Biological Study of Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lep: Plutellidae) and Its Solitary Endoparasitoid, Cotesia vestalis (haliday) (Hym. Braconidae) under Laboratory Conditions
V. Hosseini- Naveh
Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lep: Plutellidae), is a destructive
pest of brassicaceous crops in the world. Cotesia vestalis (Haliday)
is one of most important biological control agents of P. xylostella in
the world and Iran. Both of P. xylostella and C. vestalis
biology were carried out in laboratory condition. Results showed that development
time of immature stages of P. xylostella including egg, Instar I, Instar
II, Instar III, Instar IV, prepupa, pupa were 2.39±0.17, 2.18±0.17,
2.06±0.28, 2.14±0.14,2.54±0.12, 0.40±0.12 and 4.23±0.23
days, respectively. Longevity of female and male were 28.26±0.05 and
30.22±0.05 days. By dissecting the parasitized larvae, the egg incubation
period of C. vestalis was recorded 1.73±0.06 days. In long-term
oviposition trials, females laid eggs on P. xylostella larvae for up
to 10 days. Larval development of the parasitoid in host only required 6.47
days: the first instar larva required 3.25±0.047 days; the second instar
larva needed 2.78±0.1 days and the third instar larvae exited the host
and pupated in, 0.4±0.07 days. Prepupal and pupal period of wasp were
1.9±.0.06 and 2.13±0.09 day, respectively. Unmated female and
male longevity of wasp were 16.83±0.37, 16.25±0.17 and sex ratio
is male-biased. When a mixed group and isolated of instars were presented for
parasitoid, the 2nd and 3rd instar larvae were so preferred and the 4th instar
was less attractive for selection. In choice experiment, the percentage parasitism
of 2nd, 3rd and 4th instars was 78.58, 69.94 and 4.36%, respectively. The rapid
oviposition rate, short life duration and high percentage parasitism increases
parasitoid potential for suppression of host population. Present results suggest
that C. vestalis has considerable potential as a biological control agent
for P. xylostella.
to cite this article:
M. Alizadeh, G.R. Rassoulian, J. Karimzadeh, V. Hosseini- Naveh and H. Farazmand, 2011. Biological Study of Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lep: Plutellidae) and Its Solitary Endoparasitoid, Cotesia vestalis (haliday) (Hym. Braconidae) under Laboratory Conditions. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 14: 1090-1099.
November 20, 2011; Accepted: November 23, 2011;
Published: December 08, 2011
The diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae),
is one of the most destructive cosmopolitan insect pest of cruciferous plants
in many parts of the world (Talekar and Shelton, 1993).
Sometimes due to outbreak of P. xylostella in Southeast Asia, damage
to cabbage plants has reached 90% (Verkerk and Wright, 1996).
In many countries, P. xylostella has developed multiple and cross-resistance
to a wide range of conventional organic insecticides and Bacillus thuringiensis
(Bt) products (Tabashnik et al., 1990; Tabashnik,
1994; Sarfraz and Keddie, 2005; Zhao
et al., 2006; Raymond et al., 2007; Gassmann
et al., 2009; Nehare et al., 2010; Santos
et al., 2011). Insecticide resistance development of DBM due to the
high frequency of insecticides application led to use alternative strategies
and control methods such as biological control agents particularly hymenopterous
parasitoids (Talekar and Shelton 1993; Sarfraz
and Keddie, 2005). The braconid wasp, Cotesia vestalis (=plutellae)
(Haliday) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) is the most widely distributed koinobiotic
solitary larval endoparasitoid of P. xylostella and could parasitize
all instars, but preferred to parasitize instarIII (Talekar
and Yang, 1991). In Iran, It was first recorded by Karimpour
et al. (2005) from Orumieh in west Azarbayejan Province and now it
was the dominant parasitoid of P. xylostella in most province
of Iran with high parasitism. Therefore, this parasitoid has high potential
as biological control agents of P. xylostella. Undoubtedly, Successful
in integrated pest management programs is more dependent on investigation and
knowledge about biology of the pest, natural enemies and its interactions with
host plants (Sequiera and Dixon, 1996; Awmack
and Leather, 2002). Beckage and Gelman (2004) reported
that parasitoids have evolved with mechanisms to maneuver host physiology and
biochemistry to create a conditions increasing own and offspring fitness. For
improving their fitness, parasitoids have shown preference for specific larval
stages, because there are differences in host developmental stage quality (McGregor,
1996; Li et al., 2006). With increasing age
of the host, they increase their physical and immune defense mechanisms, so
these phenomena are not benefit for parasitoid (Li et
al., 2006). Thereafter, it is important to determine the host stage
most effectively parasitized by C. vestalis. for management of P.
xylostella by releasing parasitoid at the most effective time. Detailed
biology of DBM presented by Marsh (1917); Harcourt
(1957); Talekar et al. (1985) but all of them
carried out in the field condition. The braconid wasp, C. vestalis
has been preliminary studied by Chiu and Chien (1972)
and Yu et al. (2008) presented details on the
developmental biology and morphology of C. vestalis but results were
only about immature stages. Therefore, the first objective of present work was
to evaluate the life cycle duration of P. xylostella and C.
vestalis on Chinese cabbage for improving mass rearing and second specific
objectives were to determine the effects of host stage on parasitoid preference
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Host plant: The Chinese cabbage (Brassica pekinensis cv. Spring Smile) was grown in plastic pots (10x10x10 cm) under greenhouse condition (25±5°C, 65±10% r.h. and L16:D8 h).This plant were used to rear P. xylostella.
Insects culturing procedure: Both of P. xylostella larvae and
the C. vestalis specimens ( originally collected from parasitized P.
xylostella larvae) were collected from the Brassica fields in Karaj
(Alborz province, Iran) and brought to the laboratory during 2010 growth seasons.
The stock culture of DBM was maintained on 8-week-old Chinese cabbage in screened
hyaline cages (40x40x40 cm) under standard constant environment (25±1°C,
65±5% r.h. and a photoperiod of L16:D8 h; (Karimzadeh
et al., 2004). Rearing of C. vestalis was performed according
to Talekar et al. (1997) with slight modification.
A small cotton-wool wick soaked in 10% honey solution was placed in each oviposition
cage as a source of carbohydrate for adults of DBM and wasps.
Biology of Plutella xylostella (L.): For obtain the same synchronized eggs of DBM, a potted chinese cabbage (8-week-old) were placed inside oviposition cages containing 50 pairs of newly emerged P. xylostella (female 1: male 1) for one hour. The eggs laid on the leaves were then used for the experiments. By using a stereomicroscope (Olympus, SZ11), about 100 eggs transferred on fresh cabbage leaf discs (3 cm diameter) within Petri dishes (5.5 cm diameter) and the edge of each Petri dishes was covered with a layer of Parafilm® (Laboratory Film, Chicago, IL). Finally, 64 fertile egg (as 64 replicate) selected. New and fresh leaf discs were replaced every 8 h. The immature stages were checked every 4 h under stereomicroscope and developmental time of each stage was recorded until become adult and all of them died. Starting of each larval instar was recorded when molting or exuvia that observed under stereomicroscope. In addition to, other parameters including size of all stages, width of larval head capsule, total ovipositional periods, sex ratio (female number/total adult number) adult longevity and fecundity (eggs per female) were investigated in this experiment. All experiments were replicated four times in a growth chamber under controlled conditions as noted previously.
Biology of Cotesia vestalis (Haliday): The larva of DBM were
reared on the Chinese cabbage as described above and exposed to C. vestalis
to obtain a cohort group of parasitoid eggs in host larva. The early 3rd instar
of host (n = 500 larvae) parasitized by mated 3-days-old female of C. plutella
(1 Wasp: 2 Host ratios) for 1 h. Every 8 h, 20 parasitized larvae were selected
and dissected (by entomology needle No. 00) under a stereomicroscope (Olympus,
SZ11). For this purpose, at first parasitized larva were placed in a phosphate-buffered
saline (pH 7.4), that dropped on microscope slides, then larval body pulled
until it was ruptured. Finally, the DBM larvae abdomen was gently pressed with
needle until parasitoid (egg or larva) flowed out in the body fluid. Thereafter,
according to Lim (1982), duration of life cycle was recorded
from egg to adult based on immature stage morphological characters. If superparasitism
was occurred the larvae removed. In each dissecting time, eggs and larval stages
were photographed using a stereomicroscope (Olympus, SV6) and inverted Zeiss
phase contrast microscope (Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with on DinoCapture
2.0 software (AnMo Electronics Corporation).
Host age preference in non-choice tests: In the non-choice experiment, to determine the larval stages of P. xylostella that were most completely parasitized by C. vestalis, 3-day-old mated female wasps were exposed to host larvae in Petri dish (diameter, 5 cm), for 2 h containing 10% honey water on lid of dish. Each Petri dish contained a female parasitoid and 10 host larvae of a particular stage. Experiments were replicated 10 times. After parasitism, the host larvae were separated and placed individually on fresh cabbage leaf discs (5 cm diameter) within Petri dishes (7.5 cm diameter). Larvae checked daily until they had pupated, died, or produced parasitoid cocoons.
Host age preference in choice tests: In this experiment to choose the instar of P. xylostella preferred by C. vestalis for parasitization, 3-day-old mated female parasitoids were exposed to host larvae in the hyaline Plexy glass (height 4 cm; diameter, 12 cm). Ten replicates were performed. Each hyaline Plexy glass contained three parasitoids and 30 larvae. After a 2 h exposure period, larval instars were separated and placed fresh cabbage leaf discs (5 cm diameter) within Petri dishes (7.5 cm diameter). Exposed host larvae were checked daily as described in the non-choice tests.
Parasitoid oviposition dynamic: Ten parasitoid females obtained treatment were caged individually in oviposition unit (1 female: 1 male) and provided daily with smears of honey. Each oviposition unit was 40 early-3rd instar P. xylostella larvae for an exposure period of 6 h. Male parasitoids were replaced in the event of death. Host larvae previously exposed to wasp females were dissected within 24 h after exposure to determine if parasitism had occurred and number of parasitoid eggs or larvae checked. Female lifespan was recorded too.
Statistical analysis: Data were transformed and analyzed using PROC
General Linear Model. Fishers Least-Significant Difference (F-LSD) test
was applied for mean comparisons among treatments. The Two-sample t-test was
used for paired comparisons between treatments. Computations for this experiment
were done using the statistical software package SYSTAT version 12.02 (SYSTAT,
Life cycle of Plutella xylostella (L.): Life cycle of DBM consists of egg, four instars larvae, prepupa and adult. Diagnosis of these stages is important for biological purpose. The some morphological features of all stages are given below:
Egg and larvae: Eggs are oval and protuberant in shape and lubricant
pale to strong yellow in color. Hatching occurred in 2.39±0.17 days in
laboratory conditions (Fig. 1).
||The duration of immature and adult development (days; Mean±SD)
of P. xylostella
Of 323 eggs oviposited by each female on Chinese cabbage, 219 were laid on
lower leaf surfaces, 104 on upper leaf surfaces (Table 2).
First instars start feeding immediately. They are leaf miners and feed in the
spongy mesophyll tissue of leaves. First instar development was completed about
2.18±0.17 days (Fig. 1). Hence, other larval fed on
lower leaf surface and often fed all tissue at end of larva period. Anal legs
of larva are distinctive and V-shape. Larva is pale yellow in color at early
instars and gradually become pale green to dark in other instars. The developmental
time of 2ndinstar, 3rd-instar and 4th-instar were lasted about 2.06±0.28,
2.14±0.14 and 2.54±0.12, respectively (Fig. 1).
Data analysis have shown body length (F7, 232=1729, p<0.001) and
weight (F8, 261=1409, p<0.001) of immature stages are significantly
different (Table 1). There are no differences between late
1st-instar and early 2nd-instar in both length and weight, so apparent recognition
between these two instars is very difficult and distinguishes is occurred based
on head capsule width (Table 1). In other instars with increases
age of larvae the body length and weight increases (Table 1).
The changes in the head capsule width (HCW) of all instar were measured and
result showed significantly differences (F3, 116=17700, p<0.001)
(Table 1). This character would be useful for diagnosis and
separate larva stage from each other.
Prepupa and pupa: There are two inactive, non feeding stages called prepupa and pupa. The duration of prepupa was lasted 0.42±0.018 days (Fig. 1). Then this quiescent prepupa molt in its cocoons and larval skin remains attached to the posterior end of the pupa (successive observations). Development of pupal period was completed 3.82±0.06 days. In normal pupa the length and weight were 5.06±0.027 mm and 5.29±0.092 mg, respectively (Table 1).
|| Estimating of body length (mm; Mean±SE.) and weight
(mg; Mean±SE) of P. xylostella (n = 100) feed on Chinese cabbage
|1L1, L2, L3 and
L4 denote the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th instar moth larvae, respectively.2
In adult wing span:means marked with the same small letter within
the same row are not significantly different (t-test, p<0.05). 3Means
marked with the same small letter within a same row (L1 untile
L4) are not significantly different (p<0. 05; Fisher-LSD Test).
4Head capsule width
|| Ovipositional period, adult longevity and fecundity (eggs
per female) of P. xylostella on chinless cabbage
|*Means marked with the same small letter within the same row
are not significantly different (t-test, p<0.05)
Adult performance: Wingspan of male and females were different each
other (t = 8.45, dF = 31, p<0.001; Table 1) and it was
larger in females than males. There was no differences between both sex length
(t = -1.51, df = 58, p>0.05; Table 1). The longevity of
females was significantly reduced than males (t = -2.79, df = 62, p<0.05;
Table 2). Mean longevity of males and females are 30.22±0.50
and 28.26±0.50, respectively. Oviposition mainly was occurred in darkness.
Preoviposition, Ovipositon and post ovipositional periods for female lasted
0.37, 7.20, 20.7 days. The sex ratio is 0.48 (female per total emerged adult).
The mean number of total eggs oviposited by a P. xylostella female in
its oviposition period (about 10 days) was 323±6.03. Ovipositional peak
in the first 24 to 48 h had taken place and it was reduced gradually till reached
to zero after 10 days of adult emergence (Fig. 2).
Parasitoid biology, host age preference and oviposition dynamics: Life stages of the C. vestalis include egg, three larval instars, pupa and the adult. The egg and two larval stages were found on the hosts. Characteristics seen under microscopic examination included.
Eggs: Spindle shape, slightly curved and hyaline colorless. It has a short and thin pedicle with 17.72±0.18 μm length at the end 24 h after parasitism. Eggs have distinct 3-layared membrane. The external membrane was named; serosal membrane that produce teratocyte cells. Gut was visible in the embryo 24 h after wasp oviposition. The segmented larvae and big head capsule was visible in the egg nearly 36 h after parasitism. The incubation period of egg was 1.73±0.06 days (Fig. 3).
||Number of eggs (Mean±SE) laid by P. xylostella
over 10-days period
||Mean developmental time (days±SD) of C. vestalis
on parasitized larvae of P. xylostella
First instar: 1st -nstar were Caudate-mandibulate form. It has a large
sclerotized head capsule with sickle and sclerotized mandibles which were unfolded
and closed freely. Moreover mouthparts were included Labium and Maxilla. Caudal
horn was measured 66.40±0.51 μm in length. The number of body segments
wasnt countable at first day of first instar, because of serosal membrane
(external membrane embryo) and another membrane (Amnion) were still attached
to the embryo and had dissociated, respectively. The first instar larvae have
13 segments (3 thoracic segments and 10 abdominal segments after the first day.
At early first instar larva head capsule was too wide than the body, But gradually
it became older; this width ratio was reduce. The size of cauda was more reduced
that develops in to the transparent part namely anal vesicle at connecting to
anal segment at the end of first instar close to molting. The first instar was
completed about 3.25 ± 0.05 day (Fig. 3). Our result
was according to description of Lim (1982) and supported
Second instar: The 2nd-instar larvae were named vesiculate form (Lim,
1982) because of horn tail at end of larval body in first instar replaced
by vesiculate structure (anal vesicle) which attached to the midgut with a visible
constriction. In early 2nd-instar, the ratio of body width to anal vesicle was
1.226±0.09 mm and in late 2nd-instar this ratio was 1.78± 0.09
millimeters. The sclerotized head was existing in early 2nd-instar. The mandibles
were absent and mouthparts were included: Labrum and a pair of maxillae. The
body was transparent at early instar but it became cream color with light green
gut at middle course (seven days after parasitism) and the tracheal system was
visible. When the larva became older sclerotized head and body were disappeared
and became more Hymenopteriform. After One day, the body color white greenish
with dark green gut. At the end of second instar and close to molting the body
color became light to dark yellow and anal vesicle was smallest at size. The
second instar duration was completed 2.78±0.10 days (Fig.
Third instar: The 3rd-instar larva was named hymenopteriform according
to Lim (1982) description, because they were tapered
anteriorly with distinct segmentation and there were not anal vesicle and mouthpart.
Second instar of parasitoid chewed DBM larval cuticle (4th instar larvae) and
made an emergence hole on the lateral side of abdomen segments , thereafter
molted to 3th instar during emergence from the host larva and spin a cocoon
immediately beside the host. The body color of parasitoid larvae was yellowish
green. While spinning cocoon, the color of larvae change to yellowish white.
The parasitized larvae were alive with no feeding and low movement 2-2.5 days,
Cocoon: The cocoon was oval and its color was opaque white with a light green tint and was inclined to pale cream at end. The spinning of cocoon was lasted 0.158±0.0008 day. The cocoon dimension was 3.87±0.032 mm in length and 1.74±0.016 mm in most width.
Prepupa: From the cocoon formation time to shedding of the exuvium of 3rd instar was considered as prepupa. The prepupa has 13 segments and its body length was 3.25±0.024 mm. The body color was cream in head and thorax and white pus in abdomen at early and then whole of body became yellow approximately 4 h after pupation. The meconium (undigested food) was visible from through cuticle that filled gut. The C. vestalis meconium was black and moved to posterior end of cocoon, 0.32±0.015 days after pupation that it is obvious from out of cocoon by naked eye. The prepupa had two russet compound eyes were obvious approximately 2 days after pupation. The prepupa stage lasted 1.9±0.06 days (Fig. 3).
Pupation: The exuvium of 3rd instar attached to the posterior end of abdomen at end of cocoon. It was completely hard and visible unlike the exuvium of two previous instars that those were seen difficulty. Two compound eyes became dark jujube color and three dorsal ocelli became fawn antenna, wings and legs were formed at second day after cocoon formation. Then appear blackening spot in the body from head and thorax at 3rd day after spinning of cocoon and were continued to whole of body became black gently. About 4.03±0.11 day after cocoon formation, the adult wasp was emerged (Fig. 3).
Adults: The adult was black with transparent yellow in semi primary of abdominal segments at whose tergum pleura and sternum. The antenna was black and had 16 segments with uniform slender shape. The body length (head to end of abdomen) of females was more than that of males. It was 2.7±0.08 mm for females and 2.5±0.04 mm for males. Wing span of females and males were 5.8±0.12 mm and 5.76±0.09 mm, respectively. Unmated female and male longevity of wasp were 16.83±0.37, 16.25±0.17 and sex ratio is male-biased (Fig. 3).
Host age preference in choice and non-choice tests: In both choice and non-choice experiment, second and third instars of DBM a significantly higher percentage parasitism than 4th instars (Table 3). This resulted in a significantly higher preference of C. vestalis to 2nd and 3rd-instar. In choice test, C. vestalis preferred significantly 2nd-instars of P. xylostella than two others. The percentage parasitism of 2nd, 3rd and 4th instars was 78.58, 69.94 and 4.36%, respectively (Table 3). Percentage of mortality and adult emergence was not significantly affected at both experiments.
Parasitoid oviposition dynamic: In the experiment C. vestalis endoparasitoid
laid significantly more eggs on the first day than on any of the other nine
days that followed (F9,57 = 95.6, p<0.001; Table
||Influence of larval instars on percentage (Mean±SE)
P. xylostella larvae parasitized by C. vestalis within a 2-h
oviposition period in non-choice and choice tests
|1Larval instars seprated (L2,L3
and L4) during parasitism period. 2Larval instars
mixed (L2,L3 and L4) during parasitism
period. 3 L2, L3 and L4 denote
the 2nd, 3rd and 4th instar moth larvae, respectively. 4Means
followed by the same letter within columns are not significantly different
(p<0.05; Fisher-LSD Test). 5The numbers given show the degrees
of freedom of treatment and error, respectively
|| Number of eggs (mean±SE) laid by Cotesia vestalis
over 10-days period
|Means marked with the same small letter within a same row
are not significantly different (p<0. 05; Fisher-LSD test)
Total egg production per female (Mean±SE) was about 58.2±1.34.
Females oviposited for up 10 days; over 50% of the eggs were laid within first
Higher oviposition preference of P. xylostella was occurred on lower
surfaces of Chines cabbage. This result is similar to results of Charleston
and Kfir (2000), Andrahennadi and Gillott (1998)
and Satpathy et al. (2010) but in other previous
researches, oviposition preference of P. xylostella was higher on upper
surface of tested crussifera leaves (Harcourt, 1957;
Talekar and Shelton, 1993). In crussifera, the Glossy
and waxy state of leaf surfaces caused the egg deposition by females was affected
(Uematsu and Sakanoshita, 1989). Total Developmental
time (egg to pupa) of P. xylostella on B. pekinensis cv. Spring
smile was very close to result of Fathi et al. (2011)
and Soufbaf et al. (2010) on cauliflower cultivar.
The pupal period of DBM was shorter than (Karimzadeh and
Wright, 2008) that they used B. pekinensis cv. Tip Top as host plant.
Shorter development times indicate greater suitability of a host plant (Awmack
and Leather, 2002; Talekar and Shelton, 1993). In
this study, adult longevity of P. xylostella was significantly higher
than other investigations such as of Fathi et al.
(2011), (6.67±0.60 days) and Soufbaf et al.
(2010), (6.29±0.41days) on cauliflower cultivar. These differences
might be referred to low fitness of DBM produced offspring on cauliflower cultivars.
Another reason is referred to the quality and quantity of adults feeding, in
our experiment, adult fed with 10% honey solution but in another experiment
when we remove the honey solution as main food of adult they could not survive
only 2-4 days and died (unpublished data). Winkler et
al. (2005) have shown long time survival of adult completely dependent
to sources of carbohydrate-rich food as main source of energy for longevity,
fecundity and mobility. Male longevity was significantly higher than female
longevity that it was in consistent with finding of Abdel-Razek
(2003), Gholizadeh et al. (2009) and was
opposite with results of Fathi et al. (2011)
and Soufbaf et al. (2010). All of these differences
among our result and research mentioned above are probably due to difference
in cultivar of host plant and geographic populations of DBM that used in their
experiment. C. vestalis larval development was rapid, requiring only
6.47 days to complete all three instar at 25±1°C. The morphology
of first instar was very different from that of the other two instar. Similar
result have been reported in C. plutellae (Lim, 1982;
Chiu and Chien, 1972; Yu et al.,
2008) and other solitary larval endoparasitoid braconid (Hegazi
and Fuhrer, 1985; Grossniklaus-Burgin et al.,
1994; Luo et al., 2007). According to endocrine
pathways, parasitoids regulators induced developmental interruption in the hosts.
Some of these regulators consist of polydnaviruses (PDV), venoms, teratocytes
(Dahlman and Vinson, 1993; Beckage,
1998; Rana et al., 2002). For C. vestalis,
we were able to confirm the presence of teratocytes several hours after egg
hatching of C. vestalis that these giant cells envelop early first instar
larva and then distributed in the host hemocell. However, we didnt study
the egg layers of C. vestalis by electron microscope but one day later
after hatching body segmentation is visible. Therefore, we concluded that the
serosal membrane (which occurs below the chorion) began to dissociate to from
teratocytes several hours after hatching and then amnion layer (which occurs
inside the chorion) is dissociated one day after hatching. The results of Yu
et al. (2008), were supported our finding in this subject. Hagen
(1964) said that the exact number of parasitic Hymenoptera instars is very
crucial to determine. Like, Lim (1982) and Chiu
and Chien (1972), we found that the C. vestalis has three larval
instars. We couldnt observe the exuviae of C. vestalis larval instars
in the host hemolymph therefore we determined times of molting based on Lim
(1982) description for larval recognition. Quicke (1997)
reported the some of braconidae family endoparasitoids have been shown to have
anal vesicles in two first instars. In braconid, C. vestalis larvae,
there is not anal vesicle in first instar, so we could be used anal vesicle
for separating the first and second instars by using light microscopy. The anal
vesicle has two basic functions including, secretory and uptake of nutrients
from the hosts hemolymph (Edson and Vinson, 1977;
Kaeslin et al., 2006). The gut development in
Hymenoptera, including in parasitoid wasps is variable. In most Apocrita gut
remain imperfect before pupation (Quicke, 1997). In the
Apocrita species, merging of the mid and hindgut usually occurs at the end of
the final instar, providing excretion of undigested material and nitrogenous
waste in the form of meconia (Yu et al., 2008).
Our observation confirmed the result of Yu et al.
(2008) about excreting the meconia at the prepupal stage of C. vestalis,
so in pupal stage gut is complete and voids the meconium in adult eclosion.
Many hymenoptera parasitoids have the capacity to determine host nutrient quality
during the oviposition period and will often accept or reject hosts on this
foundation (Michael and Pech-Louis, 1995). The host
nutrition quality may be altered in various hosts or different host instars
(Harvey and Strand, 2002). Monnerat
et al. (2002), tested 2nd to 4th instars and demonstrated that 2nd-3rd
instars of P. xylostella were suitable for parasitization by Diadegma
sp. In this study when a mixed group of instars was presented, the 2nd instar
larvae was so preferred and the 4th instar was less suitable and less attractive
for parasitoid. Probably, required time for parasitoid development, better immunological
defense in larger hosts and ability of last instar to fight-off an approaching
parasitoid, caused lower preference of C. vestalis to 4th instar than
others. When given no choice and only a 4th instar larva was presented the percentage
parasitism is higher than 4th instar in comparison with choice test. This result
is consistent with other Monnerat et al. (2002),
however in our experiment larval mortality in all tested instars did not increased
at both mixed and isolated group. We concluded that some parameters including
the size, age and mobility of P. xylostella larvae had significant influence
on oviposition by C. vestalis and the parasitization rate decreased as
the host size increased. This finding according to result of Liu
et al. (2004) on Heliothis armigera- Microplitis mediator
system. Another reason for decrease of parasitism of 4th instar P. xylostella
by C. vestalis supports the approach that the hosts immune
system was strong enough by the 4th instar to interrupt development of the parasitoid.
Webb et al. (2001) reported hosts defense
system which increases in performance with the age of the host. Therefore, according
to this finding, it is acceptable to use 2nd and 3rd instars to mass rearing
of C. vestalis, so these caused to optimize the percentage parasitism,
parasitoid development time and survival. Gauld and Hanson
(1995) reported that many endoparasitoids are pro-ovigenic which has been
shown to be case for Microplitis bicoloatus as well Luo
et al. (2005). In present study, C. vestalis females oviposited
on the 3rd larvae of P. xylostella for up 10-days, but a high proportion
of eggs were laid on the first three days. This rapid oviposition rate increases
the potential of parasitoid for biological suppression of DBM populations because
the likelihood of mortality for the parasites due to exposure to detrimental
environmental factors or generalist predators increases with time. Muniappan
et al. (2004) were observed the gregarious larval parasitoid, Euplectrus
maternus (Eulophidae), to gently lay eggs on the second larvae of fruit-piercing
moth, Eudocima fullonia, for up 30 days and the large number of eggs
were laid during the first week after exposure. In the parasitoids mass rearing
process, high reproductive capacity and shorter oviposition period are important
factor for biological control program. In conclusion, the development of C.
vestalis is in many respects similar to other braconids. By understanding
the development of the P. xylostella and C. vestalis, we have
produced a solid foundation for further studies on laboratory mass-rearing,
ecological and physiological investigations on P. xylostella and C.
vestalis. The rapid oviposition rate of parasitoid increases the potential
for biological suppression of host. Present results suggest that C. vestalis
has considerable potential as a biological control agent for P. xylostella.
This publication is a part of the first authors Ph.D. thesis funded by the Department of plant protuction of Tehran University that which we thank for financial support.
Abdel‐Razek, A.S., 2003. Pathogenic effects of Xenorhabdus nematophilus and Photorhabdus luminescens (Enterobacteriaceae) against pupae of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.). Anzeiger fur Schadlingskunde, 76: 108-111.
Andrahennadi, R. and C. Gillott, 1998. Resistance of brassica, especially B. juncea (L.) Czern, genotypes to the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.). Crop Protec., 17: 85-94.
Awmack, C.S. and S.R. Leather, 2002. Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 47: 817-844.
Beckage, N.E. and D.B. Gelman, 2004. Wasp parasitoid disruption of host development: Implications for new biologically based strategies for insect control. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 49: 299-330.
CrossRef | PubMed |
Beckage, N.E., 1998. Modulation of immune responses to parasitoids by polydnaviruses. Parasitology, 116: S57-S64.
Charleston, D.S. and R. Kfir, 2000. The possibility of using Indian mustard, Brassica juncea, as a trap crop for the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, in South Africa. Crop Protec., 19: 455-460.
Chiu, S.C. and C.C. Chien, 1972. Observation on Apanteles plutellae Kurd, a larval parasite of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella). Plant Prot. Bull., 14: 145-152.
Dahlman, D.L. and S.B. Vinson, 1993. Teratocytes: Developmental and Biochemical Characteristics. In: Parasites and Pathogens of Insects, Beckage, N.E., S.N. Thompson and B.A. Federici (Eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, pp: 145-165.
Edson, K.M. and S.B. Vinson, 1977. Nutrient absorption by the anal vesicle of the braconid wasp, Microplitis croceipes. J. Insect Physiol., 23: 5-8.
Fathi, S.A.A., M. Bozorg-Amirkalaee and R.M. Sarfaraz, 2011. Preference and performance of Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) on canola cultivars. J. Pest Sci., 84: 41-47.
Gassmann, A.J., Y. Carriere and B.E. Tabashnik, 2009. Fitness costs of insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 54: 147-163.
CrossRef | PubMed |
Gauld, I.D. and P.E. Hanson, 1995. Life History Strategy: Idiobionts and Koinobionts. In: Parasitic Wasps, Quicke, D.L.J. (Ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp: 68-71.
Gholizadeh, A., K. Kamali, Y. Fathipour and H. Abbasipour, 2009. Life table of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) on five cultivated brassicaceous host plants. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 11: 115-124.
Direct Link |
Grossniklaus-Burgin, C., T. Wyler, R. Pfister-Wilhelm and B. Lanzrein, 1994. Biology and morphology of the parasitoid Chelonus inanitus (Braconidae, Hymenoptera) and effects on the development of its host Spodoptera littoralis (Noctuidae, Lepidoptera). Invertebr. Reprod. Dev., 25: 143-158.
Hagen, K.S., 1964. Developmental Stages of Parasites. In: Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds, DeBach, P. (Ed.). Chapman and Hall, London, pp: 168-246.
Harcourt, D.G., 1957. Biology of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Curt.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), in Eastern Ontario. II. Life-history, behaviour and host relationships. Can. Entomol., 89: 554-564.
Harvey, J.A. and M.R. Strand, 2002. The developmental strategies of endoparasitoid wasps vary with host feeding ecology. Ecology, 83: 2439-2451.
Direct Link |
Hegazi, E.M. and E. Fuhrer, 1985. Instars of Microplitis rufiventris [Hym.: Braconidae] and their relative developmental speed under different photoperiods. BioControl, 30: 231-243.
Kaeslin, M., T. Wyler, C. Grossniklaus-Burgin and B. Lanzrein, 2006. Development of the anal vesicle, salivary glands and gut in the egg-larval parasitoid Chelonus inanitus: Tools to take up nutrients and to manipulate the host?. J. Insect. Physiol., 52: 269-281.
CrossRef | PubMed |
Karimpour, Y., Y. Fathipour, A.A. Talebi and S. Moharramipour, 2005. Biology of leafy spurge defoliator moth Simyra dentinosa (Lep., Noctuidae ) and determination of its parasitoids in Orumieh, Iran. Iran. J. Agric. Sci., 36: 475-484.
Karimzadeh, J. and D.J. Wright, 2008. Bottom-up cascading effects in a tritrophic system: Interactions between plant quality and host-parasitoid immune responses. Ecol. Entomol., 33: 45-52.
Karimzadeh, J., M.B. Bonsall and D.J. Wright, 2004. Bottom-up and top-down effects in a tritrophic system: The population dynamics of Plutella xylostella (L.)-Cotesia plutellae (Kurdjumov) on different host plants. Ecol. Entomol., 29: 285-293.
Li, J., T.A. Coudron, W. Pan, X. Liu, Z. Lu and Q. Zhang, 2006. Host age preference of Microplitis mediator (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), an endoparasitoid of Mythimna separate (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Biol. Control, 39: 257-261.
Lim, G.S., 1982. The biology and effects of parasite on the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.). Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, UK.
Liu, X.X., Q.W. Zhang, J.C. Li and J. Xu, 2004. Effects of host size on oviposition and development of the endoparasitoid, Microplitis mediator (Haliday). Chin. J. Biol. Control, 20: 110-113.
Luo, K., J.T. Trumble and Y. Pang, 2007. Development of Microplitis bicoloratus on Spodoptera litura and implications for biological control. BioControl, 52: 309-321.
Luo, K.J., D.X. Gu, G.R. Zhang and Z.Q. Cheng, 2005. Ovary structures of two parasitic wasps Microplitis bicoloratus and Diglyhus isaea. Entomol. Knowl., 42: 69-70.
Direct Link |
Marsh, H.O., 1917. Life history of Plutella maculipennis, the diamond-back moth. J. Apicult. Res., 10: 1-10.
McGregor, R., 1996. Phenotypic selection by parasitoids on the timing of life history in a leafmining moth. Evolution, 50: 1579-1584.
Direct Link |
Monnerat, R.G., A.A. Kirk and E.D. Bordat, 2002. Biology of Diadegma sp. (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), a parasitoid of Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae), from Reunion Island. Neotrop. Entomol., 31: 271-274.
Direct Link |
Muniappan, R., J. Bamba, J. Cruz and G.V.P. Reddy, 2004. Biology, rearing and field release on Guam of Euplectrus maternus, a parasitoid of the fruit-piercing moth, Eudocima fullonia. BioControl, 49: 537-551.
Nehare, S., B.S. Ghodki, G.K. Lande, V. Pawade and A.S. Thakare, 2010. Inheritance of resistance and cross resistance pattern in indoxacarb-resistant diamondback moth Plutella xylostella L. Entomol. Res., 40: 18-25.
Quicke, D.L.J., 1997. Preimaginal Development: From Gametogenesis to Syngamy. In: Parasitic Wasps, Quicke, D.L.J. (Ed.). Chapman and Hall, London.
Rana, R.L., D.L. Dahlman and B.A. Webb, 2002. Expression and characterization of a novel teratocyte protein of the Branconid, Microplitis croceipes (Cresson). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol., 32: 1507-1516.
Raymond, B., A.H. Sayyed and D.J. Wright, 2007. Host plant and population determine the fitness costs of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Biol. Lett., 3: 82-85.
CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
SYSTAT., 2007. SYSTAT Version 12.2. SPSS Science Marketing Department SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.
Santos, V.C., H.A. de Siqueira, J.E. da Silva and M.J. de Farias, 2011. Insecticide resistance in populations of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), from the state of Pernambuco, Brazil. Neotrop. Entomol., 40: 264-270.
Sarfraz, M. and B.A. Keddie, 2005. Conserving the efficacy of insecticides against Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lep., Plutellidae). J. Appl. Entomol., 129: 149-157.
Satpathy, S., T.M. Shivalingaswamy, A. Kumar, A.B. Rai and M. Rai, 2010. Potentiality of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis) as a trap crop for diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) management in cabbage. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 80: 240-243.
Direct Link |
Sequiera, R. and A.F.G. Dixon, 1996. Life history responses to host quality changes and competition in the Turkey-oak aphid. Eur. J. Entomol., 93: 53-58.
Soufbaf, M., Y. Fathipour, J. Karimzadeh and M.P. Zalucki, 2010. Development and age-specific mortality of diamondback moth on Brassica host plants: Pattern and causes of mortality under laboratory conditions. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 103: 574-579.
Direct Link |
Strand, M.R. and L.L. Pech, 1995. Immunological basis for compatibility in parasitoid-host relationships. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 40: 31-56.
Tabashnik, B.E., 1994. Evolution of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 39: 47-79.
Tabashnik, B.E., N.L. Cushing, N. Finson and M.W. Johnson, 1990. Field development of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 83: 1671-1676.
Talekar, N.S. and A.M. Shelton, 1993. Biology, ecology and management of the diamondback moth. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 38: 275-301.
Talekar, N.S. and J.C. Yang, 1991. Characteristic of parasitism of diamondback moth by two larval parasites. Biocontrol, 36: 95-104.
Talekar, N.S., H.C. Yang, S.T. Lee, B.S. Chen and L.Y. Sun, 1985. Annotated Bibliography of Diamondback Moth. Tropical Vegetable Information Service, Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan, Pages: 469.
Talekar, N.S., M.Y. Lin and Y. Liang, 1997. Rearing of diamond back moth parasites. AVRDC Publication no. 97-470. pp: 21. http://www.avrdc.org/LC/cabbage/dbm/01title.html.
Uematsu, H. and A. Sakanoshita, 1989. Possible role of cabbage leaf wax bloom in suppressing diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) oviposition. Applied Entomol. Zool., 24: 253-257.
Verkerk, R.H.J. and D.J. Wright, 1996. Multi tropic interactions and management of the diamondback moth: A review. Bull. Entomol. Res., 86: 205-216.
Webb, B.A., R.L. Rana and D.L. Dahlman, 2001. Endoparasitoid-Mediated Disruption of Host Endocrine Systems: Common Themes through Uncommon Means. In: Endocrine Interactions of Insect Parasites and Pathogens, Edwards, J.P. and R.J. Weaver (Eds.). BIOS Sci. Publ., Oxfords, UK., pp: 83-93.
Winkler, K., F.L. Wackers, A. Stingli and J.C. van Lenteren, 2005. Plutella xylostella (Diamondback moth) and its parasitoid Diadegma semiclausum show different gustatory and longevity responses to a range of nectar and honeydew sugars. Entomol. Exp. et Applicata, 115: 187-192.
Yu, R.X., M. Shi, F. Huang and X.X. Chen, 2008. Immature development of Cotesia vestalis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), an endoparasitoid of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 101: 189-196.
Direct Link |
Zhao, J.Z., H.L. Collins, Y.X. Li, R.F.L. Mau and G.D. Thompson et al., 2006. Monitoring of diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) resistance to spinosad, indoxacarb and emamectin benzoate. J. Econ. Entomol., 99: 176-181.
PubMed | Direct Link |