• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances
  2. Vol 7 (2), 2012
  3. 180-186
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances

Year: 2012 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 180-186
DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2012.180.186
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Efficacy of Diclofenac Sodium, Either Alone or Together with Cefotaxime Sodium, for Control of Postoperative Pain, in Dogs Undergoing Ovariohysterectomy

Ashraf M.A. Abu-Seida

ABSTRACT


There is not much data about diclofenac sodium as anti-inflammatory drug in veterinary practice, therefore the objectives of the present study were to assess the efficacy and adverse effects of diclofenac sodium on its own and together with cefotaxime Na as postoperative pain control in dogs. A prospective, randomized, blinded, clinical trial was carried out on twenty mongrel bitches undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy. The operated bitches were assigned to one of four groups according to postoperative injections: Group 1 (given diclofenac and cefotaxime), group 2 (control), group 3 (given cefatoxime only) and group 4 (given diclofenac only). Examinations were performed postoperatively using a pain scale modified from University of Melbourne at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 h. Statistical analysis of results was done. The results of the present study showed that groups (1 and 4) had mean pain score which were not significantly different from each other and different from groups (2 and 3) significantly. From three hours post-operative till twenty four hours post-operative, groups (2 and 3) recorded mean pain scores which were significantly higher than groups (1 and 4). On the other hand, groups 2 and 3 were not statistically different from each other. Also, groups 1 and 4 were not statistically different. In conclusion diclofenac sodium is an excellent analgesic for postoperative pain in healthy dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation
Received: July 29, 2011;   Accepted: October 16, 2011;   Published: December 24, 2011

How to cite this article

Ashraf M.A. Abu-Seida, 2012. Efficacy of Diclofenac Sodium, Either Alone or Together with Cefotaxime Sodium, for Control of Postoperative Pain, in Dogs Undergoing Ovariohysterectomy. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 7: 180-186.

DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2012.180.186

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajava.2012.180.186

INTRODUCTION


Ovariohysterectomy is one of the routine laparotomies in small animals practice. This operation is a painful surgery that required postoperative anti-inflammatory drug (Lemke et al., 2002).

Several drugs were used as postoperative analgesics in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy including: carprofen (Lascelles et al., 1998), ketoprofen (Lemke et al., 2002), meloxicam (Frenso et al., 2005), morphine (Dzikiti et al., 2006), long acting sufentanil formulation (Slingsby et al., 2006).

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been successfully used to control pain in dogs and cats by inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase and subsequent interference with prostanoid synthesis (Frenso et al., 2005).

Although diclofenac (DF) is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) commonly used in human, its use in veterinary practice is relatively limited. It was used in cattle, pigs and horses for treatment of various inflammatory and degenerative post-trauma disorders and lameness, as well as pre-operative treatment for cataract extraction (Ku et al., 1986; Booth, 2001; Lascelles and Mair, 2001).

After muscle injury, accumulation of inflammatory cells, production of prostaglandins, cytokines and chemokines is rapidly occurred (Tidball, 1995; Summan et al., 2003) causing edema and soreness. It has been proposed that some components of the inflammatory response to injury are responsible for the increase in muscle function deficit (Hirose et al., 2001; Lapointe et al., 2002; Brickson et al., 2003). Early treatments of muscle injury have therefore been aimed at inhibiting the inflammatory response to alleviate the signs of inflammation and provide pain relief (Almekinders, 1993). Cefotaxime Na is one of the third generation cephalosporin commonly used as a strong broad spectrum antibiotic in dogs suffered serious and mixed infections (Trudel et al., 1994; Rebuelto et al., 2002).

University of Melbourne pain scale was developed to evaluate postoperative pain in dogs (Firth and Haldan, 1999). This scale based upon behavioral and physiologic measurements as reliable evaluation of degree of pain in dogs during the postoperative period and their response to analgesics.

The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and adverse effects of diclofenac sodium on its own and together with cefotaxime Na as postoperative pain control in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS


Animals: In the present study, a total of twenty mongrel bitches admitted to the surgery clinic at Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University between January 2010 and December 2010, for elective ovariohysterectomy was used. The operated dogs aged 1-3 years and weighted 10-30 kg. None of the dogs had any clinically detectable concurrent diseases or were being given analgesic medications. Each dog was given a full physical examination on admission.

Anesthesia and surgical procedure: The same anesthetic protocol was used for all dogs including; Premedication with atropine sulphate (0.05 mg kg-1, subcutaneously) and xylazine HCl (1 mg kg-1, intramuscularly).

Induction of the general anesthesia was carried out by ketamine HCl (5 mg kg-1, intravenously in the cephalic vein).

General anesthesia was maintained with thiopentone sodium (25 mg kg-1 2.5%, intravenously).

Under aseptic condition, ovariohysterectomy was carried out as usual by the same surgeon and by using the same materials and method in all dogs.

Ovariohysterectomy was carried out through an incision on the ventral midline of the abdomen. Ovarian pedicles and uterine body were ligated with size -0 polyglactine before transaction. The linea alba was closed with size-0 polyglactine using simple interrupted pattern and subcutaneous tissues were opposed with 2-0 polyglactine using simple continuous pattern. The skin incision was close with size-0 nylon using simple interrupted pattern.

Postoperative medications: The operated bitches were randomly assigned to four groups according to the postoperative medications as follow:

Group 1: (Dcl+Ceft Group, 5 bitches): Dogs received a once-off diclofenac sodium at a dose of 1.1 mg kg-1 and a once-off cefotaxime Na at a dose of 10 mg kg-1 given intramuscularly just after surgery
Group 2: (Control Group, 5 bitches): Dogs received a once-off normal saline 1 mL given intramuscularly just after surgery
Group 3: (Ceft. Group, 5 bitches): Dogs received a once-off cefotaxime Na (Cefotax®, EIPICO) at a dose of 10 mg kg-1 given intramuscularly just after surgery
Group 4: (Dcl. Group, 5 bitches): Dogs received a once-off diclofenac sodium (Voltarine®, Novartis Co.) at a dose of 1.1 mg kg-1 given intramuscularly just after surgery

Assessment of postoperative pain: The dogs were scored for signs of pain under blind condition by another veterinarian at 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,8,12 and 24 h after surgery using a pain scale modified from University of Melbourne (Firth and Haldan, 1999).

Hematoma formation at the surgical site, persistent bleeding from the incision, or vomiting and diarrhea in the immediate postoperative period was recorded.

No provision was made for supplementary analgesia at any time. All bitches were constantly monitored and if a dog had been found to be in severe pain, it would have been excluded from the study and treated with potent analgesics.

Analysis of results: The results were expressed as the Mean±standard error of the mean (SEM). They were analyzed by using an analysis of variance for the scores recorded. SPSS 16 software was used for this statistical analysis. Significant differences (p<0.05) were further assessed by using Least Significant Difference (LSD) post hoc test.

RESULTS


None of the bitches was found to be in extreme discomfort and so none was excluded from the study. No pain score was≥9, therefore no supplemental analgesic was required.

Hematoma, persistent bleeding, or diarrhea was not seen in all bitches. Only one bitch from the Dcl group had vomition. The mean pain score in the different groups were collected in Table 1. Results of statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference between all groups in mean pain score during the first hour post-operative. Two hours post-operative, the group 1 showed the significantly lowest mean pain score (2.67±0.67), while group 3 showed the highest mean (8±0.00) which was significantly higher than other groups. Groups (1 and 4) had mean pain score which were not significantly different from each other and different from groups (2 and 3) significantly.

Table 1: Mean±SEM of pain score in the studied group at different time intervals
Image for - Efficacy of Diclofenac Sodium, Either Alone or Together with Cefotaxime Sodium, for Control of Postoperative Pain, in Dogs Undergoing Ovariohysterectomy
Means with different superscripts (a, b, c) within the same raw are significantly different at p-value≤0.05

From three hours post-operative till twenty four hours post-operative, groups (2 and 3) recorded mean pain scores (ranged between 6.00± 0.58 and 7.33±0.33) which were significantly higher than groups (1 and 4) mean pain scores (ranged between 4.33±0.67 and 0.33±0.33), on the other hand groups (2 and 3) were not statistically different from each other. Groups (1 and 4) were not statistically different from each other (Table 1).

No significant difference was detected among the treated groups in regard to age and weight of the bitches or duration of surgery. The maximum main pain score after ovariohysterectomy was 8±0.00.

DISCUSSION


Opioids have long been the drugs of choice for control of postoperative pain. However, their potential adverse effects (bradycardia and hypo-ventilation) are not negligible (Grisneaux et al., 1999).

In recent years, there have been significant advances in the control of pain in animals. One of the most important advances has been the development of new veterinary labeled NSIAD used for postoperative pain control.

Although, Diclofenac is an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase (Riendau et al., 1997) and prostaglandin biosynthesis and reduces leukotriene formation (Kothari et al., 2003), Information about Diclofenac sodium as postoperative pain control in dogs is scarce. Therefore the present study was designed to study the efficacy and adverse effects of this NSAID as postoperative pain control in dogs.

Absence of blood coagulation disorders and slight gastrointestinal disorders in the form of vomition during the postoperative period means that there are no severe adverse effects of Diclofenac sodium as postoperative care. This is in agreement with a previous study recorded that, in clinically normal dog’s undergoing general anesthesia and elective surgery, the use of NSIAD as analgesic is not contraindicated (Lobetti and Joubert, 2000; Imagawa et al., 2011).

Various pain scales have been developed, but none have gained widespread acceptance in veterinary medicine. The present study was depended upon University of Melbourne Pain Scale for assessment of post operative pain in all dogs and their response to analgesics because it is quite accurate pain scale as it is based on 6 categories of data associated with response to pain. These categories included; physiological data, response to palpation, activity, mental status, posture and vocalization (Firth and Haldan, 1999).

There was no significant difference between all groups in mean pain score during the first hour post-operative. Possible explanation for this was that recovery from anesthesia masked clinical signs of pain. Similar explanation was mentioned in a previous study (Pibarot et al., 1997).

Cefotaxime Na is one of the most common used prophylactic antibiotics as post operative care in dogs. The present study was designed to study the effect of this antibiotic on pain control and if it has a synergistic action with diclofenac sodium or not. The results of the present study showed that the group 3 showed the highest mean pain score which was significantly higher than other groups and the mean pain scores of Groups (1 and 4) were not statistically different from each other. This means that there is neither direct analgesic nor synergistic action of cefotaxime Na as postoperative care.

From three hours post-operative till twenty four hours post-operative, groups received diclofenac sodium showed mean pain scores significantly lower than other groups. This means that the good action of diclofenac sodium starts at 3 h post administration and continues till 24 h.

On one hand, results of the present study are in disagreement with some studies (Jonhson, 1991; Gentry and Mann, 1993) that suggested that NSAID provide mild analgesia but would not be adequate for immediate postoperative pain in orthopedic patients. This could be explained by the difference in the pain scores produced by different surgeries of soft and hard tissues.

On the other hand, this study is in agreement with recent studies (Nolan and Reid, 1993; Lascelles et al., 1994; Mathews et al., 1996) which demonstrated that some NSAID were more effective than opioids for relief of pain in dogs.

Postoperative pain was considered mild, moderate or severe if the total pain score was between 0 and 5, 6 and 9, or 10 and 13, respectively (Pibarot et al., 1997). The results of the present study recorded that the maximum mean pain score resulted from ovariohysterectomy was 8±0.00. This result means that ovariohysterectomy is a moderately painful surgery, therefore, anti-inflammatory drug as postoperative care is recommended.

CONCLUSION


At the dosage indicated above, diclofenac sodium on its own is an excellent analgesic for postoperative pain in healthy dogs undergoing moderately painful surgery, without compromising haemostasis or severe gastrointestinal disorders.

REFERENCES


  1. Almekinders, L.C., 1993. Anti-inflammatory treatment of muscular injuries in sports. Sports Med., 15: 139-145.
    PubMedDirect Link

  2. Booth, D.M., 2001. The Analgesic, Antipyretic, Anti-Inflammatory Drugs. In: Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Adams, H.R. (Ed.). 8th Edn., The Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA., USA., pp: 432-449.

  3. Brickson, S., L.L. Ji, K. Schell, R. Olabisi, B.S.P. Schneider and T.M. Best, 2003. M1/70 attenuates blood-borne neutrophil oxidants, activation and myofiber damage following stretch injury. J. Applied Physiol., 95: 969-976.
    Direct Link

  4. Dzikiti, T.B., K.E. Joubert, L.J. Venter and L.N. Dzikiti, 2006. Comparison of morphine and carprofen administered alone or in combination for analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. J. Sci. Afr. Vet. Assoc., 77: 120-126.
    PubMed

  5. Firth, A.M. and S.L. Haldane, 1999. Development of a scale to evaluate postoperative pain in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 214: 651-659.
    PubMedDirect Link

  6. Frenso, L., J. Moll, B. Penalba, Y. Espada and A. Andaluz et al., 2005. Effects of preoperative administration of meloxicam on whole blood platelet aggregation, buccal mucosal bleeding time and haematological indices in dogs undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy. Vet. J., 170: 138-140.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  7. Gentry, S.G. and F.A. Mann, 1993. Postoperative care of canine and feline orthopedic paitents. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc., 29: 146-150.
    Direct Link

  8. Grisneaux, E., P. Pibarot, J. Dupuis and D. Blais, 1999. Comparison of ketoprofen and carprofen administered prior to orthopedic surgery for control of postoperative pain in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 215: 1105-1110.
    PubMedDirect Link

  9. Hirose, J., M. Yamaha, T. Kato, K. Ikebe and K. Takagi, 2001. Effects of a hydroxyl radical scavenger, EPC-K1 and neutrophil depletion on reperfusion injury in rat skeletal muscle. Acta Orthop. Scand., 72: 404-410.
    PubMedDirect Link

  10. Imagawa, V.H., D.T. Fantoni, A.C. Tatarunas, S. Mastrocinque, T.F. Almeida, F. Ferreira and I.P. Posso, 2011. The use of different doses metamizol for post operative analgesia in dogs. Vet. Anesthesia Analgesia, 38: 385-393.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  11. Jonhson, J.M., 1991. The veterinarian's responsibility: Assessing and managing acute pain in dogs and cats. Part II. Compend. Continuing Educ. Pract. Vet., 13: 911-916.
    Direct Link

  12. Kothari, H.V., W.H. Lee and E.C. Ku, 2003. An alternate mechanism for regulation of leukotriene production in leukocytes: Studies with an anti-inflammatory drug, sodium diclofenac. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA): Lipids Lipid Metab., 921: 502-511.
    Direct Link

  13. Ku, E.C., W. Lee, H.V. Kothari and D.W. Scholer, 1986. Effect of diclofenac sodium on the arachidonic acid cascade. Am. J. Med., 80: 18-23.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  14. Lobetti, R.G. and K.E. Joubert, 2000. Effect of administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs before surgery on renal function in clinically normal dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res., 61: 1501-1507.
    PubMed

  15. Lapointe, B., J. Frenette and C.H. Cote, 2002. Lengthening contraction-induced inflammation is linked to secondary damage but devoid of neutrophil invasion. J. Applied Physiol., 92: 1995-2004.
    PubMedDirect Link

  16. Lascelles, B.D. and T.S. Mair, 2001. Drugs Used in the Treatment of Disorders of the Musculoskeletal System and Joints. In: The Veterinary Formulary, Bishop, Y. (Ed.). 5th Edn., Pharmaceutical Press, London, UK., pp: 469-487.

  17. Lascelles, B.D., S.J. Butterworth and A.E. Waterman, 1994. Postoperative analgesic and sedative effects of carprofen and pethidine in dogs. Vet. Rec., 134: 187-191.
    CrossRefPubMed

  18. Lascelles, B.D., P.J. Cripps, A. Jones and A.E. Waterman-Pearson, 1998. Efficacy and kinetic of carprofen, administered preoperatively or postoperatively, for the prevention of pain in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Vet. Surg., 27: 568-582.
    PubMedDirect Link

  19. Lemke, K.A., C.L. Runyon and B.S. Horney, 2002. Effects of preoperative administration of ketoprofen on anesthetic requirements and signs of postoperative pain in dogs undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 221: 1268-1275.
    PubMedDirect Link

  20. Mathews, K.A., D.M. Paley, R.A. Foster, A.E. Valliant and S.S. Young, 1996. A comparison of ketorolac with flunixin, butorphanol and oxymorphone in controlling postoperative pain in dogs. Can. Vet. J., 37: 557-567.
    PubMedDirect Link

  21. Nolan, A. and J. Reid, 1993. Comparison of the postoperative analgesic and sedative effects of carprofen and papaveretum in the dog. Vet. Rec., 133: 240-242.
    PubMedDirect Link

  22. Pibarot, P., J. Dupuis, E. Grisneaux, S. Cuvelliez and J. Plante et al., 1997. Comparison of ketoprofen, oxymorphone hydrochloride and butorphanol in the treatment of postoperative pain in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 211: 438-444.
    PubMedDirect Link

  23. Rebuelto, M., G. Albarellos, L. Ambros, V. Kreil and L. Montoya et al., 2002. Pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone administered by the intravenous, intramuscular or subcutaneous routes to dogs. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther., 25: 73-76.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  24. Riendau, D., S. Charleson, W. Cromlish, J.A. Mancini, E. Wong and J. Guay, 1997. Comparison of the cyclooxygenase-1 inhibitory properties of Nonsteroidal Anti Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and selective COX-2 inhibitors, using sensitive microsomal and platelet assays. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol., 75: 1088-1095.
    PubMedDirect Link

  25. Slingsby, L.S., P.J. Murison, L. Goossens, M. Engelen and A.E. Waterman-Pearson, 2006. A comparison between pre-operative carprofen and a long-acting sufentanil formulation for analgesia after ovariohysterectomy in dogs. Vet. Anaesthesia Analgesia, 33: 313-327.
    CrossRef

  26. Summan, M., M. McKinstry, G.L. Warren, T. Hulderman and D. Mishra et al., 2003. Inflammatory mediators and skeletal muscle injury: A DNA microarray analysis. J. Interferon Cytokine Res., 23: 237-245.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  27. Tidball, J.G., 1995. Inflammatory cell response to acute muscle injury. Med. Sci. Sports Exercise, 27: 1022-1032.
    PubMedDirect Link

  28. Trudel, J.L., C. Wittnich and R.A. Brown, 1994. Antibiotics bioavailability in acute experimental pancreatitis. J. Am. Coll. Surg., 178: 475-479.
    PubMedDirect Link

Related Articles

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved