• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances
  2. Vol 15 (1), 2020
  3. 32-37
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances

Year: 2020 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 32-37
DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2020.32.37
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Correlations of Climatic Conditions with Seminal Quality Parameters in Gaddi and Chegu Buck Semen

Amit Sharma Amit  Sharma's LiveDNA, Pankaj Sood and Jitendra Kumar Chaudhary Jitendra Kumar  Chaudhary's LiveDNA

ABSTRACT


Background and Objective: Goats are assuming a greater importance under small household system in India. Season affects the fertility of semen and thereafter is an important factor limiting the large scale application of artificial insemination with frozen semen. Limited literature underlying the correlation of climatic parameters with seminal quality. Hence, the present study was designed to find out the correlation of temperature (°C) and sunshine (h) on processed semen quality in Gaddi and Chegu goats. Materials and Methods: A total of 286 ejaculates (Gaddi, n = 106; Chegu, n = 180) were collected using artificial vagina and selected on basis of standard quality parameters. The ejaculates were extended in Tris citrate egg yolk extender containing 10% EY and 6% glycerol to maintain a concentration of 150×106 spermatozoa/straws. The representative straws from each ejaculates were thawed at 37°C for 30 sec, 24 h post incubation to compare seminal parameters between fresh and post thaw semen along with percent change due to the processing. Results: The data was analyzed using package R version 3.4.3. In Gaddi goats, HOST reactivity was negatively and significantly correlated (r = -0.471, r = -0.527, p<0.01) to temperature in both fresh diluted and post thaw semen. Whereas, temperature was negatively significantly correlated (r = -0.745, r = -0.768, p<0.01), with post thaw progressive motility and viability in Chegu goats. Conclusion: In conclusions, present study delineates temperature rather than sunshine (h) affecting semen quality in both Gaddi and Chegu bucks during breeding season.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation
Received: November 11, 2019;   Accepted: December 07, 2019;   Published: January 31, 2020

How to cite this article

Amit Sharma, Pankaj Sood and Jitendra Kumar Chaudhary, 2020. Correlations of Climatic Conditions with Seminal Quality Parameters in Gaddi and Chegu Buck Semen. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 15: 32-37.

DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2020.32.37

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajava.2020.32.37

INTRODUCTION


Goats are important livestock species of India. Gaddi and Chegu breeds of goats are the mainstay of a large portion of nomadic and hilly tribes of Himachal Pradesh (H.P.), India. Gaddi and Chegu goats are contributing towards income and employment generation, capital storage and improvement in household nutrition1. Chegu is pashmina yielding breed of goats found usually at altitude of more than 8000 feet above mean sea level in cold desert areas and produce valuable textile fibre pashmina hence called as “Pashmina goats”1. A progressively declining cattle population in H.P. accentuates goat rearing under small household system. Unabated decline in males of superior genetic merit due to rampant slaughtering and inadvertent breeding (inbreeding) underscores the importance to conserve superior males and their use for AI. Several socio-economic reasons along with lack of developmental policies for breed conservation and improvement leading to loss of breed utility and marginalization of goat population1, Chegu being worstly affected and therefore have been put under “Endangered species” (19th livestock census, 2012).

Goats, considered as seasonal breeder2, have been used for semen related studies during short days3,4, though out of season studies per se have also been undertaken5,6. Season affects the fertility of semen and thereafter is an important factor limiting the large scale application of artificial insemination with frozen semen7. Several studies across different geographical locations using different breeds of bucks have investigated effect of season on quality and cryosensitivity of semen5,6. Meagre studies available in literature underlying the correlation of climatic parameters with seminal quality. Hence, the present study was designed to find out the correlation of temperature (°C) and sunshine (h) on processed semen quality in Gaddi and Chegu goats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS


Study area: Study was conducted at University Livestock Farm of CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur (32.6°N, 76.3°E, altitude 1290.8 m) from September-December, 2017, January and March, 2018 and September-December, 2018, respectively.

Research procedure: The study was conducted on apparently healthy Gaddi bucks (n = 11, aged 2.16±0.36 years, weighing 39.1±2.82 kg), Chegu bucks (n = 8, aged 1.98±0.34 years, weighing 28.1±1.96 kg). These bucks were selected on basis of breeding history, breeding soundness evaluation and testicular diameters. All the bucks were maintained under identical conditions and were screened for diseases, Brucellosis8, Chlamydiosis9 to eliminate the possible transmission of infection.

Average light: dark h (h) and temperature (°C) during the period of study comprised the average of the values considered on the day of semen collection and the preceding days. The average light:dark h (h) and temperature (°C) ranged from 7.07±0.41:16.93±0.41 to 12.29±0.13: 11.71±0.13 and 9.88±0.51 to 21.94±0.18°C, respectively. Similar group of bucks from both the breeds were utilized for semen analysis during the period under study.

All bucks were subjected to grazing for 5 h and remained under confinement in a shed where they were fed as per the standards of Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)10. All males had round the clock access to the clean drinking water.

A total of 286 ejaculates (Gaddi, n = 106, Chegu, n = 180) from adult healthy bucks were collected using an estrus doe. The collections were made twice weekly in artificial vagina (AV) maintained at 42-43°C. The fresh ejaculates were evaluated for any gross abnormality including color as well as volume and concentration (Caprine Photometer, IMV 1409®) followed by microscopic examination for mass motility. The suitability of ejaculates for further processing was done using the standard criterion11. Absence of any gross abnormality, milky to creamy semen color, mass motility of >3 and initial progressive motility of >70% were the criteria for selection of semen. The post- thaw cryopreserved semen samples were evaluated for progressive motility12, viablility13, morphological abnormalities14 and HOST reactivity15. Percent change in the aforesaid parameters between freshand post-thaw semen was also calculated to determine the effect of cryopreservation.

The seminal plasma was removed as described previously16,17. The semen pellet thus obtained was extended with 2 equal fractions of tris citrate egg yolk extender, TEY (TRIS 1.21 g, Citric acid 0.685 g, D-fructose 0.5 g, benzyl penicillin 1000 IU mL–1, streptomycin sulphate 1 mg mL–1), EY (10%) and glycerol (6%). The TEY was added to semen at a gap of 2-3 min to yield a final concentration 150×106 spermatozoa/straw. The pH of the buffer was adjusted to 6.7-6.9.

Extended semen was filled in 0.25 mL French mini straws (IMV Technologies, L’Aigle, Cedex, France), by aspiration using micropipette (Minitube, Germany) and subsequently sealed at free end with the help of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) (IMV Technologies, L’Aigle, Cedex, France) powder. All the aforementioned steps of semen handling were undertaken at controlled air temperature of 30°C. The straws were laid on a stainless steel rack and placed in cooling cabinet 4°C (Macro Scientific works Pvt. Ltd. India) for 4 h and thereafter exposed to liquid nitrogen vapors for 7 min. Finally the straws were plunged into liquid nitrogen for storage. The inventory of semen storage was also maintained. Thawing of semen straws was done at 37°C for 30 sec in a water bath18.

Proper ethical considerations related to animal handling and semen collections were observed and ensuring not to cause any injury during sampling.

Statistical analysis: The data obtained were analyzed using package19 R version 3.4.3. Multivariate analysis was used to determine correlations between climatic condition (Temperature (°C) and Sunshine (h) with the fresh and post-thaw semen quality parameters and to frame regression equations and their significance was tested again by using ANOVA. Results were presented as Mean±SEM and differences were considered significant when p<0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


Correlations between the climatic conditions (Temperature (°C), sunshine (h)) and seminal parameters (progressive motility, live and dead, morphological abnormalities and HOST reactivity) are presented in Table 1. Amongst the progressive motility, viability, morphological abnormalities and HOST reactivity, it was only the HOST reactivity that was negatively and significantly correlated (r = -0.471, r = -0.527, p<0.01) to temperature in both fresh diluted and post thaw semen in Gaddi goats (Table 1). It can be inferred that with reduction in temperature there is improvement in HOST reactive sperms in Gaddi buck semen. Whereas, temperature was negatively significantly correlated (r = -0.745, r = -0.768, p<0.01), with post thaw progressive motility and viability in Chegu goats (Table 1) which suggests better post thaw semen quality during the winter months.

Table 1: Inter-relationship between climatic conditions (Temperature (°C), sunshine (h)) and semen parameters in Gaddi and Chegu bucks
Relationship between parameters Breed Correlation coefficient Regression estimate Regression equation p-value Adjusted R2 value
PM fresh vs. temperature Gaddi 0.0002 - - - -
Chegu -0.355 -0.286±0.17 y = 79.143-0.28x 0.12 0.077
LD fresh vs. temperature Gaddi -0.101 -0.107±0.17 y = 76.031-0.10x 0.53 0.015
Chegu -0.270 -0.297±0.24 y = 79.805-0.29x 0.24 0.021
MA fresh vs. temperature Gaddi -0.232 -0.147±0.09 y = 10.137-0.14x 0.14 0.020
Chegu 0.088 0.029±0.07 y = 5.767+0.08x 0.70 0.047
HOST fresh vs. temperature Gaddi -0.471** -0.880±0.26 y = 83.75-0.88x 0.002 0.200
Chegu 0.165 0.492±0.69 y = 53.939+0.49x 0.48 0.026
PM post thaw vs. temperature Gaddi 0.141 0.190±0.22 y = 28.953+0.19x 0.38 0.005
Chegu -0.745** -0.870±0.18 y = 45.932-0.87x 0.000 0.531
LD post thaw vs. temperature Gaddi 0.226 0.506±0.35 y = 35.410+0.56x 0.16 0.026
Chegu -0.768** -1.375±0.26 y = 66.925-1.37x 0.000 0.568
MA post thaw vs. temperature Gaddi -0.150 -0.112±0.12 y = 11.732-0.11x 0.35 -0.003
Chegu 0.116 0.038±0.07 y = 7.205+0.03x 0.62 0.041
HOST post thaw vs. temperature Gaddi -0.527** -1.362±0.35 y = 70.310-1.36x 0.000 0.259
Chegu -0.362 -0.678±0.41 y = 48.925-0.67x 0.11 0.082
PM fresh diluted vs. light hours Gaddi -0.198 -0.281±0.22 y = 75.569-0.28x 0.21 0.014
Chegu 0.044 0.064±0.34 y = 73.490+0.06x 0.85 0.053
LD fresh diluted vs. light hours Gaddi -0.040 -0.077±0.31 y = 75.061-0.07x 0.80 0.024
Chegu -0.139 -0.280±0.46 y = 76.657-0.28x 0.55 0.034
MA fresh diluted vs. light hours Gaddi 0.253 0.288±0.17 y = 5.701+0.28x 0.11 0.039
Chegu -0.222 -0.134±0.17 y = 7.361-0.13x 0.34 0.003
HOST fresh diluted vs. light hours Gaddi -0.055 -0.187±0.54 y = 72.276-0.18 0.73 0.023
Chegu -0.018 -0.098±1.27 y = 63.578-0.09x 0.93 0.055
PM post thaw vs. light hours Gaddi 0.106 0.265±0.40 y = 29.72+0.26x 0.51 0.014
Chegu 0.001 - - - -
LD post thaw vs. light hours Gaddi 0.272 1.097±0.62 y = 34.19+1.09x 0.08 0.049
Chegu 0.110 0.360±0.76 y = 39.308+0.36x 0.64 0.042
MA post thaw vs. light hours Gaddi 0.012 0.016±0.21 y = 9.945+0.01x 0.94 0.026
Chegu -0.223 -0.134±0.13 y = 8.961-0.13x 0.34 0.002
HOST post thaw vs. light hours Gaddi -0.251 -1.166±0.72 y = 59.509-1.16x 0.11 0.030
Chegu 0.362 1.237±0.75 y = 26.952+1.23x 0.11 0.082
PM: Progressive motility, LD: Viability, MA: Morphological abnormalities, HOST: Hypo osmotic swelling test, **Values with different superscripts within same row differs (p<0.01)

Present study evaluated relationship of fresh diluted and post thaw semen parameters to change in climatic conditions within the short days of breeding season, which however is not available in the literature. Irrespective of the lack of literature for direct comparison, the present study delineates temperature rather than sunshine (h) affects semen quality. During low temperature of breeding season there was an improvement in HOST reactivity in fresh and post thaw semen in Gaddi bucks. Similarly, during a period of low temperature the post thaw progressive motility and viability were higher in Chegu buck semen. Murase and coworkers reported that post thaw motility was significantly higher in winters while HOST reactivity did not differ between season20. Moreover the relation to temperature to post thaw betterment of motility and viability in Chegu bucks could also be due to the reason that Chegu goat is native of temperate reason and may therefore perform better under low temperature.

Spring and summer have been generally accepted by various researchers’ to reduce the seminal quality with increased percentage of dead and abnormal sperms along with reduced motility21-22. Extreme temperature affects the function of the epididymis, alters the semen pH towards alkalinity23 and increases the percentages of abnormal and dead sperms24 and could also lead to testicular degeneration and even complete sterility23,24.

On the other hand, the aforesaid trend on semen quality revealed, autumn to be the best season resulting in better motility, viability and morphology of sperms, along with enhanced ability to withstand cryo-injuries25,26. Kumar and coworkers observed better ability of sperms to withstand freezing and thawing during autumn than winter27.

Winters have been equivocal in affecting the semen quality. Researchers observed better semen quality during winters5. Similarly, Gallego-Calvo6 and coworkers reported increased post thaw quality but reduced percentage of motile sperms during winter. Other studies corroborated winter to favour semen quality28,29. Reduced percent of dead sperms were observed during winters24,26. Researchers observed no effect on seasonal variability on HOST reactivity, while the post thaw motility, acrosomal integrity and abnormalities were severely affected in autumn compared to winter20. To the contrary, the desired semen quality could not be achieved in winters30,31.

Delgadillo and coworkers suggested photoperiod as main factor responsible for seasonality in buck reproductive activity. Short days and decreasing day length stimulate the secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH), which intern, induces testicular growth and the release of testosterone, resulting in quantitative and qualitative improvements in semen production along with increased sexual behavior32. Contrastingly, long days and increasing day length reduce LH secretions and testicular growth, leading to a fall in the plasma testosterone concentrations, reduced sperm quality and diminished sexual behavior21,22.

However other workers also propose that it is not only photoperiod that solely regulates but several other factors which may also influence semen. Hence there is a consensus among researchers interested in breeding of goats, that the quality of bucks’ semen is affected by various factors including but not limited to breed3, season6,26,30,32,33 and source of protein supplemented in ration34. Whereas, another group of researchers argued that season effects on semen quality were minor and the semen quality remained in the range of good semen in all seasons35. Some studies have shown that the sperm motility of pubertal bucks was high in autumn and low in summer season24.

In addition to effect of photoperiods on the LH release as listed wide supra, a favorable season for semen production could be attributed to changes in total protein and protein composition of seminal plasma36. Seminal plasma protein may influence seasonal resistance of the spermatozoa to freeze thaw damage. Smith and coworkers recorded higher total protein concentration of seminal plasma (36.9 vs. 23.0 mg mL–1) during breeding than non-breeding season suggesting its role in protection against cryopreservation effects36. Researchers observed that sperm samples supplemented with proteins from the buck seminal plasma obtained during non-breeding season led to deterioration of sperm quality37, while other studies have demonstrated the positive effects on sperm quality after thawing when the semen was supplemented with proteins or seminal plasma collected during breeding season38. There were alterations in total protein composition of seminal plasma that influenced seasonal resistance of semen to freeze thaw process.

CONCLUSION


It was concluded that temperature rather than sunshine (h) is the main factor affecting the seminal quality parameters in both Gaddi and Chegu breed of goat during breeding season.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT


This study discovered the correlation of climatic parameters with seminal quality in Gaddi and Chegu goats of Himachal Pradesh, India. In Gaddi goats, HOST reactivity was negatively and significantly correlated to temperature in both fresh diluted and post thaw semen. Whereas, temperature was negatively significantly correlated with post thaw progressive motility and viability in Chegu goats. In brief, study suggests temperature as the main factor affecting the seminal quality parameters in both Gaddi and Chegu breed of goat during breeding season. The study will help the researchers to uncover the relationship of climatic factors with seminal quality in different breeds reared in different geographical locations and strengthen our finding of impact of temperature rather than sunshine (h) on the seminal parameters in goats.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS


Authors are grateful to Dr Madhumeet Singh (Professor and Head, Department of Vety. Gynae.), Dr. Mandeep Sharma (Dean, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences) CSKHPHV, Palampur for technical and administrative support and Department of Dairy and Fisheries, GOI for financial assistance under project Adhoc-Misc 2127-37 for carrying out this study.

REFERENCES


  1. Dogra, P.K. and Y.P. Thakur, 2010. Livestock biodiversity of Himachal Pradesh with special reference to pashmina goats. Proceeding of the National Training on Production, Processing and Utilization of Pashmina Fibre, December 1-7, 2010, Palampur, H.P., India, pp: 1 12.

  2. Fatet, A., M.T. Pellicer-Rubio and B. Leboeuf, 2010. Reproductive cycle of goats. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 124: 211-219.
    PubMedDirect Link

  3. Purdy, P.H., 2006. A review on goat sperm cryopreservation. Small Rumin. Res., 63: 215-225.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  4. Gangwar, C., S.D. Kharche, S. Kumar and S.K. Jindal, 2016. Cryopreservation of goat semen: Status and prospects. Indian J. Small Rumin., 22: 1-10.
    Direct Link

  5. Farshad, A., A. Yousefi, A. Moghaddam and B. Khalili, 2012. Seasonal changes in serum testosterone, LDH concentration and semen characteristics in Markhoz goats. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 25: 189-193.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  6. Gallego-Calvo, L., M.C. Gatica, J. Santiago-Moreno, J.L. Guzmán and L. Zarazaga, 2015. Seasonal changes in reproductive activity, sperm variables and sperm freezability in Blanca Andaluza bucks. Spanish J. Agric. Res., Vol. 13.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  7. Guérin, Y., Y. Cognié and N. Poulin, 1992. Freezability of Freshly Ejaculated and Frozen Ram Semen In vitro. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Animal Reproduction, Dieleman, S.J. (Ed.)., Vol. 3, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp: 1418-1420.

  8. OIE., 2008. OIE Quality Standards and Guidelines for Veterinary Laboratories. 2nd Edn., OIE., Paris, France.

  9. Chahota, R., S. Gupta, B. Bhardwaj, P. Malik, S. Verma and M. Sharma, 2015. Seroprevalence studies on animal Chlamydiosis amongst ruminants in five states of india. Vet. World, 8: 72-75.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  10. ICAR., 2013. Nutrient Requirements of Sheep, Goats and Rabbits. 3rd Edn., ICAR., New Delhi, Inida.

  11. Rather, H.A., R. Islam, A.A. Malik and F.A. Lone, 2016. Addition of antioxidants improves quality of ram spermatozoa during preservation at 4°C. Small Rumin. Res., 141: 24-28.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  12. Hafez, E.S.E. and B. Hafez, 2000. Reproduction in Farm Animals. 7th Edn., Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, USA., ISBN: 9780683305777, Pages: 509.

  13. Hancock, J.L., 1951. A staining technique for the study of temperature-shock in semen. Nature, 167: 323-324.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  14. Bloom, E., 1977. Sperm morphology with reference to bull infertility. Proceedings of The 1st All India Symposium on Animal Reproduction, (AR'77), Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India, pp: 66-68.

  15. Pant, H.C., L.R. Barot, R. Kabiraj, A.K. Mishra and J.H. Prabhakar, 2002. Acrosomal integrity of buffalo spermatozoa and its relationship to fertility. Indian J. Anim. Reprod., 23: 110-112.

  16. Nuti, I., 2007. Techniques of Artificial Insemination in Goats. In: Current Therapy in Large Animal Theriogenology, Youngquist, R.S. and W.R. Threlfall (Eds.)., 2nd Edn., Sounders-Elsevier, St. Louis, MO., pp: 529-534.

  17. Sharma, A., P. Sood and P. Dogra, 2018. Seminal plasma removal improves cryopreserved semen quality in Gaddi bucks. Indian J. Anim. Reprod., 39: 25-28.

  18. Sariozkan, S., M.N. Bucak, P.B. Tuncer, U. Tasdemir, H. Kinet and P.A. Ulutas, 2010. Effects of different extenders and centrifugation/washing on postthaw microscopic-oxidative stress parameters and fertilizing ability of Angora buck sperm. Theriogenology, 73: 316-323.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  19. R Core Team, 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

  20. Murase, T., N. Imaeda, H. Yamada and K. Miyazawa, 2007. Seasonal changes in semen characteristics, composition of seminal plasma and frequency of acrosome reaction induced by calcium and calcium ionophore A23187 in large white boars. J. Reprod. Dev., Vol. 53.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  21. Delgadillo, J.A. and P. Chemineau, 1992. Abolition of the seasonal release of luteinizing hormone and testosterone in Alpine male goats (Capra hircus) by short photoperiodic cycles. Reproduction, 94: 45-55.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  22. Zarazaga, L.A., J.L. Guzmán, C. Domínguez, M.C. Pérez and R. Prieto, 2009. Effects of season and feeding level on reproductive activity and semen quality in Payoya buck goats. Theriogenology, 71: 1316-1325.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  23. Salah, M.S., F.D. El-Nouty, M.R. Al-Hajri and H.H. Mogawer, 1992. Effect of season on seminal characteristics of Holstein bull under semi-arid environment I. Biophysical characteristics. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 5: 439-447.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  24. Elsheikh, A.S., N.S. Elhammali, M.T. Ibrahim and A.M. Alqurashi, 2013. Influence of season of birth on pubertal characteristics of male goat kids. J. Agric. Sci. Applic., 2: 108-111.

  25. Ahmad, N. and D.E. Noakes, 1996. Seasonal variations in the semen quality of young British goats. Br. Vet. J., 152: 225-236.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  26. Karagiannidis, A., S. Varsakeli and G. Karatzas, 2000. Characteristics and seasonal variations in the semen of Alpine, Saanen and Damascus goat bucks born and raised in Greece. Theriogenology, 53: 1285-1293.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  27. Kumar, N., B. Rai, S.A. Bhat, S.D. Kharche, C. Gangwar, S.K. Jindal and S. Chandra, 2016. Effect of management system and season on semen freezability in Jakhrana bucks. Vet. World, 9: 199-202.
    Direct Link

  28. Coloma, M.A., A. Toledano-Díaz, C. Castaño, R. Velázquez, A. Gómez-Brunet, A. López-Sebastián and J. Santiago-Moreno, 2011. Seasonal variation in reproductive physiological status in the Iberian ibex (Capra pyrenaica) and its relationship with sperm freezability. Theriogenology, 76: 1695-1705.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  29. Jiménez-Rabadán, P., M. Ramón, O. García-Álvarez, A. Maroto-Morales and E. Del Olmo et al., 2012. Effect of semen collection method (artificial vagina vs. electroejaculation), extender and centrifugation on post-thaw sperm quality of Blanca-Celtibérica buck ejaculates. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 132: 88-95.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  30. Barkawi, A.H., E.H. Elsayed, G. Ashour and E. Shehata, 2006. Seasonal changes in semen characteristics, hormonal profiles and testicular activity in Zaraibi goats. Small Rumin. Res., 66: 209-213.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  31. Wang, W., J. Luo, S. Sun, L. Xi and Q. Gao et al., 2015. The effect of season on spermatozoa motility, plasma membrane and acrosome integrity in fresh and frozen-thawed semen from Xinong Saanen bucks. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 50: 23-28.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  32. Delgadillo, J., B. Lebœuf and P. Chemineau, 1993. Maintenance of sperm production in bucks during a third year of short photoperiodic cycles. Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 33: 609-617.
    Direct Link

  33. Qureshi, M.S., D. Khan, A. Mushtaq and S.S. Afridi, 2013. Effect of extenders, postdilution intervals and seasons on semen quality in dairy goats. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 37: 147-152.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  34. Elhammali, N.S. and A.S. Elsheikh, 2014. Pubertal traits of male goats kept on rations supplemented with different protein types. IOSR-J. Agric. Vet. Sci., 7: 18-21.
    Direct Link

  35. Gubartallah, K.A., M.A. Abdallah, A.O. Bakhiet and O.A. El-Khider, 2004. Some observations on the reproductive performance of sudanese nubian bucks. Sud. J. Vet. Sci. Anim. Husb., 43: 217-222.
    Direct Link

  36. Smith, J.F., J. Parr, G.R.M. Murray, R.M. McDonald and R.S.F. Lee, 1999. Seasonal changes in the protein content and composition of ram seminal plasma. Proc. New Zealand Soc. Anim. Reprod., 59: 223-225.

  37. Leahy, T., G. Evans, W.M.C. Maxwell and J.I. Marti, 2010. Seminal plasma proteins do not consistently improve fertility after cervical insemination of ewes with non-sorted or sex-sorted frozen-thawed ram spermatozoa. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 22: 606-612.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  38. La Falci, V.S.N., H. Tortorella, J.L. Rodrigues and A. Brandelli, 2002. Seasonal variation of goat seminal plasma proteins. Theriogenology, 57: 1035-1048.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved