|
|
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Year: 2009 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 113 - 123
|
 |
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Angiography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound-Directed Bare-Metal Coronary Stent Placement (The AVID Trial)
|
R. J Russo,
P. D Silva,
P. S Teirstein,
M. J Attubato,
C. J Davidson,
A. C DeFranco,
P. J Fitzgerald,
S. L Goldberg,
J. B Hermiller,
M. B Leon,
F. S Ling,
J. E Lucisano,
R. A Schatz,
S. C Wong,
N. J Weissman,
D. M Zientek
and
for the AVID Investigators
|
Abstract: Background— AVID (Angiography Versus Intravascular ultrasound-Directed stent placement) is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial designed to assess the effect of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-directed stent placement on the 12-month rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR).
Methods and Results— After elective coronary stent placement and an optimal angiographic result (<10% stenosis), 800 patients were randomized to Angiography- or IVUS-directed therapy. Blinded IVUS was performed in the Angiography group without further therapy. In the IVUS group, IVUS criteria for optimal stent placement (<10% area stenosis, apposition, and absence of dissection) were applied. Final minimum stent area was 6.90±2.43 mm2 in the Angiography group and 7.55±2.82 mm2 in the IVUS group (P=0.001). In the IVUS group, only 37% with inadequate expansion (<90%) received further therapy. The 12-month TLR rate was 12.0% in the Angiography group and 8.1% in the IVUS group (P=0.08, 95% confidence level [CI], [–8.3% to 0.5%]). When vessels with a distal reference diameter <2.5 mm by core laboratory angiography measurement were excluded from analysis, the 12-month TLR rate was 10.1% in the Angiography group and 4.3% in the IVUS group (P=0.01, 95% CI, [–10.6% to –1.2%]). With a prestent angiographic stenosis of ≥70%, the TLR rate was lower in the IVUS group compared with the Angiography group (3.1% versus 14.2%; P=0.002; 95% CI, [–18.4% to –4.2%]).
Conclusions— IVUS-directed bare-metal stent placement results in larger acute stent dimensions without an increase in complications and a significantly lower 12-month TLR rate for vessels ≥2.5 mm by angiography and for vessels with high-grade prestent stenosis. However, for the entire sample analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis, IVUS-directed bare-metal stent placement does not significantly reduce the 12-month TLR rate when compared with stent placement guided by angiography alone. In addition, IVUS evaluation of adequate stent expansion is underutilized by experienced operators. |
View Fulltext
| Related
Articles | Back
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related
Articles |
No Article Found
|
|
|
|
|