Submit Manuscript

Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances

Year: 2016 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 44-52
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Development of New ‘Indigenous Dot-ELISA Kit’ as Sensitive Field Based Herd Screening Test for the Diagnosis of Johne’s Disease in the Domestic Buffalo Population

Shoor Vir Singh Shoor Vir Singh's LiveDNA, Sachin Digambar Audarya, Manju Singh, Bjorn John Stephen, Daljeet Chhabra, Kundan Kumar Chaubey, Saurabh Gupta Saurabh Gupta's LiveDNA, Sahzad, Anjali Pachoori, Sujata Jayaraman, Gajendra Kumar Aseri, Jagdip Singh Sohal Jagdip Singh Sohal's LiveDNA, Ashok Kumar Bhatia and Kuldeep Dhama Kuldeep Dhama's LiveDNA

ABSTRACT

Johne’s disease is endemic in the domestic riverine buffalo population of the country and bio-load of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis is increasing in the absence of indigenous diagnostic kits and control programs. A new ‘dot-ELISA kit’ has been developed and validated with indigenous plate ELISA for the screening of buffaloes against Johne’s disease. Out of 156 serum samples screened 41.0 (64), 85.8 (134) and 85.2% (133) were positive for MAP infection by indigenous plate ELISA kit condition (A), condition (B) and indigenous dot ELISA, respectively. Dot-ELISA kit detected 85.2 (133) and 90.3% (141) buffaloes as positive together with indigenous plate ELISA kit in condition A and B, respectively. Comparison of ‘Indigenous plate-ELISA’ with ‘Indigenous dot-ELISA’ revealed substantial agreement between two tests. Study showed that ‘Indigenous dot-ELISA test’ has potential to be sensitive and cost effective ‘Field based herd screening test’ for the large scale screening of the domestic livestock population against Johne’s disease. The study also showed that despite high slaughter rate, incidence of Johne’s disease was high in native population of riverine buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) and call for immediate control of disease.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation

How to cite this article

Shoor Vir Singh, Sachin Digambar Audarya, Manju Singh, Bjorn John Stephen, Daljeet Chhabra, Kundan Kumar Chaubey, Saurabh Gupta, Sahzad, Anjali Pachoori, Sujata Jayaraman, Gajendra Kumar Aseri, Jagdip Singh Sohal, Ashok Kumar Bhatia and Kuldeep Dhama, 2016. Development of New ‘Indigenous Dot-ELISA Kit’ as Sensitive Field Based Herd Screening Test for the Diagnosis of Johne’s Disease in the Domestic Buffalo Population. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 11: 44-52.

DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2016.44.52

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajava.2016.44.52

Search

INTRODUCTION

Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP), the cause of chronic incurable enteritis called as Johne’s Disease (JD) primarily infects domestic livestock species and has also been recovered from wild ruminants (e.g., bison, blue bulls and deer) as well as human beings (Chiodini et al., 1984; Beard et al., 2001; Hermon-Taylor, 2009; Singh et al., 2010). Disease has major impact on the farm economy and has been frequently reported from dairy farms and farmer’s herds worldwide (Kumar et al., 2007; Singh et al., 2013a, b; Singh et al., 2014a). Buffalo considered as ‘Black Gold’ is primarily found in Asia. Buffalo population in the country has risen from 43.40 million in 1951-109 million in 2013; according to FAO and majority (98.0%) of buffaloes in the region are raised by small farmers owning less than two hectares of land and less than five buffaloes. Sharp rise in human population has led to the high demand of cheap source of protein. In recent years there has been unprecedented rise in slaughter of low or unproductive buffaloes to meet the ever growing demand of food for internal consumption and export to middle East countries. Despite high slaughter rate, per animal productivity in case of buffaloes is low. This is mainly due to the presence of chronic infections, like Johne’s disease. In the absence of ‘Indigenous diagnostic kits’, there are very few studies estimated status of Johne’s disease in the riverine buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) population. In the absence of control programs at national scale, bio-load of MAP has increased continuously in the bovine (buffaloes and cattle) population (Singh et al., 2010, 2013a, 2014c). Transmission of MAP bacilli from infected animals to susceptible young buffalo calves cannot be prevented. Since MAP is passed from generations to generations through semen, during pregnancy, by feeding of colostrums and milk (Buergelt et al., 2006). Therefore, improved hygiene, good management practices, segregation of diseased animals and culling of infected animals has little impact on the overall management and control of disease in herds and flocks.

Lack of indigenous tests for the detection infected animals in early stages of the disease is the major stumbling block in the control of JD at National level (Singh et al., 2014b). In chronic infections like JD, it has been recommended to use multiple diagnostic tests (Singh et al., 2014a; Wadhwa et al., 2012). Serology has been used in sero-screening and diagnosis of MAP infection as stated by OIE in 2014. Johnin the only test for the diagnosis of disease in the field but suffers from poor sensitivity and specificity. Of the range of diagnostic tests (faecal microscopy, fecal culture, blood PCR, ELISA and IFN-γ) available, none has potential to be used in the field. ‘Indigenous Plate-ELISA kit’ initially standardized for the diagnosis of Johne’s disease in goats (Singh et al., 2007a) was later adopted for the screening of cattle, buffaloes and sheep population (Singh et al., 2007b). The study standardized an indigenous ‘dot-ELISA kit’ (d-ELISA) for the screening of buffaloes for Johne’s disease. Indigenous ‘plate-ELISA kit’ (p-ELISA) was used as ‘Parallel test’ to evaluate efficacy of d-ELISA. Study also evaluated two test combinations (p-ELISA and d-ELISA) for the diagnosis of JD in buffaloes as ‘Herd screening test’.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Serum samples were collected from native buffalo population of government farm located at Kiratpur (Itarsi) in Central India, Buffaloes were managed under semi-intensive system of management. Most of the buffaloes were weak and suspected for Johne’s disease at the time of sampling. Some buffaloes had diarrhoea and clinical symptoms of Johne’s disease. Native buffalo population sampled belonged to Murrah, Jafrawadi and Bhadawari breeds. A total of 156 buffaloes (153 females and 3 males) were sampled between March and September, 2015. Serum samples were collected randomly and screened for MAP infection using goat based ‘Indigenous plate-ELISA’ kit; standardized in buffaloes (Yadav et al., 2008) and the newly standardized indigenous ‘dot-ELISA’ kit using same semi-Purified Protoplasmic Antigen (sPPA). Buffaloes were maintained on optimal nutrition in semi-intensive management system (Green fodder, dry bhusa with mineral concentrate). Housing and hygienic conditions of the farm were good.

Indigenous plate ELISA (p-ELISA): Native strain (S5) of MAP characterized as ‘Indian Bison type’ of goat origin was used as antigen source (Sohal et al., 2009). Initially ‘Indigenous p-ELISA’ developed for goats (Singh et al., 2007a) has previously been standardized in cattle (Sharma et al., 2008) and buffaloes (Yadav et al., 2008). Soluble whole cell, semi Purified Protoplasmic Antigen (sPPA) was prepared from the strain (S5) of novel ‘Indian Bison type’ biotype of MAP (Strain S5), isolated from a terminal case of JD in a goat (Sevilla et al., 2005). Antigen was standardized at 0.1 μg in 100 μL of carbonate-bicarbonate buffer, (pH 9.6) was added in each well of flat bottom 96 well ELISA plate and incubated for overnight at 4°C.

Image for - Development of New ‘Indigenous Dot-ELISA Kit’ as Sensitive Field Based Herd Screening Test for the Diagnosis of Johne’s Disease in the Domestic Buffalo Population
Fig. 1: Dot-ELISA test in buffaloes serum samples showing brown dot for positive samples for Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis

Table 1: Sample to positive ratios and status of Johne’s disease on the basis of likelihood ratios
Image for - Development of New ‘Indigenous Dot-ELISA Kit’ as Sensitive Field Based Herd Screening Test for the Diagnosis of Johne’s Disease in the Domestic Buffalo Population

Plate was washed thrice with PBST (PBS with 0.05% tween 20), blocked with 100 μL of 3% skimmed milk in PBS and was incubated at 37°C for 1 h. After blocking, plate was washed thrice with PBST, test serum samples (100 μL of 1:50 diluted samples) were added in duplicate wells and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Washing of plate was done thrice, 100 μL of optimally diluted (1:2500) rabbit anti-bovine conjugate was added and plates were again incubated for one hour at 37°C. Washing was done five times with PBST, 100 μL of freshly prepared OPD substrate was added and incubated till development of colour (5-10 min) at 37°C. Absorbance was read at 450 nm in ELISA reader (i Mark micro-plate reader, Biorad). Serum samples from weak culture positive and healthy and culture negative buffaloes were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Optical Densities (OD) were transformed and expressed as sample to positive (S/P) ratios as per the method of Collins (2002) (Table 1).

Analysis of OD (absorbance) values:

Image for - Development of New ‘Indigenous Dot-ELISA Kit’ as Sensitive Field Based Herd Screening Test for the Diagnosis of Johne’s Disease in the Domestic Buffalo Population

Values of sample to positive ratios and corresponding status of Johne’s disease in animals was determined: In condition A, samples in Positive (P) and Strong Positive (SP) categories of S/P ratio were taken as positive for MAP infection. Whereas, in condition B, samples in Low Positive (LP), Positive (P) and Strong Positive (SP) categories of S/P ratio were taken as positive for MAP infection. Sensitivity and specificity of the ‘Indigenous p-ELISA kit’ as per Singh et al. (2007b) was 83.3 and 90.0%, respectively.

Indigenous dot ELISA (d-ELISA): Plastic strips with 12 legs (combs) with nitrocellulose membranes were coated with 1 μL (4 μg μL‾1) of antigen solution from strain ‘S5’ and incubated at 37°C for 2 h. Combs were stored at 4°C for further use. Subsequently, 250 μL of blocking solution (3.0% skimmed milk powder in PBS) was added to the used and cleaned ELISA plate wells and the strips were incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Combs were washed in PBST solution (3 times) and dipped in 250 μL of serum solution (1:50) incubated at 37°C for 1 h followed by washing in PBST (3 times). The 250 μL of rabbit anti-bovine HRP conjugate solution was added to each well and combs were incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Finally, 250 μL of 3,3ˊ-Diaminobenzidine (6 mg/10 mL of 1X PBS) (Substrate solution) was added in new wells of used and cleaned ELISA plates, wherein combs were dipped till colour was developed (5-10 min) at room temperature. Reaction was stopped by dipping the combs in autoclaved triple distilled water air dried and observed for the appearance of brown dots (Fig. 1). The results of positive and negative controls at each comb were used to assist in reading of the test samples.

Statistical analysis: Mc Nemar's test and kappa agreement have applied for the measure the statistical significance between results of two tests (Table 2 and 3) by Graph Pad software, USA and sensitivity and specificity of the tests was measured by Med-Calc software, Belgium (Table 4).

RESULTS

Condition A: Out of 156 buffaloes screened, 41.0 (64) and 58.9% (92) were positive and negative in p-ELISA, respectively (Table 2). However, in d-ELISA, 85.2 (133) and 14.7% (23) buffaloes were positive and negative, respectively. On the basis of S/P ratio, 0.6, 40.3, 44.8, 11.5 and 2.5% buffaloes were in the strong positive, positive, low positive, suspected and negative categories with respect to the status of Johne’s disease infection in p-ELISA. Results showed that with respect to the status of Johne’s disease, 41.0 (64) and 14.7% (23) samples that were positive and negative in both the tests were considered as True Positives (TP) and True Negatives (TN), respectively (Table 2). Proportional agreement between ‘p-ELISA’ and ‘d-ELISA’ was 55.7% (Table 2). However, there were 69 (44.2%) buffaloes as false positive p-value and kappa agreement were calculated to compare combinations of tests; p-ELISA vs d-ELISA and p-value was >0.0001 which was significantly different. Whereas, Kappa agreement was 0.215 and strength of agreement was fair and 95% confidence interval was 0.129-0.300 (Table 4).

Condition B: Out of 156 buffaloes screened, 85.8% (134) buffaloes were positive in p-ELISA kit as compared to 85.2% (133) d-ELISA. However, these 85.2% positive buffaloes were distributed in strong positive (0.6%), positive (40.3%), low positive (39.7%) and suspected (4.4%) categories of S/P ratio of p-ELISA kit. Therefore, of 156 buffaloes screened by p-ELISA and d-ELISA 126, (80.7%) and 15 (9.6%) buffaloes were considered as true positive and true negative, respectively. With a mis-match of 9.6% (15) buffaloes, of which 8 (5.1%) can be considered false negative and 7 (4.4%) buffaloes can be considered as false positive in d-ELISA. Similarly in d-ELISA 5.4% (8) buffaloes positive in p-ELISA were detected as negatives and can be considered as false positives in p-ELISA. However, 2.5% (4) negative samples in p-ELISA and d-ELISA matched perfectly. Proportional agreement between ‘p-ELISA’ and ‘d-ELISA’ was 90.3% (Table 3). However, two tests together detected, 133 (85.2%) buffaloes as positive (Table 3). The pvalue and kappa agreement were calculated for comparative combinations of tests (p-ELISA vs d-ELISA) and p-value was 1.0. Kappa agreement was 0.611 and strength of agreement was good and 95% confidence interval was 0.431-0.790 (Table 4).

Table 2:
Comparative evaluation of indigenous plate-ELISA and dot ELISA in buffaloes (n = 156 samples)-Condition A
Image for - Development of New ‘Indigenous Dot-ELISA Kit’ as Sensitive Field Based Herd Screening Test for the Diagnosis of Johne’s Disease in the Domestic Buffalo Population
*Figures in parenthesis are percent, Total samples (n) =156, N: Negative, P: Positive, TP: True positive, TN: True negative, FN: False negative, FP: False positive, Sensitivity: 100%, Specificity: 25%

Table 3:
Comparative evaluation of indigenous plate-ELISA and dot ELISA in buffaloes (n = 156 samples)-Condition B
Image for - Development of New ‘Indigenous Dot-ELISA Kit’ as Sensitive Field Based Herd Screening Test for the Diagnosis of Johne’s Disease in the Domestic Buffalo Population
*Figures in parenthesis are percent, Total samples (n) =156, N: Negative, P: Positive, TP: True positive, TN: True negative, FN: False negative, FP: False positive, Sensitivity: 94.0%, Specificity: 68.0%

Table 4:
Statistical analysis between two tests by Mc-Nemar test and Kappa agreement in buffaloes
Image for - Development of New ‘Indigenous Dot-ELISA Kit’ as Sensitive Field Based Herd Screening Test for the Diagnosis of Johne’s Disease in the Domestic Buffalo Population
LP: Low positive, P: Positive, SP: Strong positive, Kappa value (0.0-0.20, poor, 0.21-0.40, Fair, 0.41-0.60, moderate, 0.61-0.80, substantial good and 0.81-100, perfect)

DISCUSSION

In India though first case of Johne’s disease was reported in 1913 but it is still a major health problem in domestic ruminants (Singh et al., 2014a) and country-wide estimates on prevalence of MAP infection are not available. In a major study by Singh et al. (2014a), 28.3% bio-load of MAP infection was reported in buffaloes from North India in last 28 years (1985-2013). This study also revealed that at least 41.0% (64) buffaloes can be safely considered as positives for MAP infection using indigenous plate-ELISA kit, since these buffaloes were detected positive in two tests combinations (Table 2). However, a total of 133 (85.2%) and 23 (14.7%) buffaloes were positive and negative in dot-ELISA (Table 2). Since disease is endemic in domestic livestock (Singh et al., 2014a), low positive (44.8% in p-ELISA and 39.7% in d-ELISA) can be considered as positive. In a study from Agra region of North India, Yadav et al. (2008) detected MAP from 48.0% tissues of unproductive buffaloes slaughtered for meat production. Using ‘Indigenous ELISA kit’, they showed that sero-prevalence of MAP infection in slaughtered buffaloes was 46.7% in the Agra region. Another study by Singh et al. (2008), wherein large scale sero-survey was conducted using this p-ELISA kit, 28.6% in buffaloes from Northern India were found positive. Sero-prevalence was low (8.6-10.5%) in Murrah breed of young bulls from the states of Uttar Pradesh and Punjab using this p-ELISA kit. However, large number of bulls on borderline (78.0-84.2%) and were considered as negative. The comprehensive study of 28 years (1985-2013) by Singh et al. (2014a) showed that, bio-load of MAP was moderately high (28.6%) in buffaloes as compared to goats (20.1%) and was behind cattle (39.3%), sheep (32.7%). Lillini et al. (2002) reported 13.3% prevalence of MAP in the Latium region of Italy using PCR in fecal samples of water buffalo herds. Molecular epidemiology studies by Kaur et al. (2011) revealed that as compared to ‘Cattle type’ biotype, ‘Indian Bison type’ was the predominant (82.0%) biotype in domestic livestock including buffaloes. Georges et al. (2011) reported 13.1% of water buffaloes were serologically positive for MAP in ELISA and 13.2% were positive in IFN-γ test. They found significant association between age and sero-positive test results, (p = 0.007, chi square 1 df, 95% confidence). Sezzi et al. (2010) studied 1400 buffaloes belonging to 71 herds in the Latium region of Italy using two different commercial ELISA kits (Pourquier and ID.vet). In Pourquier kit none of the buffaloes was positive, whereas in ID.vet kit 3 buffaloes were positives (0.2% prevalence). Similarly, Singh et al. (2007a) showed that using commercial tests antigen the sensitivity of the ELISA was extremely low. It may be due to the use of different strains as the source of antigen. Desio et al. (2013) carried out a study on 1350 buffaloes belonging to 56 herds in the Caserta province, of Campania region, Italy. The prevalence of infected buffalo dairy herds was estimated by a commercial ELISA kit using individual blood samples of animals over 24 months of age. On the basis of performance (sensitivity 43%, specificity 99.3%) of ELISA test on serum, the resulting true prevalence at animal level and at herd level was 4% (95% CI 3-5%) and 74,1% (95% CI 71.8-76%). Waqas et al. (2015) reported 4,5% prevalence of MAP infection on the basis of suspected lesions in buffaloes with non-significant difference between age groups. However, prevalence was relatively higher in buffaloes more than 10 years old (6.1%) than buffaloes of less than 5 years (3.6%) of age and between 5-10 years (3.7%) years of age. Gamberale et al. (2014) reported bio-load of MAP in buffaloes over 12 months were subjected to yearly serological examination by ELISA and positive animals were culled. The overall yearly raw prevalence obtained was very low (1.0, 2.0-0 and 0%) between 2009-2012. Abbas et al. (2011) has screened the breeding and teaser bulls for the presence of antibodies against MAP at three Semen Production Units (SPUs) located in Punjab, Pakistan. A total of 253 samples were collected from SPUs and a commercially available indirect screen ELISA (Is-ELISA) was applied. Indirect screen-ELISA detected antibodies in 20 (24.6%), 16 (22.8%) and 17 (16.6%) samples from SPU-I, SPU-II and SPU-III, respectively. Collectively, seroprevalence of 20.0% (47/235) in breeding bulls and 33.3% (6/18) in teaser bulls was observed and thus it poses a potential threat of disease spread to a high number of heifers and cows through artificial insemination. Khan et al. (2010) has analysed cattle (Bos taurus) and buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) from an abattoir of the district of Lahore for the presence of MAP and Mycobacterium bovis through acid-fast staining and polymerase chain reaction.

Table 5:
Bio-load of Johne’s disease in buffaloes and domestic livestock species globally and in India
Image for - Development of New ‘Indigenous Dot-ELISA Kit’ as Sensitive Field Based Herd Screening Test for the Diagnosis of Johne’s Disease in the Domestic Buffalo Population

Most of the animals were emaciated. Diarrhea was noticed in 15.6% of buffaloes and 19.2% of cattle. Intestinal pathology was observed in 29% of buffaloes and 32.8% of cattle. Number of Mesenteric Lymph Nodes (MLN) showing gross lesions was a little higher (35.6%) in cattle than buffaloes (31.2%). Acid-fast staining of tissue scraping smears revealed the presence of Acid-Fast Bacilli (AFB) in 17.4% intestinal and 16.4% MLN tissue samples in buffalo while in cattle 19.2% intestinal and 17.8% MLN were found positive for AFB. In buffaloes, PCR confirmed 12.8% intestinal and 12.4% MLN positive samples for MAP. However, in cattle, PCR analysis demonstrated 14.2% positive results for MAP in both MLN and intestinal tissue samples. PCR also confirmed M. bovis in 5.8% of cattle and 5% of buffaloes MLN and intestinal tissues. PCR positive tissue samples for MAP were from those animals which were emaciated, having diarrhea and severe gross lesions. Acid Fast Bacilli were was also detected in tissue scrapping smears of these animals.

Mohan et al. (2009) reported 5.8% sero-prevalence of paratuberculosis in buffaloes from unorganized dairy farms in Gujarat. Incidence of MAP was lower in rural dairy population than organized dairy farms. Tripathi et al. (2007) screened 320 buffaloes (Central West India: 80, Northern India: 240) sera for MAP infection by Pourquier ELISA kit did not show antibody prevalence. Sivakumar et al. (2005) estimated sero-prevalence of MAP in buffalo to be 21.3% in Chennai. In another study, the Ziehl-Neelsen’s stained tissue sections revealed acid-fast bacilli in grade-3 and grade-2 buffaloes and acid-fast granular debris were present in grade-1 buffaloes. Of 20 buffaloes, 14 (70%) were positive by IS900 PCR and 6 (30%) by MAP culture (Sivakumar et al., 2006). Singh et al. (2014c) screened 25 young Murrah bulls, 14 (56.0%) were positive for BJD. Sero-incidence of BJD was higher in young bulls of Murrah breed in their native tract. Chauhan et al. (2011) given his assumption that annual death losses within MAP infected herd may reach 10% and incidence of subclinical cases shedding organisms intermittently may be as high as 15.0% (Table 5).

In an earlier study, Bech-Nielsen et al. (1993) evaluated dot-ELISA results using non-absorbed sera in 29 of 44 (65.9%) clinically-suspect animals giving positive results by faecal culture and 85 of 93 (91.4%) cattle testing negative by faecal culture. With absorbed sera, the sensitivity of visual determination decreased to 15 of 44 (34.1%) while specificity increased to 91 of 93 (97.8%). Approximately 75% of cattle yielding positive results by dot-ELISA were heavy bacterial shedders (>1,500 colonies/g of faeces) at the time of serological testing. Rajukumar et al. (2006) measured the sensitivity and specificity for the dot-EIA with respect to plate ELISA and found to be 65.6% and 92.9% and for plate ELISA with respect to dot-EIA were 78.0 and 89.0%, respectively. Woodruff et al. (1991) used serum dot ELISA for the screening of MAP in animals were found infected and non-infected by culture, where 86 were positive of 101 infected cattle and 64 were negative for 64 non-infected cattle. Results of conventional ELISA and Agar Gel Immune Diffusion (AGID) tests were positive for 79 of 99 and for 51 of 101 infected cattle, respectively. The dot ELISA also was evaluated by comparing results of testing 708 sera with results of bacteriologic culturing of matched fecal samples from 262 cattle in 3 central Ohio dairy herds known to include cattle infected with MAP. Results of the dot ELISA were positive for 25 of 39 sera from cattle with positive results on culturing of concurrently obtained fecal specimens. The dot ELISA results were negative for 661 of 669 sera from cattle with negative results to culturing of concurrently obtained fecal specimens. The 39 sera from cattle with positive results on bacteriologic culturing of matched fecal specimens had positive results for ELISA and the AGID test 25 and 14 times, respectively. The 669 sera from cattle with concurrently negative results on bacteriologic culturing of faeces had negative results to ELISA and the AGID test 559 and 668 times, respectively. However, the comparative studies involving d-ELISA and p-ELISA for the detection of MAP infection in buffaloes are not available in literature. Also the comparison between d-ELISA and p-ELISA between condition A and B showed strength of agreement in condition B was good and p-value did not differ significantly (Table 4).

CONCLUSION

Study showed that d-ELISA could be used as highly sensitive and cost effective test for the diagnosis of JD and for the large scale screening of buffalo herds. Sensitivity of d-ELISA was higher than p-ELISA, especially for low shedders (Condition B). Therefore, d-ELISA emerged as ‘Field based herd screening test’ which can be used for the implementation of JD control program in India with p-ELISA as parallel test or as stand alone test.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Authors are thankful to Semi govt. organized farm, Kiratpur and Madhya Pradesh State Livestock and Poultry development corporation, Bhopal for providing the samples and Director, CIRG, Makhdoom for providing the facilities to screen the samples.

REFERENCES

  1. Abbas, M., M. Munir, S.A. Khaliq, M.I. Haq, M.T. Khan and Z.A. Qureshi, 2011. Detection of paratuberculosis in breeding bulls at Pakistani semen production units: A continuous source of threat. ISRN Vet. Sci.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  2. Beard, P.M., M.J. Daniels, D. Henderson, A. Pirie and K. Rudge et al., 2001. Paratuberculosis infection of nonruminant wildlife in Scotland. J. Clin. Microbiol., 39: 1517-1521.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  3. Bech-Nielsen, S., W.P. Shulaw, P.L. Frandsen, J.B. Jorgensen, P. Ahrens and N.C. Feld, 1993. Use of a dot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on absorbed sera for the diagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz., 12: 617-627.
    PubMedDirect Link
  4. Buergelt, C.D., B.S. Williams, G.R.G. Monif, P. Pinedo and J.H. Decker, 2006. Nested polymerase chain reaction and prenatal detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (Map) in bovine allantoic fluid and fetuses. Int. J. Applied Res. Vet. Med., 4: 232-238.
    Direct Link
  5. Chauhan, H.C., A.I. Dadawala, S.S. Patel, P.B. Ranaware and K.M. Jadhav et al., 2011. Paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) in a buffalo: A case report. Buffalo Bull., 30: 111-112.
    Direct Link
  6. Chiodini, R.J., H.J. Van Kruiningen and R.S. Merkal, 1984. Ruminant paratuberculosis (Johne's disease): The current status and future prospects. Cornell Vet., 74: 218-262.
    PubMed
  7. Collins, M.T., 2002. Interpretation of a commercial bovine paratuberculosis enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay by using Likelihood Ratios. Clin. Vaccine Immunol., 9: 1367-1371.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  8. Desio, G., S. Nizza, S. Montagnaro, S. Sasso and L. De Martino et al., 2013. Estimated prevalence of Johne's disease in herds of water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) in the province of Caserta. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 12: 1-8.
    Direct Link
  9. Gamberale, F., G. Barlozzari, G. DeSantis, P. Scaramella, G. Pietrella, M. Sala and G. Macri, 2014. Paratuberculosis in Italian Mediterranean buffalo: Screening and prevalence study in a breeding farm in province of Rome (2009-2012). Proceedings of the 12th International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis, June 22-26, 2014, Parma, Italy.
  10. Georges, K., C.D. Ezeokoli, N. Seepersadsingh, N. Lambie and L. Rastogi et al., 2011. Serological and subclinical evidence of Johne's disease (Mycobacterium paratuberculosis) in water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) on two farms in Trinidad, West Indies. West Indian Vet. J., 11: 1-6.
  11. Hermon-Taylor, J., 2009. Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis, Crohn's disease and the Doomsday scenario. Gut Pathog., Vol. 1.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  12. Kaur, P., G. Filia, S.V. Singh, P.K. Patil, G.V.P.P.S. Ravi Kumar and K.S. Sandhu, 2011. Molecular epidemiology of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis: IS900 PCR identification and IS1311 polymorphism analysis from ruminants in the Punjab region of India. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 34: 163-169.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  13. Khan, F.A., Z.I. Chaudhry, M.I. Ali, S. Khan, N. Mumtaz and I. Ahmad, 2010. Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. Paratuberculosis in tissue samples of cattle and buffaloes. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 42: 633-638.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  14. Kumar, P., S.V. Singh, A.K. Bhatiya, I. Sevilla and A.V. Singh et al., 2007. Juvenile Capri-Paratuberculosis (JCP) in India: Incidence and characterization by six diagnostic tests. Small Rumin. Res., 73: 45-53.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  15. Lillini, E., F. Gamberale, L. De Grossi, A. Cersini, B. Scherm and A. Fagiolo, 2002. Comparative study on detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis by PCR diagnosis and conventional culture on feaces of water-buffalo herds in the Latium region (Italy). Proceedings of the 7th International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis, June 11-14, 2002, Bilbao, Spain, pp: 283-286.
    Direct Link
  16. Mohan, M.S., P. Duraisamy, P.E. Praveena, P. Sivakumar, B.N. Tripathi and N. Singh, 2009. Prevalence of paratuberculosis in cattle and buffaloes. Indian Vet. J., 86: 4-6.
    Direct Link
  17. Rajukumar, K., B.N. Tripathi, N.P. Kurade and N.S. Parihar, 2006. A dot-enzyme immunoassay for large scale screening of sera for antibodies to Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in goats. J. Applied Anim. Res., 29: 49-52.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  18. Sevilla, I.X., S.V. Singh, J.M. Garrido, G. Aduriz and S. Rodriguez et al., 2005. Molecular typing of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis strains from different hosts and regions. Revue Scientifique Technique, 24: 1061-1066.
    PubMedDirect Link
  19. Sezzi, E., A. Gelli, G. Saralli, T. Zottola and L. de Grossi, 2010. Extremely low prevalence of paratuberculosis in Italian buffaloes: Biological reality or technical ineffectiveness? Revista Veterinaria, 21: 460-462.
    Direct Link
  20. Sharma, G., S.V. Singh, I. Sevilla, A.V. Singh and R.J. Whittington et al., 2008. Evaluation of indigenous milk ELISA with m-culture and m-PCR for the diagnosis of Bovine Johne's Disease (BJD) in lactating Indian dairy cattle. Res. Vet. Sci., 84: 30-37.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link
  21. Singh, S.V., A.V. Singh, P.K. Singh, V.K. Gupta, S. Kumar and J. Vohra, 2007. Sero-prevalence of paratuberculosis in young kids using Bison type, Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis antigen in plate ELISA. Small Rumin. Res., 70: 89-92.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  22. Singh, S.V., A.V. Singh, P.K. Singh, J.S. Sohal and N.P. Singh, 2007. Evaluation of an indigenous ELISA for diagnosis of Johne's disease and its comparison with commercial kits. Indian J. Microbiol., 47: 251-258.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link
  23. Singh, S.V., A.V. Singh, R. Singh, S. Sharma and N. Shukla et al., 2008. Sero-prevalence of Bovine Johne's disease in buffaloes and cattle population of North India using indigenous ELISA kit based on native Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis Bison type genotype of goat origin. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 31: 419-433.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link
  24. Singh, A.V., S.V. Singh, P.K. Singh and J.S. Sohal, 2010. Genotype diversity in Indian isolates of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis recovered from domestic and wild ruminants from different agro-climatic regions. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 33: e127-e131.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link
  25. Singh, S.V., N. Kumar, K.K. Chaubey, S. Gupta and K.D. Rawat, 2013. Bio-presence of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection in Indian livestock farms. Res. Opin. Anim. Vet. Sci., 3: 401-406.
    Direct Link
  26. Singh, S.V., P.K. Singh, S. Gupta, K.K. Chaubey and B. Singh et al., 2013. Comparison of microscopy and blood-PCR for the diagnosis of clinical Johne's disease in domestic ruminants. Iran. J. Vet. Res., 14: 345-349.
    Direct Link
  27. Singh, S.V., P.K. Singh, A.V. Singh, J.S. Sohal and N. Kumar et al., 2014. Bio-load and bio-type profiles of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection in the domestic livestock population endemic for Johne's disease: A survey of 28 years (1985-2013) in India. Transboundary Emerg. Dis., 61: 43-55.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  28. Singh, S.V., J.S. Sohal, N. Kumar, S. Gupta and K.K. Chaubey et al., 2014. Recent approaches in diagnosis and control of mycobacterial infections with special reference to Mycobacterium avium subspecies. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 2: 1-12.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  29. Singh, S.V., R.K. Yadav, V.K. Gupta, S. Gupta, K.K. Chaubey, N.D. Agarwal and N. Kumar, 2014. Co-incidence of bovine Johne's disease and bovine brucellosis in young bulls of murrah breed in their native tract (Rohtak, Haryana, India). Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 2: 23-25.
    Direct Link
  30. Sivakumar, P., B.N. Tripathi and N. Singh, 2005. Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in intestinal and lymph node tissues of water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) by PCR and bacterial culture. Vet. Microbiol., 108: 263-270.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link
  31. Sivakumar, P., B.N. Tripathi, N. Singh and A.K. Sharma, 2006. Pathology of naturally occurring Paratuberculosis in water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Vet. Pathol., 43: 455-462.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  32. Sohal, J.S., N. Sheoran, K. Narayanasamy, V. Brahmachari, S. Singh and S. Subodh, 2009. Genomic analysis of local isolate of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis. Vet. Microbiol., 134: 375-382.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  33. Tripathi, B.N., G.G. Sonawane, S.K. Munjal, R.B. Bind and D. Gradinaru et al., 2007. Seroprevalence of paratuberculosis in selected population of ruminants in India. Proceedings of the 9th International Colloquium on Paratuberculosis, October 29-November 2, 2007, Tsukuba, Japan, pp: 246-249.
  34. Wadhwa, A., R.S. Foote, R.W. Shaw and S. Eda, 2012. Bead-based microfluidic immunoassay for diagnosis of Johne's disease. J. Immunol. Methods, 382: 196-202.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  35. Waqas, A., M.T. Javed, K. Ashfaque and Q. Mehwish, 2015. An abattoir based study on brucellosis, bovine tuberculosis and paratuberculosis in buffaloes and cattle at Faisalabad, Pakistan. Int. J. Vet. Health Sci. Res., 3: 34-38.
    Direct Link
  36. Woodruff, T.S., W.P. Shulaw, S. Bech-Nielsen, G.F. Hoffsis, E. Spangler and L.E. Heider, 1991. Serodiagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis by use of a dot enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Am. J. Vet. Res., 52: 217-221.
    PubMedDirect Link
  37. Yadav, D., S.V. Singh, A.V. Singh, I. Sevilla, R.A. Juste, P.K. Singh and J.S. Sohal, 2008. Pathogenic Bison-type Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis genotype characterized from riverine buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) in North India. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 31: 373-387.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

Search

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *