• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. International Journal of Pharmacology
  2. Vol 8 (7), 2012
  3. 614-620
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

International Journal of Pharmacology

Year: 2012 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 7 | Page No.: 614-620
DOI: 10.3923/ijp.2012.614.620

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

Article Trend



Total views 100

Authors


Zhijun Xiao

Country: China

Ye Zhang

Country: China

Yan Wang

Country: China

Feng Xu

Country: China

Keywords


  • antidepressant therapy
  • Chinese
  • Quality assessment
  • systematic review/meta-analysis
Review Article

Quality Assessment for Systematic Review /Meta-Analysis on Antidepressant Therapy Published in Chinese Journals

Zhijun Xiao, Ye Zhang, Yan Wang and Feng Xu
A lot of systematic reviews/meta-analyses compiled by Chinese professionals and published in Chinese medical journals bring a lot of perplexity as they help to a certain extent to make decision in some conflicting clinical results. This study aims to assess the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on antidepressant therapy published in Chinese journals. The reviews/meta-analyses on antidepressant therapy were identified by searching three main Chinese data banks i.e., Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data (WF) and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM). A pre-stated criterion was used for review/meta-analysis selection. All reviews were evaluated by two reviewers separately. Data in qualified reviews were extracted into a Microsoft Excel database for analysis. Two assessment tools were used: (1) the Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire (OQAQ) and (2) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). Sixty eight reviews/meta-analyses were included in this study. More than 50% of them had methodological and reporting defects which could have reduced the reliability of the review/meta-analysis results. The flaws were mainly low quality of search strategy, inappropriate bias control and absence of quality assessment for original study.
PDF Fulltext XML References Citation

How to cite this article

Zhijun Xiao, Ye Zhang, Yan Wang and Feng Xu, 2012. Quality Assessment for Systematic Review /Meta-Analysis on Antidepressant Therapy Published in Chinese Journals. International Journal of Pharmacology, 8: 614-620.

DOI: 10.3923/ijp.2012.614.620

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijp.2012.614.620

Related Articles

A Comparison of Methods to Detect Publication Bias for Meta-analysis of Continuous Data
No Superiority of Exenatide over Insulin in Diabetic Patients in Terms of Weight Reduction or Incidence of Adverse Effects: A Meta-analysis

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved