Agronomic Performance, Genotype X Environment Interactions and Stability Analysis of Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)
This research was undertaken to evaluate the performance of parental lines and their crosses under different environments for yielding ability and some traits and determine the most stable lines and hybrids. Testing newly developed genotypes under several environments is important for evaluating stability of performance and range of adaptation. Twenty five F1 and their 10 parents of sorghum were evaluated at two locations (Assiut and Qena governorates) under early and late sowing dates in both 2007 and 2008 summer seasons. Year effects were significant for the studied traits. Location and date effects had the largest impact on the studied traits. The interaction effects of genotype with each of locations and dates were highly significant for all studied traits whereas genotype x year interaction effect was highly significant for days to blooming, plant height and grain yield. Genotype x year x date interaction effect was highly significant for plant height, 1000-grain weight and grain yield. However, genotype x year x location x date interaction effect was highly significant only for plant height and grain yield. Most of hybrids were significantly earlier, taller, heavier grain weight and higher grain yield compared to their parents and checks. Stability analysis for grain yield demonstrated that most of F1 hybrids had higher yields than their parents, but the parents were relatively more stable. Four genotypes (three crosses; (A-73 x R-272), (A-604 x R-92010) and (A-613 x R-210) and one parent (R-273)) were the best stable genotypes. These genotypes gave higher yields compared to the average overall genotypes (hybrids and parents, respectively). These genotypes are considered as promising cultivars and it may be suitable for growing in a wide range of environments.
Received: August 16, 2010;
Accepted: October 05, 2010;
Published: November 01, 2010
Grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) ranks fourth in important
as a cereal crop after wheat, rice and maize. The cultivated area of grain sorghum
is 150 thousand hectare. Sorghum is grown in Upper Egypt from Giza to Aswan
but most of the area (89 thousand hectare) is concentrated in Assiut and Sohag
governorates and about 37 thousand hectare in Fayoum governorate (Anonymous,
2008). It is adapted to stress conditions; hot weather, drought, salinity
and low soil fertility. Therefore, great governorates efforts are devoted to
increase the cultivated area in Upper Egypt by reclaiming desert land (Hovny
et al., 2000).
In Egypt maize and sorghum are similar in uses, sorghum flour is mixed with
wheat flour for bread making, and stalks are used for fodder or fuel. At present,
grain sorghum is a minor component of livestock feeds. Local demands for cereal,
including grain sorghum are progressively increasing due to dramatic increase
of population and the wide gap between production and consumption (Ali,
Newly genotypes generally need to be tested at many locations and for several
years before being recommended for a given zone. To achieve this goal, multi-environments
trials form the core of varietal testing programs locations. Several studies
have investigated the effect of years and/or locations on agronomic traits on
grain sorghum genotypes (El-Attar et al., 1986;
Nayeem and Bapat, 1989; Bakheit, 1990; Ahmed,
1993; Narkhede et al., 1997; Ali,
2000; Hovny et al., 2005). The differences
among genotypes in agronomic traits are likely due to the different weather
patterns and soil type from year to year and from location to another. Studies
have indicated that temperature plays a vital role in the duration of plant
growth stages, especially during pollination and grain filling. Studies conducted
with genotypes under extreme temperature conditions have indicated that grains
from sorghum plants exposed to low daily temperatures, resulting reduced grain
yield (Francis et al., 1984; Lothrop
et al., 1985).
El-Menshawy (1996), Mahmoud (1997),
Amir (1999), Ali (2000) and Hovny
et al. (2005) reported that most of hybrids were earlier, taller,
higher grain yield and heavier in grain weight than their better parent under
Nachit et al. (1992) stated that the differential
genotypic responses to variable environmental conditions especially when associated
with changes in genotypic ranking, limit the identification of superior, stable
hybrids. Francis et al. (1984) found that hybrids
and populations were relatively more stable in late than in early sowings. The
stable populations in late sowings did not produce yield higher than the average
yield of all genotypes. Hybrids were more stable than populations in early sowings
but the reverse was true in late sowings.
This research was undertaken to (1) evaluate the performance of parental lines and their crosses under different environments for yielding ability and some traits and (2) determine the most stable lines and hybrids.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The basic material consisted of 10 grain sorghum lines introduced from ICRISAT; 5 cytoplasmic male sterile lines (A-lines; A-73, A-93, A-604, A-613 and A-614) and 5 restorers (R-lines; R-210, R-272, R-273, R-295 and R-92010). These parents were sown for hybridization on three different dates 1st, 15th and 30th June Qena Agric. Res. Farm, South Valley Univ. during the two summer seasons of 2006 and 2007 to avoid differences in flowering time and to increase hybrid seed. Each genotype was sown in three rows, 6 m long, 75 cm apart and 20 cm between plants within a row. Twenty five hybrid seeds were obtained.
The 25 hybrids comprising their 10 parents (five B-lines and five R-lines)
and two checks (Shandaweel-1 hybrid and Dorado variety) were tested in field
trials at two locations (Assiut Univ. Exper. Farm and South Valley Univ. Exper.
Farm at Qena). In each location, the materials were sown at early (15th June)
and late (15th July) planting dates in 2007 and 2008 summer seasons. Some physical
and chemical properties of a representative soil sample of the experimental
sites are presented in Table 1. Minimum and maximum daily
temperatures during the growing season were obtained from the metrological station.
at each location (Table 2). The total growing degree days
GDD (Table 3), (base = 10°C) was calculated according
to Saeed and Francis (1984) as follows:
GDD = [(Maximum + Minimum temperature)/2-10 (Zero
|| Some physical and chemical properties of a representative
soil sample of the experimental sites
|*Each value represents the mean of two seasons
|| Monthly high, low and mean temperatures for the 2007 and
2008 growing seasons in Qena and Assiut
|| Dates of planting and total growing degree days (GDD) in
Qena and Assiut where grain sorghum trials were conducted
Genotypes were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications in each environment. Single row plot of 6 m length, 60 cm apart and 20 cm between hills within a row was used. After full emergence, three weeks after planting, seedlings were thinned to two plants per hill; 168700 plants ha-1. All culture practices were applied as recommended for grain sorghum production.
The traits recorded for each plot were days to 50% blooming (when anthers dehiscing half-way down the panicle of 50% plants), plant height; cm, 1000-grain weight; g and grain yield of 3 m in middle portion of the plot (converted to Mg ha-1 at 15% moisture content).
The combined analysis of variance was done according to (Gomez
and Gomez, 1984) after carrying out homogeneity test. Phenotypic stability
parameters; regression coefficients (bi) and mean square deviations
from regression (S2di) were calculated for grain yield
and for each genotype using the model described by Eberhart
and Russell (1966).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The planting dates at the two locations used to evaluate performance of the
F1 hybrids and their parents in this study provided a range of variation
in seasonal climate (Table 2, 3). Seasonal
climate, edaphic and planting dates are three important cultivation environmental
factors influencing crop performance, in general. In terms of genetic effect,
environment often causes instability in non additive genetic effect as also
obtained by Pathak and Sanghi (1992) and Can
et al. (1997).
The combined analysis of variance indicated that year and location effects
were significant (p<0.01) for all the studied traits; days to 50% blooming,
plant height, 1000-grain weight and grain yield (Table 4),
reflecting the differences in climatic and edaphic factors prevailing at the
two locations. Mean squares indicated that the effect of locations was more
important than that of years for all traits. Planting Dates (PD) show significant
(p<0.01) differences for all traits as it would be expected for optimum and
late sowing dates. Highly significant differences among genotypes and their
partitions; parents, crosses, females and males for all traits, which showed
the presence of genetic variability in this material. Male x female interaction
also showed highly significant differences for all traits, indicating specific
||Combined analysis of variance for days to 50% blooming, plant
height, 1000- grain weight and grain yield Mg ha-1 of 25 F1,s
and their 10 parents over all environments
|*, **Significant at 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively
Moreover, the relative of mean squares due to parents vs crosses was high
and significant (p>0.01) for all studied traits, emphasizing great heterotic
effects for these traits. These results are in agreement with these reported
by Patel et al. (1987), Mahmoud
(1997), Amir (1999), Ali (2000)
and Hovny et al. (2005).
Genotypes x year interaction effects were highly significant for all traits
except 1000-grain weight (Table 4). Genotype x location and
genotype x planting date interaction effects were significant (p<0.01) for
all traits, indicating that these traits differed between locations and planting
dates among genotypes (Table 4). Interaction of genotypes
with locations and planting dates was more important than that with years for
all studied traits. Therefore, testing at more locations or dates at given locations
should be done rather than testing in more years. Several workers stated that
genotype x location and genotype x location x year interactions was more important
than genotype x year interaction for sorghum yields (Obilana
and El-Rouby, 1980; Saeed et al., 1984; Ali,
2000). Moreover, genotypes x years x locations x dates interaction was highly
significant for plant height and grain yield, this indicates that it is essential
to evaluate genotypes for such traits under different environments.
Environmental conditions at Assiut were good for sorghum production in both seasons compared to Qena as observed in Table 1 and 2. Early planting was better during growth, pollination and grain filling compared to late planting.
The data presented in Table 5, revealed that early planting registered earlier blooming, taller plant height, heavier 1000-grain weight and higher grain yield than late planting date in both locations in the two years. This suggests that both of temperature and edaphic factors could be playing a significant role in different plant growth stages. Also, Assiut was higher than Qena for all the studied traits over years.
The overall mean of crosses (Table 5) indicates that the crosses were earlier at Assiut compared to Qena location at early and late plantings. Furthermore, Assiut was better than Qena location in plant height, 1000-grain weight and grain yield Mg ha-1 in both of planting dates. Likewise, the crosses mean of days to 50% blooming and plant height was highly significant earlier and taller than the two cheks; Shandaweel 1 and Dorado. Respects to 1000-grain weight, the crosses mean (25.5 g) was highly significant heavier than Shandaweel 1, but not from Dorado. However, 10 crosses showed highly significant heavier grain weight than Dorado (24.6 g). The overall mean of crosses for grain yield (7.55 Mg ha-1) was significantly higher than for the best check Shandaweel 1 (7.1 Mg ha-1), and ten crosses highly significant outyielded the best check (Table 5).
Comparisons of F1 hybrids with each of their parents and the two
commercially checks (Shandaweel-1 hybrid and Dorado variety) exhibited that
most of hybrids were significantly earlier blooming, taller plants, heavier
1000-grain weight and higher grain yield than both their parents and checks
for all studied traits overall environments (Table 5). These
data supports the results obtained by Borgonovi (1985),
Tadesse and Debelo (1995), El-Menshawy
(1996), Mahmoud (1997), Amir (1999),
Ali (2000) and Hovny et al.
The joint regression analysis of variance showed highly significant yield
differences among F1 hybrids as well as their parents (Table 6).
The relative yield performance of crosses and their parents varied from environment
to another as was indicated by significant hybrids x environments and parents
x environments interactions.
||Average performance of 25 F1, s and their 10 parents at the
two locations and two sowing dates over years for days to 50% blooming,
plant height, 1000-grain weight and grain yield
|| The joint regression analysis of variance for grain yield
for F1 crosses and their parents
|*, ** Significant at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels,
However, both F1 hybrids and their parents showed highly significant differences in deviations from regression. These results suggest that the magnitudes of genotype x environment interactions in this set of materials are largely due to differential nonlinear response of genotypes to varying environments.
Yield stability of genotype is evaluated from estimates of stability parameters;
bi and s2di (Table 7, Fig.
1). Although the grain yield of F1 hybrids and their parents
were influenced by year, location and dates, the fluctuations for a majority
of them were considered stable according to Eberhart and Russell analysis. (A-73
x R-272), (A-604 x R-92010) and (A-613 x R-210) could be considered the best
stable hybrids. It has a b- values of 1.05, 0.95 and 0.95, respectively and
produced yield higher than average of all crosses. This indicates that these
hybrids may be suitable for growing in a wide range of environments. R-273 also
seemed to be the best stable parent since it has a b-value of 1.03 and produced
yield higher than average yield of all parents. These genotypes would be promising
cultivars. Bakheit (1990), Ahmed (1993)
and Ali (2000) also demonstrated that some genotypes which
were superior in grain yield showed average stability. In addition, grain yield
was considered consistently better in favorable environments with the cross
(A-614 x R-272) and three parents; (A-613, R-272 and R-92010) because of their
high b-value (bi>1.0). This emphasizes that these genotypes are
less environmentally sensitive. Similar results were obtained by Muppidathi
et al. (1995) and Ali (2000).
||Genotypes average performance over eight environments and
stability parameters of 25 F1 crosses and 10 parents for grain
|*, **Significantly different from unity for (bi)
and from zero for (S2di) at 0.05 and 0.01 probability
|| Distribution of stability parameters for grain yield
However, grain yield for the crosses (A-73 x R-273), (A-93 x R-295), (A-604
x R-210) and (A-604 x R-272) and one parent; (A-73) had low b-values, and thus,
was considered relatively better in less favorable environments (Table
6, Fig. 1). Meanwhile, grain yield for the crosses no.
4, 6, 7, 8, 21 and 25 had high b-values and thus, were considered unstable.
This suggested that these crosses are unstable particularly in low temperature
The results indicated that stability analysis for grain yield demonstrated that most F1 hybrids had higher yields than their parents, but the parents were relatively more stable.
Results from this study showed that among the 25 F1 crosses and their parents under investigation, genotype x year interaction effect was significant for days to 50% blooming, plant height and grain yield, except 1000-grain weight. Significant genotype x location and genotype x planting date interaction effects was observed for all traits. Significant genotype x year x location x planting date interaction effects was observed for grain yield. This suggests that genotypes need to be tested under several environments before being recommended for given zone. Three crosses; crosses (A-73 x R-272), (A-604 x R-92010) and (A-613 x R-210) and produced yield higher than average of all crosses. These crosses are considered as promising cultivars, it can be tested in large scale and produce the high yielded crosses commercially. Only one parent; (R-273) was the best stable and gave yield higher than average of all parents. This parent can be used in a breeding program for growing in a wide range of environments.
Ahmed, T.A., 1993.
Evaluation of grain sorghum germplasm for some agronomic characteristics. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture Assiut University, Egypt.
Ali, M.A., 2000.
Heterosis, combining ability and stability studies in grain sorghum. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture Assiut University, Egypt.
Amir, A.A., 1999.
Line x tester analysis for combining ability in grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor
(L.) Moench]. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture Assiut University, Egypt.
Bakheit, B.R., 1990.
Stability of grain yield and its components of grain sorghum genotypes [Sorghum bicolor
(L.) Moench] as affected by different irrigation regimes. Cereal Res. Commun., 18: 117-124.
Borgonovi, R.A., 1985.
Heterosis in the biological yield of grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor
(L.) Moench]. Revista Brasileira de Genet., 8: 2-431.Direct Link |
Can, N.D., S. Nakamura and T. Yoshida, 1997.
Combining ability and genotype x environmental interaction in early maturing grain sorghum for summer seeding. Jpn. J. Crop Sci., 4: 698-705.Direct Link |
Eberhart, S.A. and W.A. Russell, 1966.
Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci., 6: 36-40.CrossRef | Direct Link |
El-Attar, F.I.H., M.M.H. El-Nahal and M.F.S. Fayed, 1986.
Stability parameters for some recently developed grain sorghum varieties and hybrids in Egypt. Ann. Agric. Fac. Ain. Shams. Univ. Cairo Egypt, 31: 299-312.
El-Menshawy, M.M.S., 1996.
A study on the production of grain sorghum hybrids. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture Assiut University, Egypt.
Francis, C.A., M. Saeed, L.A. Nelson and R. Moomaw, 1984.
Yield stability of sorghum hybrids and random-mating populations in early and late planting dates. Crop sci., 24: 1109-1112.Direct Link |
Gomez, K.A. and A.A. Gomez, 1984.
Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Edn., John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA., ISBN: 978-0-471-87092-0, Pages: 704Direct Link |
Hovny, M.R.A., K.M. Mahmoud, M.A. Ali and H.I. Ali, 2005.
The effect of environment on performance, heterosis and combining ability in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor
(L.) Moench). Proceedings of the 11th Conference of Agronomy, Nov. 15-16, Agronomy Dept., Faculty Agriculture, Assiut University, 689-699
Hovny, M.R.A., B.R. Bakheit, E.A. Hassaballa and A.A. Amir, 2000.
Line x tester analysis for combining ability in grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor
(L.) Moench]. Assiut. J. Agric. Sci., 31: 147-160.
Lothrop, J.E., R.E. Atkins and O.S. Smith, 1985.
Variability for yield and yield components in IAPIR grain sorghum random-mating population. II- Correlation, estimated gains from selection and correlated responses to selection. Crop Sci., 25: 240-244.
Mahmoud, K.M., 1997.
Combining ability and heterosis studies in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor
(L.) Moench). M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Assiut University, Egypt.
Muppidathi, N., N. Subbaraman, P. Muthuvel and S. Rajarathinam, 1995.
Phenotypic stability for yield and its components in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor
(L.) Moench). Madras Agric. J., 82: 18-21.
Nachit, M.N., M.E. Sorrells, R.W. Zobel, H.G. Gauch, R.A. Fischer and W.R. Coffman, 1992.
Association of environmental variables with sites mean grain yield and components of genotype-environment interaction in durum wheat. J. Genet. Breed., 46: 369-372.
Narkhede, B.N., M.S. Shinde and S.P. Patil, 1997.
Stability performance of sorghum varieties for grain and fodder yields. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 22: 179-181.
Nayeem, K.A. and D.R. Bapat, 1989.
Phenotypic adaptability of characters related to productivity in grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor
. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breeding, 49: 195-201.Direct Link |
Obilana, A.T. and M.M. El-Rouby, 1980.
Cultivar x environment interactions in sorghum, (Sorghum bicolor
(L.) Moench). Theor. Appl. Genet., 56: 80-84.CrossRef |
Pathak, H.C. and A.K. Sanghi, 1992.
Combining ability and heterosis studies in forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor
(L.) Moench) across environments. Indian J. Genet., 52: 75-85.Direct Link |
Patel, R.H., K.S. Desai and M.S. Desai, 1987.
Heterosis in multiple environments for grain sorghum. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 57: 1-4.Direct Link |
Saeed, M. and C.A. Francis, 1984.
Association of weather variables with genotype x environment interaction in grain sorghum. Crop Sci., 24: 13-16.
Saeed, M., C.A. Francis and J.F. Rajewski, 1984.
Maturity effects on genotype x environment interactions in grain sorghum. Agron. J., 76: 55-58.
Tadesse, M. and A. Debelo, 1995.
Genotype x environment interaction for flowering, plant height and grain yield of grain sorghum. Int. Sorghum Millets Newsletter, 36: 70-71.
Agriculture economy year book. Ministry of Agriculture, R.E.E.