch molasse. Ecl. Geol. Helv. 5111, Basel.

39:  Seilacher, A., 1963. Lebensspuren und salinitatsfazies. Fortschritte Geologic von Rheinland uber Westfalen, 10: 81-94.

40:  Seilacher, A., 1964. Biogenic Sedimentary Structures. In: Approaches to Paleoecology, Imbrie, J. and N. Newell (Eds.). Wiley and Sons, New York, pp: 296-326

41:  Seilacher, A., 1967. Bathymetry of trace fossils. Mar. Geol., 5: 413-428.
CrossRef  |  

42:  Simpson, A., 1954. The Nigerian coalfield: The geology of parts of Onitsha, Owerri and Benue Provinces. Gelogical Survey Nigeria Bulletin No. 24, pp: 85.

43:  Uchman, A., N.E. Janbu and W. Nemec, 2004. Trace fossils in the cretaceous-eocene flysch of the sinop-boyabat basin, Central Pontides, Turkey. Ann. Soc. Geol. Polon., 74: 197-235.

44:  Zonneveld, J.P., M.K. Gingras and S.G. Pemberton, 2001. Trace fossil assemblagesn in a middle Triassic mixed siliciclastic-carbonate marginal marine depositional system, British Columbia. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 166: 249-276.
Direct Link  |  

45:  Hoque, M., 1976. Significance of textural and petrographic attributes of sandstones, Southern Nigeria. J. Geol. Soc. Ind., 77: 514-521.

46:  Bromley, R.G., 1996. Trace Fossils: Biology, Taphonomy and Applications. Chapman and Hall, London, Pages: 361

47:  Akaegbobi, I.M., G.C. Amaechi and O.A. Boboye, 2009. Source rock potentials and depositional environment of the Campanian-Maastrichtian shales outcropping along Enugu-Leru axis, Anambra Basin, Nigeria. NAPE Bull., 21: 25-37.

48:  Frey, R.W. and J.D. Howard, 1970. Comparism of Upper Cretaceous Ichnofaunas from Siliceous Sandstones and Chalk Western Interior Region, USA. In: Trace Fosils, Crimes, T.P. and J.C. Harper (Ed.). Seel House Press, Liverpool, pp: 141-166

49:  Hantzschel, W., 1962. Trace Fossils and Problematica. In: Treatise of Invertebrate Paleontology (Part W.), Moore, R.C. (Ed.). Miscellanacea University of Kansas Press, Kansas, pp: 177-245

50:  Kennedy, W.J., 1970. Trace Fossils in the Chalk Environment. In: Trace Fosils, Crimes, T.P. and J.C. Harper (Ed.). Seel House Press, Liverpool, pp: 263-282

51:  Maceachem, J.A., I. Raychauduri and S.G. Pemberton, 1992. Stratigraphic Applications of the Glossifungites Ichnofacies: Delineating Discontinuities in the Rock Record. In: Applications of Ichnology to Petroleum Exploration: A Core Workshop, Pemberton, S.G. (Ed.). Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Tulsa, Okla-Homa, pp: 169-198

52:  Ojo, O.J., A.U. Kolawole and S.O. Akande, 2009. Depositional environments, organic richness and petroleum generating potential of the Campanian to Maastrichtian Enugu Formation, Anambra Basin, Nigeria. Pacific J. Sci. Technol., 10: 614-628.
Direct Link  |  

53:  Pemberton, S.G. and R.W. Frey, 1982. Trace fossil nomenclature and the planolites-palaeophycus dilemma. J. Paleontol., 56: 843-881.
Direct Link  |  

54:  Pemberton, S.G. and R.W. Frey, 1984. Ichnology of Storm- Influenced Shallow Marine Sequence, Cardium Formation (Upper Cretaceous) at Seebe, Alberta. In: The Mesozoic of Middle North America, Stolt, D.F. and D.J. Glass (Ed.). CSPG Special Publications, Canada, pp: 281-304

55:  Pemberton, S.G. and J.A. MacEachem, 1995. The Sequence Stratigraphic Significance of Trace Fossils: Exmples from the Cretaceous Foreland Basin of Alberta. In: Sequence Stratigraphy of Foreland Basin Deposits- Outcrop and Subsurface Examples from the Cretaceous of North America, Van Wagoner, J.C. and G. Bertram (Eds.). CSPG Special Publications, Canada, pp: 429-470

56:  Taylor, A.M. and R.L. Gawthorpe, 1993. Application of sequence stratigraphy and trace fossil analysis to reservoir description: Examples from the Jurassic of the North Sea. Petroleum Geol. Northwest Conf. Series, 4: 317-335.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved