• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances
  2. Vol 10 (2), 2015
  3. 62-73
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances

Year: 2015 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 62-73
DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2015.62.73
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Using of Bio-Upgraded Rice Straw in Growing Lambs Nutrition

N.E. El-Bordeny, H.M. Khattab, A.M. El-Badr and Marwa A. Madkour

ABSTRACT


The objective of this study was to investigate the ability of biological treatment (Trichoderma viride and Trichoderma reesei application) of rice straw to improve its chemical composition and cell wall constituents, as well as to evaluate male lamb’s performance fed ration containing treated rice straw. Thirty crossbred (Rahmany X Romanof) lambs (3 months old, 21±1.46 kg body weight) were randomly assigned to three groups (10 lambs each). Group one was fed ration contained 57% concentrate feed mixture and 19% clover hay plus 24 Untreated Rice Straw (URS), while group two and three were fed rations containing treated rice straw with Trichoderma reesei (TRSV) and Trichoderma viride (TRSR) instead of URS, respectively. Both of biologically treated rice straw TRSV and TRSR recorded lower OM, NDF, ADF and cellulose contents sthan URS. While TRSV and TRSR recorded higher CP, Ash and ADL contents compared to URS. Recovery rate as DM and OM for TRSV were higher than those for TRSR which was 88.05 vs 85.01 for DM recovery and 86.17 vs 83.47 for OM recovery. Insignificant differences were observed in nutrients digestibility, while insignificant increase in nutritive values as digestible protein and total digestible nutrients as well as nitrogen retention were observed for groups fed TRSV and TRSR compared to control. No significant differences were observed in rumen liquor TVFA’s, ammonia-N concentration and pH value among groups at 0, 3 and 6 h after feeding. Groups received TRSV and TRSR were significantly higher total gain and average daily gain and recorded better feed conversion as DM and CP compared to the control group. It could be concluded that biodegradation of rice straw using T. viride and T. reesei upgrade its chemical composition and inclusion TRSV and TRSR in animal ration had no adverse effect on animal performance.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation
Received: October 09, 2014;   Accepted: January 19, 2015;   Published: March 04, 2015

How to cite this article

N.E. El-Bordeny, H.M. Khattab, A.M. El-Badr and Marwa A. Madkour, 2015. Using of Bio-Upgraded Rice Straw in Growing Lambs Nutrition. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 10: 62-73.

DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2015.62.73

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajava.2015.62.73

INTRODUCTION


There is a wide gap between the available feeds and animals requirements in Egypt. It was estimated by about 6 million tons in term of concentrate feeds and as a shortage of 4.79 million tons of TDN per year (El-Ashry, 2007). In addition, accumulation of agriculture crop residuals especially rice straw has considered one of the important reasons of environmental problems during summer season which residues are burned or wasted and hence lead to environmental pollution and health hazards. Only 4.15 million tons of crop residues out of 33.477 million tons produced are used for feeding ruminants (Ministry of Agriculture, 2006). Not only these by-products can be used in favor of solving feed shortage problem but also as a method to control environmental pollution (El-Ashry et al., 2003; Khattab et al., 2009). The major limitation of using rice straw as animal feed is their lower nutritive values which mainly due to the linkage between polysaccharide and lignin (lignocelluloses bond) are not available to animal digestive hydrolysis, low protein content, high fiber content and low degradability (Van Soest, 2006). Consequently treatments of these materials become essential in order to degrade lingo-cellulosics compounds into lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose and improve crude protein content. During the last years, many efforts have been employed to remove the lignin and/or to break up the linkages between lignin and carbohydrates and to increase their feeding values by biological treatments (Karunanadaa and Varga, 1996; Liu and Orskov, 2000; Zhu et al., 2005; Eun et al., 2006). Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the ability of biological treatment (Trichoderma viride and Trichoderma reesei application) of rice straw to improve its chemical composition and cell wall constituents, as well as to evaluate performance of growing lamb fed ration containing treated rice straw.

MATERIALS AND METHODS


This study was carried out at Mahallet Mossa, farm station, Animal Production Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Ministry of Agriculture and Research Laboratories of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University.

Preparing of the microorganisms and biological treatment
Microorganisms: Trichoderma reesei and Trichoderma viride were obtained from Plant Biotechnology Department, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute, Minufiya University. Trichoderma reesei and T. viride were maintained on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium at 25°C until used. Spore suspension of T. reesei and T. viride were prepared and used to inoculate a sterilized liquid medium containing 40 g molasses, 4 g urea, 2 g KH2 PO4 and 0.3 g MgSO4.7H2O/per Liter distilled water and incubated for 7 days at 25°C.

Laboratory treatments: The fungal biomass including the inoculated medium was used to inoculate the polyethylene bags containing 50 g of sterilized rice straw, with 60% moisture level and incubated at 28°C by Solid State Fermentation System (SSFS) for 3 weeks. At the end of the incubation period, the bags were opened and its contents were oven dried at 65°C for 24 h and milled, then subjected to chemical analysis. The DM and OM recovery were calculated according the following formula:

Image for - Using of Bio-Upgraded Rice Straw in Growing Lambs Nutrition

Image for - Using of Bio-Upgraded Rice Straw in Growing Lambs Nutrition

Field treatments: The fungal biomass including the inoculated medium was used to inoculate rice straw which 2 L culture medium for T. reesei and T. viride separately were added to 500 L of tap water and mixed well with 400 kg rice straw (to get 60% moisture in the mixture) and maintained for 21 days under air temperature in shaded place with daily mixing. Then dried in sunny place and stored until used in animal rations.

Growth trial: Thirty crossbred (Rahmany X Romanof) lambs (3 months old, 21±1.46 kg body weight) were randomly assigned to three groups, 10 lambs each according to live body weight.

Table 1: Ingredients and chemical composition of the three experimental total mixed rations (g kg-1)
Image for - Using of Bio-Upgraded Rice Straw in Growing Lambs Nutrition
URS is untreated rice straw, TRSV is rice straw treated with Trichoderma viride, TRSR is rice straw treated with Trichoderma reesei, CFM is Concentrate feed mixture

Each group was assigned randomly to receive one of the three experimental rations. The experimental rations were formulated to cover lambs allowances according to NRC (1985). The first ration (control) contained 56.62% concentrate feed mixture and 19.05% clover hay plus 24.33 untreated rice straw (URS), while treated rice straw with Trichoderma reesei (TRSV) and Trichoderma viride (TRSR) were replaced by URS in the second and third rations, respectively. Formulation and chemical composition of the experimental rations are presented in Table 1. Complete rations and fresh water were offered twice daily at 8 am and 5 pm in quantities sufficient to allow free choice access to the ration. The growth phase lasted 120 days, the animals were weighed monthly to calculate total and daily gain and feed conversion.

Digestion and nitrogen balance trials: At the end of growth trial, four animals from each group were used to evaluate the experimental rations through digestion trials (21 days for adaptation and 7 days for sample collection). The animals were fed individually in metabolic cages. Feces samples were collected daily. Feces samples were dried at 60-70°C in a hot air oven. Volume of 50 mL diluted sulfuric acid (10%) was butted in urine collect containers each day. A representative samples (10%) of urine volume were stored for nitrogen determination. The orts were weighted daily, meanwhile feed intake was calculated. The dried samples of feces and feeds were grinded to pass through 1 mm screen and then these samples of rations and feces were stored for chemical analysis. Consequently, the nutrients digestibility and nutritive values of the experimental rations were calculated as well as nitrogen balance.

Rumen parameters: Rumen liquor samples were taken just before morning feeding, 3 and 6 h post feeding. Samples of rumen liquor were strained through 4 layers of cheesecloth and its pH was immediately measured after collection using pH meter (HANA, Italy). Strained rumen liquor samples were acidified with 0.1 N hydrochloric acid and concentrated orthophosphoric acid and stored by freezing for determination of total volatile fatty acids (TVFA’s). Ammonia was separated from rumen liquor by steam distillation, collected in boric acid solution and determined by titration with standard acid (Preston, 1995). Total VFA was determined by steam distillation according to Cunniff (1997).

