Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Assessment of Microbiological Quality of Raw Milk Produced at Tizi Ouzou Area (Algeria)



Yacine Titouche, Ahcene Hakem, Djouza Salmi, Benalia Yabrir, Nadia Chenouf, Achour Chergui, Amel Chenouf and Karim Houali
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Background: The microbiological quality of raw milk is relatively a new subject that interest more actors of milk production in Algeria. Until now, the raw milk collected presented a high rate of microbial contamination, prejudicial for human consumption and dairy processing. Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the hygienic and sanitary quality of raw milk produced throughout three segments where milk is handled in Tizi Ouzou area (Algeria). Methodology: For this, 174 samples of raw milk were collected throughout farms, collectors and local markets and submitted for microbiological analysis. Results: The results of this study showed that microbial contamination of raw milk increase along the dairy chain. The mean log10 of TBC at farm level was 6.73±0.25 log10 CFU mL–1. This value increase to reach a load of 6.81±0.19 and 7.2±1.05 log10 CFU mL–1 at collection centers and market points, respectively. In addition, cases of contamination by S. aureus and antibiotic residues were observed. Conclusion: This study suggest that improving of microbial quality of raw milk requires the establishment a quality policy with the training of farmers on good hygienic practices.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Yacine Titouche, Ahcene Hakem, Djouza Salmi, Benalia Yabrir, Nadia Chenouf, Achour Chergui, Amel Chenouf and Karim Houali, 2016. Assessment of Microbiological Quality of Raw Milk Produced at Tizi Ouzou Area (Algeria). Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 11: 854-860.

DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2016.854.860

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajava.2016.854.860

INTRODUCTION

The development of dairy farming in Algeria remains a target for the government but the imports of milk powder from the industrialized countries are necessary to satisfy the needs of population, which is in full demographic expansion. The national milk production is still low, covers only half of the annual consumption. The annual value of imports was estimated between 600 and 800 millions of dollar1. One of the main constraints of this sector is the low production of the imported breeds and a poor organization of the collection system2. In order to improve the levels of local production and integrate them in dairy industry, the government initiated a program of rehabilitation and promotion of the dairy production. The results of this strategy were encouraging: Increasing of local production, creation of a new dairies and diversification of dairy products. However, the collection level of raw milk remains low and the milk collected is often loaded with bacteria, harmful for human consumption and for industrial processing. The data of ministry of health, population and hospital reforms revealed that milk and milk products were implicated on food poisoning3. The existence an informal system, escaping to the sanitary control, suggest that an important part of this milk production present a potential hazards for public health. Currently, some dairies plan to collect a raw milk that present a good microbial quality. Therefore, payment measures according to the microbiological quality have been introduced. In parallel, some dairies are opting to distribute products that are used during milking procedures and during cleaning of equipment involved during raw milk storage. Many studies have been conducted in order to assess the hygienic quality of raw milk. Aggad et al.4 evaluated the hygienic quality of mik at Western of Algeria at the reception (Dairy units). Ghazi and Niar5 and Hakem et al.6 focused their studies at farm level. Adjlane-Kaouche et al.7 evaluated the quality of milk at farms and collectors centers. However, to our knowledge’s, there is no study which have been conducted to evaluate the hygienic quality at the end of dairy chain. The mains objectives of this study is to identify the relevant sources of microbial contamination of raw milk produced locally and to assess the hygienic quality of this product along the chain production.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design and collections of samples: This study was conducted during the dry season (April-September, 2015) at three stages where milk is handled in Tizi Ouzou area (Algeria): Farm tank, collector milk and local market. In this season, the study included 25 farms, 25 collectors and 4 local markets. The choice of this farms and collectors is based to their memberships to the different dairies. For this, five dairies were chosen. A total of 174 samples of raw milk were collected. Three samples of raw milk were collected from each farm and from each collector and six samples of raw milk were taken from each local market. Seventy five milk samples at farm consisted of milk tank before delivery to collector, while 75 samples from the collector’s tank at the end of collection. The samples were immediately cooled at 4°C in order to minimise the growth of spoilage microorganisms and transported them to the laboratory where tests were carried out on the same day. Data on milking procedure and other farm management that influence the microbiological quality of milk at farm level were collected using a structured questionnaire with closed end questions in a face a face farmer interview. These factors included cow cleanliness and hygiene during milking procedures, time taken to deliver milk to the collection centres, frequency of milking, type of utensil used for storage of milk at farm, equipment maintenance and cleaning, measures used in mastitis control as the use of antibiotic treatment. For this, initial visits were made to each farm where farmers were interviewed and the easiness and the lack of clarity of questions was revised.

Microbiological analysis: The microbiological analysis were carried out at the Laboratory of Analytical Biochemistry and Biotechnology of the University of Tizi Ouzou (Algeria). Samples of raw milk were analyzed for enumeration of Total Bacteria Count (TBC), Fecal Count (FC), Clostridium perfringens, detection of S. aureus and Salmonella sp. Samples of raw milk were submitted to the detection of Brucella antibodies using the Ring Test (RT) and antibiotic residues by the microbiological method.

Enumeration of Total Bacterial Count (TBC) and coliform Fecal Count (FC): The total viable bacterial counts (TBC) and coliform Fecal Counts (FC) were determined using the pour plate method. Briefly, 1 mL of each decimal dilution of the sample (10–1-10–8) was added to a sterile petri dishes and mixed with 20 mL of molten Plate Count Agar (PCA, Biokar, French) cooled to approximately at 45°C. The set agars were incubated aerobically at 30°C for 72 h. The counts of Fecal Coliforms (FC) was performed as for the total bacterial count but using a VRBL agar medium (brilliant green and phenol red agar, Biokar, French) and incubation of plates agar was realized at 44°C for 24 h. Counts were expressed as colony forming units per mL of milk.

Enumeration of Clostridium perfringens: The detection and enumeration of Clostridium perfringens was carried out in a selective medium TSN (Tryptone Sulfite Neomycin, Conda Pronadisa, Spain) by inoculation of 1 mL of raw milk and dilution (10–1) into 15 mL of this medium after their heating at 80°C /10 min (to destroy vegetative forms). The incubation was performed at 46°C for 24-48 h.

Detection of Staphylococcus aureus: Detection of S. aureus was realized at mannitol salt agar (Conda Pronadisa, Spain) after enrichment at Giolitti Cantoni broth (Conda Pronadisa, Spain) supplemented with potassium tellurite (Pasteur Institute, Algeria). Plate agar were incubated for 24-48 h at 37°C and observed for bacterial growth. Suspect colonies subcultured on the same selective media plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 h in order to obtain a pure cultures. Pure cultures were further examined for morphological (convex elevation, smooth margin), staining and cultural characteristics and for biochemical characteristics (fermentation of mannitol, catalase, DNAase and coagulase production on rabbit plasma).

Detection of Salmonella sp.: For the detection of Salmonella sp., a pre-enrichment step was carried out in buffered peptone water (Conda Pronadisa, Spain) followed by an enrichment on Rapapport Vasiliadis Broth (Conda Pronadisa, Spain). The isolation was performed on Hektoen agar (Conda Pronadisa, Spain) after incubation at 37°C for 24 h.

Detection of Brucella antibodies and antibiotic residues: The detection of Brucella antibodies was made using Brucella Milk Ring Test (MRT). This test was performed by a dding 30 μL of Brucella abortus antigen (biovar 1, strain 99) (Veterinary Laboratories Agency, UK) to a volume of 3 mL of milk that has been stored at 4°C for at least 24 h. The tubes were incubated at 37°C for 1 h. If the blue colour in the cream layer at the top of the fluid is deeper than the remaining milk, the test is considered positive. If the intensity of colour in the cream layer is equal to or less than that in the milk portion, the test is considered negative. The detection of antibiotic residues in raw milk samples was performed according to the official European method for the detection of antibiotic residues in milk (Commission decision 91/180/EEC of 14 February, 1991), which is applied in European community since 1 January, 2002 (the European 91/180, CEE, EC Regulation Nr. 1664/2006). Two tests were successively used: Acidification test based on a possible inhibition growth of B. stearothermophillus variety calidolactis ATCC 10149, as indicated by the pH indicator (purple bromocresol, Sigma Aldrich, Germany), followed by a confirmation test, corresponding to the realization of three agar diffusion tests using three bacteria strains: Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus megaterium.

Other analysis: Milk samples of collectors were submitted to the measurement of their density using a densimeter at a standardized milk temperature, in order to reveal a possible adulteration of milk.

Statistical analysis: The results of microbiological analysis (TBC and FC) were transformed into log10 in order to create a normality distribution. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with STATISTICA version 8.0. Differences were considered significant at p<0.05. The results are presented as square Mean±Standard Error of mean.

RESULTS

Hygienic practices during milking: The results of this study showed clearly the disregard and lack of interest accorded by farmers and collectors to hygienic practices. In most farms concerned by this study, the milking was conducted on salty conditions and the use of pre-dipping was absent. All famers clean the udder and teats using their hands or collective cloths, which can leads to increase the microbial contamination of milk and increase the risks of mastitis spread. Farmers let the cows suckle the calf before milking them, in order to eliminate foremilk from the udder, which is generally the most contaminated in bacteria. At farm level, the equipment used to store milk are an plastic or aluminum matter but a few farmers use a refrigerated tanks to maintain a low temperatures in order to prevent a high microbial contamination. The delivery time of milk to collections centres was considered very long. It was varied between 3 and 7 h, depending to the perimeter of collection and the number of farms associated with each collector. The majority of dairy farms are located far away the milk collection centres, causing a delay in the delivery of milk to the collection centres where cooling facilities are available. All collectors cleaned their isothermal tanks before each use, but the cleaning solution varies from one to another. Most of them, used a cold water, supplemented with soap and detergents. It was suggest that the microbiological quality of water using during cleaning was doubtful, contributing to contaminate the milk.

Table 1:Density of raw milk at the different collectors
Image for - Assessment of Microbiological Quality of Raw Milk Produced at Tizi Ouzou Area (Algeria)
On the same line, the values followed by different letters are significantly different at p<0.05

Table 2:
Total Bacterial Count (TBC) and coliform Fecal Count (FC) of raw milk at farms and collectors level
Image for - Assessment of Microbiological Quality of Raw Milk Produced at Tizi Ouzou Area (Algeria)
On the same column, the values followed by different letters are significantly different at p<0.05

Table 3:Total Bacterial Count (TBC) and coliform Fecal Count (FC) of raw milk at local markets level
Image for - Assessment of Microbiological Quality of Raw Milk Produced at Tizi Ouzou Area (Algeria)
On the same column, the values followed by different letters are significantly different at p<0.05

Table 4:Incidence of S. aureus, Clostridium perfringens and Salmonella sp. on raw milk
Image for - Assessment of Microbiological Quality of Raw Milk Produced at Tizi Ouzou Area (Algeria)

Table 5:Incidence of antibiotic residues and Brucella antibodies on raw milk
Image for - Assessment of Microbiological Quality of Raw Milk Produced at Tizi Ouzou Area (Algeria)

Density of raw milk: Overall milk samples of collectors had a density below the preconized value (1.030). The minimum value of density was observed from collectors affiliated with both dairy 1 and dairy 5 with a value of 1.028±0.0005. While the maximum value was recorded at collectors affiliated with dairy 2, with a mean value of 1.029±0.0003 (Table 1).

Microbiological quality of raw milk: The microbiological analysis of milk samples taken at three levels of production chain revealed a high microbial contamination. The mean log10 of TBC at farms level was 6.73±0.25 log10 CFU mL–1, followed by collector’s tank milk and local market milk with mean values of 6.81±0.19 and 7.2±1.05 log10 CFU mL–1, respectively (Table 2). The counts of TBC varied depending to the affiliation of farms and collectors to the different dairies (Table 2). The average count of TBC and FC at local markets are 7.2±1.05 and 1.51±0.38 log10 CFU mL–1, respectively (Table 3).

The prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus on milk was 24.71%. This rate varies along the production chain. It was highest at markets level than collector’s tank milk or farms level (Table 4). The contamination rate of milk by Clostridium perfringens was very low (2.87%). No contamination case by Salmonella sp. was revealed throughout the dairy chain (Table 4). A high contamination by antibiotic residues was observed for all samples taken along the production chain (Table 5). Out of 174 milk samples taken from three stages, 125 (71.83%) were contaminated. No contamination case by Brucella antibodies was detected (Table 5).

DISCUSSION

The density of milk collected from different dairies was below to the value preconized by Algerian norms (1.030), suggesting an adulteration. The normal density of milk is around 1.030-1.035. It varies according to the dry matter and inversely proportional to the fat content. Adulteration of milk by addition of water may introduce chemical or microbial health hazards as well as reducing the nutritional and processing quality and marketing value of milk8. The microbiological analysis of raw milk samples taken from various segments of production chain showed a high microbial contamination. The total bacteria count was more important in local market and collector’s tank than farms level. The average load of TBC on farms was 6.73±0.25 log10 CFU mL–1. This load increase to reach a values of 6.81±0.19 and 7.2±1.05 log10 CFU mL–1 at collector’s tank and local markets, respectively. This study corroborates the results of other research in smallholder areas in Algeria where counts of TBC exceeded largely the load fixed by Algerian norms (105 CFU mL–1). Ghazi and Niar5 announced that more than 91.78% of milk samples have a charge above 105 CFU mL–1. Adjlane-Kaouche et al.7 reported a load of TBC of 6.42±0.43 log10 CFU mL–1 for milk collected in the mid-Northern region of Algeria. This charge increase to reach an average value of 6.81±0.19 log10 CFU mL–1 during the collection circuit and a value of 7.2±1.05 log10 UFC mL–1 at market points. The high load of TBC may be explained by the intense microbial multiplication, favored by the no application of hygienic practices during milking and storage of milk. The use of plastic buckets during the milking and storage, the high milk temperature, the long distance between farms and collection centres and the lack of cold chain between farms to markets may be the main factors contributing to rapid bacterial multiplication8. The cleaning procedure during milking, cleaning of milking equipment and the hygiene in the handling of milk after milking requires attention to avoid contamination of milk Millogo et al.9. Bonfoh et al.10 have noted that poor cleaning of containers which are an contact with raw milk, leaves a residual contamination levels (4.1 log10 CFU mL–1). According to Faye and Loiseau11, the microbial load of milk results from both the age of product (shelf life) but also it was linked to temperature of storage. The enumeration of total bacteria count is the most common method using by milk processing units to evaluate the hygienic quality of raw milk and therefore, it is an important indicator of hygienic conditions during milking at farm level12. The average load of TBC of milk at local market was 7.2±1.05 log10 UFC mL–1. This value was higher than recorded by El-Marnissi et al.13 who reported a charge of 4.5×105 CFU mL–1 for the milk sold in the city of Fes in Morocco. However, Millogo et al.9 reported a charge of 107 CFU mL–1, on milk sold in the markets of Burkina Faso.

The average contamination of raw milk at farm level by fecal coliforms was 1.53±0.20 log10 CFU mL–1. This value was lower than announced by Aggad et al.4 who reported a load of 103 CFU mL–1 and higher than announced by Ghazi et al.14 who reported an average of 17 CFU mL–1. The charge of fecal coliforms increase to achieve a load of 2.26±0.51 log10 CFU mL–1 at collection centres. The abundance of fecal coliform bacteria in raw milk reflects the non-observance of sanitary measures required during milking, and probably the existence of cross contamination during storage of milk. The main vectors are usually related to the integument of the teat skin, soiled by feces and milking equipment poorly cleaned12.

This study revealed that 24.71% of milk samples were contaminated by S. aureus. The frequencies of isolation varied from segment to another. It was important on local market and collectors than farm level. Aggad et al.4 and Ghazi and Niar5 announced an important isolation frequencies that are in the range of 54.54 and 82%, respectively. While, Adjlane-Kaouche et al.7 reported a frequency of 33.33% at the end of milk collection. The higher prevalence of S. aureus on milk explain the role that this bacteria play on microbial contamination of food animals. The S. aureus is known to be responsible for a significant proportion of subclinical and chronic mastitis in dairy cows. Adding to that, nasal carriage of S. aureus in humans and pets is the main reservoir of this germ, which could contribute to this contamination. Kamal et al.15 reported that hand swabs of dairy workers and food handlers revealed high frequency of Coagulase Positive (CP) S. aureus colonizing their skins. Eighty percent of hand swab sample were positive for CP S. aureus; consequently, they may constitute another sustainable source of CP S. aureus contamination of dairy products. This situation does not remove a mutual transmissions between humans, animals and the food matrix. The absence of a real pasteurization step, the presence of cross contamination and the absence of a continuous refrigeration system in most local markets, as well as the bad practices (conservations storage at ambient temperatures, especially in summer) could be explain the contamination by S. aureus. In case of consumption of raw milk, there can be a real hazard, the main threat being the fact that about 10% of mastitis staphylococci are known to be producers of enterotoxin. This toxin may be produced when S. aureus counts exceed16 105 CFU mL–1.

The prevalence of Clostridium perfringens in milk samples remains low (2.87%), this is probably related to the sampling period, which is itself linked to the alimentation of dairy cows. The dairy cows feed on fresh grass in pastures instead of silage, which constitute an important source of bacterial spores. These results are similar to those announced by Afif et al.17 who reported a contamination rate around 0%. Nevertheless, Aggad et al.4 reported that sulphite-reducing Clostridia were detected in 29% of raw milk, with a lower load than that prescribed by Algerian standard (50 spores mL–1). No contamination by Salmonella sp. was revealed. These results are similar to those announced by Hakem et al.6 and Afif et al.17 who indicate the absence of Salmonella in milk samples. The results of this study revealed that all milk samples were not contaminated by Brucella antibodies. The absence of Brucella antibodies can probably be explained by the results of companions of vaccination and screening to eradicate brucellosis outbreaks in Algeria areas. These results do not corroborate with those announced by Hakem et al.6 who reported a contamination rate of 7.84%. Yabrir et al.18 unregistered a contamination rate of 13.73% in sheep milk at central of Algerian steppe. The ring test sometimes gives a false positive results if the milk sample contains colostrum or consisting a milk obtained from mastitis cow. For this, other serological test are necessary to detect a Brucella cows.

The detection of antibiotic residues in 71.83% of milk samples reflects the abusive use of antimicrobial agents by smallholder producers. Ours results do not corroborate with those announced by Ben-Mahdi and Ouslimani19, who indicated a low contamination rate (9.87%). Adjlane-Kaouche et al.7 found a contamination level of 30%, using a Delvotest method. Variable frequencies of antimicrobial residues in milk have been reported by other studies. Srairi et al.20, Kouame-Sina et al.21, Adesiyun et al.22 and Kivaria et al.16 were announced a contamination rates of 25, 24, 7 and 6.5%, respectively. The high contamination rate by antibiotic residues can probably be explained in part by the massive and uncontrolled use of intra-mammary pharmaceutical preparations during treatments and preventions applied against mastitis cows and the no respect of withdrawal periods. On the other hand, this rate is due to an intentional addition of germ growth inhibitors such as antibiotics in order to stabilize the microbial quality of milk23. Among other reasons which may be explain this high contamination, the errors committed by the farmers such as accidental mixing of milk obtained from a cow treated with other untreated and accidental mixing of medicated feed with the ration of lactating cows24. The presence of antibiotics residues in milk is a public and economic concern, because of the risk of impaired health in persons who consume milk and the interference with manufacturing of dairy products by the antibiotics present in milk16.

CONCLUSION

The sanitary quality of milk meets many challenges, it is firstly, a necessary condition to ensure the health of consumers and secondly the issue of quality is essential in the sector because it largely determines the economic development of dairy sector. This study was revealed a high microbial contamination of milk along the production chain, which indicated that consumption of raw milk pose a health hazards. The high bacterial count in milk can attributed for many factors. Among them, the lack of hygiene practices during milking, storage and handling of milk, the increase of delivery time of milk to collection centres and the absence of a continuous system of refrigeration in order to minimize the bacterial multiplication. The improving of milk quality needs the training and education of farmers, collectors and milk sellers in milk hygiene and the application of quality policy based on payment of milk according to the bacteriological quality.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors would like to acknowledge the smallholder dairy farmers and collectors for their cooperation and for samples collection.

REFERENCES

1:  Bouguedour, R. and S. Ichou, 2010. The dairy industry in the renewal of the agricultural economy. Communication at the 8th Day of Veterinary Science, Algiers, April 18-19, 2010.

2:  Djermoun, A. and F. Chehat, 2012. [The development of the dairy industry in Algeria: Self-sufficiency to dependence]. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., Vol. 24, No. 1.
Direct Link  |  

3:  Hacini, N., 2007. Dairy industry and food risks. Mag. Vet. Rev., 58: 22-29.

4:  Aggad, H., F. Mahouz, Y.A. Ammar and M. Kihal, 2009. [Assessment of milk hygienic quality in Western Algeria]. Revue Medecine Veterinaire, 12: 590-595.
Direct Link  |  

5:  Ghazi, K. and A. Niar, 2011. [Hygienic quality of cow milk, in various bovine breeds of Tiaret area (Algeria)]. Tropicultura, 29: 193-196, (In French).
Direct Link  |  

6:  Hakem, A., B. Yabrir, D. Khelef, A. Laoun and F. Mouffok et al., 2012. Evaluation of microbial quality of raw milk into two dairies Mitidja's farms (Algeria). Bull. USAMV Vet. Med., 69: 272-281.
Direct Link  |  

7:  Adjlane-Kaouche, S., R. Benhacine, F. Ghozlane and A. Mati, 2014. Nutritional and hygienic quality of raw milk in the mid-northern region of Algeria: Correlations and risk factors. Scient. World J.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

8:  Swai, E.S. and L. Schoonman, 2011. Microbial quality and associated health risks of raw milk marketed in the Tanga region of Tanzania. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed., 1: 217-222.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

9:  Millogo, V., K.S. Sjaunja, G.A. Ouedraogo and S. Agenas, 2010. Raw milk hygiene at farms, processing units and local markets in Burkina Faso. Food Control, 21: 1070-1074.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

10:  Bonfoh, B., C. Roth, A.N. Traore, A. Fane and C.F. Simbe et al., 2006. Effect of washing and disinfecting containers on the microbiological quality of fresh milk sold in Bamako (Mali). Food Control, 17: 153-161.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

11:  Faye, B. and G. Loiseau, 2002. Sources of Contamination in Dairy Supply Chains and Approaches to Quality Control. In: Food Safety Management in Developing Countries: Proceedings of the International Workshop, CIRAD-FAO, 11-13 December 2000, Montpellier (France), Ellen, H., B. Ezzedine, F. Pierre and P. Maya (Eds.). CIRAD/FAO., Montpellier, France, ISBN-13: 9782876144217

12:  Mhone, T.A., G. Matope and P.T. Saidi, 2011. Aerobic bacterial, coliform, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus counts of raw and processed milk from selected smallholder dairy farms of Zimbabwe. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 151: 223-228.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

13:  El Marnissi, B., R. Belkou, A. El Ouali Lalami and L. Bennani, 2013. [Microbiological and physicochemical characterization of raw milk and some Moroccan traditional dairy derivatives (Lben and Jben)]. Les Technologies Laboratoire, 8: 100-111, (In French).
Direct Link  |  

14:  Ghazi, K., B. Guessas, A. Niar and K.I. Louacini, 2010. Hygienic quality of cow milk, in various bovine breeds of Tiaret area (Algeria). Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 5: 592-596.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

15:  Kamal, R.M., M.A. Bayoumi and S.F.A. Abd El Aal, 2013. MRSA detection in raw milk, some dairy products and hands of dairy workers in Egypt, a mini-survey. Food Control, 33: 49-53.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

16:  Kivaria, F.M., J.P.T.M. Noordhuizen and A.M. Kapaga, 2006. Evaluation of the hygienic quality and associated public health hazards of raw milk marketed by smallholder dairy producers in the Dar es Salaam region, Tanzania. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 38: 185-194.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

17:  Afif, A., M. Faid and M. Najimi, 2008. Qualite microbiologique du lait cru produit dans la region de Tadla au Maroc. Rev. Biol. Biotechnol., 7: 2-7.
Direct Link  |  

18:  Yabrir, B., A. Hakem, A. Mostefaoui, A. Laoun and Y. Titouche et al., 2013. [Microbiological quality of raw ewe's milk in Algerian middle steppe]. Afrique Sci., 9: 86-92, (In French).
Direct Link  |  

19:  Ben-Mahdi, M.H. and S. Ouslimani, 2009. Mise en evidence de residus d'antibiotiques dans le lait de vache produit dans l'Algerois. Eur. J. Scient. Res., 36: 357-362.

20:  Srairi, M.T., H. Alaoui, A. Hamama and B. Faye, 2004. [Physical and chemical quality and antibiotics contamination of bulk milk in intensive dairy cattle farms in Morocco]. Rencontres Recherches Ruminants, 11: 115-115, (In French).
Direct Link  |  

21:  Kouame-Sina, S.M., A. Bassa, A. Dadie, K. Makita, D. Grace, M. Dje and B. Bonfoh, 2010. [Microbial risk analysis of local raw milk in Abidjan (Cote d'Ivoire)]. Revue Africaine Sante Productions Animales, 8: 35-42, (In French).
Direct Link  |  

22:  Adesiyun, A.A., S. Stoute and B. David, 2007. Pre-processed bovine milk quality in Trinidad: Prevalence and characteristics of bacterial pathogens and occurrence of antimicrobial residues in milk from collection centres. Food Control, 18: 312-320.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

23:  Zinedine, A., M. Faid and M. Benlemlih, 2007. [Detection of antibiotic residues in milk and dairy products by a microbiological method]. Revue Microbiologie Industrielle Sanitaire Environnementale, 1: 1-9, (In French).
Direct Link  |  

24:  Abidi, K., 2004. Antibiotics resisdues in milk. Ph.D. Thesis, National School of Veterinary Medicine of Sidi Thabet. Tunisia.

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved