Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Science Alert
 
FOLLOW US:     Facebook     Twitter
Blue
   
Curve Top
Journal of Applied Sciences
  Year: 2010 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 7 | Page No.: 558-563
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2010.558.563
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Drinking Water Denitrification in a Packed Bed Anoxic Reactor: Effect of Carbon Source and Reactor Depth
Saleh Faraj Magram

Abstract:
The main aim of this study was to investigate the effect of various carbon sources on the performance of anoxic upflow packed-bed reactor to remove nitrate from drinking water. The study further investigated the degree of removal of nitrate at different depths of reactors for determining the optimum depth. Nitrate contaminated groundwater is becoming a serious problem in many parts of the world. In view of the cost and toxic sludge production by the physico-chemical processes, biological treatment processes are preferable; however, the available studies have reported a wide range of denitrification performance depending on the carbon source and reactor type. In this study, the denitrification was the best in case of ethanol (average residual NO3 ¯ concentration of 15 mg L-1 with an influent concentration of around 200 mg L-1), while formic acid showed the worst performance. Denitrification performance in case of each carbon source varied depending on the depth of the reactor. Nevertheless, the fact that nitrate removal was achieved without encountering accumulation of nitrite makes the developed process very attractive.
PDF Fulltext XML References Citation Report Citation
 RELATED ARTICLES:
  •    Effect of Addition of a Sudanese Herb (Cymbopogon proximus) on Drinking Water Fluoride, Nitrate and Total Dissolved Salts Concentration Levels
How to cite this article:

Saleh Faraj Magram , 2010. Drinking Water Denitrification in a Packed Bed Anoxic Reactor: Effect of Carbon Source and Reactor Depth. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10: 558-563.

DOI: 10.3923/jas.2010.558.563

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2010.558.563

 
COMMENT ON THIS PAPER
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

       

       

Curve Bottom