Hibiscus sabdariffa L. (Roselle) is a subtropical medicinal plant belongs
to the family Malvaceae. The fruit calyxes of this plant are used for preparing
refreshing beverage and jellies of brilliant red color with pleasant acidic
taste. In addition the drink has a laxative effect due to organic acids present
in the calyxes. The calyx extraction has a great therapeutic action for curing
heart and nerve diseases and high blood pressure (Hassan,
2009). It presents antimicrobial activities due to its phenolic compounds.
It contains protein, fibers, calcium, iron, carotens and vitamin C (Fasoyiro
et al., 2005).
Biofertilizers are the formulation of living microorganisms, which are able
to fix atmospheric nitrogen and convert insoluble phosphorus to be valuable
for the plants (Mahfouz and Sharaf-Eldin, 2007).
Recently, the production of chemical-free medicinal and aromatic plants has
been the focus of interest of many researchers and producers in order to ensure
the high quality and safety, not only for human, but also for the environment.
Investigation took place for using biofertilizers as an alternative to chemical
fertilizers or at least to minimize the levels of these chemicals in order to
protect the environment from pollution, decrease the production cost and produce
chemical-free product. The vegetation growth parameters as well as sepal yield
of roselle plant were increased when seeds were inoculated with Rhizobium
and Azotobacter (Harridy and Amara, 1998; Hassan,
2009) or nitrobin which a bio-source of nitrogen (Shaalan
et al., 2001).
Inoculation of seeds with Azotobacter and Azospirillum in the
presence of chemical fertilizers resulted in improving both growth and yield
of anise (Gomaa and Abo-Aly, 2001), Foeniculum vulgare
(Kandeel et al., 2001; Mahfouz
and Sharaf-Eldin, 2007) and Nigella sativa (Shaalan,
Biofertilizers (N fixing and P dissolving bacteria) had an effective role in
partial replacement of N and P mineral fertilization. This role was revealed
by Ibrahim (2002), Badran and Safwat
(2004) on fennel, Soliman (2002) on anise, Safwat
and Badran (2002) on cumin and Badran et al.
(2002) on black cumin.
The aim of this investigation was to study the effect of some bio-and chemical fertilizers on the growth characters, yield component and chemical constituents of roselle plants under reclaimed land condition of Qena.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The experiment was conducted at the Experimental Farm of Ornamental Plants. Faculty of Agriculture, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt, which located at latitude 26 11 25 N" and longitude 32 44 42" E, during the two successive seasons of 2008 and 2009.
Physical and chemical analyses of soil were done in the Soil Analysis Laboratory of the Soil and Water Department, Faculty of Agriculture, South Valley University. The soil of the experimental field was salty loam and its characteristics are presented in Table 1.
Seeds of roselle (Dark Red cultivar) were obtained from the Medicinal and Aromatic
plants Department, Horticulture research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture,
Egypt. Seeds were coated with 10% Arabic gum as an adhesive and rolled into
the biofertilizers treatments. The biofertilizers used as inoculums for seed
treatments were Azospirillum (nitrogen fixing bacteria, N.F.B.) and
Bacillus polymyxa (phosphate dissolving bacteria, PDB) and their mixture.
|| Some physical and chemical characteristics of the used soil
All strains were locally isolated from soil rhizosphere of different plants
during a previous study (Badawy et al., 2003).
Seeds were sown directly on 1 May 2008 and 2009 for the two seasons.
The experiment was carried out in a complete randomized blocks design with thirteen treatments and three replications. There were five holes per each ridges and four ridges for each treatment/replicate with distance 50 cm between ridges and 50 cm between holes, five seeds were placed in each hole. After one month and half, the plants were thinned at one plant per each hill.
The recommended dose of NPK chemical fertilizers used in this experiment according to the Ministry of Agriculture, Egypt., as control treatment, was 225 kg fed-1 ammonium nitrate 33% N, 150 kg fed-1 super phosphate 15.5% P2O2 and (75 kg potassium sulphate 48% K2O) which was applied for all experiment treatments. The doses of nitrogen and phosphorus chemical fertilization were manipulated at various levels (0, 25, 50 and 100%) in different combinations with biofertilizers as shown in Table 2.
Phosphorus fertilizer was added during soil preparation prior to sowing, while the amount of nitrogen chemical fertilization was added in two equal batches, the first one was added after thinning with all amount of potassium and after 45 days from the first addition, the second amount of nitrogen was added.
Morphological estimation: The following measurements were recorded at the beginning of flowering stage using five plants for each treatment per replication : number of branches, fresh weight of vegetative growth and roots. Dry weight of vegetative growth and roots which recorded after drying the sample in an oven at 70°C for 72 h, while plant height, number of fruits per plant and calyx dry weight per plant were recorded after the maturity of fruits.
Chemical estimation: Leaf and calyx nitrogen percentage was determined
by the micro-Kjeldahl method as recommended by Bremner and
Mulvany (1982). Available phosphorus was determined by the method of Jackson
(1967). Anthocyanin content were determined by the method of Tibor
and Francis (1968). Vitamin C was determined as described by Jacobs
(1951). Sepals' acidity was determined according to the method of Chemists
|| Details of recommended doses of bio- and chemical fertilizers
for the different treatments
|PDB: Phosphate dissolving bacteria and NFB: Nitrogen fixing
Statistical analysis: The data were statistically analyzed as Means
and was compared using LSD at 5% according to Steel and Torrie
Vegetative growth characteristics
Plant height: Data presented in Table 3 revealed
that the addition of NPK recommended dose with mixed biofertilizers increased
significantly plant height in both seasons compared to control (NPK recommended
dose only). Also highly significant increase was recorded in the case of the
same chemical fertilizers dose with NFB in the second seasons.It was found also
that the differences between 100% chemical NPK (control) and 50% NPK plus all
biofertilizer treatments were not significant in both seasons.
Number of branches/plant: In both seasons, it seems that all biofertilizer treatments with full dose of NPK significantly increased the number of branches/plant compared to 100% chemical fertilizers alone (control), while PDB biofertilizer treatment plus 100% NPK recorded significant increase in the first season only as shown in Table 3.
The increases in number of branches per plant in the first season were 32.2, 24.7 and 31.1% for inoculation treatment with PDB, NFB and their mixture plus 100% NPK for first season respectively, while the increases in the second season were 16.6 and 41.3% for inoculation with NFB and NFB+PDB plus 100% chemical fertilizers, respectively.
Fresh and dry weight of shoots and roots of Roselle plants: Data in
Table 4 showed that fresh and dry weight of vegetative growth
for plants treated with different biofertilizer treatments plus 50 or 100% chemical
fertilization did not differ significantly compared with the control in both
seasons, except for fresh weight of plants treated with PDB plus 50 and 100%
NPK in the first season. Significant increases in vegetative dry weight were
recorded in the case of inoculation treatment with PDB and the mixture of NFB
and PDB with 100% chemical fertilizers in the second season.
||Effect of bio-and chemical fertilizers on plant height and
numbers of branches of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. plants during first
and second seasons
|** Significant at p = 0.01
||Effect of bio-and chemical fertilizers on fresh and dry weight
of vegetative growth and roots fresh and dry weight of Hibiscus sabdariffa
L. during first and second seasons
|** Significant at 0.01
All biofertilizer treatments without NPK reduced thr fresh and dry weight of
the vegetative growth.
Data presented in Table 4 showed that the roots fresh weight significantly increase as a result of the application all biofertilization treatments plus 100% chemical fertilization in the two seasons compared to 100% chemical fertilizers alone. Results of roots dry weight showed that significant increases in roots dry weight as a result of the application of all biofertilizer treatments plus 100% chemical fertilizer recommended dose in both seasons except of PDB and NFB treatments in the second season and PDB treatment in the first season.
Data also revealed that no significant differences were found in roots dry weight between applications of biofertilization treatments plus 50% of chemical NPK dose compared to 100% chemical fertilizers (control).
The yield parameters
Number of calyx/plants: The maximum number of calyx in the first
season was obtained in the plants treated with 100% NPK chemical fertilizers
plus NFB biofertilizers or plus mixture of NFB and PDB with compared to 100%
NPK chemical fertilizers alone in the first season as shown in Table
In the second season the highest calyx number per plant was recorded in the case of inoculation treatment with the mixture of nitrogen fixing bacteria and phosphate dissolving bacteria plus 100% and 50% chemical fertilizers as compared with 100% chemical fertilizers alone.
Sepals dry weight and yield: Data recorded in Table 5 showed that there were significant increases in sepals dry weight and yield as a result of inoculation with mixture biofertilization treatments plus 100% chemical fertilizers compared to the control in both seasons. Also, addition 50% of chemical NPK dose to mixture of biofertilizers treatment gave almost the same yield obtained by application 100% chemical fertilizers alone.
||Effect of bio-and chemical fertilizers on number of calyx/plants,
calyx dry weight and yield/fed. of Roselle plants during first and second
|** Significant at p = 0.01, 1From approximately
With respect to sepals yield, data presented that the highest yield was obtained in case of application of full dose of chemical fertilizers plus BDP, NFB and mixed biofertilizers treatments in the first season. Data also obtained that, application of 50% chemical fertilizers plus mixed biofertilizers recorded significant increase in sepals yield comparing with 100% chemical fertilizers alone. In the second season, application of full dos of chemical fertilizers plus mixed biofertilizers treatment increased significantly sepals yield comparing to chemical fertilizers alone.
The increment in the dry sepal yield for the mixture of biofertilizers plus 100% NPK treatment were 19.48 and 10.61% in the first and second seasons, respectively.
Nitrogen percentage (N%): Data in Table 6 indicated
that in both seasons the addition of 100% chemical fertilizers in combination
with all biofertilizers increased significantly N% in the leaves compared to
control treatment (100% chemical fertilizers). Also, data showed that addition
of 50% chemical fertilizers dose gave the same effect on N% in case of combination
with NFB biofertilizer or mixed biofertilizer.
With regard to N% in sepals, data revealed that the highest N% was obtained in case of application of full dose of chemical fertilizers plus both of NFB or mixed biofertilizers treatments.
Phosphor percentage (P%): Concerning the effect of bio-fertilizers in combination with the different levels of NPK chemical fertilizers on P percentage of roselle plants, data in Table 7 showed that the highest significant increase in P percentage were found, during the two seasons with the biofertilizer treatments of NFB and mixture of NFB+PDB plus 100% chemical fertilizers. Data also showed that sepals P% was not affected by the application of the different biofertilizer treatments with full dose of chemical fertilizer.
|| Effect of bio- and chemical fertilizers on N% of leaves and
sepals of roselle plants during first and second seasons
|** Significant at p = 0.01
|| Effect of bio-and chemical fertilizers on P% on Hibiscus
sabdariffa L. leaves and sepals during first and second seasons
|** Significant at p= 0.01
Moreover, it can be seen in Table 6 that the differences between the treatments of 50% NPK+bio-fertilizers compared with 100% NPK chemical fertilizers treatments were not significant with respect to the phosphorus percentage and its total content in the leaves.
Anthocyanin, Vitamin C and sepals acidity: Data in Table 8 revealed that there were no significant differences on anthocyanin and vitamine C content of the sepals as a result of the biofertilizers treatments compared to 100% NPK chemical fertilizers treatments alone.
Also, the data as shown in Table 8 revealed that a significant increase was recorded in the acidity of roselle sepals. This high acidity was found in case of applying biofertilizers (Mixture) plus 100% chemical NPK fertilization and also with using NFB plus 100% NPK.
||Anthocyanin, Vitamin C content (mg g-1 dry weight)
and Acidity in calyces of roselle plant as affected by different bio and
|NS,*, ** Non significant, significant at p = 0.05 and 0.01,
The obtained results show that biofertilizers treatments promoted the growth
characters and increased the yield component of roselle plants. These results
are in agreement with those of Mohamed and Ahmed (2003)
on fennel, Shaalan (2005) on Nigella sativa,
Yuonis et al. (2004) on Ammi visnaga,
Heikal (2005) on Thymus vulgaris, Abd
El-Latif (2006) on Salvia officinalis, Swaefy
Hend et al. (2007) on peppermint and Hassan (2009)
These results could be attributed to the effect of the non-symbiotic N2-fixing
bacteria (Azospirillum) producing adequate amounts of IAA, gibberellins,
cytokinins and B group vitamins that promote rooting capacity, root length and
enhanced the root hair branching with an eventual increase on the uptake of
nutrients from the soil (Rodriguez and Fraga, 1999;
Revilas et al., 2000).
Phosphate solubilizing bacteria (Bacillus polymyxa) release organic
and inorganic acids which reduce soil pH leading to change of phosphorus and
other nutrients to available forms ready for uptake by plants (Singh
and Kapoor, 1999).
Therefore, the percentages of N and P elements in the leaves were increased
and this increment led to promote the growth and yield of roselle plants. Similar
results have been reported by Kandeel et al. (2001),
Mahfouz and Sharaf-Eldin (2007) on foeniculum,
Hassan (2009) on roselle and Mostafa
and Abo-Baker (2010) on sunflower.
The obtained results showed that using bacteria inoculation combined with 50 or 100% chemical fertilizers improved, in most cases, the growth characters and increased sepal yield or at least did not differ significantly from the control (full recommended dose of NPK fertilizers alone).
It is well known that the chemical fertilizers promote plant growth through
the role of nitrogen in protein synthesis and increasing the meristmatic activity.
In addition, mineral P is an essential component of the energy compounds (ATP
and ADP) and phosphoproteins. Similar results have been reported when roselle
plants were treated with NPK fertilizers (Harridy and Amara,
Adding of 50% of the recommended dose of chemical fertilizers to the biofertilizers
improved the plant growth and increased the sepal yield. This improvement may
be due to the direct effect of chemical fertilizers or indirect through the
microbial propagation activation. These results are in accordance with those
obtained by Shaalan et al. (2001) on roselle
plants, Shaalan (2005) on Nigella sativa plants
and Hassan (2009) on roselle.
It could be concluded that biofertilizers promoted the growth and increased the sepal yield of roselle plants compared to the chemical fertilization alone. Applying 50% of the recommended dose of NPK plus mixture of biofertilizers, decrease the production cost and obtain high quality product.