Chemical analysis: Feeds and feces were analyzed for proximate chemical analyses according to AOAC (2000). Nitrogen free extract was calculated by difference. Also urine nitrogen concentration was analyzed according to AOAC (2000). The NDF, ADF and ADL was determined according to Van Soest et al. (1991). Cellulose and hemi-cellulose were calculated by difference according to following equation:

Image for - Using of Bio-Upgraded Rice Straw in Growing Lambs Nutrition

Carboxymethyle cellulase (CMCase) activity assay was determined in culture medium of T. reesei and T. viride according to (Mandels and Waber, 1969).

Blood parameters: At the end of growth trial, blood samples were taken from all experimental animals. A sample of 10 mL of blood per animal was withdrawn from the jugular vein. The blood sample was directly collected into a clean dried glass culture tubes (after addition of heparin as an anti coagulant) at 3 h post feeding. The blood plasma was obtained by centrifuging the blood samples soon after collection at 4000 rpm for 15 min. Blood plasma was transferred into a clean dried glass vials and then stored in deep freezer at -20°C for subsequent specific chemical analysis. Blood plasma samples were analyzed using commercial kits. Total plasma protein concentrations was determined as described by Armstrong and Carr (1964), albumin concentrations was determined using methods of Doumas et al. (1971) blood plasma urea was determined according to (Patton and Crouch, 1977) blood plasma cholesterol was determined according to (Raltiff and Hall, 1973). Alanin amino transferase (ALT) and aspartate amino transferase (AST) activities were calorimetrically determined according to AST and ALT kits (Quimica Clinica Aplicada S.A., Spain) based on reaction of Young (1997) Globulin was calculated.

Statistical analysis: The obtained data were statistic analyzed according to statistical analysis system (SAS., 1999). Separation between means was carried out by using Duncun Multiple Range test (Duncan, 1955). The collected data were statistically analyzed according the following model:

Image for - Using of Bio-Upgraded Rice Straw in Growing Lambs Nutrition

where, yij is represents observation, μ is overall mean, Ti is effect of treatment (experimental group), eij is experimental error. The result are significant at p<0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


Chemical composition and recovery rate: Biodegradation of rice straw resulted in reduction of OM, NDF, ADF and cellulose content for TRSV and TRSR, respectively compared to URS (Table 1).

Image for - Using of Bio-Upgraded Rice Straw in Growing Lambs Nutrition
Fig. 1: Effect of biological treatment on DM and OM recovery rate

Image for - Using of Bio-Upgraded Rice Straw in Growing Lambs Nutrition
Fig. 2: Effect of biological treatment on degradability of crude fiber and its constituents

This may be attributed to utilization of soluble and structure carbohydrate contents by fungi cells as carbon source to produce energy and CO2, to grow up and produce fungal biomass. In this connection Zadrazil et al. (1999) and Sarnklong et al. (2010) stated that cellulose, hemicelluloses and other solid substrates decreased after incubation of fiber materials with pure or mixed cultures of microorganisms under controlled conditions, with the aim of producing a high quality standardized products (different from composting) but losses due to mycelial growth depend on the fungus species.

On the contrary crude protein content increased by 91.7 and 28.5% for TRSV and TRSR, respectively compared to URS (Table 1). This may be due to the trapping of excess ammonia in the biological medium and its subsequent conversion to fungal protein (Gupta et al., 1988) and or presents N2-fixers bacteria in the treated rice straw which Perez et al. (2002) reported that most of the cellulolytic microorganisms establish synergistic relationships with non-cellulolytic species in cellulosic wastes. The present results agree with those obtained by Adamovic et al. (1998), Ramirez-Bribiesca et al. (2010) and Mansour et al. (2014) who found that OM, NDF and ADF contents decreased and crude protein and ash contents increased in treated crops residuals compared to the untreated.

The present results indicated that both biological treatments decreased recovered DM and OM compared to untreated rice straw. These may be due to the hydrolysis effect of the Trichoderma reesei and Trichoderma viride which fungi decompose most of solid substrate of rice straw. The same trend was observed by Jung et al. (1992) and Gupta et al. (1993), who found that, although CP content increased to 13 to 14%, the DM loss was more than 25% and was also uneconomical. Recovered DM and OM for TRSV were higher than those for TRSR (Fig. 1). Moreover T. reesei recorded higher capability of NDF, ADF and cellulose degradation compared to T. viride (Fig. 2).

Table 2: Effect of treatments on nutrients digestibility and nitrogen efficiency utilization
Image for - Using of Bio-Upgraded Rice Straw in Growing Lambs Nutrition
The values in this table revealed the data collected from the digestion trails

The lower recovery rate and higher nutrients degradation recorded for TRSR compared to TRSV (Fig. 1 and 2) may be due to that T. reesei had higher CM Case activity compared to T. viride (Table 1). Similar results were obtained by Tangnu et al. (1981) who found an increase of about of 2.84 and 25 times, respectively in filter paper activity and β-glucosidase activity for Trichoderma reesei compared to Trichoderma viride.

Nutrients digestibility and Nitrogen efficiency utilization: Insignificant differences were noticed among the different experimental groups in all nutrients digestibility (Table 2). Many studies indicated that the biological treatments tend to increase in vitro digestibility of treated materials as Zadrazil and Brunnert (1980), Nikhat et al. (1983), Kamra and Zadrazil (1988), Zadrazil and Puniya (1995), Sharma and Arora (2010) and in vivo digestibility Chen et al. (1995), Akinfemi et al. (2009) and Arora and Sharma (2009). While the insignificant effect in nutrients digestibility recorded in this study may be attributed to that neither untreated rice straw nor treated rice straw was the only roughage source in the animal ration, hence the experimental rations contained about 19% high quality roughage material (clover hay) (Table 1).

Moreover insignificant increase in feeding values as digestible protein and Total Digestible Nutrients (TDN) as well as nitrogen retention were observed for the groups received rations containing treated rice straw (TRSV and TRSR) compared to control group (Table 2). These could be understood through the higher CP content recorded for the rations contained TRSV and TRSR (Table 1) parallel to the insignificant differences in nutrients digestibility. These results disagree with the findings obtained by Walli et al. (1988), Fazaeli et al. (2004), Kabirifard et al. (2007), Omer et al. (2012), Shrivastava et al. (2012) and Mahesh and Mohini (2013) who found that utilization of biological treated crop residues in animal feeding resulted in a positive response in terms of nitrogen balance.

Rumen liquor parameters: Rumen liquor TVFA’s, ammonia-N concentration and pH values showed insignificant differences among the different experimental groups at 0, 3 and 6 h. post feeding (Table 3).

Table 3: Effect of treatments on rumen liquor parameters
Image for - Using of Bio-Upgraded Rice Straw in Growing Lambs Nutrition
a, b and cMeans with different superscripts in the same column are significant (p<0.05) different

Table 4: Effect of treatments on some blood plasma parameters
Image for - Using of Bio-Upgraded Rice Straw in Growing Lambs Nutrition
a and bMeans with different superscripts in the same column are significant (p<0.05) different

Total VFAs concentration in the rumen depends on factors such animal diets, rate of absorption, time of sampling, as well as the microbial population in the rumen and their activities (McDonald et al., 1995). A higher pH is favorable for bacterial adherence, an important prerequisite for fiber digestion (Palmonari et al., 2010). The observed insignificant differences for TVFA’s, ammonia-N concentration and pH value among the different experimental groups may be attributed to that the three experimental ration were approximately similar in chemical composition (Table 1) as well as the insignificant differences recorded in nutrient digestibility (Table 2). These results agree with the findings obtained by Khattab et al. (2009) who reported insignificant differences in rumen fluid TVFA’s concentration between animals received ration containing biological treated wheat straw and those received untreated wheat straw. However, Gado et al. (2006), Salman et al. (2008), Akinfemi and Ladipo (2011), Omer et al. (2012) and Mahesh and Mohini (2013) reported that biological treatments increased rumen TVFA's and ammonia concentration compared to the untreated.

Blood parameters: Data of Table 4 showed insignificant (p>0.05) increase in total plasma protein and albumin concentration for the groups received treated rice straw compared to control. These may be due to the higher CP and DCP content of the ration of these groups compared to control group. Serum total proteins reflect the nutritional status of the animal and it has a positive correlation with dietary protein (Kumar et al., 1980). Also, Bush (1991) reported a positive correlation between dietary protein and plasma protein concentration and stated that the low level of plasma proteins may be attributed to a decrease in the protein absorbed and synthesized and an increase in protein losses.

Table 5: Effect of treatments on lambs growth performance and economic efficiency
Image for - Using of Bio-Upgraded Rice Straw in Growing Lambs Nutrition
a and bMeans with different superscripts in the same row are significantly (p<0.05) different

The present results agree with those obtained by Khattab et al. (2009) who found that inclusion of treated wheat straw in lamb ration did not affect total blood protein concentration. Also insignificant differences were observed among the different experimental groups for blood plasma urea and creatinine concentration. These results indicated that the experimental animals were not in a catabolism situation and kidney function was not adversely or negatively affected by biological treatments consequently, the animals were in a good nutritional condition.

Circulating cholesterol level is known to be influenced by thyroid function (Laird, 1972) and the activity of steroid producing organ (Roussel et al., 1982), therefore, the non-significant variations in cholesterol level among the different treatments indicated that the activity of thyroid and steroids production was the same for all experimental treatments.

The present values of AST and ALT activity indicated normal activity of the animal hepatic tissues. Consequently, biological treatments applied in the present investigation had no an adverse effect on the liver function. Which Benjamin (1984) reported that the enzymes of AST and ALT are most important indicator for liver activity.

Growth performance: Total gain and average daily gain increased (p≤0.05) at a rate of about 22.8 and 19.9% for groups received TRSV and TRSR, respectively compared to control group. Also significantly (p≤0.05) improvements in feed conversion as DM and CP were observed for the groups received ration containing treated rice straw (T2 and T3) compared to the control group (T1), while insignificant differences were noticed in feed conversion as TDN (Table 5). The higher total gain and average daily gain recorded for groups received biological treated rice straw could be attributed to the insignificant higher intake of CP and TDN for groups T2 and T3 compared to T1. Moreover the superiority of feed conversion as DM and CP for T2 and T3 could be attributed to the close values of feed intake for the different experimental groups parallel to the higher values of average daily gain recorded for T2 and T3 compared to T1. Present findings are in consistent with the findings of Walli et al. (1988), Kabirifard et al. (2007), Khattab et al. (2009), Omer et al. (2012) and Shrivastava et al. (2012) who reported a positive response in terms of nutrient utilization, nitrogen balance as well as gain in body weight associated with utilization of biological treated crop residues in animal feeding.

CONCLUSION


Biodegradation of rice straw using T. viride and T. reesei improved its chemical composition which decrease fiber contents and increase its protein contents as well as no adverse effects were noticed on nutrients digestibility, rumen fermentation and nitrogen balance. Also, biological treatment upgrade the chemical composition and feeding values of rice straw in order to increase its utilization and decrease environmental problems. But it must be taken in consideration the recovery rate and the alternative solutions.

REFERENCES


  1. Adamovic, M., G. Grubic, I. Milenkovic, R. Jovanovic, R. Protic, L. Sretenovic and L. Stoicevic, 1998. The biodegradation of wheat straw by Pleurotus ostreatus mushrooms and its use in cattle feeding. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 71: 357-362.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  2. Akinfemi, A. and M.K. Ladipo, 2011. Effect of fungal treated maize cob on the performance of west african dwarf rams. Proceedings of the Conference on International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development, October 5-7, 2011, University of Bonn, pp: 4221-4231.
    Direct Link

  3. Akinfemi, A., O.A. Adu and O.A. Adebiyi, 2009. Use of white rot-fungi in upgrading maize straw and, the resulting impact on chemical composition and in-vitro digestibility. Livestock Res. Rural Develop., Vol. 21.
    Direct Link

  4. AOAC., 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA., USA.
    Direct Link

  5. Armstrong, W.D. and C.W. Carr, 1964. Physiological Chemistry: Directions. 3rd Edn., Burges Publishing Co., Minneapolis Minnesota, pp: 75.

  6. Arora, D.S. and R.K. Sharma, 2009. Comparative ligninolytic potential of Phlebia species and their role in improvement of in vitro digestibility of wheat straw. J. Anim. Feed Sci., 18: 151-161.
    Direct Link

  7. Bush, B.M., 1991. Interpretation of Laboratory Results for Small Animal Clinicians. Oxford Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, ISBN-13: 9780723608516, pp: 238-249.

  8. Chen, J., S.L. Fales, G.A. Varga and D.J. Royse, 1995. Biodegradation of cell wall components of maize stover colonized by white-rot fungi and resulting impact on in-vitro digestibility. J. Sci. Food Agric., 68: 91-98.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  9. Doumas, B.T., W.A. Watson and H.G. Biggs, 1971. Albumin standards and the measurement of serum albumin with bromcresol green. Clin. Chim. Acta, 31: 87-96.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  10. Duncan, D.B., 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11: 1-42.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  11. El-Ashry, M.A., 2007. Animal Resources in the Frame of the Egyptian Agriculture Development, Horizons of Animals Resource Development-Ruminants. Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt, pp: 37-42.

  12. El-Ashry, M.A., A.M. Kholif, M. Fadel, H.A. El-Alamy and H.M. El-Sayed, 2003. Effect of biological treatments on chemical composition and in vitro and in vivo digestibilities of poor quality roughages. Egypt. J. Nutr. Feeds, 6: 113-126.

  13. Eun, J.S., K.A. Beauchemin, S.H. Hong and M.W. Bauer, 2006. Exogenous enzymes added to untreated or ammoniated rice straw: Effects on in vitro fermentation characteristics and degradability. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 131: 86-102.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  14. Fazaeli, H., H. Mahmodzadeh, Z.A. Jelan, Y. Rouzbehan, J.B. Liang and A. Azizi, 2004. Utilization of fungal treated wheat straw in the diet of late lactating cow. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Since, 17: 467-472.
    Direct Link

  15. Gado, H.M., S.A. Nasr, B.K. Mohamed and A.A. Mahrous, 2006. Effect of biological treatments on the nutritive value of rice straw. Egypt. J. Nutr. Feeds, 9: 207-219.

  16. Gupta, B.N., S.N. Rai, T.K. Walli and K. Singh, 1988. Evaluation of fungal treated rice straw at different fermentation periods in relation to dry matter intake and nutrient utilization in goats. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 5: 273-279.
    Direct Link

  17. Gupta, B.N., G.P. Singh and K. Singh, 1993. Biological Treatment of Lingo-Cellulosics as Feed for Animals-An Overview. In: Feeding of Ruminants on Fibrous Crop Residues, Singh, K. and J.B. Schiere (Eds.). Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi, India, pp: 209-221

  18. Jung, H.G., F.R. Valdez, A.R. Abad, R.A. Blanchette and R.D. Hatfield, 1992. Effect of white rot basidiomycetes on chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of oat straw and alfalfa stems. J. Anim. Sci., 70: 1928-1935.
    PubMedDirect Link

  19. Kabirifard, A., F. Kafilzadeh and H. Fazaeli, 2007. Effect of Pleurotus florida on nutritive value of wheat stubble and date leaf. Proceedings of the International Tropical Animal Nutrition Conference Volume II, October 4-7, 2007, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, pp: 105-105.

  20. Kamra, D.N. and F. Zadrazil, 1988. Microbiological Improvement of Lignocellulosics in Animal Feed Production: A Review. In: Treatment of Lignocellulosics with White Rot Fungi, Zadrazil, F. and P. Reiniger (Eds.). Elsevier Applied Science, Essex, UK., ISBN-13: 9781851662418, pp: 56-63

  21. Karunanadaa, K. and G.A. Varga, 1996. Colonization of crop residues by white-rot fungi: cell wall monosaccharides, phenolic acids, ruminal fermentation characteristics and digestibility of cell wall fiber components in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 63: 273-288.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  22. Khattab, H.M., H.M. El-Sayed, N.E. El-Bordeny, O.N. Al-Asfour and M.S. Fadel, 2009. Gross performance of Barki lambs fed rations with different ratios of untreated or biologically treated wheat straw. Egypt. J. Nutr. Feed, 12: 215-228.

  23. Kumar, N., U.B. Singh and D.N. Verma, 1981. Effect of different levels of dietary protein and energy on growth of male buffalo calves. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 51: 513-517.
    Direct Link

  24. Laird, C.W., 1972. Representative Values for Animal and Veterinary Populations and their Clinical Significances. Hycel, Inc., Houston, Texas.

  25. Liu, J.X. and E.R. Orskov, 2000. Cellulase treatment of untreated and steam pre-treated rice straw-effect on in vitro fermentation characteristics. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 88: 189-200.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  26. Mahesh, M.S. and M. Mohini, 2013. Biological treatment of crop residues for ruminant feeding: A review. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 12: 4221-4231.
    Direct Link

  27. Mandels, C. and J. Waber, 1969. Effect of carboxymethyle cellulase on source of fiber. Biochem. J., 79: 926-935.

  28. Mansour, A.A., T.S. El-Tayeb and N.E. El-Bordeny, 2014. Identification, molecular characterization and evaluation of some ruminal bacteria that catalyze and degrade plant cellulosic materials. Am. J. Applied Sci., 11: 127-136.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  29. Benjamin, M.M., 1984. Outline of Veterinary Clinical Pathology. 3rd Edn., Iowa State University Press, Lowa, Boots, USA.

  30. McDonald, P., R.A. Edwards, J.F.D. Greenhalgh and C.A. Morgan, 1995. Animal Nutrition. 5th Edn., Addison Wesley Longman, London, UK.

  31. Nikhat, P., S.S. Kehlon., R.P. Sethi and A.K. Chopra, 1983. Solid substrate fermentation of wheat straw into animal feed. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 53: 1191-1194.

  32. NRC., 1985. Nutrient Requirements of Sheep. 6th Edn., National Academy Press, Washington, DC., USA.

  33. Omer, H.A.A., F.A.F. Ali and S.M. Gad, 2012. Replacement of clover hay by biologically treated corn stalks in growing sheep rations. J. Agric. Sci., 4: 257-268.
    Direct Link

  34. Palmonari, A., D.M. Stevenson, D.R. Mertens, C.W. Cruywagen and P.J. Weimer, 2010. pH dynamics and bacterial community composition in the rumen of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 93: 279-287.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  35. Patton, C. and G. Crouch, 1977. Enzymatic colorimetric determination of urea. Anal. Chem., 49: 464-469.

  36. Perez, J., J. Munoz-Dorado, T. de la Rubia and J. Martinez, 2002. Biodegradation and biological treatments of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: An overview. Int. Microbiol., 5: 53-63.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  37. Preston, T.R., 1995. Tropical animal feeding: A manual for research workers. FAO Animal Production and Health Papers No. 126, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.

  38. Raltiff, C.R. and F. Hall, 1973. Laboratory Manual of Clinical Biochemistry. Scott and Memorial Hospital Publication Office, Temple, TX., USA.

  39. Ramirez-Bribiesca, J.E., A. Soto-Sanchez, L.M. Hernandez-Calva, J.S. Alinas-Chavira, J.R. Galaviz-Rodriguez, R.G. Cruz-Monterrosa and S. Vargas-Lopez, 2010. Influence of Pleurotus ostreatus spent corn straw on performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot Pelibuey lambs. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 80: 754-757.
    Direct Link

  40. Roussel, J.D., T.J. Aranas and S.H. Seybt, 1982. Metabolic profile testing in Holstein cattle in Louisiana: Reference values. Am. J. Vet. Res., 43: 1658-1660.
    PubMedDirect Link

  41. Salman, F.M., R.I. El-Kadi, H. Abdel-Rahman, S.M. Ahmed, M.I. Mohamed and M.M. Shoukry, 2008. Biologically treated sugar beet pulp as a supplement in goat rations. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 10: 412-416.
    Direct Link

  42. Sarnklong, C., J.W. Cone, W.F. Pellikaan and W.H. Hendriks, 2010. Utilization of rice straw and different treatments to improve its feed value for ruminants: A review. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 23: 680-692.
    Direct Link

  43. SAS., 1999. Statistical Analysis System User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC., USA.

  44. Sharma, R.K. and D.S. Arora, 2010. Production of lignocellulolytic enzymes and enhancement of in vitro digestibility during solid state fermentation of wheat straw by Phlebia floridensis. Bioresour. Technol., 101: 9248-9253.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  45. Shrivastava, B., P. Nandal, A. Sharma, K.K. Jain and Y.P. Khasa et al., 2012. Solid state bioconversion of wheat straw into digestible and nutritive ruminant feed by Ganoderma sp. rckk02. Bioresour. Technol., 107: 347-351.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  46. Tangnu, S.K., H.W. Blanch and C.R. Wilke, 1981. Enhanced production of cellulase, hemicellulase and β-glucosidase by Trichoderma reesei (Rut C-30). Biotechnol. Bioeng., 23: 1837-1849.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  47. Van Soest, P.J., 2006. Rice straw, the role of silica and treatments to improve quality. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 130: 137-171.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  48. van Soest, P.J., J.B. Robertson and B.A. Lewis, 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 3583-3597.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  49. Walli, T.K., B.N. Gupta, S.N. Rai and K. Singh, 1988. Biological treatment of straws, N-transactions during fermentation and subsequent utilization by ruminants. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Fibrous Crop Residues as Animal Feeds, October 27-28, 1988, Bangalore, India, pp: 75-81.

  50. Young, D.S., 1997. Effects of Preanalytical Variables on Clinical Laboratory Tests. 2nd Edn., AACC Press, Washington, DC., USA., ISBN-13: 9780915274888, Pages: 1285.

  51. Zadrazil, F. and H. Brunnert, 1980. The influence of ammonium nitrate supplementation on degradation and in vitro digestibility of straw colonized by higher fungi. Applied Microbiol. Biotechnol., 9: 37-44.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  52. Zadrazil, F. and A.K. Puniya, 1995. Studies on the effect of particle size on solid-state fermentation of sugarcane bagasse into animal feed using white-rot fungi. Bioresour. Technol., 54: 85-87.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  53. Zadrazil, F., I.G. Permana and C. Wiesche, 1999. Is the conversion of lignocellulose into feed with white rot fungi realizable? Practical problems of scale up and technology transfer. Proceedings of the Deutscher Tropentag 1999: Knowledge Partnership-Challenges and Perspectives for Research and Education at the Turn of the Millennium, October 14-15, 1999, Berlin, Germany, pp: 1-10.
    Direct Link

  54. Zhu, S., Y. Wu, Z. Yu, J. Liao and Y. Zhang, 2005. Pretreatment by microwave/alkali of rice straw and its enzymic hydrolysis. Process Biochem., 40: 3082-3086.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  55. Cunniff, P.A., 1997. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 16th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, USA., ISBN: 0-935584-54-4.
    Direct Link

  56. Ministry of Agriculture, 2006. Economic affairs, sector of agricultural statistics, Egypt. Ministry of Agriculture, Egypt. November 2006.

Related Articles

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved