Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Abstract
Fulltext PDF
References
Research Article
 

Detection of Epstein Barr Virus among Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors



M. Eghbali, M. Ghane, M. Mirinargesi and A. Zare Mehrjardi
 
ABSTRACT

Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) infects more than 90% of the world's human population. An association is proposed between EBV infection and occurrence of breast cancer, with a large difference in the results reported by different researchers. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of EBV among benign and malignant breast tumors. A total of 24 carcinomas and 24 fibroadenomas paraffin embedded tumoral tissue samples were obtained from the pathology sections of Toos and Firoozgar hospitals in Tehran, Iran. All samples had been collected from patients from June 2011 to February 2012. DNA was extracted from all samples and their infection with EBV was examined by PCR technique. The results obtained by this study showed that 4 out of 24 carcinoma samples (16.6%) were infected by EBV, while the number of fibroadenoma samples infected by this virus was 1 (4.1%). The frequency of EBV infection was different among malignant and benign tumors. However, no association was observed between EBV infection and the formation of malignant or benign tumors based on the Chi-square test. In relation to some other studies, this analysis does not confirm any association between EBV infection and breast cancer occurrence. However, due to the high frequency of EBV infection among breast cancer patients, future studies are needed to elucidate the possible role of the virus in the disease.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

M. Eghbali, M. Ghane, M. Mirinargesi and A. Zare Mehrjardi, 2012. Detection of Epstein Barr Virus among Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors. Asian Journal of Biological Sciences, 5: 365-371.

DOI: 10.3923/ajbs.2012.365.371

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajbs.2012.365.371
 
Received: July 15, 2012; Accepted: September 11, 2012; Published: October 12, 2012

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the uncontrolled growth of abnormal cells, which is created in various regions of the breast. This cancer may develop in different tissues such as ducts, which transfer breast milk, production tissue of the milk and in non-glandular tissue. Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women (Parkin et al., 2005). Every year, a large number of women are afflicted by breast cancer, of which the disease is fatal for a number of sufferers (Khorshid, 2011). According to the data presented by the US National Institute of Cancer, out of every 8 women, one individual will be inflicted with breast cancer (Wong et al., 2002). Although genetic factors, such as mutation in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, play an important role in the occurrence of the cancer (Miki et al., 1994; Wooster et al., 1995), other susceptible factors cannot be neglected. For example, the risk of suffering from breast cancer increases with age (Abbasi et al., 2009; Alamelumangai and Devishree, 2012). Almost, three quarters of the cases of affliction occur in women who are more than 50 years old. Except for age, other risk factors include: family history of breast cancer, puberty before the age of 13 years, menopause after the age of 51 years, women who have never become pregnant and those who have become pregnant for the first time after the age of 30 years, suffering from obesity, particularly after menopause, poor diet (Hafidh et al., 2009), excess alcohol consumption and viral infection (Wooster et al., 1995).

The studies carried out in two recent decades have provided the role of viruses in the occurrence of breast cancer. One of the most important viruses is the Epstein Barr Virus, which is a member of the herpes viridea family. Attributes of this virus have a double strand DNA and icosahedral symmetry. This nucleocapsid has been surrounded by a covering being of the lipid genus type (Izham et al., 2011). EBV is a carcinogenic virus and known as one of the prevalent viruses around the world. At present, this virus is identified as the cause of a number of varieties of cancer, including African Burkitt’s lymphoma (Epstein et al., 1964; Irshaid et al., 2010), Hodgkin lymphoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma (Nikakhlagh et al., 2010), Lymphoproliferative disorder (Hsu and Glaser, 2000; Niedobitek et al., 2001) and gastric carcinomas (Perrigoue et al., 2005). The genetic material of the EBV was identified for the first time in the breast tumors of Japanese women by Horiuchi et al. (1994). After that, more than a hundred studies were conducted regarding the relationship of EBV with breast cancer, which have been accompanied by contradictory results. Some researchers reported the presence of the EBV in breast cancer (Labrecque et al., 1995; Glaser et al., 1998; Bonnet et al., 1999; Hemminki and Dong, 1999; Fina et al., 2001; Trablesi et al., 2008), while others have reported the lack of identification of the genetic material of this virus in samples of the breast tumor (Chu et al., 1998; Deshpande et al., 2002; Hermann and Niedobitek, 2003; Perrigoue et al., 2005). These contradictory findings may have been the result from the methods used in the diagnosis of the EBV genome (Lawson et al., 2006).

The hypothesis that the presence of EBV in the tumor tissues of the breast may have resulted from the infiltration of the lymphocytes infected with this virus was previously raised by a number of researchers. The studies conducted by Labrecque et al. (1995) showed clearly that EBV genetic materials existing mostly of cancerous cells and have benefitted from the lack of presence in the infiltrated lymphocytes. Also, it was confirmed that the EBV genetic materials in the epithelial cell available in the milk samples of healthy women are identifiable too (Junker et al., 1991). Because of the lack of documented information regarding the frequency of the Epstein Barr Virus in the benign and malignant tumors, the current study was designed and executed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Paraffin embedded samples of the breast carcinoma (N = 24) and fibroadenoma (N = 24) were collected from the pathology ward of Toos and Firozgar hospitals of Tehran, IRAN in 2011-2012. The carcinogenicity of the samples was diagnosed with the aid of the pathologist and based on the Richardson classification system.

Protocol of deparaffin of the samples: At first, ten 5μ cutting were provided from the paraffin blocks by the sterile microtome blade (N35) and transferred to sterile containers. In order for deparaffinization to occur, the samples were left in a xylene solution (Merck Germany) for 30 min. To dehydrate the samples, they were placed for 10 sec in ethanol solutions of 100, 80, 60 and 40% concentrate (Merck Germany), respectively. The tissue obtained was then transferred to sterile microtubes and stored under -20°C until the process of DNA extraction took place.

DNA extraction: Extraction of DNA from the tissue was implemented according to the instructions of the manufacturing company (Qiagene, Lot No: 11872534, Cat No: 51306). The purity of the extracted DNA was analyzed based on absorbance of the extracted DNA at 260 and 280 nm wavelengths by biophotometer (Eppendorf-Germany).

PCR method: Specific Primers produced by TAG Copenhagen (Denmark) were used to amplify the EBV gene. The sequences of forward and reverse primers were 5'-GTG TGC GTC GTG CCG GGG CAG CCA C-3' and 5'-ACC TGG GAG GGC CAT CGC AAG CTC C-3', respectively (Liloglou et al., 1994).

Each reaction was performed in a total volume of 25 μL, which contained 14.5 μL of molecular biology-grade water (Sigma Aldrich Company LTD., USA), 2.5 μL of 10xPCR buffer (Promega, USA), 1 μL of 10 pM of forward and reverse PCR primers, 1 μL of 10 mM dNTPs (Promega, USA), 0.5 μL of smart Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, USA), 1 μL of 50 mM MgCl2 (Promega, USA) and 5 μL of DNA template. The negative control tube contained the same PCR reagents as above but had 5 μL of water substituted for the DNA template. PCR amplification conditions on thermocycler (Biorad-Germany) were as follows: 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 52°C for 1 min and 72°C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. An aliquot of all PCR products was run on a 1.5% (w/v) agarose gels with a 100 bp DNA ladder (Fermentas-Russia) and electrophoresed at 75 V for 40 min. The bands were visualized using ethidium bromide staining and photographed after UV treatment by a transilluminator (UV doc, England).

Statistical analysis: Chi square test was used to determine whether there was any significant difference between the frequency of EBV in the carcinoma and fibroadenoma samples and its relationship with the breast cancer (SPSS software 17).

RESULTS

The number of patients who suffered from the carcinoma based on age groups were: below 35 years old, 5 patients (21%), 35 to 55 years old, 12 patients (50%) and over 55 years old, 7 patients (29%). The average tumor size in 6 individuals (25%) was smaller than 2 cm and in 18 individuals (75%) the average tumor size was larger than 2 cm. Regarding the lymphatic glands under than arms, involvement of these glands was not diagnosed in 6 individuals (25%). But, involvement of the lymphatic glands was observed in 18 individuals (75%). Among the studied carcinoma samples, 22 samples of ductal carcinoma (92%), one sample of the lobular carcinoma (4%) and one sample of the mucinous carcinoma (4%) were diagnosed. Four individuals (16.6%) suffered from stage I malignant tumor, 9 individuals (37.5%) reached stage II and 11 individuals (45.9%) were diagnosed with a stage III (Table 1).

Regarding the demographic information of patients afflicted with fibroadenoma, only the age of the individuals was available. 17 individuals (71%) suffering from fibroadenoma were in the age group under 35 years and 7 individuals (29%) were in the age group of 35-55 years.

In order to identify the DNA of virus in the tissue samples, the PCR technique was used. The presence of a 375 bp band indicates the presence of EBV DNA in the sample (Fig. 1). In summary, four samples (16.6%) were positive from the view point of the presence of EBV among the 24 patients. One individual was in the age group under 35 years, two individuals were in the age group of 35 to 55 years and one individual was over 55 years old. Each of the 4 patients infected with the virus also suffered from the ductal carcinoma and average tumor size was larger than 2 cm.

Fig. 1: EBV amplification products analyses in a 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide, the presence of a 375 bp band indicates the presence of EBV DNA in the sample, Lane M: Marker size 100 bp, Lane 1-2: Amplified EBV DNA, Lane 3: Negative control

Table 1: Demographics of the breast cancer
The No. of specimens for evaluation = 24, SBR: Scarff, Bloom and Richardson

Involvement of the lymph was positive in 1 individual (25%). Two individuals infected with virus suffered from stage III while stage I was diagnosed in one patient and stage II was diagnosed in another patient. Out of 24 samples of fibroadenoma, one sample (4.1%) possessed the genome for this virus with this patient placed in the age group under 35 years. The statistical analysis did not show a significant relationship between the frequencies of this virus in the samples studied.

DISCUSSION

Epstein Barr virus is a prevalent virus so that 90% of the world’s human population is infected (Gratama and Emberg, 1995). Infection resulting from this virus in developing countries occurs predominantly during childhood, while this condition is observed in teenagers (Moghim et al., 2007). The hypothesis exists that the infection resulting from EBV can create various cancers (Lawson et al., 2006). For example, Burkitt lymphoma in Africa, a nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the people of the southeast and Hodgkin lymphoma in western societies are amongst those cancers attributed to these viruses (Irshaid et al., 2010; Nikakhlagh et al., 2010; Hsu and Glaser, 2000; Niedobitek et al., 2001). This research, which was conducted to determine the frequency of EBV on the benign and malignant tumor, leads to the identification of this virus in each of the two kinds of tumors. Its prevalence in the ductal carcinoma and fibroadenoma was reported 16.6 and 4.1%, respectively. The frequency of EBV has been confirmed in a high percentage of patients suffering from breast cancer over the last decade. For example, Fina et al. (2001), Murray et al. (2003), Xue et al. (2003), Tsai et al. (2005) and Arbach et al. (2006) confirmed the presence of this virus in 32, 21, 40, 45 and 46%, breast tumors, respectively.

While the failure to identify the virus has been reported by a large number of researchers, including Gaffey et al. (1993), Lespagnard et al. (1995), Glaser et al. (1998), Chu et al. (1998), Dadmanesh et al. (2001), Deshpande et al. (2002) and Perrigoue et al. (2005), these contradictory results could be from the usage of different diagnosing techniques or usage of the paraffined fix tissues or new tissues.

Most of the studies conducted, which have been able to show the presence of the virus’s genome in tumor tissues, used the PCR technique. Compared to PCR, the technique such as in situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry often reported the negative results (Lawson et al., 2006).

Another reason for the failure to identify the EBV in breast tumors, conducted by Murray et al. (2003) and Perrigoue et al. (2005) has been attributed to the presence of EBV in the infiltrated lymphocytes in breast tumors, which this hypothesis was denied by a number of exact studies. Identification of the genetic material of EBV in about half of the milk samples of the healthy women is a confirmation of the presence of this virus in the epithelial cells (Junker et al., 1991).

Although, the expression of the EBV genetic materials in breast tumor compared to the tumors such as nasopharyngeal carcinoma or Burkitt lymphomas vary less, the presence of the virus in the epithelial cells can be a cofactor for the formation of the cancer (Lawson et al., 2006).

CONCLUSION

The results obtained by this study show the presence of EBV in both malignant and benign tumors of breast and it seems that prevention from infection with this virus can play a more effective role in the reduction of the affliction with breast tumor. However, further studies are needed to confirm the role of EBV in tumor formation.

REFERENCES
Abbasi, S., P. Ismail., F. Othman., R. Rosli and C. Azimi, 2009. Estrogen receptor-α gene, codon 594 (G3242A) polymorphism among iranian women with breast cancer: A case control study. Asian J. Sci. Res., 2: 51-60.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Alamelumangai, N. and J. Devishree, 2012. Automated clustering of cancer cells using fuzzy C means with repulsions in ultrasound images. J. Artif. Intel., 55: 14-25.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Arbach, H., V. Viglasky, F. Lefeu, J.M. Guinebretiere and V. Ramirez et al., 2006. Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) genome and expression in breast cancer tissue: Effect of EBV infection of breast cancer cells on resistance to paclitaxel (Taxol). J. Virol., 80: 845-853.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Bonnet, M., J.M. Guinebretiere, E. Kremmer, V. Grunewald, E. Benhamou, G. Contesso and I. Joab, 1999. Detection of Epstein-Barr virus in invasive breast cancers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 91: 1376-1381.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  

Chu, J.S., C.C. Chen and K.J. Chang, 1998. In situ detection of Epstein-Barr virus in breast cancer. Cancer Lett., 124: 53-57.
CrossRef  |  

Dadmanesh, F., J.L. Peterse, A. Sapino, A. Fonelli and V. Eusebi, 2001. Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of the breast: Lack of evidence of Epstein-Barr virus infection. Histopathology, 38: 54-63.
PubMed  |  

Deshpande, C.G., S. Badve, N. Kidwai and R. Longnecker, 2002. Lack of expression of the EBV gene products, EBERs, EBNA1, LMP1 and LMP2A, in breast cancer cells. Lab. Invest., 82: 1193-1199.
PubMed  |  

Epstein, M.A., B.G. Achong and Y.M. Barr, 1964. Virus particles in cultured lymphoblasts from Burkitt's lymphoma. Lancet, 1: 702-703.
PubMed  |  

Fina, F., S. Romain, L.H. Ouafik, J. Palmari and F.B. Ayed et al., 2001. Frequency and genome loaad of Epstein-barr virus in 509 breast cancers from different geographical areas. Br. J. Cancer, 84: 783-790.
CrossRef  |  

Gaffey, M.J., H.F. Frierson Jr., S.E. Mills, J.C. Boyd and R.J. Zarbo et al., 1993. Medullary carcinoma of the breast. Identification of lymphocyte subpopulations and their significance. Mod. Pathol., 6: 721-728.
PubMed  |  

Glaser, S.L., R.F. Ambinder, J.A. DiGiuseppe, P.L. Horn-Ross and J.L. Hsu, 1998. Absence of Epstein-Barr virus EBER-1 transcripts in an epidemiologically diverse group of breast cancers. Int. J. Cancer, 75: 555-558.
PubMed  |  

Gratama, J.W. and I. Emberg, 1995. Molecular epidemiology of epstein-barr virus infection. Adv. Cancer Res., 67: 197-255.
CrossRef  |  

Hafidh, R.R., F. Abas, A.S. Abdulamir, F. Jahanshiri, F. Abu Bakar and Z. Sekawi, 2009. A review: Cancer research of natural products in Asia. Int. J. Cancer Res., 5: 69-82.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Hemminki, K. and C. Dong, 1999. Detection of Epstein-Barr virus in invasive breast cancers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 91: 2126-2127.
PubMed  |  

Hermann, K. and G. Niedobitek, 2003. Lack of evidence for an association of Epstein-Barr virus infection with breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res., 5: R13-R17.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Horiuchi, K., K. Mishima, M. Ohsawa and K. Aozasa, 1994. Carcinoma of stomach and breast with lymphoid stroma: localisation of Epstein-Barr virus. J. Clin. Pathol., 47: 538-540.
PubMed  |  

Hsu, J.L. and S.L. Glaser, 2000. Epstein-Barr virus-associated malignancies: Epidemiologic patterns and etiologic implications. Crit. Rev. Hematol. Oncol., 34: 27-53.
PubMed  |  

Irshaid, F., A. Jaran, F. Dilmi, K. Tarawneh, R. Hadeth and A. Al-Khatib, 2010. Prevalence of epstein-barr virus latent membrane protein-1 in Jordanian Patients with hodgkin's lymphoma and non-hodgkin's lymphoma. J. Biol. Sci., 10: 507-513.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Izham, N.S.A.S., H. Zuridah, S. Rashidah, O. Azizon and N.A. Zeenathul, 2011. In situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction methods for the detection of Epstein-Barr virus RNA in breast cancer specimens. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res., 5: 4392-4397.
Direct Link  |  

Junker, A.K., E.E. Thomas, A.G.I. Radcliffe, R.B. Forsyth, A.G.F. Davidson and L. Rymo, 1991. Epstein-Barr virus shedding in breast milk. Am. J. Med. Sci., 392: 220-223.
PubMed  |  

Khorshid, F.A., 2011. The cytotoxic effect of PM 701 and its fractions on cell proliferation of breast cancer cells, MCF7. Am. J. Drug Discovery Dev., 1: 200-208.
CrossRef  |  

Labrecque, L.G., D.M. Barnes, I.S. Fentiman and B.E. Griffin, 1995. Epstein-Barr virus in epithelial cell tumors: A breast cancer study. Cancer Res., 55: 39-45.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Lawson, J.S., W.H. Gunzburg and N. Whitaker, 2006. Viruses and human breast cancer. Future Microbiol., 1: 33-51.
PubMed  |  

Lespagnard, L., P. Cochaux, D. Larsimont, M. Degeyter, T. Velu and R. Heimann, 1995. Absence of Epstein-Barr virus in medullary carcinoma of the breast as demonstrated by immunophenotyping, In situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 103: 449-452.
PubMed  |  

Liloglou, T., A. Giannoudis, M. Ergazaki, M. Koffa and D. Spandidos, 1994. Epstein-Barr virus by the PCR in immunosuppressed and immunocompromised patients. Oncol. Rep., 1: 809-811.
PubMed  |  

Miki, Y., J. Swensen, D. Shattuck-Eidens, P.A. Futreal and K. Harshman et al., 1994. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science, 266: 66-71.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Moghim, S.H., M. Chalabi, A. Moghareh Abed, F. Rezaei and H. Tamizifar, 2007. Prevalence of epstein-barr virus type 1 in patients with chronic periodontitis by nested-PCR. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 10: 4547-4550.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Murray, P.G., D. Lissauer, J. Junying, G. Davies and S. Moore et al., 2003. Reactivity with a monoclonal antibody to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nuclear antigen 1 defines a subset of aggressive breast cancers in the absence of the EBV genome. Cancer Res., 63: 2338-2343.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Niedobitek, G., N. Meru and H.J. Delecluse, 2001. Epstein-Barr virus infection and human malignancies. Int. J. Exp. Pathol., 82: 149-170.
PubMed  |  

Nikakhlagh, S., F. Rahim, A. Khodadadi and N. Saki, 2010. The association between epstein-barr virus with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in patients from Southwestern Region of Iran. Int. J. Cancer Res., 6: 89-94.
CrossRef  |  

Parkin, D.M., F. Bray, J. Ferlay and P. Pisani, 2005. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA: Cancer J. Clin., 55: 74-108.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Perrigoue, J.G., J.A. den Boon, A. Friedl, M.A. Newton, P. Ahlquist and B. Sugden, 2005. Lack of association between EBV and breast carcinoma. Cancer Epid. Biomark. Prev., 14: 809-814.
PubMed  |  

Trablesi, A., S. Rammeh, W. Stita, M. Mokni, A. Mourou and S. Korbi, 2008. Detection of Epstein-Barr virus in breast cancers with lymphoid stroma. Ann. Biol. Clin. (Paris), 66: 59-62.
PubMed  |  

Tsai, J.H., C.H. Tsai, M.H. Cheng, S.J. Lin, F.L. Xu and C.C. Yang, 2005. Association of viral factors with non-familial breast cancer in Taiwan by comparison with non-cancerous, fibroadenoma, and thyroid tumor tissues. J. Med. Virol., 75: 276-281.
PubMed  |  

Wong, M., J.S. Pagano, J.T. Schiller, S.S. Tevethia, N. Raab-Traub and J. Gruber, 2002. New associations of human papillomavirus, Simian virus 40, and Epstein-Barr virus with human cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 94: 1832-1836.
PubMed  |  

Wooster, R., G. Bignell, J. Lancaster, S. Swift and S. Seal et al., 1995. Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature, 378: 789-792.
PubMed  |  

Xue, S.A., I.A. Lampert, G.S. Haldane, J.E. Bridger and B.E. Griffin, 2003. Epstein-Barr virus gene expression in human breast cancer: Protagonist or passenger? Br. J. Cancer, 89: 113-119.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

©  2019 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved
Fulltext PDF References Abstract