
ABSTRACT
Background and Objective: Fish is a highly desirable foodstuff as it possesses excellent nutritional components, it is man’s most important source of high-quality protein. Fish supplies, however, are dwindling due mainly to pollution of the aquatic environment. Toxicants enter fish, they affect fish organs, bioaccumulate and invariably affect the end consumer of such contaminated fish. This study aimed at identifying the bacterial flora present in the gut and gills of Oreochromis niloticus and Clarias gariepinus. Materials and Methods: This research was conducted to assess the bacterial load on fish species found in Ureje Reservoir in Ekiti State. The most popular freshwater fish species in Ureje Reservoir are Oreochromis niloticus and Clarias gariepinus. Samples of each fish species were kept in sterile bags and transported to the laboratory for bacterial analysis. Results: Eight bacteria species were identified (Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhimurium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Proteus spp., Enterococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp.). The highest colony count was found in the gut of Clarias gariepinus. The presence of these bacteria species could pose a potential public health threat to consumers. Conclusion: It is recommended that better handling and processing methods should be adopted to eliminate health risks to fresh fish consumers.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation
How to cite this article
DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2022.1.8
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajava.2022.1.8
INTRODUCTION
Fish is considered one of the most nutritive and highly desirable foodstuff, as fish meat has excellent nutritional value being rich in proteins, vitamins and unsaturated fatty acids. It is also extremely perishable and the safe consumption requires adequate sanitary conditions from the moment of catch, through preparation, sale and consumption1. The most popular freshwater fish species in Ureje Reservoir are Oreochromis niloticus and Clarias gariepinus. On a global scale, fish and fish products are the most important source of protein and it is estimated that more than 30% of fish for human consumption comes from aquaculture2,3. Fishery products are important not only from a nutritional point of view but also as an item of international trade and foreign exchange earner for some countries in the world3. Fish and shellfish are highly perishable and prone to vast variations in quality due to differences in species, environment and feeding habits3. Fish is a vital source of food for people and contributes about 60% of the world's supply of protein4. The 60% of the inhabitants of developing countries derive 30% of their animal protein requirement from fish4,5. Today, fish provides more than one billion poor people with most of their daily animal protein. Fish provides nutrients and micronutrients that are essential for cognitive and physical development, especially in children and are an important part of a healthy diet. As an affordable animal source of protein in some of the poorest countries, fish is the primary source of nutrition, creating a growing demand for this staple. However, fish supplies are failing to meet demand and there are major shortages in some critically poor countries where they are needed most. A greater part of the pollutants exhibits biomagnification and bioaccumulation capabilities with a broad spectrum of impacts and stresses on aquatic organisms6. This leads to a steady decline in aquatic flora and fauna, particularly fishes. Aquatic organisms, like fish, accumulate pollutants directly from contaminated water and indirectly through the food chain7,8. Entry of contaminants into the body of fish may lead to the disruption of physiological functions.
Ureje Reservoir is located on the Ureje River, Ado Ekiti. This reservoir is important in controlling floods and releasing water in the dry season to the surrounding areas. Ureje Reservoir is an artificial lake in Ado Ekiti, it was established by the government to provide water for domestic use to residents of the town. In recent times, there has been the rapid expansion of the town which is also accompanied by poor disposal of sewage and garbage. Runoff may wash some of these poorly disposed of wastes into the water body and contaminate the water and fish species that inhabit it with pathogenic bacteria.
This can be a potential threat to the health of people who consume such fish. This work aimed at identifying the bacterial flora present in the gut and gills of Oreochromis niloticus and Clarias gariepinus which are two of the most abundant fish species found in it.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study area: This study was carried out in January to March, 2020. The study area is the Ureje Reservoir. Ureje Reservoir is located on the Ureje River, Ado Ekiti, with a latitude and longitude of 7°35'59"N and 5°12'46"E, respectively.
Collection of fish samples: Freshly caught samples of Oreochromis niloticus and Clarias gariepinus were purchased at the fish landing site from artisanal fishermen operating at Ureje Reservoir. Samples of each species were kept in sterile nylon bags and preserved in an ice chest before being transported to the laboratory for bacterial analysis. Sterile dissecting instruments were used to take samples Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus from the mouth, gill and gut of the fishes’ bodies for analysis.
Morphometric of the fish: Morphometric parameters of the fish samples such as weight, standard length, head length, gill length and buccal depth were measured with the use of top-loading balance for weights and graduated measuring ruler for lengths. This was done for all the samples of fish taken from the reservoir and their values were recorded to two decimal places.
Preparation of the serial dilutions: Distilled water 90-100 mL was dispensed into the conical flask as diluents for each sample and 9 mL of these diluents was dispensed into McCartney bottles for serial dilutions. The diluents were autoclaved at 121°C for 15 min. Nutrient agar was also autoclaved along with the diluents and both were kept to cool.
Fish samples: Using sterile dissecting tools, mortar and pestle, samples were taken from the fish (mouth, gill and gut). Each sample was pounded into pieces and properly mixed. Each of these samples was added into 9ml sterile distilled water in the test tubes and thoroughly mixed to make a dilution of 101. Sevenfold serial dilution was made using a sterile pipette (101 to 107). However further dilution till 109 was made and used where required to allow easy colony counting.
Inoculation into the solid medium: The 1 mL of inoculum was pipette into sterile Petri dishes. This was done in duplicates and also labelled sequentially. Using the pour plate method, about 15 mL of sterilized molten Nutrient agar medium, cooled to about 45°C was poured into the inoculated Petri dishes within 15 min of original dilution. Both the sample dilution and agar medium were mixed thoroughly and uniformly and allowed to gel.
Some plates were also prepared as a control to check on the sterility of the diluents, glassware and agar medium. The possibility of air contamination was also assessed with the use of control plates. All poured Petri dishes were incubated in an inverted position at 37°C for 24 hrs.
Using the same procedure described above for the total bacteria count with nutrient agar as a general-purpose medium, the following list of indicator bacteria of faecal and industrial pollution were isolated from the fish organs (mouth, gill and gut) using their respective selective medium: Coliform bacteria and E. coli were isolated with MacConkey agar, Staphylococcus spp., were isolated with Mannitol salt agar, Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp., were isolated with salmonella shigella agar (SSA), Vibrio spp., were isolated with thiosulphate citrate bile salt agar (TCBS), Streptococcus faecalis were isolated with blood agar whose 5% is horse blood and lastly, Clostridium spp., were isolated with reinforced clostridium agar (RCA).
Media preparation: Media used in this study were prepared according to the manufacturer’s instruction and sterilized using the autoclave at 121°C for 15 min.
Nutrient agar: Dehydrated powder (28 g) of nutrient agar was dissolved in 1000 mL of distilled water in a conical flask, mixed, properly corked and sterilized using the autoclave at 121°C for 15 min.
Colonial and microscopic examination: From the isolated colonies, the colonial characteristics were first determined with the colony counter magnifying lens, which was also used to count the numbers of the colony in each plate. Further clarification was then conducted with the use of a light microscope, especially morphological characteristics. The shape and arrangement and some other characteristics of the colonies were examined and recorded9. Also, Gram’s staining was carried out.
Biochemical test: The following biochemical tests were carried out at the microbiology laboratory in Ekiti State University and used to further identify the bacteria isolated and also to identify any other bacteria that could be present.
Catalase test: A drop of 3% hydrogen peroxide was placed at the centre of a slide and a sterile wire loop was used to take a small portion of the micro-organism to be identified from the nutrient agar plate into the hydrogen peroxide for immediate gas bubble formation. Quick production of gas bubbles or foaming indicates positive result9.
Coagulase test: A drop of physiological saline was placed on two separate slides. A colony of the test organism was emulsified in each drop to make a suspension. A drop of plasma was then added and mixed gently with the suspension. Clumping (due to coagulation) of the organisms within 10 sec, when viewed under the microscope, indicates a positive result. This was done for the plate suspected to be Staphylococcus aureus9.
Motility test: A loopful of growth was inoculated into peptone water broth and incubated overnight. A wet preparation from the peptone water culture was prepared and examined under a microscope at ×40 objective lens. Darting movement of the organism indicate a positive result9.
Citrate utilization test: A slant of a citrate agar was aseptically inoculated with the organisms to be identified using a sterile wire loop. The inoculated citrate agar slant was incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs and was thereafter monitored daily for up to 4 days for possible colour change. Blue colouration indicates positive test9.
Indole reaction test: The micro-organisms to be identified were inoculated into tryptone broth for 48 hrs at 37°C. Five drops of Kovac’s reagent was then added. The formation of deep red colour indicates a positive result9.
Sugar fermentation test: Peptone water (7.5 g) was diluted to 500 mL with distilled water after which a few pinches of phenol red was added. 9 mL of broth was distributed into test tubes with Durham tubes inverted into each tube. The tubes were sterilized at 121°C (at 15 pounds pressure) for 15 min. 1% (w/v) aqueous solution of Glucose, Sucrose, Lactose and Mannitol were prepared separately and sterilized. The 1 mL of 1% of the sugar solution was added aseptically using a sterile pipette into each of the test tubes that contained broth. The test organisms were inoculated into each set of test tubes. The test tubes that served as control were, however, not inoculated. Incubation was done at 35°C for 5 days. A change in the colour of the solution from red to yellow indicates acid production and the presence of gas in the inverted Durham tubes indicates gas production9.
Oxidase test: A drop of a freshly prepared oxidase reagent was added onto a strip of filter paper. A little of the test organism was rubbed into it. Change in colour to deep-blue in 5 sec indicates a positive test while non-colouration indicate a negative result9.
Statistical analysis: Data obtained for an abundance of detected bacteria in the mouth, gills as well as gut were compared in the two selected fish species by subjecting them to student t-test, using Standard Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0.
RESULTS
Types and abundance of detected bacteria in each sampled organ of Oreochromis niloticus and Clarias gariepinus: The bacteria isolated from the mouth, gill and gut of Oreochromis niloticus and Clarias gariepinus such as Staphylococcus aureus (in the mouth of O. niloticus 50.0% and C. gariepinus 33.33%, also in the gills of O. niloticus 66.67% and C. gariepinus 33.33% in the study area while the bacterium was only found in the gut of C. gariepinus-28.57%), Salmonella typhimurium was observed only in C. gariepinus: Mouth-50.0%, gill-50.0% and gut-28.57%, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was present also only in C. gariepinus: Gill-16.67% and gut-14.29%. Escherichia coli was found only in the gut (28.57%) of C. gariepinus while in O. niloticus, it was found in the mouth (33.33%), in the gill (16.67%) and in the gut (25.0%). Klebsiella pneumonia was present in the mouth (16.00%) of C. gariepinus and the gut (25.0%) of O. niloticus. Proteus spp., was only observed in O. niloticus, in the mouth (16.67%) and the gut (25.0%). Enterococcus spp., was only present in O. niloticus-in the gill (16.67%) and the gut (12.50%) also, Streptococcus spp., was only present in the gut (12.5%) of O. niloticus as depicted below in Table 1 and 2.
Biochemical properties of the bacteria isolated: Biochemical properties of the isolated bacteria are shown in Table 3. The isolated bacteria tested positive or negative for gram stain tests carried out. Another biochemical tests to which the bacteria either tested positive or negative include, motility, sucrose, glucose, lactose, maltose, mannitol, citrate utilization, indole, catalase, oxidase, methyl red, urease, nitrate reduction.
Total abundance of each bacterium: Table 4 shows the total abundance of each species of bacteria detected in each of the fishes analyzed (Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus). Salmonella typhimurium was the most abundant in Clarias gariepinus with an abundance of 42.11%, while the least abundant was Klebsiella pneumonia (5.26%).
Table 1: | Bacteria detected in the mouth, gill and gut of Oreochromis niloticus and Clarias gariepinus |
Organs | Oreochromis niloticus | Clarias gariepinus |
Mouth | Staphylococcus aureus | Staphylococcus aureus |
Proteus aureus | Klebsiella pneumonia | |
Escherichia coli | Salmonella typhimurium | |
Gill | Staphylococcus aureus | Staphylococcus aureus |
Enterococcus spp. | Salmonella typhimurium | |
Escherichia coli | Pseudomonas aeruginosa | |
Gut | Klebsiella pneumonia | Staphylococcus aureus |
Proteus spp. | Salmonella typhimurium | |
Enterococcus spp. | Pseudomonas aeruginosa | |
Escherichia coli | Escherichia coli | |
Streptococcus spp. | ||
Field Survey, 2020 |
Table 2: | Abundance of detected bacteria in each examined organ of Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus |
Clarias gariepinus | Oreochromis niloticus | ||||||||||
Mouth | Gill | Gut | Mouth | Gill | Gut | ||||||
Bacteria species | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | % |
Staphylococcus aureus | 2 | 33.33 | 2 | 33.33 | 2 | 28.57 | 3 | 50 | 4 | 66.67 | 0.00 |
Salmonella typhimurium | 3 | 50.00 | 3 | 50.00 | 2 | 28.57 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 16.67 | 1 | 14.29 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Escherichia coli | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 2 | 28.57 | 2 | 33.33 | 1 | 16.67 | 25.00 |
Klebsiella pneumonia | 1 | 16.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 25.00 |
Proteus spp. | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 16.67 | 0 | 0.00 | 25.00 |
Enterococcus spp. | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 16.67 | 12.50 |
Streptococcus spp. | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 12.50 |
Table 3: | Biochemical properties of isolated bacteria |
Grams reaction | Motility | Sucrose | Glucose | Lactose | Maltose | Mannitol | Citrate utilization | Indole | Catalase | Oxidase | Methyl red | Urease | Nitrate reduction | Suspected organisms |
+ | - | A | A | A | A | A | - | - | + | - | + | + | + | Staphylococcus aureus |
- | + | - | AG | - | AG | AG | + | - | + | - | + | - | + | Salmonella typhinum |
- | + | AG | AG | - | - | + | + | - | + | - | - | - | + | Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
- | - | AG | AG | AG | AG | AG | - | + | + | - | + | - | + | Escherichia coli |
- | - | + | + | - | + | - | + | - | + | - | - | + | + | Klebsiella pneumonia |
- | + | - | + | - | - | - | + | - | + | - | + | + | + | Proteus spp. |
+ | - | + | + | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | Streptococcus spp. |
+ | + | AG | AG | AG | AG | AG | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | Enterococcus spp. |
+: Positive reaction of bacteria, -: Negative reaction of bacteria, A: Acid and AG: Acid and gas |
In Oreochromis niloticus, Staphylococcus aureus was the most abundant species (35.00%), while Streptococcus sp., was the least abundant (5.00%).
Total plate count: Table 5 shows the bacterial load in the mouth, gills and gut of both Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus captured from Ureje Reservoir. In C. gariepinus, the highest total plate count of 17.20±0.73×108 CFU g1 was recorded in the gut, while the gill has the lowest value of 7.20±0.16×108 CFU g1. Also, in O. niloticus, the gut had the highest total plate count of 10.23±2.14×108 CFU g1, while the gill had the lowest count of 4.17±0.53×108 CFU g1. The overall highest total plate count for the two species was recorded in the gut of C. gariepinus (17.20±0.73×108 CFU g1), while the overall lowest count occurred in the gill of O. niloticus (4.17±0.53×108 CFU g1).
Interpretation of T-Test result: The T-Test result to compare the abundance of the detected bacteria in Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus is presented in Table 6. The result showed that the abundance of Staphylococcus aureus, in each of the organs examined (mouth (0.413), gills (0.242) and gut (0.951)) was not significantly different (p>0.05) at 5, 1 and 10% significance level in both Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus. The occurrence of Salmonella typhimurium was significantly different (p<0.05) in the mouth (0.042) but was not significantly different in the gill (0.063) and gut (0.500) of both Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus at 1 and 5% at significance level. However, the abundance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, in both Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus, was not significantly different in the mouth (0.500), (p>0.05) at 5% significance level, also in the gill (0.063) and gut (0.063) of both fishes, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) at 1% significance level. For Escherichia coli, there was no significant difference in its abundance in the mouth (0.067), gill (0.202) and gut (1.000) of both Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus (p>0.05) at a 1% significance level. The abundance of Klebsiella pneumonia, in the mouth (0.866), gill (0.486) and gut (0.129) of both C. gariepinus and O. niloticus was not significantly different (p>0.05) 10, 5 and 1% significance level. There was no significant difference in the abundance of Proteus spp. (p>0.05) in the mouth (0.244), gill (0.513) and gut (0.294) of both C. gariepinus and O. niloticus at 10, 5 and 1% significance levels.
Table 4: | Total abundance of each bacterium detected in Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus |
Clarias gariepinus | Oreochromis niloticus | |||
Bacteria | Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage |
Staphylococcus aureus | 6 | 31.57 | 7 | 35.00 |
Salmonella typhimurium | 8 | 42.11 | 0 | 0.00 |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 2 | 10.53 | 0 | 0.00 |
Escherichia coli | 2 | 10.53 | 5 | 25.00 |
Klebsiella pneumonia | 1 | 5.26 | 2 | 10.00 |
Proteus spp. | 0 | 0.00 | 3 | 15.00 |
Enterococcus spp. | 0 | 0.00 | 2 | 10.00 |
Streptococcus spp. | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 5.00 |
Table 5: | Total plate count for the mouth, gill and gut of Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus (CFU g1±SD)×108 |
Clarias gariepinus | Oreochromis niloticus | ||||
Mouth | Gills | Gut | Mouth | Gills | Gut |
11.97±0.20 | 7.20±0.16 | 17.20±0.73 | 6.90±0.43 | 4.17±0.53 | 10.23±2.14 |
Table 6: | Bacterial Composition of Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus in mouth, gill and gut |
Bacteria | Organs | T-value | Std deviation | Mean value of catfish and tilapia | Significant level (2-tailed) |
Staphylococcus aureus | Mouth | -1.317 | 1.33 | -1.24** | 0.413 |
Gill | -2.500 | 0.56 | -1.800*** | 0.242 | |
Gut | -0.077 | 1.838 | -0.100* | 0.951 | |
Salmonella typhimurium | Mouth | 15.000 | 0.141 | 1.500*** | 0.042 |
Gill | 15.000 | 0.141 | 1.500*** | 0.063 | |
Gut | 10.000 | 0.141 | 1.000** | 0.500 | |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Mouth | 1.0000 | 0.007 | 0.000** | 0.500 |
Gill | 10.000 | 0.07 | 0.500*** | 0.063 | |
Gut | 10.000 | 0.07 | 0.500*** | 0.063 | |
Escherichia coli | Mouth | -9.47 | 0.14 | -0.995*** | 0.067 |
Gill | -3.04 | 0.31 | 0.670*** | 0.202 | |
Gut | 0.00 | 0.84 | 0.00*** | 1.000 | |
Klebsiella spp. | Mouth | -0.214 | 0.989 | -0.15* | 0.866 |
Gill | 1.047 | 0.304 | 0.225** | 0.486 | |
Gut | -4.854 | 0.289 | -0.995*** | 0.129 | |
Proteus spp. | Mouth | -2.478 | 0.487 | -0.855*** | 0.244 |
Gill | -0.959 | 0.346 | -0.235** | 0.513 | |
Gut | -2.010 | 0.700 | -0995*** | 0.294 | |
Enterococcus spp. | Mouth | -0.961 | 0.360 | -0.245** | 0.513 |
Gill | -1.000 | 0.240 | -0.170** | 0.500 | |
Gut | -131.00 | 0.007 | -0.655*** | 0.005 | |
Streptococcus spp. | Mouth | -1.000 | 0.311 | -0.0220** | 0.500 |
Gill | -1.000 | 0.007 | -0.005** | 0.500 | |
Gut | -1.047 | 0.304 | -0.225** | 0.500 | |
*, **, ***Mean±standard deviation (p<0.05) are significantly different |
The abundance of Enterococcus spp., in the mouth (0.513) and gill (0.500) was not significantly different (p>0.05) in both C. gariepinus and O. niloticus at a 5% significance level while that of the gut (0.005) in both fishes was significantly different at 1% significance level. The abundance of Streptococcus spp., was not significantly different (p>0.05) in the mouth (0.500), gut (0.500) and gill (0.500) of both Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus at a 5% significant level.
DISCUSSION
The consumption of fresh African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) is on the increase in both rural and urban centres of Nigeria4.
Fish is an important food commodity that is traded internationally but rapidly deteriorates, in terms of quality, when not properly preserved.
Fish, in their natural habitat, may not be free from bacterial infection but the rate however is highly dependent on some key environmental and climatic factors as well as the species of fish and bacteria in question. Certain environmental factors tend to encourage the rate of infection while others affect bacterial survival and development negatively. The timings of bacterial infection on fish is also, to some extent, controlled by seasonal changes with the consequent changes in climatic conditions. The result from this research shows that the bacterial load varied in the three parts of the fishes analyzed- the mouth, gills and gut.
The bacterial population isolated from the two fish species analyzed were, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhimurium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Proteus spp., Enterococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. and this was in agreement with the work of several researchers10,11 isolated Shigella species, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Catfish samples, while another study12 isolated Staphylococcus spp. and Salmonella spp., from fresh tilapia fish. Researcher13 isolated Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella species, Salmonella species, Shigella species, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris and Moraxella catarrhalis.
The distribution of bacteria in the mouth, gut and gill of Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus revealed the occurrence of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhimurium, Klebsiella pneumonia, Proteus spp., Enterococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. (Table 1). Although the bacterial flora found in this study did not cause mortality to the fishes probably because the fishes have a strong host defence response, the species have opportunistic and pathogenic tendencies which could make them incite fish disease14. In addition, these organisms could also be involved in the transmission of diseases to human beings. Fish and fish products have been reported as vehicles of foodborne bacterial infections in humans2,15.
Total plate count is an index for measuring total bacterial load. In this study, the highest total plate count was recorded in C. gariepinus. This shows that it is more susceptible to bacterial invasion than O. niloticus in Ureje Reservoir. Both species of fish were also found to have the highest total plate count in the gut region comparable to the result16. The high level of bacterial infection of the gut could be due to low acid concentration in the region, prolific multiplication of naturally occurring bacteria in the region or movement of bacteria from other parts to the gut region where the environment is more conducive for their survival.
In the two fish species examined in this study, the gills had the lowest total plate count compared to the gut and mouth. The quantum of bacteria found on the gills is maintained at a low level, thus implying that fish may have a mechanism that enables it to keep the bacteria number low and therefore be conferred with some degree of protection against bacteria invasion by the gill microflora12.
Salmonella spp., was the most abundant in C. gariepinus (with a percentage occurrence of 42.1%) but was not detected in O. niloticus. The presence of Salmonella spp., indicates faecal contamination of water from which the fishes were harvested17. Salmonella is a very pathogenic bacterium18. It had been reported to cause enteritis and systemic disease12.
Escherichia coli strains have percentage occurrence of 10.53 and 25% in C. gariepinus and O. niloticus, respectively. This bacteria species have been implicated as the causative agent of urinary tract infection19. Staphylococcus aureus had the highest percentage occurrence in O. niloticus and the second-highest C. gariepinus. It has been associated with different clinical conditions. For instance, it is still one of the most frequently encountered single bacteria species in hospitals and continues to be one of the common causative agents of burn wound infections20.
Pseudomonas is a soil bacterium that requires a high water activity for growth, it is known to cause food spoilage (meat, fish) and this is done by secreting lipases and proteases that cause off-odours and the formation of slime12.
The presence of the isolated organisms was not surprising since the occurrence of human pathogenic bacteria in fish, according to another study21, can be traced to its direct contact with a contaminated aquatic environment or ingestion of bacterial flora from water sediments. Bacteria flora associated with Nigerian water includes the genera: Bacillus, Lactobacillus, Staphylococcus, Escherichia, Micrococcus and Proteus12. Some of these bacteria species such as Pseudomonas sp. and Klebsiella spp., are pathogenic22 to exhibit extensive drug resistance.
CONCLUSION
This research has brought to light the bacterial species associated with Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus and has shown that they are potentially pathogenic to humans. Therefore, all necessary measures must be taken inadequately processing these fishes before consumption. Based on the findings of this study, it is recommended that the government, through the Ministry of Environment, should ensure that industrial and municipal effluents are properly treated before being discharged into water bodies. The banks of Ureje Reservoir and its tributaries should be free of domestic animals, litter and other waste materials. Besides, fish should be properly processed before consumption in other to prevent human beings from being infected with pathogenic bacteria that might have contaminated the fish.
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT
This study discovered the presence of pathogenic bacteria on O. niloticus and C. gariepinus captured from Ureje Reservoir. This discovery can be beneficial in assisting government to regulate the indiscriminate discharge of industrial effluents and sewage into the Reservoir as well as its tributaries. This study will help researchers to carry out further investigations that will help in devising strategies that are required to prevent further contamination of the Reservoir.
REFERENCES
- Alghabban, A.J.M., 2014. Fish Farms as a source for parasites transport: Parasitological and developmental studies of Prohemistomum vivax with the ameliorating role of Moringa oleifera in the treatment. J. Am. Sci., 10: 6-14.
CrossRefDirect Link - Hastein, T., B. Hjeltnes, A. Lillehaug, J.U. Skare, M. Berntssen and A.K. Lundebye, 2006. Food safety hazards that occur during the production stage: Challenges for fish farming and the fishing industry. Rev. Sci. Tech., 25: 607-625.
Direct Link - Yagoub, S.O., 2009. Isolation of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp. from raw fish sold in fish market in Khartoum state. J. Bacterial Res., 1: 85-88.
CrossRefDirect Link - Godwin, A.O.M. and U. Uchechi, 2016. Comparative study on bacterial load in intestine, gills and skin of cultured African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) from different locations in rivers state, Nigeria. Int. J. Innovative Stud. Aquat. Biol. Fish., 2: 21-29.
CrossRefDirect Link - Balami, S., A. Sharma and R. Karn, 2019. Significance of nutritional value of fish for human health. Malaysian J. Halal Res., 2: 32-34.
CrossRefDirect Link - Censi, P., S.E. Spoto, F. Saiano, M. Sprovieri and S. Mazzola et al., 2006. Heavy metals in coastal water systems. A case study from the Northwestern Gulf of Thailand. Chemosphere, 64: 1167-1176.
CrossRefPubMedDirect Link - Riba, I., M. Conradi, J.M. Forja and T.A. Delvalls, 2004. Sediment quality in the guadalquivir estuary: Lethal effects associated with the Aznalcóllar mining spill. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 48: 144-152.
CrossRefDirect Link - Ashraj, W., 2005. Accumulation of heavy metals in kidney and heart tissues of Epinephelus microdon fish from the Arabian Gulf. Environ. Monit. Assess., 101: 311-316.
PubMedDirect Link - Osungbemiro, N.R., R.O. Sanni, R.F. Olaniyan and A.O. Olajuyigbe, 2014. Bacterial flora in the gut and respiratory organs of Clarias gariepinus in fresh and brackish water habitats of Ondo state, South/West Nigeria. Int. J. Biol. Bimolecular Agric. Food Biotechnol. Eng., 8: 558-561.
CrossRefDirect Link - Abiodun, O.A., A. Ojo, R.M.O. Kayode, V.E. Edem, M.O. Shittu, Z.A. Opaleye and T.N. Olayinka, 2021. Chemical and microbial properties of kiln-smoked catfish in selected locations in Ilorin Metropolis, Nigeria. Ife J. Sci., 23: 83-94.
CrossRefDirect Link - Shinkafi, S.A. and V.C. Ukwaja, 2010. Bacteria associated with fresh tilapia fish (Oreochromis niloticus) sold at Sokoto central market in Sokoto, Nigeria. Niger. J. Basic Appl. Sci., 18: 217-221.
Direct Link - Afolabi, F.T. and F.K. Fabunmi, 2018. Physicochemical and microbiological quality of fresh and smoked catfish (Clarias gariepinus) and tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in Ibadan, Nigeria. J. Sci. Res. Rep., 20: 1-10.
Direct Link - Danba, E.P., A.H. Bichi, S. Ishaku, M.K. Ahmad and U. Buba et al., 2014. Occurrence of pathogenic bacteria associated with Clarias gariepinus in selected fish farms of Kumbotso local governement area of Kano State, Nigeria. Bayero J. Pure Appl. Sci., 7: 145-149.
CrossRefDirect Link - Novotny, L., L. Dvorska, A. Lorencova, V. Beran and I. Pavlik, 2004. Fish: A potential source of bacterial pathogens for human beings. Vet. Med. Czech, 49: 343-358.
CrossRefDirect Link - Andy, I.E., I.U. Bassey, J.A. Lennox and V.U. Obo, 2018. Assessment of the bacteriological quality of cat fish (Clarias gariepinus) sold at 8 miles market, cross river state, Calabar. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ., 8: 130-135.
CrossRefDirect Link - Adamu, K.M., H. Muhammad, S.U. Ahmad, M.M. Ahmad and A.M. Yakubu, 2020. Diversity of bacteria and fungi associated with freshwater fishes from Mijawal River, Nasarawa, Nigeria. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage., 24: 1085-1092.
CrossRefDirect Link - Eng, S.K., P. Pusparajah, N.S. Ab Mutalib, H.L. Ser, K.G. Chan and L.H. Lee, 2015. Salmonella: A review on pathogenesis, epidemiology and antibiotic resistance. Front. Life Sci., 8: 284-293.
CrossRefDirect Link - Bien, J., O. Sokolova and P. Bozko, 2012. Role of uropathogenic Escherichia coli virulence factors in development of urinary tract infection and kidney damage. Int. J. Nephrol. Vol. 2012.
CrossRefDirect Link - Chen, Y.Y., P.F. Wu, C.S. Chen, I.H. Chen, W.T. Huang and F.D. Wang, 2020. Trends in microbial profile of burn patients following an event of dust explosion at a tertiary medical center. BMC Infect. Dis., Vol. 20.
CrossRefDirect Link - Novoslavskij, A., M. Terentjeva, I. Eizenberga, O. Valciņa, V. Bartkevičs and A. Bērziņš, 2016. Major foodborne pathogens in fish and fish products: A review. Ann. Microbiol., 66: 1-15.
CrossRefDirect Link - Karaiskos, I., S. Lagou, K. Pontikis, V. Rapti and G. Poulakou, 2019. The "Old" and the "New" antibiotics for MDR gram-negative pathogens: For whom, when, and how. Front. Public Health, Vol. 7.
CrossRefDirect Link