• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances
  2. Vol 9 (12), 2014
  3. 767-774
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances

Year: 2014 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 12 | Page No.: 767-774
DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2014.767.774
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Cystic Echinococcosis in Wild Boars (Sus scrofa) and Slaughtered Domestic Ruminants in Algeria

Nassim Ouchene, Idir Bitam, Faycal Zeroual and Nadjet Amina Ouchene- Khelifi

ABSTRACT


A total of 5592 cattle, 10974 sheep and 10066 goats in El Tarf; 49 cattle, 923 sheep and 198 goats in Tebessa and 951 cattle, 20350 sheep, 67 goats and 2731 dromedaries in Ouargla were carefully examined, between 2008 and 2009, for the presence of Echinococcus granulosus hydatid cysts during the routine meat inspection in abattoirs. Also, for the first time in Algeria, the study included 111 wild boars. The prevalence of cystic Echinococcosis in El Tarf was 24.86, 13.83 and 3.71% in cattle, sheep and goats, respectively. In Tebessa, it was 89.80% in cattle, 78.01% in sheep and 67.17% in goats and in Ouargla it was 17.77, 10.83, 8.35 and 7.46% in sheep, cattle, dromedaries and goats, respectively. Concerning Wild boars, the prevalence of cystic Echinococcosis was 6.81 (3/44) and 5.97% (4/67) in El Tarf and Annaba regions, respectively, which giving an overall prevalence of 6.3% (7/111). Livers and lungs were the only infected organs in domestic ruminants. Generally, the most affected organ was the lung. The total annual economic losses from organ condemnation due to hydatidosis was estimated at 28,286; 25,939; 3,309 and USD 3,747 in cattle, sheep, goats and dromedaries, respectively. This epidemiological study confirms the importance of cystic Echinococcosis in slaughtered domestic ruminants in Algeria. Thus, there is a need to introduce appropriate control measures to minimize the rate of infection and reduce the ensuing economic losses and public health consequences of cystic echinococcosis.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation
Received: July 29, 2014;   Accepted: November 20, 2014;   Published: December 30, 2014

How to cite this article

Nassim Ouchene, Idir Bitam, Faycal Zeroual and Nadjet Amina Ouchene- Khelifi, 2014. Cystic Echinococcosis in Wild Boars (Sus scrofa) and Slaughtered Domestic Ruminants in Algeria. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9: 767-774.

DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2014.767.774

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajava.2014.767.774

INTRODUCTION

Echinococcosis is a zoonotic parasitic infection caused by several species of the genus Echinococcus. Human echinococcosis results following contact with canid hosts, which are themselves infected by various domestic and wild mammals. Echinococcosis in farm animals causes considerable economic losses as well, due to the condemnation of the affected organs and the consequent reduction in productivity (Ibrahim, 2010; Romig et al., 2011; Kumsa and Mohammedzein, 2014). Several surveys on the frequency of cystic echinococcosis in farm animals were conducted in the world (Azlaf and Dakkak, 2006; Kebede et al., 2009a; Lahmar et al., 2013). In North Africa, cystic echinococcosis remains highly endemic (Dar and Alkarmi, 1997; Sadjjadi, 2006; Abu-Seida, 2014).

Hydatid disease, caused by the larva of Echinococcus granulosus, is a cosmopolitan disease which prevails in endemic state in parts of the world. It represents a public health problem in North Algeria. Epidemiological data on human infection is around 400 cases yearly according to official statistics from the National Institute of Public Health of Algeria, the actual data should be multiplied by three according to the service practitioners surgeries hospitals of Algeria (INSP., 2014).

Algeria has about 1,607,890 cattle, 19,615,730 sheep, 3,754,590 goats and 286,670 dromedaries in Algeria (MADR., 2006). These animals present an important component of the farming system. However, information about the prevalence of hydatidosis in domestic ruminants in Algeria is limited without any evaluation of economic losses caused by this infection and any information concerned Echinococcosis in wild mammals. Some studies were realized in slaughtered domestic ruminants only in Tiaret on the northwestern (Kouidri et al., 2012; Mokhtaria et al., 2013) and in Djelfa and Adrar on the southwestern of Algeria (Hamrat et al., 2011a, b). Therefore, the objectives of present study were to determine the prevalence and organ distribution of hydatid cysts in three regions in the east of Algeria and to assess the economic losses due to condemnation of organs with cystic Echinococcosis in slaughtered domestic ruminants (cattle, sheep, goats and dromedaries). Also, this study records for the first the prevalence of cystic Echinococcosis in wild boars in Algeria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS


Study areas: A survey on cystic echinococcosis in slaughtered domestic ruminants was undertaken in abattoirs at three regions in Algeria: El Tarf, Tebessa and Ouargla during the period from January 2008 to December 2009. For wild boars, the study was conducted in 2011 in two regions: Annaba and El Tarf, which are located in the northeastern of Algeria and have a humid climate. Tebessa region is located in the northeastern and has a semi-arid climate. Ouargla region is located in the Sahara (southeastern) and has a Saharan climate.

Animals: A total of 5592 cattle, 10974 sheep and 10066 goats in El Tarf and 49 cattle, 923 sheep and 198 goats in Tebessa and 951 cattle, 20350 sheep, 67 goats and 2731 dromedaries in Ouargla, were carefully inspected for the hydatid cyst during routine meat inspection in abattoirs at these regions.

For wild boars and after post mortem examination, the study concerned the number of 44 and 67 in El Tarf and Annaba, respectively.

Economic evaluation in abattoirs: Economic losses due to infected organs condemnation were evaluated according to the weight of condemned organs (kg) multiplied by the price of one kilogram.

For cattle, sheep and goats, the price of one kilogram of liver is 2000 Algerian Dinar (DA) and for lungs is 300 DA. For dromedaries, the price of one kilogram of liver is 1500 DA and for lungs is 300 DA based on information collected from butchers and customers.

Statistical analysis: Data was analyzed by R i386 3.0.2 for Windows GUI front-end. The prevalence of cystic echinococcosis in the slaughtered domestic ruminants at the different regions of the study was carried out with ANOVA. Chi2 test (95% confidence interval) was used to study the relationship of the prevalence of cystic echinococcosis with the organ affected and regions of study. The significance was considered when the probability value p<0.05.

RESULTS


The prevalence of cystic echinococcosis in slaughtered domestic ruminants depended very significantly upon the study area (p<0.01). In El Tarf region, the prevalence of cystic echinococcosis was 24.86, 13.83 and 3.71% in cattle, sheep and goats, respectively. In Tebessa, the prevalence was 89.8, 78.01 and 67.17% in cattle, sheep and goats, respectively. In Ouargla, the prevalence in cattle, sheep, goats and dromedaries was 10.83, 17.77, 7.46 and 8.53%, respectively (Table 1).

The highest prevalences of cystic echinococcosis in domestic ruminants were observed in Tebessa region (p<0.001).

Cattle had the highest prevalence compared to small ruminants (p<0.04). Sheep were more infected than goats (p<0.001).

The cystic echinococcosis was observed in 3 wild boars (6.81%) in El Tarf and in 4 wild boars (5.97%) in Annaba. The overall prevalence of echinococcosis in wild boars was 6.3% (7/111).

Within the three studied regions, the prevalence of cystic echinococcosis in the affected organs depended very significantly upon the different slaughtered domestic ruminants (p<0.001). Livers and lungs were the only infected organs in this study. The overall results showed that the lungs, in different domestic ruminants, were the mostly affected organ with cystic echinococcosis (p<0.05).

In El Tarf, cystic echinococcosis in cattle and sheep was found to infect the liver and lungs equally (45.46 and 41.36% in cattle and 40.18 and 47.76% in sheep). The lowest prevalences were found in liver and lungs together (13.16% in cattle and 12.05% in sheep) (p<0.001). In goats, the lungs were the most commonly infected organ with cystic echinococcosis (70.51%) (p<0.001) (Table 2).

In Tebessa, the prevalence of cystic echinococcosis was higher in animals that had cysts in the lungs and liver together compared to those had cysts in the liver or lungs alone (p<0.001) (Table 2).

Table 1:Prevalence of cystic echinococcosis in different slaughtered animals in El Tarf, Tebessa and Ouargla abattoirs, Algeria
Image for - Cystic Echinococcosis in Wild Boars (Sus scrofa) and Slaughtered Domestic Ruminants in Algeria

Table 2:Predilection sites of hydatid cyst in the different organs of examined animals
Image for - Cystic Echinococcosis in Wild Boars (Sus scrofa) and Slaughtered Domestic Ruminants in Algeria

Table 3:Evaluation of the economic losses due to condemnation of the affected organs by cystic echinococcosis
Image for - Cystic Echinococcosis in Wild Boars (Sus scrofa) and Slaughtered Domestic Ruminants in Algeria

In Ouargla, the lungs were the most commonly infected organ with cystic echinococcosis in cattle (65.04%), sheep (82.85%) and dromedaries (78.07%) (p<0.001). However, only five goats were infected with cystic echinococcosis and three of them showed cysts in the liver and two in the lungs (Table 2).

For wild boar, cysts were observed in the liver of four out of seven wild boars (57.14%) and the peritoneum in the other three wild boars (42.85%).

The weight of condemned liver and lungs in the examined animals has been represented in Table 3.

In cattle, the economic loss due to condemnation of the affected organs with cystic echinococcosis in different regions for years 2008-2009 was 4,455,550 DA.

So, the annual economic losses were 2,227,775 DA (~ 28,286 USD). For sheep the annual economic losses were 2,042,930 DA (~ 25,939 USD). In goats, the annual economic losses were 260,650 DA (~ 3,309 USD). Concerning dromedaries the annual economic losses were 295,125 DA (~ 3,747 USD).

DISCUSSION

The current study, conducted in several abattoirs and in wild boars, indicated that cystic echinococcosis is a highly endemic in Algeria.

The prevalence of cystic echinococcosis infection recorded in El Tarf region was 24.86, 13.83 and 3.71% in cattle, sheep and goats, respectively. In general, the same prevalences were previously reported in Tiaret and Djelfa regions, Algeria (Hamrat et al., 2011b; Kouidri et al., 2012; Mokhtaria et al., 2013).

In Ouargla region, the prevalence of cystic echinococcosis in sheep and goats was close to that reported in the Adrar region which has the same climate as Ouargla, Algeria (Hamrat et al., 2011a). While dromedaries marked a higher prevalence of 16.62-25.88% than the present result (8.53%). However, the prevalence of cystic echinococcosis in cattle at Ouargla was 10.83% which is slightly lower than that recorded in previous studies at both Tiaret and Djelfa regions (Hamrat et al., 2011b; Kouidri et al., 2012).

Moreover, these results are close to what has been reported in other regions in the North Africa as Tunisia (Lahmar et al., 2013), Morocco (Azlaf and Dakkak, 2006), Libya (Kassem et al., 2013) and consistent with those obtained in other studies (Kebede et al., 2009a, b).

In this study, the prevalence of cystic echinococcosis at Tebessa region was high (89.80, 78.01 and 67.17% in cattle, sheep and goats, respectively) (p<0.001). Several factors have been contributed to increase the prevalence of cystic echinococcosis in domestic ruminants in this region including absence of routine deworming of domestic dogs (Buishi et al., 2006), the risk practices related to family slaughter (Traub et al., 2005) and presence of high numbers of wild dogs (Grainger and Jenkins, 1996; Jenkins and Morris, 2003).

In the present study, cattle were the mostly infected domestic ruminants with cystic echinococcosis (p<0.04). Similar finding was mentioned by Kouidri et al. (2012) in Tiaret, Algeria; Azlaf and Dakkak (2006) in Morocco and Haridy et al. (2006) in Egypt. Also, this study revealed a low incidence of cystic echinococcosis in goats which may be a reflection of animal husbandry practices where goats may have a lower contact with dogs and due to their grazing behaviour. This observation was reported in other studies (Torgerson et al., 1998; Mokhtaria et al., 2013). Interestingly, this work is the first study carried out in wild boars in Algeria. The prevalence of cystic echinococcosis was 5.97 and 6.81% in Annaba and El Tarf regions, respectively which give an overall incidence of 6.3%. In this respect, the prevalence of cystic echinococcosis in wild boars in Italy was 3.7% (Varcasia et al., 2008) which correlates with our result.

The major economic impacts caused by cystic echinococcosis in animals are losses in productivity such as milk production, fertility, reductions in carcass weight, birth rate and fecundity, delayed performance and growth, condemnation of organs especially liver and lungs (Ibrahim, 2010; Romig et al., 2011; Kumsa and Mohammedzein, 2014).

Livers and lungs were the only organs infected by cystic echinococcosis in the present study. This is explained by the fact that liver and lungs have the first great capillaries sites encountered by the migrating Echinococcus oncospheres (hexacanth embryo) which adopt the portal vein route and primarily negotiate hepatic and pulmonary filtering system sequentially before any other peripheral organ is involved (Kebede et al., 2009a). However, development of hydatid cysts occurs occasionally in other organs and tissue when oncospheres escape into the general systemic circulation (Abunna et al., 2012).

In Tebessa region, the prevalence of co-infection (liver and lungs) in the examined domestic ruminants was the highest. This result is in line with other study in Tiaret, Algeria (Kouidri et al., 2012). However in Egypt, Omar et al. (2013) recorded that the livers harbored a higher percentage of cystic echinococcosis.

In cattle, cystic echinococcosis was found to infect the liver and lungs equally in El Tarf. The present data agree others of previous studies (Ibrahem and Craig, 1998; Kebede et al., 2009b; Omar et al., 2013).

In Ouargla, hydatid cysts were found to occur preferentially in the lungs which correlate with the findings of other authors (Khan et al., 2001; Daryani et al., 2006; Kebede et al., 2009a, c; Getaw et al., 2010).

In sheep, in El Tarf and Ouargla, the prevalence of lungs hydatid cysts was higher than that of liver hydatid cysts alone and of liver and lungs hydatid cysts. This result is in line with other studies (Khan et al., 2001; Daryani et al., 2006; Getaw et al., 2010). However, in previous studies in Algeria, the highest distribution of cystic Echinococcosis in sheep was in co-infection (liver and lungs) (Kouidri et al., 2012; Mokhtaria et al., 2013).

Hydatid cysts were found to occur preferentially in the lungs in goats (El Tarf) and in dromedaries (Ouargla) which is in agreement with previous reports (Sangaran and John, 2009; Mokhtaria et al., 2013; Omar et al., 2013; Elham et al., 2014).

In Ouargla, cystic echinococcosis was observed mainly in the liver in goats, the same result was observed in other studies (Azlaf and Dakkak, 2006; Daryani et al., 2006; Getaw et al., 2010; Lahmar et al., 2013).

Co-infection of both liver and lungs was less common in dromedaries than infection of liver or lungs alone. Similar findings were reported before (Lahmar et al., 2013; Omar et al., 2013).

Economic losses due to the cystic echinococcosis are depending on the number of slaughtered animals and the study area. In the present study, direct financial losses due to bovine hydatidosis was estimated at USD 28,286 per annum. Other studies have found different results; USD 51,883 (Kebede et al., 2009c), USD 1,38,563 (Regassa et al., 2010), USD 30,202 (Bekele and Butako, 2011).

For sheep and goat, economic losses were 25,939 USD and 3,309 USD per annum, respectively in this study. The total annual economic losses incurred due to cystic Echinococcosis in sheep and goats was also estimated to be USD 99,938 and USD 49,373, respectively (Kumsa and Mohammedzein, 2014). Ahmadi and Meshkehkar (2011) found the following values: USD 1,23,490 for sheep (n = 2,815,982) and USD 3,5,549 for goat (n = 427,790).

For dromedaries, financial losses were estimated in this study at 3,747 USD. In Ethiopia, the economic losses in dromedaries were estimated by Gizachew et al. (2013) at 61,222 USD.

CONCLUSION


Finally, cystic echinococcosis is widespread in slaughtered domestic ruminants causing huge economic losses in Algeria and cattle are the most highly infected animals. Therefore, more epidemiological studies on the role of other intermediate host species, definitive hosts, zoonotic impact of cystic echinococcosis are urgently needed in different parts of Algeria.

REFERENCES


  1. Abunna, F., S. Fentaye, B. Megersa and A. Regassa, 2012. Prevalence of bovine hydatidosis in Kombolcha ELFORA abattoir, North Eastern Ethiopia. Open J. Anim. Sci., 2: 281-286.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  2. Abu-Seida, A.M., 2014. Assessment of ultrasonography as a method of diagnosis for hepatic hydatid cysts in donkeys. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Concentrator Photovoltaic Systems, April 7-9, 2014, Albuquerque, USA.

  3. Ahmadi, N.A. and M. Meshkehkar, 2011. An abattoir-based study on the prevalence and economic losses due to cystic echinococcosis in slaughtered herbivores in Ahwaz, South-Western Iran. J. Helminthol., 85: 33-39.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  4. Azlaf, R. and A. Dakkak, 2006. Epidemiological study of the cystic echinococcosis in Morocco. Vet. Parasitol., 137: 83-93.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  5. Bekele, J. and B. Butako, 2011. Occurrence and financial loss assessment of cystic echinococcosis (hydatidosis) in cattle slaughtered at Wolayita Sodo municipal abattoir, Southern Ethiopia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 43: 221-228.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  6. Buishi, I.E., E. Njoroge, E. Zeyhle, M.T. Rogan and P.S. Craig, 2006. Canine echinococcosis in Turkana (North-Western Kenya): A coproantigen survey in the previous hydatid-control area and an analysis of risk factors. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol., 100: 601-610.
    CrossRefPubMed

  7. Dar, F.K. and T. Alkarmi, 1997. Public health aspects of cystic echinococcosis in the Arab countries. Acta Tropica, 67: 125-132.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  8. Daryani, A., R. Alaei, R. Arab, M. Sharif, M.H. Dehghan and H. Ziaei, 2006. Prevalence of hydatid cyst in slaughtered animals in Northwest Iran. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 5: 330-334.
    Direct Link

  9. Elham, M., B. Hassan, N.A. Ghasem, R. Gholamreza and S. Parviz, 2014. Epidemiological study of hydatidosis in the dromedaries (Camelus dromedarius) of different regions of Iran. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed., 4: S148-S151.
    CrossRefPubMed

  10. Getaw, A., D. Beyene, D. Ayana, B. Megersa and F. Abunna, 2010. Hydatidosis: Prevalence and its economic importance in ruminants slaughtered at Adama municipal abattoir, Central Oromia, Ethiopia. Acta Tropica, 113: 221-225.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  11. Gizachew, B., F. Kibru and B. Asrade, 2013. Camel hydatidosis: Prevalence and economic significance in pastoral regions of Ethiopia. J. Parasitol. Vector Biol., 5: 90-95.
    Direct Link

  12. Grainger, H.J. and D.J. Jenkins, 1996. Transmission of hydatid disease to sheep from wild dogs in Victoria, Australia. Int. J. Parasitol., 26: 1263-1270.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  13. Hamrat, K., Y. Achour, A. Bouhousse and V. Cozma, 2011. Study of the prevalence of Echinococcus granulosus in the South of Algeria (as in the Adrar region). Sci. Parasitol., 12: 219-221.
    Direct Link

  14. Hamrat, K., Y. Achour, G. Yacin and V. Cozma, 2011. Epidemiologic study of hydatidosis in the steppe regions of Djelfa, Algeria. Sci. Parasitol., 12: 177-183.
    Direct Link

  15. Haridy, F.M., B.B. Ibrahim, A.M. Elshazly, S.E. Awad, D.M. Sultan, G.T. El-Sherbini and T.A. Morsy, 2006. Hydatidosis granulosus in Egyptian slaughtered animals in the years 2000-2005. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol., 36: 1087-1100.
    PubMed

  16. Ibrahem, M.M. and P.S. Craig, 1998. Prevalence of cystic echinococcosis in camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Libya. J. Helminthol., 72: 27-31.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  17. Ibrahim, M.M., 2010. Study of cystic echinococcosis in slaughtered animals in Al Baha region, Saudi Arabia: Interaction between some biotic and abiotic factors. Acta Tropica, 113: 26-33.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  18. INSP., 2014. [Healthcare-newsletter of public health]. Infos Sante-Bulletin d'Information de Sante Publique No. 7, March 2014. http://www.ands.dz/insp/infos_sante_07.pdf, (In French).

  19. Jenkins, D.J. and B. Morris, 2003. Echinococcus granulosus in wildlife in and around the Kosciuszko National Park, South-Eastern Australia. Aust. Vet. J., 81: 81-85.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  20. Kassem, H.H., A.K. Abdel-Kader and S.A. Nass, 2013. Prevalence of hydatid cysts in slaughtered animals in Sirte, Libya. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol., 43: 33-40.
    PubMedDirect Link

  21. Kebede, W., A. Hagos, Z. Girma and F. Lobago, 2009. Echinococcosis/hydatidosis: Its prevalence, economic and public health significance in Tigray region, North Ethiopia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 41: 865-871.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  22. Kebede, N., H. Mekonnen, A. Wossene and G. Tilahun, 2009. Hydatidosis of slaughtered cattle in Wolaita Sodo Abattoir, Southern Ethiopia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 41: 629-633.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  23. Kebede, N., A. Abuhay, G. Tilahun and A. Wossene, 2009. Financial loss estimation, prevalence and characterization of hydatidosis of cattle slaughtered at Debre Markos Municipality abattoir, Ethiopia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 41: 1787-1789.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  24. Khan, A.H., A.A. El-Buni and M.Y. Ali, 2001. Fertility of the cysts of Echinococcus granulosus in domestic herbivores from Benghazi, Libya and the reactivity of antigens produced from them. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol., 95: 337-342.
    Direct Link

  25. Mokhtaria, K., B.K. Fatima, B. Abboud and S.S.M. Ammar, 2013. Cystic echinococcosis in small ruminants in Tiaret (Algeria). Global Veterinaria, 11: 753-758.
    Direct Link

  26. Kouidri, M., F. Benchaib-Khoudj, A. Boulkaboul and S.M.A. Selles, 2012. Prevalence, fertility and viability of cystic echinococcosis in sheep and cattle of Algeria. Bulgarian J. Vet. Med., 15: 191-197.
    Direct Link

  27. Kumsa, B. and A. Mohammedzein, 2014. Prevalence, organ distribution, risk factors and financial losses of hydatid cysts in sheep and goats slaughtered in restaurants in Jimma, South Western Oromia. Comp. Clin. Pathol., 23: 333-339.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  28. Lahmar, S., M. Trifi, S. Ben Naceur, T. Bouchhima and N. Lahouar et al., 2013. Cystic echinococcosis in slaughtered domestic ruminants from Tunisia. J. Helminthol., 87: 318-325.
    CrossRef

  29. MADR., 2006. Direction of agricultural statistics and information systems: Report on the situation of the agricultural sector. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MADR), pp : 1-77. http://www.minagri.dz/pdf/Rapports/Rapport%20sur%20la%20situation%20du%20secteur%20agricole%202006.pdf.

  30. Omar, M., K. Sultan, M. Haridy and A. Omran, 2013. Prevalence of cystic echinococcosis in slaughtered ruminants in different abattoirs, Upper Egypt. Am. J. Anim. Vet. Sci., 8: 117-121.
    CrossRef

  31. Regassa, F., A. Molla and J. Bekele, 2010. Study on the prevalence of cystic hydatidosis and its economic significance in cattle slaughtered at Hawassa Municipal Abattoir, Ethiopia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 42: 977-984.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  32. Romig, T., R.A. Omer, E. Zeyhle, M. Huttner and A. Dinkel et al., 2011. Echinococcosis in sub-Saharan Africa: Emerging complexity. Vet. Parasitol., 181: 43-47.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  33. Sadjjadi, S.M., 2006. Present situation of echinococcosis in the Middle East and Arabic North Africa. Parasitol. Int., 55: S197-S202.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  34. Sangaran, A. and L. John, 2009. Prevalence of hydatidosis in sheep and goats in and around Chennai. Tamilnadu J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 5: 208-210.
    Direct Link

  35. Torgerson, P.R., D.H. Williams and M.N. Abo-Shehada, 1998. Modelling the prevalence of Echinococcus and Taenia species in small ruminants of different ages in Northern Jordan. Vet. Parasitol., 79: 35-51.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  36. Traub, R.J., I.D. Robertson, P.J. Irwin, N. Mencke and R.C.A.A. Thompson, 2005. Canine gastrointestinal parasitic zoonoses in India. Trends Parasitol., 21: 42-48.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  37. Varcasia, A., T. Piseddu, A.P. Pipia, G. Schianchi and A. Marongiu et al., 2008. Epidemiological and biomolecular updates on cystic echinococcosis in pigs and wild boars of Sardinia (Italy). Lucrari Stiintifice Medicina Veterinara, 41: 385-387.
    Direct Link

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved