Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Science Alert
 
Blue
   
Curve Top
Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences
  Year: 2007 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 6 | Page No.: 986-988
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2007.986.988
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

Effects of Underfeeding on Semen Quality of Rhode Island Cocks

M. Kabir, O.O. Oni, G.N. Akpa, I.A. Adeyinka and P.I. Rekwot

Abstract:
Fifty Rhode Island chickens were randomly assigned to five treatments with ten cocks in each treatment. Group I cocks (full fed control) received 140 g of a 16% CP growers ration per cock per day. Cocks in Group II, III, IV and V received 98, 70, 42 and 28 g of the same ration per cock per day, representing 70, 50, 30 and 20% of Group I intake, respectively. The feeding trials lasted for 8 weeks during which one ejaculate per day was collected from each cock using the massage technique. The ejaculated semen samples were subjected to both physical and biochemical evaluations. Results showed that cocks that were severely underfed (i.e., Groups IV and V) took significantly longer time (p<0.01) to ejaculate. In addition, ejaculation failures were encountered more frequently with the severely underfed cocks than in cocks that were moderately underfed (i.e., Groups II and III). There were however, no significant differences in most of the biochemical parameters between cocks I all the treatment groups. Ejaculate volume, progressive sperm motility and sperm concentration were significantly depressed (p<0.01) in the severely underfed cocks than in the moderately underfed cocks. Thus, this study revealed that providing Rhode Island red and white cocks with one-half to three-quarter (i.e., 50-70%) of their normal daily ration would neither undermine their semen producing ability nor affect their semen quality adversely.
PDF Fulltext XML References Citation Report Citation
How to cite this article:

M. Kabir, O.O. Oni, G.N. Akpa, I.A. Adeyinka and P.I. Rekwot, 2007. Effects of Underfeeding on Semen Quality of Rhode Island Cocks. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 10: 986-988.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2007.986.988

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjbs.2007.986.988

COMMENT ON THIS PAPER
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Curve Bottom