The Effect of Seed Extraction Methods on Seed Quality of Two Cultivar's Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)
In order to compare of different methods and identify the optimum condition for tomato seed extraction, factorial experiments with 3 replications was conducted. In the first experiment, pulp of two tomato cultivars (Faraon, Dominator) were fermented at two temperatures (25, 35°C) and six periods (24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 h). The germination of seeds in laboratory as well as seedling emergence and preliminary growth in greenhouse were studied and measured. The results showed that effect of cultivar on traits (except of seedling emergence) was significant. Also the effect of temperature of fermentation, duration of fermentation and also interaction effects of them on seed germination were significant. Totally seed quality decreased with increasing temperature and duration of fermentation and the fermentation duration from 24 to 48 h at temperature 25°C, is recommended. In the second experiment, tomato seeds were extracted by HCL (pH was arranged to 1, 2, 3 for 10, 20, 30 min), H2SO4 (pH was arranged to 1, 2, for 15, 30 min), Sodium carbonate (5, 10% for 24 and 48 h) and fermentation. Percentage germination, germination rate, length of radicle and length of plumule were used for seed quality assessment. The results showed that interaction effect between pH and duration of HCL treatments was significant for seed germination (percentage and rate) and there was an interaction effect between concentration and duration for germination rate in alkali treatments. Different extraction methods had not detrimental effect on percentage germination, but acid treatments produce very bright clean seeds in compare to other treatments.
May 06, 2010; Accepted: July 19, 2010;
Published: August 21, 2010
The seed quality of tomato is affected by factors such as seed extraction method,
duration and fermentation temperature for seed extraction and fruit maturity
(Kailappan and Karunanithy, 2006). Tomato seed extraction
involves a treatment to remove the gelatinous coating around the seeds. Processing
of tomato seeds that includes several steps is accomplished by pulping by machine
or hand followed by removal of the gel surrounding the seeds by fermentation,
chemicals or by mechanical means (Silva et al., 1982).
Advantages and disadvantages of each technique depends on temperature, application
period and concentration (Demir and Samit, 2001).
In fermentation methods, the selected ripe fruits are harvested, crushed and allowed
for fermentation in non-metallic containers at room temperature for two to three
days. The pulps remain in the extract until the gel surrounding the seeds has
been degraded by microorganisms (Eevera and Vanangamudi, 2006).
The mixture should be stirred at once or twice a day to maintain a uniform rate
of fermentation, also to release the seeds entrapped in the floating pulp and
to prevent a fungal growth from starting at the surface of the mass, which can
injure or discolour seeds (Raymond, 1999). When fermentation
is complete, the good seeds settle down at the bottom and much of the pulp floats
at the top, leaving a layer of clear liquid in between (Desai,
2004). Fermentation should take place long enough for the sufficient disintegration
mucilaginous material adhering to the seed. The speed or duration of fermentation
process is largely dependent on the temperature. If it remains between 24 to 27°C,
satisfactory separation of seed and pulp may be achieved within 48 to 72 h (Agrawal,
1995). In relatively high temperatures (25-30°C) the fermentation is complete
in approximately 24 h (Fenwick-Kelly and George, 1998).
Excessive fermentation reduces seed quality. Usually the longer the fermentation
time and the higher the temperature resulted in the greater reduction in germination
(Silva et al., 1982). Fermentation should be a
controlled process because if continued too long, it creates heat and mechanical
injury to the seeds (McDonald and Copeland, 1997). Also
long fermentation can cause premature sprouting (Eevera and
Vanangamudi, 2006). Liptay (1989) stated that with
long term fermentation percentage germination was declined severely at 25°C
or higher temperatures.
Acid extraction methods especially hydrochloric acid is used largely for separating
tomato pulp and seeds (Silva et al., 1982). This
method is often favoured by large commercial producers as it rapidly degrades
the gelatinous seed coating resulting in the production of a very bright clean
seed sample (Gowda et al., 1991). Efficient breakdown
of the gel surrounding the seed and quick cleaning, avoiding of the low and
high temperatures problem, eradication of bacterial canker and producing bright
looking seed coat are important features of acid extraction method (Desai,
2004). However, it can be deteriorative on seed quality if application period
and concentration are not appropriate. Same concentration of sulphuric acid
and three percent nitric acid could also be used instead of hydrochloric acid
(Singh et al., 1985). If sulphuric acid added
to the pulp without dilution was very corrosive and it damaged the seed (Kailappan
and Karunanithy, 2006). Sodium carbonate method darkens the seed coats and
is, therefore not normally used for commercial seeds (McDonald
and Copeland, 1997).
Brar and Singh (1984) observed that different extraction
methods did not significantly affect on seed recovery, but Yadav
et al. (2004) reported that none of the extraction methods was detrimental
to germination, but the seed recovery in fermentation method was highest. Some
investigators reported that the best quality seed is obtained by fermentation
method, because it is a natural process that is least harmful to the seed and
can eradicate bacterial canker and other seed borne diseases (Das
et al., 1997; Olympio and Dankyir, 1999). While
Silva et al. (1982) and also Jadli
and Singh (2009) found that natural fermentation resulted in poor breakdown
of the gel surrounding the seed and significantly reduced seed vigour, so is not
suitable method to obtain maximum seed quality in tomato. Vadivelu
and Srimathi (1988) reported that the highest seed quality, as defined by
percentage germination and seed recovery observed for acid extraction method and
lowest was recorded in fermentation method. Gowda et al.
(1991), Ghosh and Syamal (1997) Jadli
and Singh (2009) stated acid treatments, alkali treatment, hydrochloric acid
and alkali treatment as the best extraction method, respectively.
Supplying of high quality seeds is the basic requirement and it contributes greatly to the success any crop. Because of the importance of tomato, large quantities of high quality tomato seeds are required worldwide. In Iran, factors like inadequate seed production technology, absence of suitable varieties and poor post harvest seed handling resulted in the unavailability of good quality seed became a major problem. Then, two experiments were conducted to identify the optimum condition for fermentation treatment and also compare the effect of different seed extraction procedures on the quality of the seed obtained from tomato.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants of Faraon and Dominator cultivars were grown at the agricultural research glasshouse, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad during 2007-2008. Pulps were removed from fruits with uniform size and maturity.
In the first experiment the pulp of two tomato cultivars were fermented in glass beakers in incubators set at 25 and 35°C for each of the following durations: 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 and 144 h. The slurry was stirred twice daily during fermentation. At the end of treatments seeds were washed in running tap water, cleaned, surface dried on blotting paper and left on top of filter paper to dry at room temperature for 3 days. Final seed moisture content was determined by the high temperature oven method (ISTA, 1985) after drying and it was adjusted to <10%. Then seeds were evaluated in the laboratory at 25-30°C using the percentage germination and germination rate traits. The seeds were surface sterilized with 5% of sodium hypo-chlorite for 5 min and then washed with distilled water three times. Germination tests of both cultivars were done on three replicates of 30 seeds of every period at temperature 25 and 35°C in 9.0 cm diameter petri dishes with blotting paper for 14 days. In order to keep the papers moist, but avoiding free water, two sheets of paper were used with 5 mL of water and then added as required during the test. Germination was considered to have occurred when the radicle was at least 2 mm long. Germinating seeds were counted daily for 14 days and counts were made every day at the same time during the test. Seedling emergence and preliminary growth tests carried out in a glasshouse. Three replicates of 20 seeds from each of the 24 lots (2 cultivars x 2 temperatures x 6 periods) were sown in seedling trays. The seedling emergence (appearance of the hook at the surface), height and the number of leaf/seedling were monitored and measured after 28 days.
In the second experiment seed extraction techniques used were acid extraction by soaking in commercial hydrochloric acid HC1 (37%), H2SO4 (98%), alkali extraction by soaking in Sodium carbonate and natural fermentation for 48 h at ambient temperature for both cultivars. Pulp of fruits was fermented 48 h at room temperature for natural fermentation and pH was arranged to 1, 2, 3 by adding required HCL to the slurry and kept at room temperature for 10, 20 and 30 min for HCL extraction. Sulphuric acid treatment, was done by using H2SO4 (98%) for arranging slurry to pH 1, 2 and then kept for 15 and 30 min at room temperature. During acid treatments the slurry was stirred with a magnetic stirrer. For alkali extraction method the pulp containing the extracted seeds was mixed with equal volume of 5 and 10% solutions of sodium carbonate and then mixtures were left 24 and 48 h at room temperature. After each method time the seeds mixture were washed with distilled water 4-5 times and subsequently dried in the same manner as in the natural fermentation method. Percentage germination, germination rate, length of radicle and length of plumule were used for seed quality assessment. Petri dishes were tightly closed by wax film to prevent possible evaporation and length of radicle and plumule was recorded after 14 days. The studies were conducted in factorial experiments in a completely randomized design with three replications.
Finally different extraction methods in Faraon cultivar were compared. This experiment was carried out in three replications and the data were analyzed in completely randomized design.
Duncan's multiple range tests was used for comparing the means of traits. Treatments were compared by applying Least Significant Difference (LSD) test at a 5% level of significance.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The effect of temperature and duration of fermentation: Results in Table
1 indicated that significant differences were found on traits (except of
seedling emergence) among two cultivars. Seeds extracted from cultivar Faraon
had significantly higher mean than those extracted from the cultivar Dominator.
Similar to our finding, Brar and Singh (1984), Singh
et al. (1985) and Valdes and Gray (1998) reported
that the cultivar had a significantly effect on some seed quality traits. The
effect of temperature of fermentation and duration of fermentation on all traits
was significant, so that increasing duration and temperature during the fermentation
drastically reduces the seed germination and other seed quality traits including
seedling emergence, height and the number of leaf/seedling (Table
1). The best results were obtained from 24-48 h fermentation. This agrees
with Singh et al. (1985), Liptay
(1989), Pandita et al. (1996) and Vishwanath
et al. (2006). Whereas Baldo and Vallador (1985)
and Kanwar (1989) found that eight and three days of
natural fermentation was the best for getting good quality tomato seed, respectively.
Also, Reyes et al. (2007) reported that increasing
the fermentation time up to 7 days had not significantly effect on germination,
but seed vigour decreased with fermentation longer than 5 days. These differences
can be due to genotype, environment, fermentation condition and various seed
McDonald and Copeland (1997) stated that prolonged fermentation
affected the seed germination, because it creates heat and cause mechanical injury
to the seeds. Also Eevera and Vanangamudi (2006) found
that long fermentation can cause premature sprouting and therefore reduce total
germination and seed quality.
Interaction effects were significant for most of the seed quality traits. As
shown in Fig. 1a and d, in both cultivars
seed germination decreased significantly with increasing temperature from 25
to 35°C. Cultivar Faraon at temperature 25°C resulted in the highest
percentage germination (89.6%) and germination rate (7.1 seed/day). Also seed
germination decreased with increasing period from 24 to 144 h (Fig.
1b, e). Cultivar Faraon for 24 h attained maximum percentage
germination and germination rate with 92.78% and 9.0 seed/day, respectively
and the lowest mean as 33.9% and 1.5 seed/day was recorded in cultivar Dominator
for 144 h. In all fermentation periods, the Dominator cultivar showed lower
germination than Faraon cultivar with only exception of 48 h in which there
was no difference among two cultivars statistically for germination rate.
|| The effect of temperature and duration of fermentation on
seed quality of two cultivar's tomato
|Values with different are significantly different
||(a-i) Change in percentage germination, germination rate,
seedling emergence, seedling height and leaf No./seedling during different
temperature and periods of fermentation (cvs. Faraon, Dominator)
In agreement with this conclusion, Singh et al.
(1985) also found that seed germination affected by cultivar and decreased
with duration of fermentation, the best fermentation period was 24 and 48 h
for the cultivars Punjab Chhuhara and Punjab Kesari, respectively.
Determination of interaction effects between fermentation time and temperature
revealed that at 25°C, increasing the time up to 120 and 48 h had not significantly
effect for percentage germination and germination rate, respectively. However
at 35°C, percentage germination was decreased significantly with fermentation
times longer than 24 h. In this temperature germination rate showed very similar
pattern of response as percentage germination, but in general in lower values.
None of the tomato seeds incubated at 35°C had high germination rate (Fig.
1c, f). The results are in agreement with those obtained
by Liptay (1989) where the temperature for tomato fermentation
used was ≥25°C, seed vigour declined severely, but at 15°C, more
than 50% of the seeds were viable even after 25 days of fermentation. He found
that optimum seed quality were obtained at 15- 30°C from 24-48 h fermentation,
our results are tallying with his finding. Since rate of fermentation is highly
temperature dependent (Agrawal, 1995), it is obvious that
various fermentation temperature and duration can cause differences in seed
germination. So, fermentation needs careful regulation to ensure optimum seed
quality. Silva et al. (1982) reported that fermentation
with longer term and higher temperature can greater reduce germination. In present
study seed germination was declined at 35°C and this reduction that was
increasingly severe with increasing fermentation period, can attributed to addition
of fungi, discolouration, sprouting and heavy seed leachate (Jadli
and Singh, 2009).
The results show that seedling emergence was similar in all times at 25°C,
but it was greatly reduced with fermentation longer than 48 h, at 35°C and
completely inhibited by 144 h fermentation (Fig. 1g). This
could be explained by the fact that high fermentation temperature causes injury
to the seeds effecting seedling emergence (McDonald and Copeland,
1997; Jadli and Singh, 2009).
Similar to seedling emergence, seedling preliminary growth remained unchanged
with further time at 25°C. However fermentation longer than 48 and 96 h
at 35°C had a significant effect on seedling height as well as the number
of leaf per seedling, respectively (Fig. 1h, i)
and they declined severely with long-term fermentation.
According to the present results the temperature and time at which the tomato seed pulp fermentation is done is crucial for the retention of good seed quality. In both cultivars, seed germination decreased with increasing temperature from 25 to 35°C and increasing period from 24 to 144 h. Totally fermentation duration from 24 to 48 h at temperature 25°C, is recommended. High temperature and time ie 35°C is especially deleterious to the retention of a high level of seed quality, therefore in warm environment the fermentation must be for short time.
The effect of different extraction methods on seed quality: Similar to previous experiment, cultivar Faraon had significantly higher mean than cultivar Dominator in most seed extraction procedures of tomato (Table 2).
The results obtained with the HCL treatment indicate among the times of treatment, germination rate was significantly the highest for 20 min. Interaction effect between pH and time was found significant in hydrochloric acid but not in sulphuric acid (p<0.05) respecting both percentage germination and germination rate values. The highest percentage germination and germination rate measured in pH = 3 for 20 min (92.8% and 6.5 seed/day, respectively) in hydrochloric acid treatment (Fig. 2a, b). In pH = 1 the lowest germination was observed on seed treated for 10 min that shows in low pH, the treatment time should be longer in compare high pH.
In Sodium carbonate (10%) extraction method, germination rate decreased significantly with increasing duration of treatment from 24 to 48 h (Fig. 2c).
The effect of different extraction methods on percentage germination and germination
rate of Faraon cultivar was significant. Maximum percentage germination (92.8%)
was recorded for seeds extracted by hydrochloric acid extraction method (pH
= 3, 20 min). However, the percentage germination was not significantly different
in the most of seed extraction methods (Fig. 3a). Totally
none of the extraction methods was detrimental to percentage germination of
seeds and it was greater than 80% for all treatments, but the seeds extracted
by the means of acid were shiny and cleaned quite easily in compare to other
methods since very good breakdown of coating occurred, while all alkali treatments
showed dark testa that may reduce the preference by farmers.
||Change in percentage germination and germination rate during
different pH and time in HCL treatment (a, b), Change in germination rate
during different concentration and time in Sodium carbonate treatment (c)
||The effect of seed extraction method on seed germination of
two cultivar's tomato
|Values with different letters are significantly different
This agrees with conclusion of Brar and Singh (1984)
and Yadav et al. (2004). Whereas Silva
et al. (1982), Vadivelu and Srimathi (1988)
and Jadli and singh (2009) reported that the seed extracted
by various procedures respond differently to germination tests. They stated
that natural fermentation was not satisfactory method in breaking down the seed
gelatinous coating from the seeds and fermentation gave lower germination than
acid treatments in their study. By contrast, Das et al.
(1997) and Olympio and Dankyir (1999) reported that
the best quality seed was observed for seeds extracted using the fermentation
technique. On the other hand acid treatment in Vadivelu
and Srimathi (1988) and Gowda et al. (1991)
studies, alkali treatment in Ghosh and Syamal (1997)
study and HCL and alkali treatments in Jadli and Singh (2009)
experiment considered as the best extraction method. These differences may be
attributed to the difference in initial seed quality and or may be due to difference
in seed coat permeability, thickness and leaching out of different amino acids
(Jadli and Singh, 2009). The seed quality parameters
although differed significantly due to seasons, environmental and varietal differences,
effect of chemicals type and concentration used for seed extraction, application
period of treatments, various seed quality and vigour tests.
||The effect of different extraction methods on percentage germination
and germination rate of Faraon cultivar (T1: HCl, pH = 1, 10'; T2: HCl,
pH = 1, 20'; T3: HCl, pH = 1, 30'; T4: HCl, pH = 2, 10'; T5: HCl, pH = 2,
20'; T6: HCl, pH = 2, 30'; T7: HCl, pH = 3, 10'; T8: HCl, pH = 3, 20'; T9:
HCl, pH = 3, 30'; T10: H2SO4, pH = 1, 15'; T11: H2SO4,
pH = 1, 30'; T12: H2SO4, pH = 2, 15'; T13: H2SO4,
pH = 2, 30'; T14: Na2CO3, 5%, 24 h; T15: Na2CO3,
5%, 48 h; T16: Na2CO3, 10%, 24 h; T17: Na2CO3,
10%, 48 h; T18: Natural fermentation)
The variation in speed of germination under different treatments was also observed
(Fig. 3b). Results showed that germination rate higher in
those treatments where fruit pulp was treated with acid. Soaking in HCl (pH
= 3) for 20 min resulted in the highest germination rate (6.5 seed/day). However,
reduced germination rate was recorded with alkali and fermentation treatments.
These finding are in close conformity with the observations of Silva
et al. (1982) and Jadli and Singh (2009)
which obtained the highest germination rate with HCl extraction method.
Length of radicle and length of plumule has been studied during the investigation and no significant variations among the treatments were observed.
On the basis of above results it can be conducted that HCl treatment had created ideal conditions for germination of tomato seeds.
Agrawal, R.L., 1995. Seed Technology. 2nd Edn., Oxford and IBH, Oxford, pp: 829.
Baldo, N.B. and D.M. Vallador, 1985. The influence of fermentation time and fruit maturity on the seed quality of tomato. CMU J. Agric. Food Nutr., 7: 246-253.
Brar, P.S. and H. Singh, 1984. Effect of different methods of tomato seed extraction on seed recovery and its germination. Haryana J. Horticul. Sci., 13: 161-164.
Das, R.K., G.K.S. Baruah and S.R. Paul, 1997. Effect of extraction techniques on seed quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Annu. Agric. Res., 18: 220-221.
Demir, I. and Y. Samit, 2001. Quality of tomato seeds as affected by fruit maturity at harvest and seed extraction method. Gartenbauwissenschaft, 66: 199-202.
Direct Link |
Desai, B.B., 2004. Seeds Handbook, Biology, Production, Processing and Storage. 2nd Edn., Marcel Decker Inc., New York, pp: 233-359.
Eevera, T. and K. Vanangamudi, 2006. Tomato: Advances in Science and Technology. In: Quality Seed Production in Vegetables, Vanangamudi, K., N. Natarajan, P. Srimathi, K. Natarajan and T. Saravanan et al. (Eds.). Agrobios Publisher, India, pp:159-185.
Fenwick-Kelly, A. and R.A.T. George, 1998. Encyclopedia of Seed Production of World Crops. John Willey & Sons, USA., pp: 356-364.
Ghosh, P.K. and M.M. Syamal, 1997. A study of seed extraction methods in tomato. Adv. Plant Sci., 10: 165-167.
Gowda, S.J., K.C. Talukdar and H. Ramaiah, 1991. Optimization of seed extraction techniques in tomato. Seeds Farms, 17: 15-18.
Jadli, S. and J.P. Singh, 2009. Effect of seed extraction methods on seed quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Pantagar. J. Res., 7: 127-130.
Kailappan, P. and C. Karunanithy, 2006. Seed Processing Equipments: Advances in Science and Technology. In: Recent Trends in Seed Technology and Management, Vanangamudi, K., N. Natarajan, A. Bharathi, R. Umarani, K. Natarajan and T. Saravanan, (Eds.). Agrobios Publisher, India, pp: 804-826.
Kanwar, S.S., 1989. Quality seed production technique of tomato. Seeds Farms, 15: 20-23.
Direct Link |
Liptay, A., 1989. Extraction procedures for optimal tomato seed quality. Acta Horticulture, 253: 163-170.
Direct Link |
McDonald, M.B. and L.O. Copeland, 1997. Seed Production, Principles and Practices. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp: 590-643.
Olympio, N.S. and J.O. Dankyira, 1999. Preliminary studies on extraction techniques and their effects on the quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) seeds. J. Ghana Sci. Assoc., 1: 5-10.
Direct Link |
Pandita, V.K., K.S. Randhawa and B.S. Modi, 1996. Seed quality in relation to fruit maturity stage and duration of pulp fermentation in tomato. Gartenbauwissenschaft, 61: 33-36.
Raymond, A.T.G., 1999. Vegetable Seed Production. 2nd Edn., CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.
Reyes, S.N.M., J.M. Solis and J.E.R. Perez, 2007. Methods of seed extraction in the tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Proceedings of the International American Society for Tropical Horticulture, October 07, Morelia, Mexico, pp: 178-184.
Silva, R.F., R.B. Koch and E.L. Moore, 1982. Effect of extraction procedures on tomato seed germination and vigour. Seed Sci. Technol., 10: 187-191.
Singh. G., H. Singh and T.S. Dillon, 1985. Some aspects of seed extraction in tomato. Seed Res., 13: 67-72.
Vadivelu, K.K. and P. Srimathi, 1988. Tomato seed technology. Seeds Farms, 14: 22-27.
Valdes, V.M. and D. Gray, 1998. The influence of stage of fruit maturation on seed quality in tomato ( Lycopersicon lycopersicum (L.) Karsten). Seed Sci. Technol., 26: 309-318.
Direct Link |
Vishwanath, K., B.S. Rajashekar, H.M. Palluvi, V.P. Kalappa, V. Muniyappa and N. Adiveppar, 2006. Influence of seed extraction methods on seed quality in leaf curl resistant tomato varieties. J. Asia Hort., 2: 250-254.
Direct Link |
Yadav, S.K., P.R. Kumar and H.C.S. Negi, 2004. Comparison of different methods of tomato seed extraction. Seed Res., 32: 160-162.
Direct Link |