day 30 after emergence, weed dry weight was highest with T2 followed by T3 and least with T1 with mean values of 8.06, 3.59 and 1.25 g for T2, T3 and T1, respectively. The differences were large and highly significant. At day 45, T2 gave the highest followed by T3 and T1 was the least with mean values of 19.90, 4.60 and 1.51 g, respectively. The differences were large and highly significant. At day 60, again weed dry weight of T2 was highest followed by T1 and T3 where both T1 and T3 were similar with mean values ranged from 1.98 to 22.52 g for T1 and T2, respectively. The differences were large and highly significant. At the final harvest for rice yield (at day 156 after emergence), the results showed that weed dry weights of all treatments became smaller than any other previous sampling periods, i.e., T2 gave the highest followed by T1 and T3 where T1 and T3 were similar with mean values ranged from 0.09 to 1.60 g for T3 and T2, respectively.

Yield components, number of panicles ha-1, 1000-seed weight and seed yields: For rice seed yield components, the results showed that number of unfilled seeds panicle-1 was highest with T3 followed by T1 and T2 with mean values of 6.95, 5.85 and 2.43 seeds, respectively. The differences were large and highly significant (Table 4). With filled seeds panicle-1, the results revealed that filled seeds were highest with T3 followed by T1 and T2 with mean values of 81.60, 46.60 and 41.70 seeds, respectively. However, T2 was not significantly different from T1. With number of panicles m-2, the results showed that T2 and T3 were similar but T1 was the least with mean values of 100, 113 and 38 panicles, respectively. The differences were large and highly significant. For 1000-seed weight, the results showed that T3 was the highest followed by T2 and T1 with mean values of 26.26, 25.48 and 25.14 g, respectively. However, T1 and T2 were not significantly different from each other. For seed yields, seed yield ha-1 was highest with T2 followed by T3 and the lowest was with T1 with mean values of 1136.25, 1083.31 and 487.50 kg ha-1, respectively. The differences were large and highly significant.