Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article

Antioxidant Activity of Phenolic Rich Fraction Obtained from Convolvulus arvensis L. Leaves Grown in Egypt

A.A. Elzaawely and S. Tawata
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

Acidic ethyl acetate fraction was prepared from the leaves of Convolvulus arvensis L. contents of total phenolics and total flavonoids, antioxidant activity and reducing power were evaluated in this fraction. Total phenolics and total flavonoids were measured as 244.6±2.9 and 174.4±0.4 mg gallic acid and rutin equivalents per gram extract, respectively. The fraction exhibited strong antioxidant activity measured by the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging method and its IC50 value was 66.9±0.1 μg mL-1. Further it possessed strong reducing power and inhibited the oxidation of β-carotene. GC-MS and HPLC analyses indicated that, this fraction contained a variety of phenolic compounds including p-hydroxybenzoic acid, syringic acid, vanillin, benzoic acid and ferulic acid. This study revealed that acidic ethyl acetate fraction of C. arvensis L. leaves has strong antioxidant activity which is correlated with its high content of phenolic compounds and it may serve as a phenolic rich fraction in food industry.

Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

  How to cite this article:

A.A. Elzaawely and S. Tawata, 2012. Antioxidant Activity of Phenolic Rich Fraction Obtained from Convolvulus arvensis L. Leaves Grown in Egypt. Asian Journal of Crop Science, 4: 32-40.

DOI: 10.3923/ajcs.2012.32.40

Received: July 22, 2011; Accepted: September 28, 2011; Published: December 31, 2011


Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) have been considered to cause oxidative injury to living organisms and thus play an important role in many human diseases such as arthritis, atherosclerosis, emphysema, aging process, diabetes mellitus and cancer (Elzaawely et al., 2005; Gupta et al., 2007; Juan and Chou, 2010). Synthetic antioxidants such as Tert-butyl Hydroxyanisole (BHA) and Tert-butyl Hydroxytoluene (BHT) are used to protect foods against oxidative damage caused by ROS (Liu et al., 2011). However, these synthetic antioxidants have been proved to have undesirable side effects; therefore, there has been an increasing interest in the substitution of synthetic antioxidants by natural ones (Al-Soqeer, 2011). Phenolic compounds are natural plant-derived substances that have positive antioxidant, antimutagenic, anticarcinogenic, anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activities (Su et al., 2009; Caliskan and Polat, 2011; Anago et al., 2011).

Convolvulus arvensis (Family: Convolvulaceae) is a wild plant native to Europe and Asia and widely distributed in Egypt. It is a climbing or creeping herbaceous perennial plant growing to 0.5-2 m high. It showed an allelopathic activity (Om et al., 2002; Hegab and Ghareib, 2010), antibacterial activity (Sener et al., 1998) and antioxidant activity (Thakral et al., 2010). Previous phytochemical studies revealed that C. arvensis contained tropane alkaloids (Molyneux et al., 1993; Todd et al., 1995) and phenolic compounds (Hegab and Ghareib, 2010).

This study was designed to prepare a phenolic rich fraction from the leaves of C. arvensis grown in Egypt and to investigate its antioxidant capacity as well as its contents of phenolic compounds.


Chemicals: Standard phenolic compounds (p-hydroxybenzoic acid, syringic acid, vanillin, benzoic acid and ferulic acid), Folin- Ciocalteu’s reagent, aluminum chloride, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), Tert-butyl Hydroxytoluene (BHT), β-carotene, linoleic acid, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monopalmitate (Tween-40), potassium ferricyanide, trichloroacetic acid, ferric chloride and all solvents used were of analytical grade and purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan).

Plant material: C. arvensis plants were collected from Tanta province, Egypt. The leaves were air dried for one week and the dried materials were powdered and kept in the refrigerator till use.

Preparation of the acidic fraction: Five grams dried powdered leaves of C. arvensis were extracted with aqueous ethanol 80% (3x200 mL) for 24 h at room temperature. The extracts were collected, filtered and the volume was reduced under vacuum at 40°C. After the pH of the solution adjusted to 11.0 by NaOH 4 N, it was extracted with chloroform (3x150 mL) to remove basic material that mainly contains alkaloids. The remaining aqueous solution was made acidic to pH 2.0 with HCl 6 N and then extracted with ethyl acetate (5x150 mL). The ethyl acetate fraction was collected, filtered and dried under vacuum at 40°C to yield 0.17 g of crude acidic fraction. The fraction was hydrolyzed with 50 mL NaOH 4 N at 50°C with stirring for 4 h to release phenolic acids. After the pH was adjusted to 2.0 by HCl 6 N, it was extracted with ethyl acetate (2x150 mL). The acidic ethyl acetate fraction was filtered and dried under vacuum to yield 0.13 g of phenolic-rich ethyl acetate fraction of C. arvensis leaves.

Determination of total phenolic content: The amount of total phenolics was determined according to the Folin-Ciocalteu procedure described by Kahkonen et al. (1999). Briefly, 1.0 mL Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent (50%) and 0.8 mL 7.5% (w/v) Na2CO3 were added to 0.2 mL (500 ppm) of methanolic solution of EtOAc fraction. After shaking, the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Absorption was measured at 765 nm using a Shimadzu UV-160A spectrometer, Kyoto (Japan). Total phenolic content was expressed as Gallic Acid Equivalents (GAE) in milligrams per gram extract.

Determination of total flavonoids: The amount of total flavonoids was determined according to the method described by Djeridane et al. (2006). Briefly, 1.0 mL of methanolic solution of EtOAc fraction (1000 ppm) was mixed with 1 mL aluminum chloride (2% in methanol). After shaking, the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 15 min and then the absorption was measured at 430 nm using a Shimadzu UV-160A spectrometer, Kyoto (Japan). Total flavonoids content was expressed as Rutin Equivalents (RE) in milligrams per gram extract.

Antioxidant activity by DPPH method: The radical scavenging activity was evaluated as described previously by Abe et al. (1998). Two millileter of the methanol solution of the sample (25, 50 and 100 ppm) were mixed with 1 mL of 0.5 mM DPPH methanol solution and 2 mL of 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.5). After shaking, the mixture was incubated at room temperature in the dark for 30 min and then the absorbance was measured at 517 nm using a Shimadzu UV-160A spectrometer, Kyoto (Japan). BHT (10 ppm) was used as positive reference while methanol was used as negative one. The IC50 value was determined as the concentration required to give 50% DPPH radical scavenging activity.

Antioxidant activity by β-carotene bleaching method: Antioxidant activity was evaluated according to the β-carotene bleaching method as reported by Siddhuraju and Becker (2003). β-Carotene (2.0 mg) was dissolved in 10 mL chloroform. One milliliter of the chloroform solution was mixed with 20 μL linoleic acid and 200 mg Tween-40. The chloroform was evaporated under vacuum at 45°C, then 50 mL oxygenated water was added and the mixture was vigorously shaken. The emulsion obtained was freshly prepared before each experiment. An aliquot (250 μL) of the β-carotene-linoleic acid emulsion was distributed in each of the 96-wells of the microtitre plates. Methanolic solutions (30 μL) of the sample and BHT at 1000 ppm were added. An equal amount of methanol was used for control. The microtitre plates were incubated at 50°C and the absorbance was measured using a model MTP-32 microplate reader (Corona Electric, Ibaraki, Japan) at 492 nm. Readings of all samples were performed immediately at zero time and every 15 min up to 180 min.

Reducing power: Reducing power was determined as described previously by Yildirim et al. (2003). One milliliter of the ethyl acetate fraction of C. arvensis leaves and BHT at different concentrations in methanol was mixed with 2.5 mL phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.6) and 2.5 mL potassium ferricyanide [K3Fe(CN)6] (10 g L-1), then the mixture was incubated at 50°C for 30 min. Afterwards, 2.5 mL trichloroacetic acid (100 g L-1) was added to the mixture which was subsequently centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min. Finally, 2.5 mL of the supernatant solution was mixed with 2.5 mL distilled water and 0.5 mL FeCl3 (1 g L-1) and the absorbance was measured at 700 nm. Increased absorbance of the reaction mixture indicated increased reducing power.

GC-MS analysis: A 1 μL aliquot of the acetone solution of the ethyl acetate fraction was injected into the GC-MS (QP-2010, Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan). The DB-5MS column was 30 m in length, 0.25 mm id and 0.25 μm in thickness (Agilent Technologies, J and W Scientific Products, Folsom, CA, USA). The carrier gas was helium. The GC oven temperature program was as follows: 50°C hold for 6 min, raised at 5°C min-1 to 280°C and hold for 5 min. The injector and detector temperatures were set at 250 and 280°C, respectively. The mass range was scanned from 20 to 900 amu. The control of the GC-MS system and the data peak processing were carried out by means of Shimadzu’s GC-MS solution software, version 2.4.

Quantification by HPLC: Phenolic compounds were measured at 280 nm using a Shimadzu HPLC (SCL-10 A vp, Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan) coupled with a UV-vis detector (SPD-20A, Shimadzu). Separations were achieved on a RP-18 ZORBAX ODS column (Agilent Technologies, USA) (25x0.46 cm i.d.; 5 μm particle size). The mobile phase was water with 1% acetic acid (v/v) (solvent A) and methanol: acetonitrile:acetic acid (75:24:1, v/v/v) (solvent B) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL min-1. The gradient elution was performed as follows: 0-2 min, 5% B isocratic; 2-10 min, linear gradient 5-25% B; 10-20 min, linear gradient 25-40% B; 20-30 min, linear gradient 40-50% B; 30-40 min, linear gradient 50-100% B; 40-45 min, 100% B isocratic and 45-55 min, linear gradient 100-5% B. A 5 μL Methanolic solution of the ethyl acetate fraction at 10,000 ppm was used and the identification of the compounds was carried out by comparing their retention times to those of standards. The quantification of each compound was determined based on peak area measurements which were reported to calibration curves of the corresponding standards.

Statistical analysis: Data were analyzed using SAS version 6.12 using ANOVA with the Least Significant Difference (LSD) at the 0.05 probability level.


Total phenolic and total flavonoids: Contents of total phenolic compounds were determined using Folin-ciocalteau method and total flavonoids determined using the aluminum chloride colorimetric assay of the acidic ethyl acetate fraction prepared from C. arvensis leaves are shown in Fig. 1. Results show that, this fraction contained high amounts of total phenolics and total flavonoids and they were measured as 244.6±2.9 and 174.4±0.4 mg gallic acid and rutin equivalents per g extract, respectively. It has been recorded that phenolic compounds including flavonoids are associated with strong antioxidant activity (Liu et al., 2011) and they possess healthy benefits (Shih and Diagle, 2003).

Antioxidant activity: The DPPH radical scavenging activity of acidic ethyl acetate fraction of C. arvensis leaves and BHT as positive control are presented in Fig. 2. The IC50 defined as the concentration of the sample needed to scavenge 50% of DPPH present in the test solution. Lower IC50 value reflects higher DPPH radical scavenging activity.

Fig. 1: Total phenolics (mg GAE g-1 extract) and total flavonoids (mg RE g-1 extract) in acidic ethyl acetate fraction of C. arvensis leaves

Fig. 2: DPPH radical scavenging activity of acidic ethyl acetate fraction of C. arvensis leaves and BHT

Fig. 3: Antioxidant activity of acidic ethyl acetate fraction of C. arvensis leaves and BHT measured by β-carotene bleaching method

DPPH is a stable radical showing a maximum absorbance at 515 nm. It can be reduced by an antioxidant molecule to uncolored solution (Erkan et al., 2008). It is a convenient, accurate and easy method and therefore, it is widely used to measure the antioxidant activity of plant extracts (Blois, 1958; Ali et al., 2011). Under the assay conditions employed here, the acidic ethyl acetate fraction of C. arvensis leaves showed strong DPPH activity with the IC50 value of 66.9±0.1 μg mL-1; while the IC50 of BHT as standard was 12.2 μg mL-1. This high activity may be due to the high amounts of the corresponding phenolic compounds found in this fraction. Positive correlation has been demonstrated between antioxidant activity and phenolic content of plant extracts (Su et al., 2008; Biglari et al., 2008; Socha et al., 2009; Juan and Chou, 2010).

Effect of the acidic ethyl acetate fraction of C. arvensis leaves as well as BHT on oxidation of β-carotene/linolic acid is shown in Fig. 3. The linoleic acid free radical, formed upon the abstraction of a hydrogen atom from one of its diallylic methylene groups, attacks the highly unsaturated β-carotene molecules. As β-carotene molecules lose their double bonds by oxidation, the compound loses its orange color. The presence of extract/fraction that has antioxidant activity can hinder the extent of β-carotene-bleaching by neutralizing the free radicals formed in the system and thus, the degradation rate of β-carotene depends on the antioxidant activity of the extract/fraction (Jayaprakasha et al., 2001). In present study, the acidic ethyl acetate fraction of C. arvensis leaves reduced the oxidation of β-carotene to some extent and its effect was less than that of BHT.

Reducing power is considered to be a strong indicator of the antioxidant activity and was determined using a modified iron (III) to iron (II) reduction assay. The presence of the reductants (antioxidants) in the solution can reduce the Fe3+/ferricyanide complex to the ferrous form by donating an electron (Ali et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2011). The reducing power of the acidic ethyl acetate fraction of C. arvensis leaves as well as standard BHT is presented in Fig. 4. The reducing power of both samples increased with its concentrations. The ethyl acetate fraction had high ability to reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+ and the effect was less than that of BHT. The reducing ability is generally associated with the presence of reductants which exert antioxidant action through breaking the free radical chain by donating a hydrogen atom or preventing peroxide formation (Kumaran and Karunakaran, 2006). The results presented in Fig. 4 indicated that the reducing activity of the ethyl acetate fraction attend to be due to the presence of phenolic compounds that may act as reductants by donating the electrons and reacting with free radicals to convert them to more stable products and terminate radical chain reaction (Loganayaki et al., 2011).

Fig. 4: Reducing powers of acidic ethyl acetate fraction of C. arvensis leaves and BHT

Fig. 5: Contents of phenolic compounds (μg g-1 DW) in acidic ethyl acetate fraction of C. arvensis leaves LSD (p<0.05) = 62.656. Values are means of 3 replications±SE. Means followed by different letters are significantly different at p<0.

Fig. 6: HPLC chromatogram of phenolic compounds from acidic ethyl acetate fraction of C. arvensis leaves. 1: p-Hydroxybenzoic, 2: Syringic, 3: Vanillin, 4: Benzoic and 5: Ferulic

Identification and quantification of phenolic compounds: Since phenolic acids are often found in plants in bound complexes such as esters and glycosides (Germano et al., 2006), it needs to be released fro m its bound form by using alkaline, acidic or enzymatic hydrolysis (Madhujith and Shahidi, 2009). In this study, alkaline hydrolysis with 4 M NaOH at 50°C was carried out to release conjugated phenolics and subsequently five phenolic compounds were detected in the acidic ethyl acetate fraction of C. arvensis by GC-MS and HPLC. These compounds are p-hydroxybenzoic acid, syringic acid, vanillin, benzoic acid and ferulic acid. Figure 5 displays quantitative results of identified phenolic compounds in the acidic ethyl acetate fraction of C. arvensis by HPLC and Fig. 6 shows the representative HPLC chromatogram of this fraction monitored at 280 nm. The quantification of the compounds using HPLC was carried out by comparing their retention times to those of standards. Furthermore, the identification of the compounds was confirmed using the GC-MS by comparing their retention times and spectral characteristics of their peaks with those of standards. Statistically significant variation was found in the quantities of phenolic compounds in this fraction. Benzoic acid was the predominant phenolics (350.6 μg-1 DW) while syringic acid was the lowest one (30.5 μg g-1 DW). Previous study reported that the methanol extract and its ethyl acetate fraction prepared from the aerial parts of C. arvensis grown in India showed strong antioxidant activity; however, its chemical constituents were not identified (Thakral et al., 2010). It was previously reported that phenolic compounds have strong antioxidant activity (Elzaawely et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2009; Mariod et al., 2010) and therefore, the phenolic compounds in the phenolic rich fraction of C. arvensis may be responsible for its antioxidant activity.


This investigation shows that, the acidic ethyl acetate fraction prepared from C. arvensis leaves contains high amounts of total phenolics and total flavonoids and it exhibited strong reducing power and antioxidant activity measured by DPPH and β-carotene bleaching methods. GC-MS and HPLC revealed that this fraction contains five phenolic compounds viz., p-hydroxybenzoic acid, syringic acid, vanillin, benzoic acid and ferulic acid that are responsible for its strong antioxidant activity. Further studies in isolation of individual phenolic compounds particularly flavonoids in this fraction and its effect on antioxidant status in animal models are needed to evaluate their potential benefits.

1:  Abe, N., T. Murata and A. Hirota, 1998. Novel DPPH radical scavengers, bisorbicillinol and demethyltrichodimerol, from a fungus. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 62: 661-666.
Direct Link  |  

2:  Ali, M., M. Arfan, H. Ahmad, K. Zaman, F. Khan and R. Amarowicz, 2011. Comparative antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of phenolic compounds extracted from five Hypericum species. Food Technol. Biotechnol., 49: 205-213.
Direct Link  |  

3:  Al-Soqeer, A., 2011. Antioxidant activity and biological evaluation of hot-water extract of Artemisia monosperma and Capparis spinosa against lead contamination. Res. J. Bot., 6: 11-20.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

4:  Anago, E., L. Lagnika, J. Gbenou, F. Loko, M. Moudachirou and A. Sanni, 2011. Antibacterial activity and phytochemical study of six medicinal plants used in Benin. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 14: 449-455.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

5:  Biglari, F., A.F.M. AlKarkhi and A.M. Easa, 2008. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of various date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) fruits from Iran. Food Chem., 107: 1636-1641.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

6:  Blois, M.S., 1958. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature, 181: 1199-1200.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

7:  Caliskan, O. and A.A. Polat, 2011. Phytochemical and antioxidant properties of selected fig (Ficus carica L.) accessions from the Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Scientia Horticulturae, 128: 473-478.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

8:  Djeridane, A., M. Yousfi, B. Nadjemi, D. Boutassouna, P. Stocker and N. Vidal, 2006. Antioxidant activity of some Algerian medicinal plants extracts containing phenolic compounds. Food Chem., 97: 654-660.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

9:  Elzaawely, A.A., T.D. Xuan and S. Tawata, 2005. Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Rumex japonicus HOUTT. aerial parts. Biol. Pharm. Bull., 28: 2225-2230.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

10:  Elzaawely, A.A., T.D. Xuan, H. Koyama and S. Tawata, 2007. Antioxidant activity and contents of essential oil and phenolic compounds in flowers and seeds of Alpinia zerumbet (Pers.) B.L. Burtt. and R.M. Sm. Food Chem., 104: 1648-1653.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

11:  Erkan, N., G. Ayranci and E. Ayranci, 2008. Antioxidant activities of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) extract, blackseed (Nigella sativa L.) essential oil, carnosic acid, rosmarinic acid and sesamol. Food Chem., 110: 76-82.
CrossRef  |  

12:  Germano, M.P., V. D'Angelo, T. Biasini, R. Sanogo, R. De Pasquale and S. Catania, 2006. Evaluation of the antioxidant properties and bioavailability of free and bound phenolic acids from Trichilia emetic Vahl. J. Ethnopharmacol., 105: 368-373.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

13:  Gupta, M., U.K. Mazumder and P. Gomathi, 2007. Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of galega purpurea root. Asian J. Plant Sci., 6: 533-537.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

14:  Hegab, M.M. and H.R. Ghareib, 2010. Methanol extract potential of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L.) for wheat growth enhancement. Int. J. Bot., 6: 218-226.

15:  Jayaprakasha, G.K., R.P. Singh and K.K. Sakariah, 2001. Antioxidant activity of grape seed (Vitis vinifera) extracts on peroxidation models in vitro. Food Chem., 73: 285-290.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

16:  Juan, M.Y. and C.C. Chou, 2010. Enhancement of antioxidant activity, total phenolic and flavonoid content of black soybeans by solid state fermentation with Bacillus subtilis BCRC 14715. Food Microbiol., 27: 586-591.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

17:  Kahkonen, M.P., A.I. Hopia, H.J. Vuorela, J.P. Rauha, K. Pihlaja, T.S. Kujala and M. Heinonen, 1999. Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem., 47: 3954-3962.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

18:  Kumaran, A. and R.J. Karunakaran, 2006. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of an aqueous extract of Coleus aromaticus. Food Chem., 97: 109-114.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

19:  Liu, J., C. Wang, Z. Wang, C. Zhang, S. Lu and J. Liu, 2011. The antioxidant and free-radical scavenging activities of extract and fractions from corn silk (Zea mays L.) and related flavone glycosides. Food Chem., 126: 261-269.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

20:  Loganayaki, N., P. Siddhuraju and S. Manian, 2011. Antioxidant activity and free radical scavenging capacity of phenolic extracts from Helicteres isora L. and Ceiba pentandra L. J. Food Sci. Technol., (In Press) 10.1007/s13197-011-0389-x

21:  Madhujith, T. and F. Shahidi, 2009. Antioxidant potential of barley as affected by alkaline hydrolysis and release of insoluble-bound phenolics. Food Chem., 117: 615-620.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

22:  Mariod, A.A., R.M. Ibrahim, M. Ismail and N. Ismail, 2010. Antioxidant activities of Phenolic Rich Fractions (PRFs) obtained from black mahlab (Monechma ciliatum) and white mahlab (Prunus mahaleb) seedcakes. Food Chem., 118: 120-127.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

23:  Molyneux, R.J., Y.T. Pan, A. Goldmann, D.A. Tepfer and A.D. Elbein, 1993. Calystegins, a novel class of alkaloid glycosidase inhibitors. Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 304: 81-88.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

24:  Om, H., S.D. Dhiman, S. Kumar and H. Kumar, 2002. Allelopathic response of Phalaris minor to crop and weed plants in rice-wheat system. Crop Prot., 21: 699-705.
CrossRef  |  

25:  Sener, B., F. Bingol, I. Erdogan, W.S. Bowers and P.H. Evans, 1998. Biological activities of some Turkish medicinal plants. Pure Applied Chem., 70: 403-406.
Direct Link  |  

26:  Shih, F.F. and K.W. Diagle, 2003. Antioxidant properties of milledrice co-products and their effects on lipid oxidation in ground beef. Food Chem. Toxicol., 68: 2672-2675.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

27:  Siddhuraju, P. and K. Becker, 2003. Studies on antioxidant activities of mucuna seed (Mucuna pruriens var utilis) extract and various non-protein amino/imino acids through in vitro models. J. Sci. Food Agric., 83: 1517-1524.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

28:  Socha, R., L. Juszczak, S. Pietrzyk and T. Fortuna, 2009. Antioxidant activity and phenolic composition of herbhoneys. Food Chem., 113: 568-574.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

29:  Su, X.Y., Z.Y. Wang and J.R. Liu, 2009. In vitro and in vivo antioxidant activity of Pinus koraiensis seed extract containing phenolic compounds. Food Chem., 117: 681-686.
CrossRef  |  

30:  Thakral, J., S. Borar, Roopa, A.N. Kalia, 2010. Antioxidant potential fractionation from methanol extract of aerial parts of Convolvulus arvensis Linn. (Convolvulaceae). Int. J. Pharmacol. Sci. Drug Res., 2: 219-223.

31:  Todd, F.G., F.R. Stermitz, P. Schultheis, A.P. Knight and J. Traub-Dargatz, 1995. Tropane alkaloids and toxicity of convolvulus arvensis. Phytochemistry, 39: 301-303.

32:  Yildirim A., A. Mavi and A.A. Kara, 2003. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Polygonum cognatum Meissn extracts. J. Sci. Food Agric., 83: 64-69.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

33:  Zhang, Z., L. Liao, J. Moore, T. Wua and Z. Wang, 2009. Antioxidant phenolic compounds from walnut kernels (Juglans regia L.). Food Chem., 113: 160-165.
CrossRef  |  

34:  Su, M.S., Y.T. Shyu and P.J. Chien, 2008. Antioxidant activities of citrus herbal product extracts. Food Chem., 111: 892-896.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved