Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Science Alert
 
Blue
   
Curve Top
Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences
  Year: 2010 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 10 | Page No.: 509-512
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2010.509.512
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

Comparison between Invasive and Noninvasive Tests in Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection

Saffari Mahmood and Abtahi Hamid

Abstract:
In this study, the invasive and noninvasive diagnotic tests were compared to choose the appropriate test for diagnostice of H. pylori infection. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a human pathogen that causes chronic gastritis, has a role in gastric and duodenal ulcer, is involved in gastric carcinogenesis and is regarded as a possible important factor in at least a subset of patients with functional dyspepsia. The diagnosis of H. pylori is an essential element in the management of many common gastrointestinal pathologies. The assessment of each routine invasive and noninvasive test is important. We studied a total of 127 outpatients for the detection of H. pylori infection. The presence of H. pylori infection by invasive tests containing the Rapid Urease Test (RUT), histology (Giemsa staining) and culture in 127 patients. Patients who were positive in culture, or two tests from four tests, invasive and noninvasive, were considered to have H. pylori infection. In noninvasive tests, we evaluated anti-H. pylori IgG and anti-CagA antibodies using commercial Enzyme-Linked Immunoassay (ELISA) and Western blot in dyspeptic patients. Eighty five out of the 127 patients were positive for H. pylori. Helicobacter pylori IgG seropositivity and 35 out of the 127 patients were positive for immunoblot. RUT had sensitivity, specifity and accuracy of 96, 80 and 90.5%, respectively; for Elisa these were 85.2, 33 and 70.5%, respectively and for ELISA with immunoblotting they were 65, 45 and 58.8%, respectively. The results of this study suggest that noninvasive tests (ELISA, immunoblotting) have the lowest and RUT with histology have the highest accuracy. These earlier tests can not be used for accurate infection diagnosis.
PDF Fulltext XML References Citation Report Citation
 RELATED ARTICLES:
  •    Severe Acne Vulgaris is Associated with Helicobacter pylori Infection: First Report in the Literature
  •    Rapid Urease Test, Touch Cytology and Histopathologic Assessment in Determining Infection by Helicobacter pylori in Outpatient Setting
  •    Prevalence and Risk Factors of Helicobacter pylori Infection among Health Center Referrals in Khorramabad (West of Iran)
  •    A Review on the Recent Advances in Pharmacological Studies on Medicinal Plants; Animal Studies are Done but Clinical Studies Needs Completing
How to cite this article:

Saffari Mahmood and Abtahi Hamid, 2010. Comparison between Invasive and Noninvasive Tests in Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 13: 509-512.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2010.509.512

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjbs.2010.509.512

COMMENT ON THIS PAPER
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Curve Bottom