| |
Research Article
|
|
A Survey on Mosquitoe Diversity in Parangipettai Coast, Southeast Coast of Tamilnadu, India
|
|
S. Balakrishnan,
M. Srinivasan
and
K. Elumalai
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
A preliminary survey of mosquito diversity in the different habitats of the Parangipettai coast, southeast coast of India was made during March, 2007 to February, 2008, for a qualitative and quantitative assessment of mosquito distribution. Different habitats were selected as sampling stations; such as mangrove, estuarine and salt marsh ecosystem. Bimonthly collections were made with the Shannon trap and human bait, including diurnal, crepuscular and nocturnal period of mosquito activity. A total of 337 individuals of mosquito species belonging to 3 genera, 5 families and 7 orders were collected from all the three habitats. In summer season totally 107 individuals, in rainy season 148 individuals and in winter season 82 individuals were recorded. Different statistical tools were used to know the Shannon-Weaver diversity index (2.37-2.356), Simpsons index (0.9039-0.9016), Margalef richness (2.269-2.001) and Pielous evenness (0.9725-0.9589) of mosquitoes. The possible causes of these differences are discussed. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION
Mosquitoes are well known groups of insects belonging to the family Culicidae
of the order Diptera. They are known to be the vectors of many dreadful human
diseases like malaria, filariasis, encephalitis, dengue fever etc. Mosquitoes
distributed worldwide and practically no part of the globe that can serve for
human existence is free from mosquitoes. The mosquitoes in general, are quite
abundant in coastal belts. But there is no devoted study on mosquitoes of a
particular coastal area of India covering mangroves, estuary and salt marsh.
In coastal areas such as salt marshes and mangrove swamps, many species of adult
mosquitoes are often found but collections of mosquito larvae and pupae from
habitats that are occasionally flooded by tides and rains yield far fewer species
(O'Meara, 1976).
Mangroves constitute an important ecosystem in the coastal regions and act
as barriers to sea intrusion and coastal erosion (Swaminathan
et al., 1994). Although, less than 5% of 2, 500 described mosquito
species regularly breed in brackish waters, they represent a rather diverse
group of species. The diversity among insects has always been of keen interest,
not only to entomologists dealing with structure and function, but also to those
who are engaged in different environmental programs. Relating to the biodiversity
of insect richness, Prendergast et al. (1993)
compared the coincidence of diversity hotspots of some different groups of insects
(viz., butterflies and dragonflies) and examined the extent to which
species-rich areas for different taxa coincide and whether species-rich areas
contain substantial numbers of rare species. The importance of biodiversity
for ecosystem processes has been the focus in studies on functional diversity,
looking at the extant of functional differences among the species in a community
(e.g., Collins and Benning, 1996; Petchey
and Gaston, 2002). India has been considered as one of the mega-diversity
countries possessing a rich measure of all living organisms when biodiversity
is viewed as a whole. According to Mittermeier et al.
(1999) and Myers et al. (2000) biological-rich
areas are found in a high range across the altitudinal variation associated
with diverse habitats.
Mosquitoes exploit almost all types of lentic aquatic habitats for breeding.
The immature stages of mosquitoes thrive in the aquatic bodies along with conspecifics
and heterospecifics forming the larval mosquito community. The resources in
terms of food, predators and competitors present in the habitat determine the
population status of larval mosquitoes, both qualitatively and quantitatively
(Sunahara et al., 2002; Carlson
et al., 2004). Evaluation of mosquito habitats in terms of species
composition and resources help to understand the bio-ecology and related control
measures of pests and vector mosquitoes is more appropriable. Hence, the present
investigation was made to study the mosquitoes of the Parangipettai coast, southeast
coast of India.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Sampling site: The study was carried out near Parangipettai, southeast coast of India (11° 24' N; 79° 46' E) during summer (Mar.-Jun.), rainy (July-Oct.) and winter (Nov.-Feb.) seasons for a period of one year from March, 2007 to February, 2008 (Fig. 1).
Mosquito sampling: Mosquito collection was carried out in the selected
sites using standard methods (WHO, 1975) only at night
time. Random collection was also made while sampling fixed localities. Information
about mosquito species, habitats etc., was recorded on a data sheet. Soon after
collection, the mosquitoes were immobilized with 70% ethanol, then sorted and
identified with separated, firstly by genera and thereafter by species. Immature
species were collected from different breeding habitats viz., mangrove
area, salt marshes, estuarine complex using tray and plastic container. Collected
mosquitoes were identified using keys by Mohrig (1969),
Gutsevich et al. (1974) and Wood
et al. (1979) while nomenclature followed (Reinert,
2000).
| | Fig. 1: |
Map showing the study area |
Data analysis: Different statistical tools were used in the present
study, to know the Shannon- Weaver diversity index, Simpsons index, Margalef
richness and Pielou evenness using PAST (Ver. 1.42). The number of individuals
of each species present was recorded in the study sites. The Simpsons
index (D) (Simpson, 1949), Pielous evenness index
(J`) and Shannons diversity index (H) were used (Shannon
and Weaver, 1949). Beta diversity was analyzed using the Bray-Curtis similarity
index using presence/absence data. Cluster analysis was done following hierarchical
agglomerative clustering (Bray and Curtis, 1957). Each
data point is plotted with CA first axis row scores on the horizontal axis (Hennebert
and Lees, 1991). Principal component analysis was used to evaluate the biotic
integrity of communities (Fig. 4).
RESULTS Mosquito diversity was encountered at different habitats such as Mangroves, Salt marshes and estuarine complexes. A total of 337 individuals of mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) belonging to 3 genera, 5 families and 7 orders were collected from all the three habitats. In the temporary pools, maximum number of species was encountered, in the summer season (107 species of mosquitoes), followed by rainy season (148 species of mosquitoes) and winter season (82 species of mosquitoes). Diversity indices (Shannon- Weaver index, Simpsons index), richness (Margalef index) and evenness (Pielou index) for three different seasons were calculated. Shannon-Weaver and Simpsons index were higher in Rainy season (2.37) and lower in summer season (2.356). Species richness (Margalef) was higher in winter season (2.269) and lower in rainy season (2.001). Values on evenness index showed little contrast; it was highest in rainy season (0.9725) and lowest in summer season (0.9589). The Margalef index was highest during winter season (2.269) and lowest during rainy season (2.001) (Table 1). Highest recorded mosquito species were Anopheles annularis, An. culicifacies, An.maculatus, An. stephensi, An. tessellatus, Culex mimulus, Cx. pipiens and Cx. tarsalis. Since, the lowest mosquito species found was Aedes aegypti, Ae. albopictus and Ae. vittatus. The dendrogram (Fig. 2) drawn revealed clearly the separate grouping of Culex pipiens, Cx. tarsalis, An. tessellatus and An. tessellatus maximum in the study sites. Culex pipiens, Cx. tarsalis and An. tessellatus linked at other mosquito species. These two groups got linked at mangrove, saltmarshes and estuarine complex area (Fig. 3).
| Table 1: |
Seasonal variation of mosquito species from different coastal
ecosystems |
 |
| Presence (+) and Absence (-); S: Summer, R: Rainy and W: Winter |
| | Fig. 2: |
A cluster analysis based on the Bray-Curtis similarity coefficient
of species composition between three seasons summer, rainy and winter |
| | Fig. 3: |
Relay plot of sampling seasons by correspondence analysis |
Mosquito abundance differed between study sites. The 95% confidence for the variation in Bray-Curtis analysis for a mosquito collected from Parangipettai coast, values of all the mosquito species is shown in (Fig. 4). Culex pipiens, Cx. tarsalis, An. tessellatus and An. tessellates were dominant in the study sites. Principal component analysis on estuarine complex and mangrove area showed significant relationships with species abundance (Fig. 5). Higher mosquito species taxa richness was displayed (Fig. 6) in rainy season followed by summer and winter season. DISCUSSION
Parangipettai contains both estuarine, mangroves and saltmarshes constitute
an important ecosystem. However, they are commonly associated with mosquitoes
(Diptera Culicidae) and are usually regarded as negative by humans because they
can cause nuisance and transmit diseases. Mosquitoes diversity showed several
of the well-established diversity patterns such as a species relationship and
a distribution-abundance relationship. Besides the species-area relationship,
the distribution-abundance relationship has received attention in ecological
studies (Hanski and Gyllenberg, 1997; Gaston
et al., 2000).
| | Fig. 4: |
Bray-Curtis analysis for a mosquito collected from Parangipettai
coast |
| | Fig. 6: |
Taxonomic richness of three seasons (summer, rainy and winter
season) |
A positive distribution-abundance relationship has been observed in other studies
on dipterans (Malmqvist et al., 1999; Hughes
et al., 2000).
In previous studies (Stewart, 1954) has been reported
that American salt marsh mosquitoes visit flowers of Avicennia before
going for a blood meal. Mosquitoes causing filariasis, malaria and encephalitis
are also known to occur in mangrove forests. Mosquitoes are often incredibly
numerous and the degree of abundance is exceptional (Macnae,
1968). Thangam and Kathiresan (1993) have been reported
the populations are often dense and 18 species occur in Pichavaram and they
reported the occurrence of filariasis, malaria and encephalitis. The incidence
of filariasis was high and coincided with high populations of filarial vector,
Culex quinqufasciatus (Slooff and Marks, 1965)
have reported that in Solomon Islands, the mosquito, Aedes (Geoskusea)
forceps Edwards was captured while biting a species of Periophthalmus.
Macnae (1968) also reported that mosquitoes settle on
the back of the head of the mud skipping Goby, Boleophthalmus boddarti.
The bloodsucker, Tabanus striatus was also collected in Pichavaram by
Senthil and Varadharajan (1995) and its occurrence is
attributed to the presence of Jackal, otter and other domesticated cattle in
Pichavaram mangrove. In Singapore and Malaysia, the mosquitoes and diptera insects
act as vectors for pathogenic viruses that cause dreadful human diseases like
Dengue and Haemorrhage fever (Murphy, 1990). Similar
observations were made in mangroves from South China to Australia (Marks,
1954); India to South China, Malaya and Sumatra to Philippines and Thailand
(Macnae, 1968). Thomson (1951)
reported that mosquitoes had a specific association with Avicennia as
opposed to Rhizophora. Mosquitoes are the notable offensive insects in
mangroves and make the area totally in hospitable to humans. In South Florida
the mosquitoes which breed in mangroves were reported to transmit disease like
malaria and dengue fever (Tomlinson, 1986). In the present
study found abundance and species richness of Culex pipiens, Cx.
tarsalis, An. tessellatus and An. tessellatus complexes in the estuarine
complex and mangrove area.
The occurrence of only two species of mosquitoes in the mangroves of Gujarat
compared to the numerous species in other regions can be attributed to the degraded
status of mangrove in Gujarat. The two districts Surat and Baruch are highly
industrialized, consequent of which the mangrove areas are restricted to mere
patches of sparse and stunted vegetation attaining not even a height of 1 m.
Comparatively, the mangroves in other regions are extensive and dense with stands
of 5-8 m and mostly undisturbed. Nevertheless, the occurrence of Cx. quinquefasciatus
that breed in sullage water in the Vikhroli mangroves is indicative of the 60
threat faced by these mangroves by the drainage that is let out into the mangroves.
However, in the case of rare and restricted species, there is no indication
about their occurrence in most species-rich sites, but in the present findings,
all the rare species of Anophelines and Culex were found in species-rich
areas. Generally, all species-rich sites do not represent all mosquito species
in our findings. This is may be due to the fact that the distribution of rare
and uncommon species was not found within the distribution of more widespread
species (Devi and Jauhari, 2005).
This study showed that diversity indexes used in environmental assessment, mainly to monitor changes in the diversity of organisms, could be applied to monitor mosquito species. Diversity indexes should be used to monitor mosquito vector species at many sites in relation to habitat type, latitude and land use and the databases generated throughout monitoring time should be used to forecast the effects of environmental change in mosquito populations. Once changes on adult mosquito species abundance are powerfully influenced by increase or removal of breeding places in the study habitats, the study of factors that regulate immature mosquito dynamics in the area is also a significant requirement. For the first time, extensive studies on diversity of mosquitoes in Parangipettai coastal ecosystems have been undertaken and it provides the first hand information on the diversity of mosquitoes in this area. ACKNOWLEDGMENT We are grateful thanks to the Director T. Balasubramanian, Faculty of Marine Science, Centre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Annamalai University for providing permission and facilities in the study period.
|
|
REFERENCES |
Bray, J.R. and J.T. Curtis, 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern wisconsin. Ecological Monographs, 27: 326-349. Direct Link |
Carlson, J., J. Keating, C.M. Mbogo, S. Kahindi and J.C. Beier, 2004. Ecological limitations on the aquatic mosquito predator colonization in the urban environment. J. Vector Ecol., 29: 331-339. PubMed |
Collins, S.L. and T.L. Benning, 1996. Spatial and Temporal Patterns in Functional Diversity. In: Biodiversity: A Biology of Numbers and Differences. Gaston, K.J. (Ed.). Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K., pp: 253-280.
Devi, N.P. and R.K. Jauhari, 2005. Habitat biodiversity of mosquito richness in certain parts of Garhwal (Uttaranchal), India. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health, 36: 616-622. PubMed | Direct Link |
Gaston, K.J., T.M. Blackburn, J.J.D. Greenwood, R.D. Gregory, R.M. Quinn and J.H. Lawton, 2000. Abundance-occupancy relationships. J. Applied Ecol., 37: 35-59. CrossRef | Direct Link |
Gutsevich, A.V., A.S. Monchadskii and A.A. Shtakelberg, 1974. Fauna of the U.S.S.R. Diptera. Vol. 3. Keter Publishing House Jerusalem Ltd., Jerusalem, pp: iii + 408.
Hanski, I. and M. Gyllenberg, 1997. Uniting two general patterns in the distribution of species. Science, 275: 397-400. CrossRef | Direct Link |
Hennebert, M. and A. Lees, 1991. Environmental gradients in carbonate sediments and rocks detected by correspondence analysis: Examples from the recent of Norway and the dinantian of southwest England. Sedimentology, 38: 623-642. CrossRef | Direct Link |
Hughes, J.B., G.C. Daily and P.R. Ehrlich, 2000. Conservation of insect diversity: A habitat approach. Conserv. Biol., 14: 1788-1797. Direct Link |
Macnae, W., 1968. A general account of the fauna and flora of mangrove swamps and forests in the Indo-West-Pacific regon. Adv. Mar. Biol., 6: 73-270.
Malmqvist, B., Y. Zhang and P.H. Adler, 1999. Diversity, distribution and larval habitats of North Swedish blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae). Freshwater Biol., 42: 301-314. CrossRef | Direct Link |
Marks, E.N., 1954. A review of the Aedes scutellaris subgroup with a l study of variation in Aedesp seudoscutellaris (Taeobald) (Diptera: Culicidae). Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Ent., 3: 347-414.
Mittermeier, R.A., N. Myers, P.R. Gil and C.G. Mittermeier, 1999. Hotspots: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecosystems. CEMEX S.A. and Conservation International, Mexico City, ISBN 968-6397-58-2, pp: 431.
Mohrig, W., 1969. Die Culiciden Deutschlands: Untersuchungen zur Taxonomie, Biologie und Okologie der Einheimischen Stechmucken. G. Fischer, Germany, pp: 260.
Murphy, D.H., 1990. The natural history of insect herbivory on mangrove trees in and near Singapore. Raffles Bull. Zool., 38: 119-203.
Myers, N., R.A. Mittermeier, C.G. Mittermeier, G.A.B. da Fonseca and J. Kent, 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403: 853-858. CrossRef | Direct Link |
O'Meara, G.F., 1976. Saltmarsh Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). In: Marine Insects, Cheng, L. (Ed.). North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, pp: 303-333.
Petchey, O.L. and K.J. Gaston, 2002. Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol. Lett., 5: 402-411. CrossRef | Direct Link |
Prendergast, J.R., R.M. Quinn, J.H. Lawton, B.C. Eversham and D.W. Gibbons, 1993. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature, 365: 335-337. CrossRef |
Reinert, J.F., 2000. New classification for the composite genus Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae: Aedini), elevation of subgenus Ochlerotatus to generic rank, reclassification of the other subgenera and notes on certain subgenera and species. J. Am. Mosquito Control Assoc., 16: 175-188. PubMed | Direct Link |
Senthil, R. and M. Varadharajan, 1995. Proceeding of the national symposium on recent trends in wild life research. A.V.C. College Mayiladuthurai, 609: 30-35.
Shannon, C.E. and W. Weaver, 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. 1st Edn., University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL., ISBN-10: 0252725484.
Simpson, E.H., 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163: 688-688. CrossRef | Direct Link |
Slooff, R. and E.N. Marks, 1965. Mosquitoes (Culicidae) biting a fish (Periophthalmidae). J. Med. Entmol., 2: 16-16. PubMed | Direct Link |
Stewart, T.E., 1954. Biologists invade florida (Report of field trips in AIIBS annual meeting at Gainsoifle). Science, 120: 874-876.
Sunahara, T., K. Ishizaka and M. Mogi, 2002. Habitat size: A factor for determining the opportunity for encounters between mosquito larvae and aquatic predators. J. Vector Ecol., 27: 8-20. PubMed | Direct Link |
Swaminathan, M.S., S.V. Deshmukh and V. Balaji, 1994. Establishment of an international network for the conservation and sustainable utilization of mangrove forest genetic resources. Final Report of the Travelling Workshops to Mangrove Forests in South and Southeast Asia, Oceania and West and Central Africa. Madras, India ITTO-CRSARD Project, MS Swaminathan Research Foundation.
Thangam, T.S. and K. Kathiresan, 1993. The mosquito composition and seasonal distribution of Culex quinquefasciatus in a coastal town of wouth India. Trop. Biomed., 10: 175-177.
Thomson, R.C.M., 1951. Mosquito Behavior in Relation to Malaria Transmission and Control in the Tropics. Edward Arnold Publisher, London.
Tomlinson, P.B., 1986. The Botany of Mangroves. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK., Pages: 419.
WHO, 1975. Manual on Practical Entomology in Malaria: Vector Bionomics and Organization. World Health Organization, Offset Publication, Geneva, Switzerland.
Wood, D.M., P.T. Dang and R.A. Ellis, 1979. The Mosquitoes of Canada Diptera: Culicidae. Canadian Department of Agriculture Publication, Ottawa, Canada, PP: 390.
|
|
|
 |