Komkrit Puphan
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
Pairat Sornplang
Department of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
Suthipong Uriyapongson
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
ABSTRACT
The objectives of this study were to develop culture medium and fillers with appropriate growth conditions and to evaluate stability of selected Lactobacillus salivarius L61 and commercial probiotic (L. plantarum Fr-B). Both strains were cultured in full-fat Soybean, Skim Milk, Dextrose (SSMD) and K2HPO4 with 1, 5 or 10 g/L yeast extract compared to de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) medium. Stabilities of powdered Lactobacillus cultures were examined using Ground Rice Husk (GRH) or Rice Bran (RB) fillers with 25% (w/w) CaCO3. Lactobacillus counts were determined using ten-fold serial dilution of a pour plate method on MRS agar and incubated in anaerobic jar at 37°C for 48 h. The results showed that Lactobacilli populations in MRS broth were higher than those in SSMD but had lower stability. Lactobacillus salivarius L61 and L. plantarum Fr-B population growth at optimal incubation time (24 h) and optimal growth medium were 2.63 x 1010 CFU/ml and 1 x 109 CFU/ml. The optimal growth media (w/v) was 1% full-fat soybean, 1% skim milk, 0.5% yeast extract, 0.5% dextrose and 0.05% K2HPO4. The stability of Lactobacillus L61 in GRH was higher than in RB and the stability under refrigeration temperature (RFT, 4-6°C) in both fillers were higher those in room temperature (RMT, 28-30°C). The GRH filler could maintain 109 CFU/g of Lactobacillus L61 cells at RFT and at RMT for 35 and 21 d, respectively while RB could maintain 109 CFU/g of Lactobacillus L61 cells at RFT for 14 d.
PDF References Citation
How to cite this article
Komkrit Puphan, Pairat Sornplang and Suthipong Uriyapongson, 2013. Cultivation of Lactobacillus sp. and Production of
Probiotic Powder as Animal Feed Additive. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 12: 567-570.
DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2013.567.570
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjn.2013.567.570
DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2013.567.570
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjn.2013.567.570
REFERENCES
- Anadon, A., M.R. Martinez-Larranaga and M.A. Martinez, 2006. Probiotics for animal nutrition in the European Union. Regulation and safety assessment. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 45: 91-95.
CrossRefPubMedDirect Link - Avonts, L., E. Van Uytven and L. De Vuyst, 2004. Cell growth and bacteriocin production of probiotic Lactobacillus strains in different media. Int. Dairy J., 14: 947-955.
Direct Link - Kailasapathy, K. and J. Chin, 2000. Survival and therapeutic potential of probiotic organisms with reference to Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. Immunol. Cell Biol., 78: 80-88.
CrossRefDirect Link - Sornplang, P. and V. Leelavatcharamas, 2010. Antimicrobial susceptibility of probiotic lactobacilli isolated from chicken feces. KKU Res. J., 15: 689-697.
Direct Link - Sornplang, P., V. Leelavatcharamas, P. Sukon and S. Yowarach, 2011. Antibiotic resistance of lactic acid bacteria isolated from a fermented fish product, Pla-chom. Res. J. Microbiol., 6: 898-903.
Direct Link - Tannock, G.W., K. Munro, H.J.M. Harmsen, G.W. Welling, J. Smart and P.K. Gopal, 2000. Analysis of the fecal microflora of human subjects consuming a probiotic product containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus DR20. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 66: 2578-2588.
CrossRef