Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Isolation and Potential Culture of Phytoplankton Live Feed for Freshwater Mussels Sinanodonta woodiana (Lea, 1834)



H. Hamli, N. Hashim and Abdulla-Al- Asif
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Background and Objective: Gastropod and Bivalves are widely known as filter feeders which used to feed the phytoplankton and other micro creatures. This study was conducted to identify, isolate and determine the potential culture of phytoplankton species for mussel culture. Materials and Methods: The phytoplankton identification and the culture of phytoplankton in ponds in UPMKB, Sarawak, Malaysia were studied for a period of 3 months from February 2019 to May 2019. Results: Three genera were recorded from the ponds namely Selenastrum sp. followed by Licmophora sp. and Gloeocapsa sp. The highest abundant genus was Licmophora sp. due to their presence in every pond while the highest composition in culture condition was Selenastrum sp. because every treatment had this genus. The impact of physicochemical parameters on phytoplankton compositions and abundances in four ponds in UPMKB was assessed. Water quality parameters, such as temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH and conductivity were measured in situ from the ponds. Phytoplankton compositions and abundances were analyzed in the laboratory. ANOVA result of the physicochemical parameters showed the presence of significant difference among pH and temperature between ponds. Conclusion: The study concluded that the presence of the Selenastrum sp. genus could be the biological indicator of the water quality ponds. The best culture of phytoplankton shown by using the fertilizer treatment which was NPK fertilizer that improves the distribution of the culture of the phytoplankton.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

H. Hamli, N. Hashim and Abdulla-Al- Asif, 2020. Isolation and Potential Culture of Phytoplankton Live Feed for Freshwater Mussels Sinanodonta woodiana (Lea, 1834). Asian Journal of Animal Sciences, 14: 127-136.

DOI: 10.3923/ajas.2020.127.136

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajas.2020.127.136
 
Received: March 12, 2020; Accepted: July 15, 2020; Published: September 15, 2020


Copyright: © 2020. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

INTRODUCTION

The largest bivalve mollusk family of freshwater mussels is Unionidae which is consisted about 800 species worldwide1. Other than that, the freshwater mussel families belong to two different evolutionary families which are freshwater mussels and freshwater clams and these two groups are not closely related. Bivalve food consists of not only a variety of suspended particles such as bacteria, phytoplankton, micro-zooplankton and detritus, but also Dissolved Organic Material (DOM) such as amino acids and sugars2-5.

Algae can be found in every aquatic ecosystem which can be referred as phytoplankton or macrophytic that is underwater vegetation in marine and freshwaters, but also worldwide distributed in terrestrial habitat6. Phytoplankton is the single-celled micro-phyte that accumulate in the water7. Sometimes this aquatic micro-phyte can be colonized into a large amount that can be seen by naked eyes8. It is also known as microalgae which are similar to plants due to containing chlorophyll and require sunlight for existence and growth as well as reform carbon dioxide to release oxygen. Phytoplankton requires inorganic nutrients such as nitrates, phosphates and sulfur which they convert into proteins, fats and carbohydrates9. Phytoplankton is enabled to produce their food like plants which is photosynthetic10. Phytoplankton contributes as the essential component for bivalve mollusk feeding11.

The phytoplankton is fed by zooplankton and other microscopic sea creatures since they are filter feeders. Sinanodonta woodiana a most large-sized in of the family Unionidae belongs to East and South-East Asia12. Some authors classify this species as belonging to the genus Anodonta, but according to the latest taxonomy, it should be more appropriately assigned to the genus Sinanodonta13. Among freshwater bivalve species recently introduced to Europe, Sinanodonta woodiana can assemblage rapidly14,15.

Mussel plays an important role of protein source of the communities and had been a filter-feeder of phytoplankton. It contributes as a converter of nutrients and organic matter into nutritious animal protein16. Aquaculture of mussels can provide an additional and alternative food source for the rapidly growing human population. In east Malaysia, some investigation on freshwater gastropod and bivalves were conducted such as, the taxonomic study of edible bivalve by Hamli et al.17, diversity of edible Mollusc (Gastropoda and Bivalvia) by Hamli et al.18, checklist and habitat descriptions of edible Gastropods by Hamli et al.19, fisheries assessment, gametogenesis and culture practice of local bivalve investigated by Hamli et al.20, diversity and habitat characteristics of local freshwater Gastropoda by Hamli et al.21. Some studies on mangrove as well as marine gastropod and bivalves study were also performed22-27. But no other study did not reveal the planktonic food source and production of plankton for mussel from East Malaysia which is generally known as Sarawak.

In order to culture the mussel species, phytoplankton acts as an important food source for the cultured mussel. Considering above mentioned aquaculture prospect of freshwater mussel, live feed production and feed optimization is necessary to enhance the aquaculture possibility of this species. The aquaculture prospect and economic potentiality lead this investigation to certain objectives and those were, to identify the phytoplankton species from different ponds; to isolate phytoplankton species from the water fish pond and to determine the potential culture of phytoplankton species from a different treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area: The study was conducted at the four sampling sites located at UPMKB (Fig. 1). Three fish pond and one abandoned pond were taken into consideration for phytoplankton collection. The total duration of the study is from February-May, 2019.

Sample collection: Phytoplankton samples were collected horizontally from four selected areas using 90 μm phytoplankton net. After samples were collected samples were preserved in 250 mL plastic bottles with two conditions; in which, first containing 10% buffered formalin and second containing nutrient solution (N:P:K = 1:1:1). Samples with 10% formalin were used for species identification in the laboratory. Meanwhile, samples with nutrient solution to keep them alive for isolation and culture process. The water physical parameters form every study area such as pH, dissolved oxygen, turbidity and temperature were measured in situ using multi-parameter equipment (Model WQC-24; DKK-TOA Corporation, Tokyo, Japan)28.

Identification and count of phytoplankton: After collection of samples, these samples were brought to the Aquatic Ecology Laboratory of Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus for further analysis and identification. The identification was performed by a compound microscope (LEICA CWE compound microscope; 40×10 magnification) following the method described by Newell and Newell29 and Sukhanova30.

Image for - Isolation and Potential Culture of Phytoplankton Live Feed for Freshwater Mussels Sinanodonta woodiana (Lea, 1834)
Fig. 1:The sampling sites at UPMKB

Table 1: Different mediums of phytoplankton culture in laboratory conditions
Image for - Isolation and Potential Culture of Phytoplankton Live Feed for Freshwater Mussels Sinanodonta woodiana (Lea, 1834)

Collection and isolation of phytoplankton: Collection and isolation of phytoplankton were carried out by several procedures which are preparation of agar, centrifuge washing technique, streak plating technique based on Phang and Chu31 and the culture of phytoplankton.

Preparation of agar: Agar plates were prepared by dissolving nutrient agar in Schott bottle and were autoclaved at 126°C for 15 min. Then the nutrient agar poured in plates to cool down. These plates were allowed to cool, kept in an inverted position for not drying and at least 72 h before streaking.

Centrifuge washing technique (Purification of algal samples): A volume of 12 mL phytoplankton samples was taken especially from enrichment culture in each of at least four centrifuge tubes. These tubes were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min. After removing the supernatant, the cells were suspended in fresh sterile water in each tube using a vortex mixer (rotated at 1000-1500 rpm up to homogeneous suspension). About 500 mL sterile water was prepared using an autoclave (at 126°C for 15 min) to complete the centrifuge-washing process. Centrifugation and washing were repeated six times to expel the microorganisms presented in the algal sample and the cells were then streaked on to agar plates.

Streak plating technique: The streak plating technique was performed based on Phang and Chu31 and Parvin et al.32. Washed microalgae allowed to streak through the loop in plates in axenic conditions and to keep for at least seven days to grow microalgae. Repeated streak-plating was carried out to peak up a single colony from earlier streaked plates and to make free from bacteria. From last streaked plates, the single colonies were picked up by loop and allowed to grow in tubes and vials. Before putting in the tubes and vials, the single-cell growth and purity of single species were confirmed after observing under a compound microscope. Then, the pure culture of isolated phytoplankton was maintained in a volumetric flask in the aquatic ecology laboratory for further use. Serial dilution in 0.9% sterilized distilled water of phytoplankton suspension was spread on nutrient agar with bold basal medium plates using pour plate technique which is the method for counting the number of colonies forming phytoplankton present in a liquid specimen. The 1 mL of inoculum from a phytoplankton sample was placed in the petri dish using the pipette and molten cooled nutrient agar (NA) that was added with 2% of Bold Basal Medium (BBM) was poured into the petri dish that contains the inoculum. The agar plate was inverted for 48 hrs after the solidification of agar at room temperature with adequate light in order to obtain a successful single colony of phytoplankton.

Culture of phytoplankton: The experimental design was set up based on Completely Randomized Design (CRD) which consists of three treatments each contains three replications including one control treatment of Selenastrum sp. The culture media of phytoplankton was prepared by washing 500 mL of Schott bottles and sterilized by using autoclave for 15 min at 121°C. After that, the bottles were filled with 250 mL of distilled water. There have four treatments which were urea, standard medium (NPK fertilizer), controlled and waste (banana peel) (Table 1).

The treatments were put in each of the Schott bottles with three replications. The single culture of treatment was pipette 100 mL into the treatment bottle for culturing. The bottles were capped with cork. Blowers and lights were installed and operated for 24 hrs every day for 14 days (two weeks). After successful culture of phytoplankton, 100 mL water had been filtered by using filter paper (Whiteman cellulose nitrate membrane filter paper; pore size, 0.45 μm; diameter, 47 mm) and vacuum pump (Rocker 300). Then the filter paper was oven (Memmert; Loading Modell 100-800) dried with 103°C for 2 hrs, after these, the biomass was calculated. The biomass of phytoplankton was calculated using the formula:

Phytoplankton biomass (mg) = Final weight of filter paper (mg)- Initial weight of filter paper (mg)

Statistical analysis: Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s test was performed to determine mean differences the number of phytoplankton colonies in nutrient agar and the growth performance of phytoplankton measured based on biomass between treatments. Furthermore, in order to determine to mean differences in water quality parameters between ponds, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test was performed by using SAS 9.3.

RESULTS

Distribution of phytoplankton species: The three different genera were identified from selected ponds in UPMKB, namely Selenastrum, Gloeocapsa and Licmophora. The Selenastrum sp. and Gloeocapsa sp. had occurred in Station 1 and Station 3 while the Licmophora sp. was found distributed at the Station 1, 2 and Station 4 (Table 2).

Gloeocapsa sp. were usually spherical in shape and surrounded by gelatinous sheaths that were easily identified by its bright colour. Gloeocapsa sp. had colourless sheaths. Licmophora sp. was distinct triangular or fan-shaped cells, grow on a common stalk that is attached to rocks or algae. Selenastrum sp. has strongly curved and often slightly sigmoid, lunate to sub-circular with pointed tips shape and widely found in freshwater lakes ponds and rivers (Fig. 2a-c).

Image for - Isolation and Potential Culture of Phytoplankton Live Feed for Freshwater Mussels Sinanodonta woodiana (Lea, 1834)
Fig. 2(a-c): The three genus Selenastrum sp. (a) Licmophora sp. (b) and Gleocapsa sp. (c) has been observed under microscope 40×0.65 X magnification

Water quality parameter: The water quality parameters, namely pH, temperature, conductivity and dissolved oxygen were measured in situ from three fish ponds and an abandoned pond located in UPMKB (Table 3). There was no significant difference at level (p>0.05) on environmental variables which is conductivity and dissolved oxygen. Besides, only Station 4 showed a significant difference for environmental variables for both pH and temperature while the other three stations did not show significant differences. In station 1, the value of pH (7.67±0.10) and temperature (30.2±0.10°C) was highest amongst all stations and parameters. The lowest result of pH (6.65±0.17) and temperature (29.2±0.20°C) was found in Station 4.

Isolation of phytoplankton: The isolation of phytoplankton was carried out with using two medium which are Nutrient Agar (NA) (Fig. 3a-c) and nutrient agar (NA) combined with 2% of Bold Basal Media (BBM) (Fig. 4a-c). The isolation on nutrient agar showing that no growth of phytoplankton’s colony. Phytoplankton grown well in Nutrient Agar (NA) and BBM combination.

Samples were streaking until a single colony and the inoculum serially diluted with sterile water spread onto nutrient agar that was added with a modified medium which is bold basal medium agar plates, by using pour plate method until identifiable colonies appeared after two days.

Table 2:Species distribution of phytoplankton at selected ponds in UPMKB
Image for - Isolation and Potential Culture of Phytoplankton Live Feed for Freshwater Mussels Sinanodonta woodiana (Lea, 1834)
+: Present, -: Absent

Image for - Isolation and Potential Culture of Phytoplankton Live Feed for Freshwater Mussels Sinanodonta woodiana (Lea, 1834)
Fig. 3(a-c): The isolation of phytoplankton on nutrient agar (NA)

Image for - Isolation and Potential Culture of Phytoplankton Live Feed for Freshwater Mussels Sinanodonta woodiana (Lea, 1834)
Fig. 4(a-c):
The isolation of phytoplankton on combination of NA and BBM33

Table 3:
Environmental parameters (Mean±SD) of each station at selected ponds in UPMKB
Image for - Isolation and Potential Culture of Phytoplankton Live Feed for Freshwater Mussels Sinanodonta woodiana (Lea, 1834)
Means in the same column followed by the same letter do not differ significantly according to the Tukey’s test (p<0.05)

Table 4:
Biomass of the phytoplankton in four different treatments
Image for - Isolation and Potential Culture of Phytoplankton Live Feed for Freshwater Mussels Sinanodonta woodiana (Lea, 1834)
Means in the same column followed by the same letter do not differ significantly according to the Tukey’s test (p<0.05)

Culture of phytoplankton: The standard fertilizer (NPK fertilizer) medium produced phytoplankton showed the highest (0.067±0.028) biomass among all other treatments. On the other hand, waste medium treatment showed the lowest biomass value (0.026±0.009). Meanwhile, the urea (0.027 mg) and waste (0.026 mg) treatment had almost similar value (Table 4).

DISCUSSION

The three genera had identified from the collected samples from different ponds comprised Licmophora sp., Gloeocapsa sp. and Selenastrum sp. All of three genera were found at Station 1. Licmophora sp. was only noticed from Station 2 and 4. Station 2 had two genera namely, Selenastrum sp. and Gloeocapsa sp. The research team found the Licmophora sp. was the dominant genus compared with the others due to their presence in three stations out of four. Selenastrum sp. is freshwater algae or phytoplankton and this genus is cosmopolitan in freshwater lakes, ponds and rivers34,35. Cells found spherical with strongly curved and often slightly sigmoid with a pointed tip. The cells of Selenastrum sp. used to reproduce by autospore formation and colony fragmentation. Furthermore, Gloeocapsa is a genus from the cyanobacteria group. The cells secrete individual gelatinous sheaths which can often be seen as sheaths around recently divided cells within outer sheaths. Komárek36 stated that the Gloeocapsa sp. is a unicellular-colonial species that can form small colony while irregular aggregations. Most of the species known from wet or dry, periodically moistened, inhabits on stony and rocky walls and from rocks with streaming water, distributed all over the world. Lastly, Licmophora sp. form fan-shaped colonies attached valve to valve, with wedge-shaped girdles33.

The collected samples from four stations were put the nutrient medium (NPK fertilizer)to enhance phytoplankton growth. We found that, station 1 had more green color which indicated more phytoplankton abundance compared to the other three stations. Station 1 showed the higher composition of phytoplankton caused the higher possibilities to the isolation of phytoplankton growing on two types of media; nutrient agar and the combination of nutrient agar with a bold basal medium. We figured out that the combination of the nutrient agar with a bold basal medium showed the positive growth performance of phytoplankton. Which was the evidence that the bold basal medium was the good nutrient for freshwater algae that helps to the growth performance of phytoplankton on the agar. We had carried out the Colony-forming Units (CFU) technique to determine the number of colony-forming units. Therefore, often only parts of a plate are analyzed and used to estimate the whole plate count after extrapolation37. Furthermore high numbers of CFUs on a plate can lead to false results due to overcrowding of bacteria38.

The urea and banana waste phytoplankton culture medium showed the lowest (0.027±0.011 and 0.026±0.011) weight among the treatment, while the highest (0.067±0.028) biomass was obtained from NPK fertilizer medium, which was 0.041g higher than the banana waste treatment. In relation to, biomass value of urea and waste medium, the urea medium has almost a similar value with the waste medium phytoplankton biomass where the difference was 0.001. Although the biomass of phytoplankton in NPK fertilizer medium seemed to be the highest among other treatments there was no statistically significant difference among four treatment mediums, the species in the sample probably contribute in a high degree to the total biomass of the phytoplankton in the culture of phytoplankton. Different concentrations of fertilizer can be taken into consideration for further study that which concentration would better for phytoplankton growth and biomass production. Mia et al.39 and Mia et al.40 did similar research used liquid rice starch and rotten apple concentration respectively.

Most of the physicochemical parameters were very suitable for phytoplankton growth. The ANOVA result showed that there were significant differences in temperature, pH, while Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and conductivity had no significant differences. The Tukey test also showed a similar scenario. Specifically, the temperature of the station's water ranged from 29.2 (Station 4) to 30.5 (Station 1). This registered temperature was not optimum for planktons but good for the growth of fish as suggested41,42,43 which is between 22 and 31. pH of the stations extended from 6.65. (Station 4) to 7.67 (Station 1). These pH values were optimum for aquatic life including fish44 within the EPA Redbook recommended pH range for freshwater (6.5-9.0)45 and recommended by others46,47. The range of dissolved Oxygen (DO) was from 1.3 to 3.06 mg L1; meanwhile obtained DO concentration did not satisfy the minimum recommended standard (5 mg L1) set by EPA Redbook and others48,49 which suggested that value was good for fish aquaculture and planktons. Dissolved Oxygen (DO) is one of the most important factors used in determining the quality of water50. Among four stations conductivity level ranged from 1.3 to 3.06 μS cm1 which was low in comparison to the standards for the World Health Organization of 250 μS cm1.

The result showed that phytoplankton was highly distributed in fertilizer treatment medium comparison with the other three treatments based on the calculation of growth performance of the phytoplankton measured based on biomass. Phytoplankton analysis, which includes species count and biomass determination, could be used as an indicator of water quality51. The results indicated Selenastrum sp. was the most abundant species among the phytoplankton composition and stations. The dominance of Selenastrum sp. could be related to the abundant quantity of biomass in treatment (NPK fertilizer) because of the mean dry weight of the phytoplankton biomass compared to the other three treatments.

The outcome of this present study will help to accelerate the initiation of freshwater mussel culture research; as live phytoplankton is the primary food source of these filter feeder mussels. Previously no other evidence noticed in Sarawak, Malaysia of phytoplankton culture research which referred for mussel culture; so the present investigation can be the baseline study of phytoplankton culture for different freshwater mussel aquaculture. However, evaluation of dose optimization of daily feed application on freshwater mussel aquaculture is highly recommended for further study.

CONCLUSION

Three different genera of phytoplankton has been recorded from four different ponds in UPMKB, Sarawak, Malaysia which indicate that the overall health of these pond water was not bad during study periods. The genus Licmophora sp. found as most distributed species which found at three ponds compared to other species. However, Selenastrum sp. was the most abundant genus compared to another genus due to its existence growing on agar (nutrient agar + bold basal medium). Laboratory culture of phytoplankton showed NPK fertilizer treatment improves the distribution and biomass of phytoplankton species. Phytoplankton feeding dose optimization for freshwater mussel species can be taken under consideration for further study by using this present study data.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study was the first approach to isolate and find the potential candidate species of live feed culture for freshwater mussel species Sinanodonta woodiana (Lea, 1834) in Malaysia. This present finding will help the related researcher to select and culture of appropriate phytoplankton species to ensure live feed production for freshwater mussel species Sinanodonta woodiana. Thus a new phytoplankton species candidate for mussel aquaculture may be arrived at.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The Author would like to thanks the deanery and staff s from the Department of Animal Science and Fishery, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus for technical, logistic supports and laboratory facilities provided. First Author would like to thank Universiti Putra Malaysia for the funds GP-IPM/2017/9538200.

REFERENCES

1:  Graf, D.L. and K.S. Cummings, 2007. Review of the systematics and global diversity of freshwater mussel species (Bivalvia: Unionoida). J. Moll. Stud., 73: 291-314.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

2:  Gosling, E.M., 2003. Bivalve Molluscs-Biology, Ecology and Culture. Fishing News Books, Oxford, UK., ISBN: 0852382340, Pages: 443

3:  Wilson, A.E., 2003. Effects of zebra mussels on phytoplankton and ciliates: a field mesocosm experiment. J. Plankton Res., 25: 905-915.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

4:  Welker, M. and N. Walz, 1998. Can mussels control the plankton in rivers?-a planktological approach applying a Lagrangian sampling strategy. Limnol. Oceanogr., 43: 753-762.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

5:  Lopes-Lima, M., P. Lima, M. Hinzmann, A. Rocha and J. Machado, 2014. Selective feeding by Anodonta cygnea (Linnaeus, 1771): The effects of seasonal changes and nutritional demands. Limnologica, 44: 18-22.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

6:  Broady, P.A., 1996. Diversity, distribution and dispersal of Antarctic terrestrial algae. Biodivers. Conserv., 5: 1307-1335.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

7:  Vaulot, D., 2001. Phytoplankton. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. London: Nature Publishing Group.

8:  Guiry, M., 2014. What are algae? In the seaweed site: information on marine Algae. http://www.seaweed.ie/algae/algae.php.

9:  NOAA, 2017. Historical Maps and Charts audio podcast. National Ocean Service website.

10:  Lindsey, R. and M. Scott, 2010. What are phytoplankton? In NASA earth observatory. http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/Phytoplankton/.

11:  Arapov, J., D. Ezgeta–Bali, M. Peharda and N. Gladan, 2010. Bivalve feeding — how and what they eat? Ribarstvo, 68: 105-116.
Direct Link  |  

12:  Zhadin, V.I., 1952. Molluscs of fresh and brackish waters of the USSR. Opredeliteli po Faune SSSR, 46: 1-376.
Direct Link  |  

13:  Bogatov, V.V. and E. M. Sayenko, 2002. On the structure and systematic position of the genus Sinanodonta (Bivalvia, Unionidae). Bull. Russian Far East Malacol. Soc., 7: 85-93.

14:  Cianfanelli, S., E. Lori and M. Bodon, 2007. Non-indigenous freshwater molluscs and their distribution in Italy. In: Biological Invaders in Inland Waters: Profiles, Distribution, and Threats, Gherardi, F., Springer, Netherlands, pp: 103-121
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

15:  Donrovich, S.W., K. Douda, V. Plechingerová, K. Rylková and P. Horký et al., 2017. Invasive Chinese pond mussel Sinanodonta woodiana threatens native mussel reproduction by inducing cross-resistance of host fish. Aqua. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwat. Eco., 27: 1325-1333.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

16:  Douda, K. and Z. Čadková, 2017. Water clearance efficiency indicates potential filter-feeding interactions between invasive Sinanodonta woodiana and native freshwater mussels. Biol. Invasions, 20: 1093-1098.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

17:  Hamli, H., M.H. Idris, M.K. Abu Hena and S.K. Wong, 2012. Taxonomic study of edible bivalve from selected division of Sarawak, Malaysia. Int. J. Zool. Res., 8: 52-58.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

18:  Hamli, H., M.H. Idris, M.K. Abu Hena and S.K. Wong, 2012. Diversity of edible mollusc (Gastropoda and Bivalvia) at selected division of Sarawak, Malaysia. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inform. Technol., 2: 5-7.
CrossRef  |  

19:  Hamli, H., M.H. Idris, M.K. Abu Hena, S.K. Wong and A. Arshad, 2013. Checklist and habitat descriptions of edible gastropods from Sarawak, Malaysia. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 8: 412-418.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

20:  Hamli, H., M.H. Idris, M.K.A. Hena and A.H. Rajaee, 2019. Fisheries assessment, gametogenesis and culture practice of local Bivalve: A review. PERTANIKA J. Trop. Agric. Sci., 42: 103-124.
Direct Link  |  

21:  Hamli, H., S.H. Syed Azmai, S. Abdul Hamed and Abdulla-Al-Asif, 2019. Diversity and habitat characteristics of local freshwater gastropoda (caenogastropoda) from sarawak, malaysia. Singapore J. Sci. Res., 10: 23-27.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

22:  Hamli, H., A.R. Azimah, H.I. Mohd, H.M.K. Abu and S.K. Wong, 2015. Morphometric variation among three local mangrove clam species of corbiculidae. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol., 37: 15-20.

23:  Hamli, H., M.H. Idris, A.H. Rajaee and M.K. Abu Hena, 2015. Reproductive cycle of hard clam, Meretrix lyrata Sowerby, 1851 (Bivalvia: Veneridae) from Sarawak, Malaysia. Trop. Life Sci. Res., 26: 59-72.
Direct Link  |  

24:  Hamli, H., M.H. Idris, H.M.K. Abu, A.H. Rajaee and A. Arshad, 2016. Inner shell as variation key of local hard clam meretrix spp. J. Environ. Biol., 37: 641-646.

25:  Hamli, H., M.H. Idris, A.H. Rajaee, A.H.M. Kamal and M.N. Hoque, 2017. Condition index of Meretrix lyrata (Sowerby 1851) and its relationship with water parameter in Sarawak. Sains Malaysiana, 46: 545-551.

26:  Idris, M.H., A.A. Rahim, H. Hamli, M.H. Nesarul and M.K. Abu Hena, 2017. Determination of gonad development of mangrove clam Polymesoda expansa (Mousson 1849) by histological classification. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 12: 168-176.
CrossRef  |  

27:  Idris, M.H., H. Hamli, M.K. Abu Hena and A.H. Rajaee, 2017. Distribution of mineral contents in the selected tissues of Meretrix lyrata. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 12: 149-156.
CrossRef  |  

28:  DKK-TOA Corporation, 2003. Hand-held water quality meter WQC-24 instruction manual. DKK-TOA Corporation, Cambridge, UK. https://www.airmet.com.au/assets/documents/product/129/file_1438664945_589.pdf.

29:  Newell G.E. and R.C. Newell, 1973. Marine Plankton: A Practical Guide. Hutchinson Educational Ltd., London, Pages: 244
Direct Link  |  

30:  Sukhanova, Z.N., 1978. Settling Without the Inverted Microscope. In: Phytoplankton Manual, UNESCO, Sourina, A. (Ed.). Page Brothers (Nourich) Ltd., Indian, pp: 97

31:  Phang, S.M. and W.L. Chu, 1999. Catalogue of Strains, University of Malaya Algae Culture Collection (UMACC). Institute of Postgraduate Studies and Research, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, pp: 77.

32:  Parvin, M., M.N. Zannat and M.A.B. Habib, 2007. Two Important techniques for isolation of microalgae. Asian Fish. Sci., 20: 117-124.
Direct Link  |  

33:  Lu, W.Y., Y.J. Zhao and R. Zhou, 2007. A methodological study on rapid identification and isolation of algicidal bacteria (in Chinese with English abstract). Microbiol., 34: 119-122.
Direct Link  |  

34:  Guiry, M.D. and G.M. Guiry, 2020. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway.

35:  Krienitz, L., C. Bock, H. Nozaki and M. Wolf, 2011. SSU rRNA gene phylogeny of morphospecies affiliated to the bioassay alga "Selenastrum capricornutum" recoverd the polyphyletic origin of crescent-shaped Chlorophyta. J. Phycol., 47: 880-893.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

36:  Komárek, J., 2003. Coccoid and colonial cyanobacteria. In: Freshwater Algae of North America. Ecology and Classification, Wehr, J.D. and R.G. Sheath, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp: 59-116
Direct Link  |  

37:  Blodgett, R.J., 2008. Mathematical treatment of plates with colony counts outside the acceptable range. Food Microbiol., 25: 92-98.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

38:  Breed, R.S. and W.D. Dotterrer, 1916. The number of colonies allowable on satisfactory agar plates. J. Bacteriol., 1: 321-331.
Direct Link  |  

39:  Mia, M.L., M.A.B. Habib, M.M. Rahman, N. Hoque, M.S. Islam and A.A. Asif, 2018. Use of liquid rice starch as a source of carbon for growth of Spirulina platensis. J. Fisher. Life Sci., 3: 34-45.

40:  Mia, M.L., M.A.B. Habib, N. Hoque, M.S. Islam and M.M. Rahman et al., 2019. A study on growth performance of Spirulina platensis in different concentrations of rotten apple as a carbon source. Int. J. Excellence Innovation Dev., 2: 29-40.

41:  Korai, A.L., G.A. Sahato, K.H. Lashari and S.N. Arbani, 2008. Biodiversity in relation to physicochemical properties of Keenjhar Lake, Thatta District, Sindh, Pakistan. Turkish J. Fish. Aqua. Sci., 8: 259-268.
Direct Link  |  

42:  Al Asif, A., S. Rikta, M.S. Islam and S. Aktar, 2019. Productivity of phytoplankton by using different organic fertilizers in the glass aquarium. Res. Reviews: A J. Bioinform., 6: 25-37.
Direct Link  |  

43:  Akter, S., M.M. Rahman, A. Faruk, M.N.M. Bhuiyan, A. Hossain and A.A. Asif, 2018. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of phytoplankton in culture pond of Noakhali district, Bangladesh. Int. J. Fisher. Aquat. Stud., 6: 371-375.
Direct Link  |  

44:  Oso, J.A. and O. Fagbuaro, 2008. An assessment of the physico-chemical properties of a tropical reservoir, Southwestern, Nigeria. J. Fish. Int., 3: 42-45.
Direct Link  |  

45:  Schmirz, R.J., 1995. Introduction to Water Pollution Biology. Gulf Professional Publishing, Texas, United States, Pages: 320
Direct Link  |  

46:  Chapman, D., 1996. Water Quality Assessments: A Guide to the Use of Biota, Sediments and Water in Environmental Monitoring. 2nd Edn., E&FN Spon, London, UK., ISBN-13: 9780203476710, Pages: 648
Direct Link  |  

47:  Goldman, C.R. and A.J. Horne, 1983. Limnology. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, Pages: 464

48:  USEPA, 2008. Nutrient criteria technical guidance manual wetlands. United State Environment Protection Agency.

49:  Yajurvedi, H.N., 2008. A study of growth on co-efficient and relative condition of factor of the major carp (Catla catla) in two lakes differing in water quality. App. Ecol. Env. Res., 6: 33-47.
Direct Link  |  

50:  Odum, H.T., 1956. Primary production in flowing water. Limnol. Oceanogr., 1: 102-117.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

51:  Salmaso, N., G. Morabito, F. Buzzi, L. Garibaldi, M. Simona and R. Mosello, 2006. Phytoplankton as an indicator of the water quality of the Deep Lakes South of the alps. Hydrobiologia, 563: 167-187.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved