Relationship Between Leadership Style, Job Satisfaction and Employees Turnover Intention: A Literature Review
Choi Sang Long
Lee Yean Thean
Employees turnover has been always a key concern issues faced by organizations regardless of its locations, sizes or natures of business. All parties in the organization play crucial role in promoting human capital to achieve competitive advantage. Therefore, high employees turnover definitely will defeat this objective. Leadership styles and job satisfaction have been identified in this study that gives great impact to employees turnover intention. Base on the literature review, majority of the studies had identified a negative relationship between job satisfaction and employees turnover intention in various fields of industries. Similarly, researches on examining the relationship between leadership styles and job satisfaction have also indicated substantial degree of co-relationship between these two variables.
October 29, 2011; Accepted: November 16, 2011;
Published: December 27, 2011
Employees turnover has been always a key concern issues faced by organizations
regardless of its locations, sizes, natures of business, business strategy (profit
or non-profit oriented). Yin-Fah et al. (2010)
also quoted employees turnover as a serious issue especially in the field
of human resources management. Ali (2009) also argued
that organizational cost expenditure will be increased if high employees
turnover is not solved. Studies have also been carried out regionally and globally
to explore and to study the relationship between various variable(s) with employees
turnover. These studied variables includes occupational content (Salahudin
et al., 2009), leadership styles (Gwavuya, 2011;
Ramey, 2002) and job satisfaction (Ali,
2009; Park and Kim, 2009).
Salahudin et al. (2009) stressed that employees
turnover is ranging from 3 to 27% in the Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs). This
is according to the report from the World Bank on the situation in the developing
countries. SMEs in Malaysia, being a developing country have surprisingly recorded
one of the highest numbers of turnover which is 19% for small enterprises and
22% for medium-sized enterprise.
Employees turnover is costly to all level of organizations regardless of its
nature and usually the productivity and quality of the products or services
are always negatively affected. Ali (2009) has quoted
that tremendous impact on direct and indirect cost can be resulted from high
employees turnover and this would brings destruction to the organizations. Direct
costs are referring to costs such as expenditures incurred on the selection,
recruitment, induction and training of new employees (Staw,
1980). Indirect costs are referred to cost of learning, reduced morale and
pressure on the existing employees (Dess and Shaw, 2001).
In addition, high employees turnover will jeopardize the progress on achieving
organization pre-determined objectives and goals. Apart from monetary measureable
cost, non-monetary cost such as deteriorated reputations, lost of customers
loyalty, reduced branding trust, etc. may bring forward much more severe long
term impact (Dess and Shaw, 2001).
Therefore, the objective of this study was to look at the independent variables such as leadership styles and employees job satisfaction that may affect employees turnover intention. These independent variables may be the most effective in overcoming the problem of high employees turnover in an organization.
Leadership: Leadership issues have always been a widely discussed topic.
It had raised interest and attracted the attention of many historians, philosophers,
researchers or scholars who wish to explore the true meaning of leadership (Bass,
1990). Burns (1978) also stated that leadership is
one of the most observed and least understood phenomena on earth (Awan
and Mahmood, 2010).
Leadership is one of the critical and important factors in enhancing an organizational
performance (Riaz and Haider, 2010). Leaders in any
organization are expected to carry out tasks with limited resources to the maximum
level in order to maintain the competitive edge and to sustain profitability
position of the organization (Riaz and Haider, 2010).
Leadership was also quoted by various researchers as the major elements in order
to preserve and improve an organization competitive advantage among its competitor
(Zhu et al., 2005; Rowe,
2001; Riaz and Haider, 2010). According to Kotter
(1999), leadership is about setting a direction or developing a vision of
the future together with the necessary strategies for producing the changes
needed to achieve this vision. Another definition of leadership by Bennis
and Nanus (1985) and Hamidifar (2010) is Leadership
is an influence relationship among leaders and followers to perform in such
a way to reach a defined goal or goals. Leadership therefore is an important
element for the success of an organization, regardless of its nature of activities,
profit or charity orientated, private or government linked organizations.
Transformational leadership: Transformational leadership was first coined
by Downton (1973) as well as cited by Northouse
(2010). Transformational leadership is one of the more popular approaches
to leadership that has been focused by many researchers since early 1980s (Northouse,
2010). According to Bryman (1992), transformational
leadership is part of the New Leadership paradigm which gives more
attention to charismatic and effective elements of leadership.
Transformational leaderships are defined as:
||Leadership that makes subordinates or followers aware of the
importance of their jobs and performance to the well being of the organization
as well as their own needs for personal career advancement and growth and
able to motivates subordinates to work harder for the good of the organization
(Jones and George, 2004)
||Rising the level of motivation of the followers through leaders
connection and engagement process (Northouse, 2010)
||Leader who able to stimulates and inspires or transform his or her subordinates
to strive hard in order to achieve extraordinary outcomes (Robbins
et al., 2010)
||Leadership that inspire followers to believe in their own potential so
as to create a better prospect and future for the organization as well as
to believe in the leader personally (Daft, 2010)
||The leadership process that involves exercising influence on the attitudes
and assumptions of organization members and building commitment for the
organizations mission, objectives and strategies (Dessler
and Starke, 2004)
||Leaders who are able to change the beliefs and attitudes of subordinates
and inspire them to pursue their own interests for the well being of the
organization (Burns, 1978)
In contrast to the earlier theories on traits or characteristics or situational
approaches which concentrate on the leaders, this transformational leadership
instead focused on the leaders and followers relationship. Transformational
leadership is expected to be able to provide a clear vision and mission, inspire
self-esteem and gain trust and respect through charisma (Bass,
1990). Bass (1990) further highlighted that a transformational
leader would asks his or her subordinates to go beyond self-interest for the
benefit of the team, organization as well as society. Furthermore, this type
of leaders will take serious consideration on the long term need for self-improvement
and development over short term or current needs.
Transactional leadership: Transactional leadership focuses and emphasizes
on completion and accomplishing of allocated tasks on hand. This type of leader
maintains and preserves harmony working relationships coupled with promises
on rewards for satisfactory performance (Dessler and Starke,
Furthermore, this leadership focused on leader-follower exchanges in which
followers or subordinates are expected to carry out his or her duty and perform
according to the given instruction. The followers in turn with expectation that
they will be compensated positively in line with the result generated by them.
These rewards shall also include negative based rewards such as punitive and
penalized actions in the event that the followers or subordinates fail to perform
as per the instruction. Positive rewards are such as complimentary comments,
praise and recognition upon successful compliance with instruction from the
leaders and achievement of objectives (Riaz and Haider,
2010). Similarly, Avolio et al., (1991)
has commented that transactional leaders are supposed and expected to conduct
frequent and regular communication with their followers in particularly explanation
on work instruction and guidance in order complete the assigned task. Any rewards
following satisfactory completion of assigned tasks are to be conveyed and communicate
to his or her followers too (Hamidifar, 2010).
Laissez-faire leadership: In contrast to transformational and transactional
leaderships, Laissez-Faire leadership is a passive kind of leadership style.
This type of leader generally gives his or her followers or employees complete
freedom to make decisions or to complete a task in whichever way they deems
fit and appropriate (Robbins et al., 2010). It
also being interpreted as a non-transactional kind of leadership style in which
prompt decisions are not made with delay in action taken, coupled with ignoring
of leadership responsibilities and non-exercise of authority. Hamidifar
(2010) commented that leaders who are practicing this leadership style are
usually do not care and take no consideration and concern on issues that arises
in organization environment.
Laissez-Faire is refers to hands-off, let things-ride approach
in its original French phrase. Leader of Laissez-Faire are said to relinquish
responsibility, give no feedback, delays in decision making and not keen to
help followers in satisfying their needs (Northouse, 2010).
Job satisfaction: Job satisfaction has been defined as a perceived relationship
between what one wants from ones job and what one perceives it as offering
(Lund, 2003). Jones and George (2004)
stress that job satisfaction is the collection of feelings and beliefs that
employees have about their jobs. Employees general attitude toward his
or her job is also referred as job satisfaction (Rezaiean
et al., 2010). It is an important concern for employer as it is believe
that a satisfied employees are more likely to show up for work, have higher
levels of performance and will stay with an organization (Robbins
et al., 2010). Alternatively, job satisfaction is also referred to
ones positive attitude on his or her assigned tasks or job (Daft,
Similar to leadership, job satisfaction has been widely studied by researchers
and theorists in various organizations content, industries or profession in
the last four decades (Currivan, 1999) (Lund,
2003). Researchers and theorists from different continents have been trying
to explore and develop various factors and theories on job satisfaction. This
includes the exploration of relationship between job satisfaction and organization
variables such as performance, cohesion, organizational commitment, age and
gender, industries and organizational environment (Lund,
Theorists such as Maslow (1954), Herzberg
(1966) and Bryman (1992) had investigated and developed
respective theories related to job satisfaction. For instance, Maslows
hierarchy of needs theory proposes that people are motivated by multiple needs
in hierarchical order. Lower-order needs must be fulfilled before higher-order
needs are satisfied. These needs in sequence are physiological needs, safety
needs, belongingness needs, esteem needs and self-actualization needs (Daft,
Another popular theory on motivation is Herzbergs two-factor theory (Hygiene
and Motivator factors) which suggested that work behavior or characteristics
associated with dissatisfaction are different from those related to satisfaction.
Herzberg pointed out two separate dimensions which contributed to employees
behavior during work are hygiene factor and motivators. Hygiene factor are refers
to factors outside the job such as working conditions, salary, security, companies
policies and supervision. Motivator factors refer to factors such as opportunities
for achievement, recognition, responsibility, personal growth and challenge
on the job which are intrinsic to the work itself (Dessler
and Starke, 2004). When motivator factors are absent workers are neutral
toward work. However, workers are highly motivated and satisfied with the present
of motivator factors. Herzberg commented that the best way to motivate employees
is to build challenge and opportunities for achievement into job, i.e. to provide
intrinsic motivation(Akinyele, 2007).
Turnover intention: Turnover intention is defined as an employees
personal estimated probability that he or she has a deliberate intent to leaving
the organization permanently in near future. Employee turnover intention is
refers to an employee who are considering and thinking to quit a job (Firth
et al., 2004). The word intention, is the main determinants
of actual quitting from the job behavior (Salahudin et
Turnover are classified and categorized into voluntary or involuntary, as well
as functional or dysfunctional, each will have varying degree of impact on the
organization (Wells and Peachey, 2010). Wells
and Peachey (2010) claimed that voluntary turnover is defined as a process
in which an employee makes decision whether to stay on or leave the organization.
Mobley (1982) further commented that this type of turnover
is usually dysfunctional and can be most detrimental to the organization. It
is also warned that those that most likely to leave the organization are those
most talented and smartest employee within the group. Their valuable experiences,
talent, skills and knowledge will leave with them and resulted in deteriorating
efficiency (Abbasi and Hollman, 2000).
In contrast, involuntary turnover is referred to the situation in which the
organization undertaken the control over the employees decision to stay
or leave the organization (McPherson, 1976). The reason
why it is classified as functional turnover is due to the often removal of under-performing
employees (Watrous et al., 2006).
Direct relationship between research variables
Relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and job satisfaction:
Several studies have been conducted in the education profession (Silins
and Mulford, 2002; Blogler, 2002; Rossmiller,
1992). For instance, study by Silins and Mulford (2002)
has revealed high level of teacher satisfaction and learning in school systems
where transformational leadership is implemented. Similarly, some previous investigation
on teachers job satisfaction revealed that lack of effective leadership
skills had negatively affected teachers job satisfaction as in Blogler
(2002) study. Further empirical studies such as the study carried out by
Rossmiller (1992) revealed that teachers perception
of principals transformational leadership skills has significant impact
on teachers job satisfaction and often concluded that principles of the
school practicing transformational leadership are more likely to foster and
enhance job satisfaction among teachers, as compare to those principles who
are not transformative in their leadership styles.
Ejimofor (2007) also conducted a study to investigate
the relationship between teachers perceptions of principals, transformational
leadership skills and teachers, job satisfaction in two large Local Government
Areas in a metropolis of Southeastern Nigeria. Participants included 518 secondary
teachers and 48 principals and the result of the study also asserted that teachers,
perception on principals, transformational leadership skills have substantial
and significant impact on teachers, job satisfaction.
Further studies with similar aim to explore the relationship between leadership
and job satisfaction have been carried out by Ramey (2002).
Ramey (2002) has conducted a study to examine the relationship
between leadership styles of nurse managers and job satisfaction of registered
staff nurses in hospital settings in an Appalachian state, USA. A total of 200
participants has been selected using simple random sampling method from the
total registered nurses of 7190. Similar to other research study such those
mentioned earlier, a positive and moderate association was found between job
satisfaction of registered staff nurses and nurse managers who practicing transformational
leadership. The association between job satisfaction of staff nurses and their
superiors who practicing transactional leadership was found to be in contrary.
This finding has further supported the existence of positive relationship between
transformational leadership styles and job satisfaction between staff nurse
and nurse managers.
Hamidifar (2010) also conducted similar study on the
relationship between leadership and employee job satisfaction at Islamic Azad
University 16 Branches in Tehran, Iran. 400 questionnaires have been distributed
using random sampling method and 386 completed. The result of the study is found
to be consistent with other similar studies which shown the significant positive
influence of transformational leadership factors on employee job satisfaction.
This study undertaken by Hamidifar (2010) also shown
that there is significant negative influence of laissez-faire leadership on
subordinates job satisfaction.
Walumbwa et al. (2004) has conducted a study
on the relationship between transformational leadership and work outcomes using
a sample of 402 employees in China and India in the banking and finance sectors.
The result has again demonstrated a positive relationship between transformational
leadership and job satisfaction as well as organizational commitment.
Choi et al. (2007) found that transformational
leadership of the athletic director in sport field was associated with head
coaches altruistic behavior, effective commitment and job satisfaction.
Another study was also quoted from Yusof and Shah (2008)
study in the sport organization and found that athletic director exercising
transformational leadership had led to greater job satisfaction among head coaches.
In another recent study by Burton and Peachey (2009)
in the similar field, the result revealed that transformational leadership of
the athletic director was positively associated with satisfaction with the leader
and transformational leaders was preferred regardless of the gender of the leaders
(Wells and Peachey, 2010).
Relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and turnover
intention: The relationship between transformational and transactional leadership
and turnover intention has been explored by a number of researchers such as
Bycio et al. (1995) and Martin
and Epitropaki (2001). Their studies have generally shown that transformational
leadership is the key factor in reducing and mitigating turnover intentions
(Bass, 1990). In the studies undertaken by Martin
and Epitropaki (2001), it was found that transformational leadership was
contrary related to turnover intentions among employees for several commercial
and profit-oriented based businesses. In another study carried by
Bycio et al. (1995) in the nursing profession, it was found that
higher degrees of transformational leadership were associated with lower intention
Wells and Peachey (2010) has conducted a separate study
to investigate the relationship between leadership behaviors (transformational
and transactional), satisfaction with the leaders and voluntary turnover intentions.
This study was conducted on 200 participants from National Collegiate Athletic
Association Division I softball and volleyball assistant coaches in the USA.
The study result revealed significant negative relationship between transformational
leadership behavior and voluntary organizational turnover intentions. Negative
relationship is also found between transactional leadership behavior and voluntary
organizational turnover intentions.
Relationship between job satisfaction and turnover intention: Various
studies have been carried by researchers to examine the relationship between
job satisfaction and turnover intention (Yin-Fah et al.,
2010; Ryan et al., 2010; Park
and Kim, 2009; Ali, 2009; Amah,
Research conducted by Yin-Fah et al. (2010)
on private sector employees in Petaling, Selangor (Malaysia) with the aim to
study the organizational commitments, job stress, job satisfaction and turnover
intention has revealed a contrary or negative relationship between job satisfaction
and turnover intention.
Ryan et al. (2010) has conducted a study to
examine the deciding factors for the intention to leave a job held by non-managerial
staff in the Malaysian fast food industry which also includes issues such as
job stress and peer groups. The result of the study has revealed that 20% of
the total sample think frequently of leaving and quit their job, while another
20% were found being committed and stayed to their employment. It was further
analyzed that the high intention to quit are in fact resulted from the influenced
by friends coupled with experiencing of job stress and being burn-out
(Ryan et al., 2010). Job stress and feeling of
being burn-out are obviously a factor that would have impact on
job satisfaction of employee.
Park and Kim (2009) has carried out a study to examine
the relationship between organizational culture and job satisfaction and turnover
intention among hospital nurses in Korea.
|| Conceptual Framework
One of the hypothesis being tested was job satisfaction will be negatively associated with turnover intention. The hypothesis was eventually accepted and asserted that job satisfaction is negatively related to turnover intention for nurses in Korea.
Ali (2009) has conducted a study on the factors affecting
overall job satisfaction and turnover intention on academic staff or lecturers
of private college in Pakistan. It is found that the overall job satisfaction
was found to have a significant negative association with turnover intention.
Amah (2009) has conducted a survey on the moderating
effect of job role centrality and life satisfaction on the relationship between
job satisfaction and turnover intention in a new generation bank with its head
office in Lagos of Nigeria, with branches throughout the states in the country.
According to Amah, new generation banks are highly automated and carries aggressive
marketing plan and strategies. It is also common for these banks to recruit
and employ staff with varying academic qualification. Generous salary structures
and substantial autonomy are granted and offered to the staff with core intention
to retain them. The result of the survey which comprises of 1200 participants
out of 5000 staff strength has again revealed the existence of negative relationship
between job satisfaction and turnover intention which is coincided with most
other studies mentioned above.
Research propositions and conceptual framework: This study would like to explore the linkage between leadership style, job satisfaction and turnover intention as shown in the authors conceptual model (Fig. 1). Therefore, propositions established state that:
||Proposition 1: Leadership style will be positively
related to job satisfaction
||Proposition 2: Leadership style will be positively related to turnover
||Proposition 3: Job satisfaction will be positively related to turnover
Understanding the impact of leadership style and job satisfaction on employees turnover intention is critical and an integral part of the success of an organization. Leaders must realize that proper style of leadership skill is pivotal and will also effect employees job satisfaction. A good understanding of the leadership style is vital in supporting human capital management is likely to be a key factor in determining the success of both the leaders as individual and the organization.
Abbasi, S.M. and K.W. Hollman, 2000. Turnover: The real bottom line. Public Personnel Manage., 29: 333-342.
Direct Link |
Akinyele, S.T., 2007. Needs satisfaction: An effective tool for workers commitment to work. Res. J. Business Manage., 1: 72-79.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
Ali, N., 2009. Factors affecting overall job satisfaction andturnover intention. J. Manage. Sci., 2: 239-252.
Direct Link |
Amah, O.E., 2009. Job satisfaction and turnover intention relationship: The moderating effect of job role centrality and life satisfaction. Res. Practice Hum. Resource Manage., 17: 24-35.
Direct Link |
Avolio, B.J., D.A. Waldman and F.J. Yammarino, 1991. Leading in the 1990's: The four I's of transformational leadership. J. Eur. Ind. Train., 15: 9-16.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
Awan, M.R. and K. Mahmood, 2010. Relationship among leadership style, organizational culture and employee commitment in university libraries. Library Manage., 31: 253-266.
Bass, B.M., 1990. From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organ. Dynamics, 18: 19-32.
Direct Link |
Bennis, W. and B. Nanus, 1985. Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge. Harper and Row Publishers, New York..
Blogler, R., 2002. Two profiles of school teachers: A discriminant analysis of job satisfaction. Teaching Teacher Edu., 18: 665-673.
Direct Link |
Bryman, A., 1992. Charisma and Leadership in Organizations. Sage, London, UK., Pages: 198.
Burns, J.M., 1978. Leadership. Harper and Row, New York, USA.
Burton L. and J.W. Peachey, 2009. Transactional or transformational? Leadership preferences of division III athletic administrators. J. Intercollegiate Sport, 24: 245-259.
Direct Link |
Bycio P., R. Hackett and J. Allen, 1995. Further assessment of bass's (1985) Conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. J. Applied Psychol., 80: 468-478.
Choi, J.S., M. Sagas, S. Park and G. Cunningham, 2007. Transformational leadership in collegiate coaching: The effects of transformational leadership on job satisfaction, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Int. J. Sport Manage., 8: 429-445.
Currivan, D.B., 1999. The causal order of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in models of employee turnover. Human Resour. Manage. Rev., 9: 495-524.
Direct Link |
Daft, R., 2010. New Era of Management. 9th Edn., South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, OH..
Dess, G.G. and J.D. Shaw, 2001. Voluntary turnover, social capital and organizational performance. Acad. Manage. Rev., 26: 446-456.
Direct Link |
Dessler, G. and F.A. Starke, 2004. Management: Principles and Practices for Tomorrow's Leaders. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ., ISBN: 9780131202566, Pages: 630.
Downton, J.V., 1973. Rebel Leadership: Commitment and Charisma in a Revolutionary Process. Free Press, New York, USA., Pages: 306.
Ejimofor F.O., 2007. Principals transformational leadership skills and their teachers job satisfaction in Nigeria. Cleveland State University ETDs. http://etd.ohiolink.edu/send-pdf.cgi/Ejimofor%20Francis%20O.pdf?csu1202235575.
Firth, L., D.J. Mellor, K.A. Moore and C. Loquet, 2004. How can managers reduce employee intention to quit. J. Manage. Psychol., 19: 170-187.
Gwavuya, F., 2011. Leadership influences on turnover intentions of academic staff in tertiary institutions in Zimbabwe. Acad. Leadership Online J., Vol. 9,
Hamidifar, F., 2010. A study of the relationship between leadership styles and employee job satisfaction at Islamic Azad University Branches in Tehran, Iran. AU-GSB e-J., 3: 45-58.
Herzberg, F., 1966. Work and Nature of Man. Cleveland The World Publishing Company, Ohio..
Jones, G.R. and J.M. George, 2004. Essentials of Contemporary Management. McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., Boston..
Kotter, J.P., 1999. What Leaders Really Do. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, USA., Pages: 184.
Lund, D.B., 2003. Organizational culture and job satisfaction. J. Bus. Ind. Market., 18: 219-236.
Martin, R. and O. Epitropaki, 2001. Role of Organizational Identification on Implicit Leadership Theories (ILTS), Transformational leadership and work attitudes. Group Process Intergroup Relations, 4: 247-262.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
Maslow, A., 1954. Motivation and Personality. Harper and Row, New York.
McPherson, B., 1976. Involuntary Turnover and Organizational Effectiveness in the National Hockey League. In: Canadian Sport: Sociological Perspectives, Gruneau, R.S. and J.G. Albinson (Eds.). Addison-Wesley, Don Mills, pp: 259-275.
Mobley, W.H., 1982. Employee Turnover: Causes, Consequences and Control. Addison-Wesley Publishing, Philippines..
Northouse, P.G., 2010. Leadership: Theory and Practice. 5th Edn., SAGE Publications, California..
Park, J.S. and T.H. Kim, 2009. Do types of organizational culture matter in nurse job satisfaction and turnover intention? Leadersh. Health Serv., 22: 20-38.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
Ramey, J.W., 2002. The relationship between leadership styles of nurse managers and staff nurse job satisfaction in hospital settings. M.A. Thesis, The Graduate College of Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia.
Rezaiean, A., M.E. Givi, H.E. Givi and M.B. Nasrabadi, 2010. The relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: The mediating role of organizational commitment, satisfaction and trust. Res. J. Bus. Manag., 4: 112-120.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
Riaz, A. and M.H. Haider, 2010. Role of transformational and transactional leadership on job satisfaction and career satisfaction. Bus. Econ. Horiz., 1: 29-38.
Direct Link |
Robbins, S.P., D.A. Decenzo and M. Coulter, 2010. Fundamentals of Management: Essential Concepts and Applications. 7th Edn., Prentice Hall, New Jersey, ISBN: 9780136109822, Pages: 450.
Rossmiller, R.A., 1992. The secondary school principal and teachers quality of work life. Edu. Manage. Admin., 20: 132-146.
Direct Link |
Rowe, W., 2001. Creating wealth in organizations: The role of strategic leadership. Acad. Manage. Executive, 15: 81-94.
Direct Link |
Ryan, C., H. Ghazali and A. Mohsin, 2011. Determinants of intention to leave a non-managerial job in the fast-food industry of West Malaysia. Int. J. Contemp. Hospitality Manage., 23: 344-360.
Salahudin, S.N., N.L. Baharin, M.M. Abdullah, M.Z.M. Harun and F.H.M. Taufek, 2009. Occupational content and turnover intention: A case study of small and medium sized enterprises. Proc. Int. Conf. Hum. Capital Dev., 31: 63-73.
Silins, H. and B. Mulford, 2002. Schools as learning organizations: The case for system, teacher and student learning. J. Edu. Admin., 40: 425-446.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
Staw, B.M., 1980. The consequences of turnover. J. Occup. Behav., 1: 253-257.
Walumbwa, F.O., P. Wang, J.J. Lawler and K. Shi, 2004. The role of collective efficacy in the relations between transformational leadership and work outcomes. J. Occup. Organiz. Psychol., 77: 515-530.
Watrous, K.M., A.H. Huffman and R.D. Pritchard, 2006. When co-workers and managers quit: The effects of turnover and shared values on performance. J. Bus. Psychol., 21: 103-126.
Direct Link |
Wells J.E. and J.W. Peachey, 2010. Turnover intentions: Do leadership behaviors and satisfaction with the leader matter?. Team Perform. Manage., 17: 23-40.
Yin-Fah, B.C., Y.S. Foon, L. Chee-Leong and S. Osman, 2010. An exploratory study on turnover intention among private sector employees. Int. J. Bus. Manage., 5: 57-64.
Direct Link |
Yusof, A. and P.M. Shah, 2008. Transformational leadership and leadership substitutes in sports: Implications on coaches job satisfaction. Int. Bull. Bus. Admin., 3: 17-29.
Direct Link |
Zhu, W., I. Chew and W. Spangler, 2005. CEO transformational leadership and organizational outcomes: The mediating role of human-capital-enhancing human resource management. The Leadership Quarterly, 16: 39-52.