Asian Science Citation Index is committed to provide an authoritative, trusted and significant information by the coverage of the most important and influential journals to meet the needs of the global scientific community.  
ASCI Database
308-Lasani Town,
Sargodha Road,
Faisalabad, Pakistan
Fax: +92-41-8815544
Contact Via Web
Suggest a Journal
Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances
Year: 2011  |  Volume: 6  |  Issue: 4  |  Page No.: 385 - 390

Effects of Molasses and Bacterial Inoculant on Chemical Composition and Aerobic Stability of Sorghum Silage

M.M. Paviz, T. Ghoorchi and F. Ghanbari    

Abstract: This experiment was conducted to determine the effects of an inoculant (lactobacillus plantarum, 106 g kg-1 fresh forage) and molasses (%5), on chemical composition and aerobic stability of sorghum (speedfeed variety) silage. The data were analyzed as Completely Randomized Design with 5 replicates for each treatment. The pH of all treated silage was below 4 and did not significantly differ (p>0.05). The DM content was same in all treatments (p>0.05). Ash content was greater in silage treated with molasses than inoculants and control (p<0.05). Crude Protein (CP) did not significantly differ among treatments (p>0.05). Ammonia-N concentration was higher in silage treated with molasses than inoculants and control (p<0.05). Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) content did not significantly differ among treatments (p>0.05). Silage treated with inoculant had greater disappearance Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF) compared to silages treated with molasses and control (p<0.05). Crude Fat (CF) was not significantly different among treatments (p>0.05). The pH and temperature was measured regularly each 2 h for 12 days after opening silos. Finally silage affected by additives (p<0.05). Silage treated with bacterial inoculant had higher pH and temperature (4/66, 26/46) compare to silage treated with molasses (4/49, 24/97) and control (4/03, 24/17) (p<0.05). Spoilage in forages tissues was more than in silage treated with bacterial inoculation compare to others (p<0.05).

Cited References   |    Fulltext    |   Related Articles   |   Back
   
 
 
 
  Related Articles

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Copyright   |   Desclaimer   |    Privacy Policy   |   Browsers   |   Accessibility