Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Response of Some Wheat Varieties to Bio and Mineral Nitrogen Fertilizers



U.A. Abd El-Razek and A.A. El-Sheshtawy
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

In order to study the effect of Microbin inoculation, different rates of nitrogen fertilizer (45, 90, 135 and 180 kg ha-1) and their interaction on yield and yield components and protein percentage of two wheat varieties (Sakha 93 and Gemmeiza 9) during the two successive growing winter seasons 2010/2011 and 2011/2012 seasons. The experimental design was split B split plot design with three replications, Microbin inoculations were located in main plots and four N rates fertilizers were allocated in the sup-plots and two wheat cultivars were allocated in the sub-sub plots. The highest yield was produced due to application of microbin, also the same trend was obtained with N rate of 180 kg ha-1. Gemmeiza 9 recorded the highest yield compared with Sakha 93. The interaction between bio-fertilizer and N rates proved to be significant for all studied traits. The highest grain yield/ha was found with the interaction between MicrobinxGemmeiza 9. Also, the interaction between 180 kg N ha-1xGemmeiza 9 recorded the highest grain yield ha-1. According to these results, rate of 180 kg N ha-1 and application of microbin as bio-fertilizer using variety Gemmeiza 9 could be recommended for favorable wheat production under the local environmental conditions of this study.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

U.A. Abd El-Razek and A.A. El-Sheshtawy, 2013. Response of Some Wheat Varieties to Bio and Mineral Nitrogen Fertilizers. Asian Journal of Crop Science, 5: 200-208.

DOI: 10.3923/ajcs.2013.200.208

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajcs.2013.200.208
 
Received: October 24, 2012; Accepted: December 18, 2012; Published: February 02, 2013



INTRODUCTION

Wheat is the major winter cereal grain crop and the third major crop in terms of area planted. Recently, a great attention of several investigations has been directed to increase the productivity of wheat to minimize the gap between the Egyptian production and consumption by increasing the cultivated area and wheat yield per unit area (Zaki et al., 2007).

Using bio-fertilizer may be supply plants with their need of nitrogen during their growth by cheap means which in turn led to significant decrease in crop production costs. In addition pollution rates in soil, water and air may be reduction as a result of this practice. Emara (1994), Sushila and Gajendra (2000) and El-Kalla et al. (2002) indicated that, Bio-fertilizers increased yield and yield components. Caballero et al. (1992) found that inoculation of wheat with various strains of Azospirillum significantly increased grain yield from 23-63% in 1986 and from 29-43% in 1987.

Yield and yield components increased by increasing nitrogen rates, they have also been reported by Sharshar et al. (2000), Sushila and Gajendra (2000) and Saleh (2002). Sharief et al. (1998), Atta and Swelam (2006) and Kandil et al. (2011) increased nitrogen rates up to N level of 178.5 kg ha-1 recorded the highest yield. The interaction between bio fertilizer and nitrogen levels had significant effect on yield and yield components (Ali et al., 2002). Kandil et al. (2011) found that, the highest spike number/m2, grain weight/spike, 1000 grain weight, biological yield, straw yield, both N and protein contents of grain were recorded with the interaction between bio-fertilizers and N levels.

Differences among the two bread wheat cultivars (Gammeiza 9 and Sakha 93) were respecting with plant height at harvest, grain weight/spike, 1000 grain weight, number of spikes/m2, grain yield (ardab/fad.) and straw yield (ton/fad.) they stated that, Gemmeiza 9 significantly surpassed Sakha 93 cultivars in the all studied characters, Atta and Swelam (2006). Sakha 94 recorded the highest values for all studied traits, except spike length, grain weight/spike and 1000 grains weight compared with the other varieties, Hafez et al. (2012).

The objectives of this study were aimed to study the effect of N bio and mineral fertilizers on wheat productivity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study area: The present investigation was carried out at the Exp. Farm, Fac. of Agric., Tanta Univ., Tanta, Egypt during the two successive growing winter seasons 2010/2011 and 2011/2012 to study the effect of Microbin as bio-fertilizer and nitrogen rates on yield and its components of two wheat varieties.

The experimental design and necessary management: The experimental design was split-split plots with three replications; two Bio-fertilizer treatments; without bio-fertilizer (B1) and with bio-fertilizer (B2) were randomly allocated in the main plots. The sub-plots were designated to rates of nitrogen; 45, 90, 135 and 180 kg ha-1. The sub-sub plots randomly occupied by two wheat varieties; Sakha 93 (V1) and Gemmeiza 9 (V2). The treated bio-fertilizer containing N-free living bacteria (Azotobacter and Azospirillum) and a phosphate dissolving bacteria (Bacillus megaterium), under the trade name of Microbin. The source of Microbin was the Unit of Biofertilizer Production, General Organization for Agriculture Equalization Fund (GOAEF), Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation, Egypt, (Abou El-Naga, 1993). The grain inoculation was done before sowing directly. Nitrogen in the form of urea was added as follows: 1/5 at sowing, 2/5 at first irrigation and 2/5 at second irrigation. In the two seasons, wheat crop was planted at 15th November. The unit area of experimental plot was 12 m2 (3x4 m). The proceeding crop was maize in the two seasons. Soil samples were taken and mechanically analyzed following the methods described by Piper (1950) and chemically analyzed according to Black (1965). The soil texture of experimental soil is clay. The chemical analyses of soil were: pH (7.6), EC (1.31 dS m-1), available P (9.5 mg kg-1), available K (194.2 mg kg-1) and total nitrogen (0.08%).

Field sampling and data collection: At harvest one square meter was taken randomly from each sub-sub plot for the last three replications to determine yield and its components:

Plant height (cm)
Spike length (cm)
No. of grains/spike
No. of spikelets/spike
No. of spikes/m2
1000-kernel weight (g)
Grain yield (t ha-1)
Straw yield (t ha-1)
Harvest index (seed yield/biological yield)
Protein percentage

Total nitrogen of seeds was determined by the conventional micro-Kjeldahl method (Varley, 1966). Crude protein content was calculated by multiplied N value by 6.25 as reported by Pirie (1955).

Statistical analysis: Data were subjected to the proper statistical analysis as the technique of analysis of variance (ANOVA) of split-split plot design as mentioned by Gomez and Gomez (1984). Treatment means were compared using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test as outlined by Waller and Duncan (1969). The error mean squares of split-split plot design were homogenous (Bartlett’s test), the combined analysis was calculated for all the studied characters in both seasons. Computations were done using computer software.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Bio-fertilizer effects: Results presented in Table 1 indicate significant effects due to Bio-fertilizer for plant height, yield and its components and protein percent, except spike length in combined analysis. Microbin as bio-fertilizer treatment was significantly increased No. of spikes/m2 by 7.91%, plant height by 1.41%, No. of grains/spike by 3.52%, No. of spikelet's/spike by 1.37%, 1000 kernels weight 1.04%, grain yield (t ha-1) by 7.89%, straw yield (t ha-1) by 4.83%, harvest index by 1.82% and protein percent by 5.46% than without bio-fertilizer treatment, as shown as in Table 1. Similar results found by Basha (2004). El-Moursy (1998) and Ali et al. (2002) found that, cerealin inoculation gave the highest grain nitrogen percentage and crude protein percentage, as well. It seems that increasing nitrogen application had favorable effect on grain quality since it builds up the protein content of grain.

Nitrogen fertilizer rate effects: Means of plant height, yield and its components and protein percentage were significantly affected by nitrogen fertilizer rates in the combined analysis, as shown in Table 1.

Increasing nitrogen fertilizer rate up to 180 kg k ha-1 significantly increased plant height, yield and its components and protein percentage in the combined analysis compared with 45 kg N and the other nitrogen rates. The grain yield (t ha-1) due to increasing nitrogen fertilizer rate were 9.68 for 180 kg ha-1, followed by 8.82 for 135 kg N, 7.15 for 90 kg N and 5.46 t ha-1 for 45 kg N in the combined analysis. However, increasing nitrogen rate up to 180 kg N significantly increased protein percent in the combined analysis. Similar results were found by Shalaby et al. (1993), Atta and Swelam (2006) and Hafez et al. (2012). El-Sayed and Hammed (2007) studied the effect of nitrogen rates on agronomic quality traits in three bread wheat cultivars, Sakha 93, Sakha 94 and Giza 168, the results indicated that increasing nitrogen rate up to 238 kg N ha-1 resulted in significant gradual increase in plant height, number of spikes/m2, number of kernels/spike, grain yield/fad. and crud protein.

Table 1: Means of varietal differences for wheat plant height and yield as affected by bio-fertilizer, nitrogen rates and their interaction on in the combined analysis
Image for - Response of Some Wheat Varieties to Bio and Mineral Nitrogen Fertilizers

Rahimi (2012) study the effect of nitrogen rates: 0, 40, 60 and 80 kg ha-1 as urea and showed that effect of nitrogen on grain yield was highly significant. The grain yield was increased to 4800 kg ha-1 by the application of 80 kg ha-1 nitrogen. Gul et al. (2012) found that, higher grain yield (2994.78 kg ha-1) at 130 kg N ha-1. On the other hand, the lowest values of all the studied traits were recorded from the treatment of 45 kg N ha-1.

Varietal differences: Results in Table 1 show that, there are significant differences in the ten traits studied in the combined analysis.

From the same Table 1, it can be noticed also that, the plants of Gemmeiza 9 variety produced the greatest values of all studied traits, except plant height, spike length and 1000 kernels weight in the combined analysis. The results clearly showed that, the highest grain yield (t ha-1) found with Gemmeiza 9 in the combined analysis. The findings are in agreement with Zeidan et al. (2005) pointed that, Gemmeiza 3 produced the highest grain yield compared to Sakha 69 and Sakha 8.

El-Gizawy (2005) tested wheat cultivars Gemmeiza 5, 7 and Gemmeiza 9 showed significant variation for all studied traits. Gemmeiza 9 surpassed the other two cultivars in plant height, number of spikes/m2, number of grains/spike, 1000-kernel weight and grain yield.

Interaction effects: Wheat plant inoculated with microbinx180 kg N ha-1 significantly produced the highest values of all studied traits in the combined analysis. Interaction Bio-fertilizerxnitrogen at 180 kg ha-1 were increased grain yield (t ha-1) by 3.68% and protein percentage by 4.04% compared with the same dose without Bio-fertilizer Table 1. Similar results were reported by Omar et al. (1996) who found that, the combination of microbin inoculation and highest dose of nitrogen fertilizer of 214.2 kg N ha-1 gave the highest means of both grain nitrogen percentage and crude protein content in the three seasons. Bedaiwi et al. (1997) showed that, bio-fertilization could increase grain yield as much as 116-128% over the control by using no more than 70 or 80 kg N fad-1. which accounted for 60% of the recommended mineral nitrogen (120 kg N fad-1.). Kotb (1998) reported that, Sakha 69 variety showed increases of number of spikes/m2, number of grains/spike, straw yield fad-1. with increasing nitrogen fertilization level up to 75 kg N fad-1. or with inoculation.

Results in Table 2 showed that, the interaction between Sakha 93 and Microbin were recorded the highest values of plant height, spike length and 1000-kernels weight while the highest values of the other traits where found with Gemmeiza 9 and Microbin. Zaki et al. (2012) found that, the highest values of plant height, number of grains/spike and number of spikelets/spike were obtained from planting Gemmeiza 7 cultivar with all biofertilizers inoculation Azos., yeast and (Azos.+yeast) in both seasons and 1000 grain weight only in the second season.

The interaction between nitrogen rates and wheat varieties recorded the highly significant values for all studied traits in the combined analysis, as shown as in Table 2. Increasing Nitrogen rates up to 180 kg ha-1 significantly increased all studied traits with variety Gemmeiza 9, except plant height and 1000 kernels weight which were found with the same rate of nitrogen and variety Sakha 93, as shown as in Table 2. Results were in accordance with those obtained by Hassanein (2001), who reported that there was a significant interaction between wheat cultivars and nitrogen levels for yield and yield components i.e., plant height, number of tillers/plant, number of spikes/plant, grain yield/plant, straw yield/plant, biological yield/plant, grain yield/fed, straw yield/fed and biological yield/fed.

Table 2: Effect of bio-fertilizer (B)xwheat varieties (V) and nitrogen rates (N)xwheat varieties (V) interaction on plant height and yield and yield components in the combined analysis
Image for - Response of Some Wheat Varieties to Bio and Mineral Nitrogen Fertilizers

Interaction of Microbinx180 kg N ha-1xGemmeiza 9 gave the highest values for all studied traits in the combined analysis, except plant height, 1000 kernels weight and straw yield which found with the same interactions but with the variety Sakha 93, as shown as in Table 3. Zaki et al. (2012) reported that, the effective treatments for plant height, weight of grains/spike, 1000 grains weight, straw yield and biological yield/fed. were obtained from Gemmeiza-7 cultivar with Azos+yeast+50% NPK, as well as for No. of grains/spike, spike length and grains yield/fed. was Sakha-93 with Azos+yeast+50% NPK.

Table 3: Bio-fertilizer (B)xnitrogen rates (N)xwheat varieties (V) interaction effect on plant height and yield and yield components in the combined analysis
Image for - Response of Some Wheat Varieties to Bio and Mineral Nitrogen Fertilizers

Generally, it can be concluded that for the two cultivars the lowest values were obtained by uninoculation. These results are in harmony with those obtained by Hassanein and Gomaa (2001), Hosam El-Din (2007) and Shoman et al. (2006).

CONCLUSION

From the present results under the same conditions we can recommended that, the interaction between bio-fertilizer, Gemmeiza 9 and 180 kg N ha-1 obtained that highest grain yield ha-1.

REFERENCES

1:  Abou El-Naga, S.H., 1993. Production of bio-fertilizers by GOAEF in Egypt. General Organization of Agriculture Equalization Fund, pp: 508-514.

2:  Ali, N.A.A., S.D. Darwish and S.M. Mansour, 2002. Effect of Azotobocter chrococcwn and Azosplrillum brasilense inoculation and anhydrous ammonium on root colonization, plant growth and yield of wheat plant under saline alkaline conditions. J. Agric. Sci., Mansoura Univ., 27: 5575-5591.

3:  Atta, Y.I. and A.A. Swelam, 2006. Effect of irrigation number on productivity and some waterrelations of two bread wheat cultivars under East Delta conditions. Egypt J. Applied Sci., 21: 101-122.

4:  Basha, M.B.I., 2004. Agronomic studies on wheat. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture Tanta University, Egypt.

5:  Bedaiwi, E.H., R.A. Mitkees, M.A.M. Eid, M.H. Iskander, I.M.M. Sadek, A.M. Abu warda and A.A. Hamada, 1997. Effects of some Egyptian biofertilizers on wheat plants (Triticum aestivum, L.). Egypt J. Applied Sci., 12: 57-67.

6:  Black, C.A., 1965. Methods of Soil Analysis. American Society of Agronomy Inc., Madison, WI., USA

7:  Caballero, M.J., M.M.G. Carcon and E.M.A. Mascarua, 1992. Field inculation of wheat (Triticum aestivum) with Azospirillum brasilense under temperate climate. Symbiosis, 13: 243-253.

8:  El-Gizawy, N.K.B., 2005. Yield and nitrogen efficiency as influenced by rates and sources of nitrogen fertilizer of some wheat varieties. Proceedings of the 11th Conference of Agronomy, November 15-16, 2005, Agriculture Department Faculty of Agriculture Assiut University, Egypt -

9:  El-Kalla, S.E., A.E. Sharief, A.A. Leilah, A.M. Abdalla and S.A.K. El-Awami, 2002. Utilization of some agriculture Practices to improve some wheat cultivars productivityl-yield and its components. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 27: 6583-6597.

10:  El-Moursy, S.A., 1998. NPK requirements for wheat under newly reclaimed soils. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 23: 47-59.

11:  El-Sayed, S.A. and S.M. Hammed, 2007. Effect of nitrogen and potassium levels on agronomic and quality traits in three bread wheat cultivars. J. Agric. Sci., Mansoura Univ., 32: 5139-5153.

12:  Emara, M.A.T., 1994. Wheat response to rhizospheric bacterial inoculation under field conditions. Desert Inst. Bull., 44: 333-335.

13:  Gomez, K.A. and A.A. Gomez, 1984. Statistical Procedures of Agricultural Research. 2nd Edn., John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA., pp: 680

14:  Gul, H., B. Saeed, A.Z. Khan, U. Latif, K. Ali, Javid-ur-Rehman and Saad-ur-Rehman, 2012. Yield and yield contributing traits of wheat cultivars inrelation with planting dates and nitrogen fertilization. ARPN J. Agric. Bio. Sci., 7: 386-395.
Direct Link  |  

15:  Hafez, E.M., S.H. Aboukhadrah, S. Gh, R. Sorour and A.R. Yousef, 2012. Comparison of agronomical and physiological nitrogen use efficiency in three cultivars of wheat as affected by different levels of N-sources. Proceedings of the 13th International Agronomy Conference, September 9-10, 2012, Faculty of Agriculture Benha University, Egypt, pp: 30-

16:  Hassanein, M.S. and A.M. Gomaa, 2001. Productivity efficiency of certain wheat cultivars biofertilized with phosphate solubilizing Bacilli, Azotobacter and yeast under varying levels of phosphorus. Ann. Agric. Sci. Moshtohor, 39: 1907-1922.

17:  Hassanein, M.S., 2001. Effect of variety and nitrogen levels on growth, yield and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Newly Cultivated Land. Egypt J. Agron., 23: 111-131.

18:  Hosam El-Din, A.T.S., 2007. Productivity of some wheat varieties by using bio and organic fertilization in the New Valley. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture Ain Shams University, Egypt.

19:  Kandil, A.A., M.H. El-Hindi, M.A. Badawi, S.A. El-Morarsy and F.A.H. Kalboush, 2011. Response of wheat to rates of nitrogen, biofertilizers and land leveling. Crop Environ., 2: 46-51.
Direct Link  |  

20:  Kotb, M.T.A., 1998. Response of wheat to biofertilizer and inorganic N and P levels. Proceedings of the Regional Symposium on Agro-Technologies based on Biological Nitrogen Fixation for Desert Agriculture, April 14-16, 1998, El-Arish, North Sinai Governorate, Egypt, pp: 291-300

21:  Omar, M.N.A., N.M. Mahrous and A.M. Hamouda, 1996. Evaluating the efficiency of inoculating some diazotrophs on yield and protein content of 3 wheat cultivars under graded levels of nitrogen fertilization. Ann. Agric. Sci., 41: 579-590.
Direct Link  |  

22:  Piper, C.S., 1950. Soils and Plants Analysis. Intersciences Publishers, New York, USA

23:  Pirie, N.W., 1955. Protein. In: Modern Methods of Plant Analysis, Peach, K. and M.V. Traacey (Eds.). Vol. 4. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp: 23-68

24:  Rahimi, A., 2012. Effect of potassium and nitrogen on yield and yield components of dry land wheat in Boyerahmad Region of Iran. Ann. Biol. Res., 3: 3274-3277.
Direct Link  |  

25:  Saleh, M.E., 2002. Response of two wheat cultivars to seeding rates and nitrogen levels. Zagazig. J. Agric. Res., 29: 1367-1378.

26:  Shalaby, E.E., M.M. El-Ganbeehy and M.H. El-Sheik, 1993. Response of several wheat genotypes to different levels of nitrogen fertilization. Minufiya J. Agric. Res., 18: 1079-1096.

27:  Sharief, A.E., S.E. El-Kalla, A.A. Leilla and H.E.M. Moustafa, 1998. Response of some wheat cultivars to nitrogen fertilizer levels and biological fertilization. J. Agric. Sci., Mansoura Univ., 23: 5807-5816.

28:  Sharshar, M.S., M.M. Sobh and F.A. Sherif, 2000. Effect of some N-Bio-fertilizer sources as supplementary fertilization on wheat yield, yield components and quality under graded levels of N-chemical fertilizer. J. Prod. Dev., 5: 1-11.

29:  Shoman, H.A., A.M. Abo-Shtaia, K.A. El-Shouny and M.A. El-Gawad, 2006. Effect of biological and organic fertilization on yield and its components of two wheat cultivars under Al-Wady Al Gadeed conditions. Alexandria J. Agric. Res., 51: 49-65.

30:  Sushila, R. and G.R. Gajendra, 2000. Influence of farmyard manure, nitrogen and biofertilizers on growth, yield attributes and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under limited water supply. Indian J. Agron., 45: 590-595.
Direct Link  |  

31:  Varley, J.A., 1966. Automated method for the determination of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in plant material. Analyst, 91: 119-126.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

32:  Waller, R.A. and D.B. Duncan, 1969. A bayes rule for the symmetric multiple comparisons problem. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 64: 1484-1503.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

33:  Zaki, N.M., M.S. Hassanein and K.M. Gamal El-Din, 2007. Growth and yield of some wheat cultivars irrigated with saline water in newly cultivated land as affected by biofertilization. J. Applied Sci. Res., 3: 1121-1126.
Direct Link  |  

34:  Zaki, N.M., M.A. Gomaa, F.I. Radwan, M.S. Hassanein and A.M. Wali, 2012. Effect of mineral, organic and bio-fertilizers on yield, yield components and chemical composition of some wheat cultivars. J. Applied Sci. Res., 8: 174-191.

35:  Zeidan, E.M., A.A. El-Khawaga, H.A. Basha and I.M. Abd El-Hammeed, 2005. Improvement of wheat productivity in newly reclaimed soil in Egypt. Ann. Univ. Mar. Curie-Skłodowska E, 60: 113-121.
Direct Link  |  

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved