Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences1028-88801812-5735Asian Network for Scientific Information10.3923/pjbs.1998.232.234Zea mays L.) Under Different Methods of Sowing]]>AyubM. AhmadR. TanveerA. AhmadI. 3199813Response of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars viz., Sadaf, Sultan, Sarhad White and Golden to two sowing methods, i.e., broadcast and line sowing was studied under field conditions. Significant differences were observed amongst the cultivars for plant height, leaf area per plant, stem diameter, fresh fodder yield and ether extractable fat percentage. Cultivar Sultan proved superior to all other cultivars with respect to higher fodder yield of better quality. Plant population was significantly higher under line sowing where as fodder yield and all other yield parameters studied were not significantly affected by sowing methods.]]>Ashraf, Y., S.A. Nagre and A.H. Gillani,199533421425Farnworth, J. and S.A. Said,1983pp: 77pp: 77Gautam, I. and R. Kumar,1992367782Hussain, A., D. Muhammad, S. Khan and M.B. Bhatti,199533413426Jabbar, M.,19861986Khan, K.M.,19851985Kim, D.A. M.H. Jo, C.H. Kwon, K.J. Han and J.K. Kim,199212161172Mohammad, D., A. Hussain, S. Khan and M.B. Bhatti,199432383388Naeem, M., S. Nasim and A. Shakoor,199219185188Pereira, J.E., M.A. Andrade and A.R. Evangelista,1990Zea mays L.) as influenced by fertilizer application and cultivars.]]>1990Rehman, N., A.R. Chaudhry and M. Hussain,1992304150Roth, G.W.,199475054Sencor, O., A. Yildirim and S. Gokmen,199317763773Shah, S.N.H.,19841984Sial, M.A. and M.Z. Alam,19881988Zahid, M.S. and M.B. Bhatti,199410345350AOAC.,198414th Edn.,Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie,19842nd Edn.,pp: 172-177pp: 172-177