| |
Research Article
|
|
Effects of Light Intensity, Salinity and Temperature on Growth in Camalti Strain of Dunaliella viridis Teodoresco from Turkey
|
|
Ilknur Ak,
Semra Cirik
and
Tolga Goksan
|
| |
ABSTRACT
|
|
In this study, Dunaliella viridis was isolated
from Çamalti salt work and its growth rate, cell density, chlorophyll-a
and total carotenoids content were studied in a batch system. This strain
was cultured at different NaCl concentrations (1, 2 and 3M), different
temperatures (25 and 28°C) and different light intensities (50 and
75 μmol photon/m2/sec). In this experiment, maximum growth
rate was at 2 M salinity with 28°C temperature and 50 μmol photon/m2/sec
light intensity. Maximum cell density for D. viridis was obtained
at 25°C, 50 μmol photon/m2/sec, 2M cultures. The highest
chlorophyll-a and total carotenoids were calculated as 2.84±0.50
and 1.11±0.05 pg cell-1, respectively. The optimum temperature
and salinity for growth of D. viridis strain were around 25°C
and 2 M NaCl. The present study shows that cell densities and pigment
yields of D. viridis Çamalti strain are strongly dependant
on salinity, temperature and light intensity. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION
The unicellular green algae of the genus Dunaliella are among
the most widespread eukaryotic organisms in hyper saline environments,
and shows a remarkable degree of adaptation to a variety of salt concentrations
from as low as 0.2%, to about 35% (Ben-Amotz and Avron, 1983, 1990). It
is an obligatory phototrophic, oxygenic, aerobic, unicellular organism
(Javor, 1989). Dunaliella species are lack of a rigid cell wall,
ovoid in shape and contain large cup-shaped chloroplast with two equal
flagella (Borowitzka and Borowitzka, 1992).
Dunaliella salina (Dunal) Teodoresco and D. vidiris Teodoresco
are predominant microalgae species in solar salt works (Davis, 1990).
Under stress conditions such as lack of nitrogen sources, high salinities
and high levels of irradiance, D. salina stores large amounts of
β-carotene, a pigment which is used as pro-vitamin A in animal food,
as a food coloring agent and as an additive to health food products (anti-cancer
and antioxidant agent) (Ben-Amotz and Avron, 1990). Because of this ability,
the emphasis of research was placed on the mass culture of this species
(Ben-Amotz and Avron, 1983; Borowitzka et al., 1984; Borowitzka,
1986). Different from D. salina and D. viridis was considered
a pest because it appeared to compete with D. salina and reduced
β-carotene yield (Borowitzka et al., 1984; Moulton et al.,
1987). However, D. viridis could be a potential candidate for mass
culture on commercial scale; it produces predominantly oxygenated carotenoids
(Moulton and Burford, 1990).
Dunaliella growth responses are complicated interactions of many
variables such as temperature, salinity and light intensity. Optimum values
of these variables depend on the species. Dunaliella viridis grows
optimally in 5.8-8.9% (w/v) NaCl and tolerates up to 23.2% (Borowitzka
et al., 1977; Borowitzka and Borowitzka, 1992). The optimum temperature
for D. viridis lies in the range 14 to 30°C, with an upper
limit for survival of about 35°C (Gibor, 1956). The marine D.
bioculata and D. primolecta have temperature optima between
25 and 29°C and D. tertiolecta grew optimally at 30°C (Goldman,
1977).
The objective of this study was to determine growth rates, cell density,
chlorophyll-a and carotenoid content of Dunaliella viridis Çamalti
strain under different combinations of temperature, salinity and light
intensity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Isolation of Dunaliella viridis and cultivation: Dunaliella
viridis cells were isolated from the Çamalti solar salt works
(Izmir, Turkey). The water temperature and salinity of the salt works
were measured from 10 to 27°C and from 0.32 to 23.8%, respectively
in 6-7 months period between the years 2004-2006. Total nitrogen concentration
ranged from 0.08 to 3.08 μmol L-1. Identification of isolates
were established based on morphological characters following Preising
(1992). After isolation; stock cultures was established under laboratory
conditions (25± 1°C, 50 μmol photon/m2/sec)
in a modified Johnson Medium (Johnson et al., 1968) at 2 M NaCl.
The composition of the modified Johnson Medium was as follows: MgCl2,
1.5 g L-1; KCl, 0.2 g L-1; CaCl2
1.5 g L-1; NaNO3 1.5 g L-1; NaHCO3
0.043 g L-1; KH2PO4 0.035 g L-1;
Fe solution (Na2EDTA, 189 mg L-1; FeCl3.6H2O,
244 mg L-1), 10 mL and trace metal solution (H3BO3,
61.0 mg L-1; (NH4)MO7O24.4H2O,
38.0 mg L-1; CuSO4. 5H2O, 6.0 mg L-1;
CoCl2.6H2O, 5.1 mg L-1; ZnCl2,
4.1 mg L-1; MnCl2.4H2O, 4.1 mg L-1),
10 mL.
Experimental culture conditions: Dunaliella viridis strain
was cultivated at three NaCl concentrations (1, 2 and 3 M) in 1L flasks
at two different temperatures (25, 28°C) and two light intensities
(50 and 75 μmol/m2/sec). These experimental conditions
were selected to monitored the in cell density and pigment composition
(chlorophyll a and total carotenoids) over time. Cultures of D. viridis
at the mid-exponential phase were used for inoculation. Cells were grown
using modified Johnson Medium and NaCl added as needed to obtain target
salinity. Experiments were conducted over a 30 day period. These experiments
were conducted between December 2005 to July 2006.
Analytical methods: For the extraction of chlorophyll-a and total
carotenoids, 5 mL of algal culture was taken daily from each flask. The
cells were pelleted by centrifugation (Sigma, 1-6) at 5000 rpm for 10
min at room temperature and then resuspended in 5 mL of 90% acetone. Cellular
debris was removed by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 10 min into a screw
cap tube. The concentration of chlorophyll a and total carotenoids in
the supernatant was spectrophotometrically at 450, 630, 645 and 663 nm
wavelengths. Chlorophyll-a and total carotenoids were calculated using
the equations of Scor-Unesco (1966). Absorbance measurements were made
by using a Jasco UV/Visible Spectrophotometer. Algal growth was monitored
by counting cells numbers in a counting chamber (Neubauer Heamocytometer).
Specific growth rate (μ) and doubling time (d.t.) were calculated
as in following equation:
where, X2 and X1 represent the cell density at
the times t2 and t1, respectively.
Statistical analysis: Data were tested for homogeneity (Levene).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-test were used to determine the significance
of the differences between treatments.
RESULTS
Growth of D. viridis Çamalti strain at different salinities,
temperatures and light intensities is shown in Fig. 1.
Maximum cell density for D. viridis was obtained at 25°C, 50
μmol photon/m2/sec, 2 M cultures (8.56±0.12 x106
cell mL-1) and the lowest concentrations were at 25°C,
50 μmol photon/m2/sec, 3 M cultures (4.92±0.25
x106 cell mL-1).
Temperature clearly affected the cell density in D. viridis. The
optimum temperature for growth of D. viridis strain was around
25°C. There was a significant decrease (p<0.002) of the maximum
cell number with increasing in temperature. At low salinities cells grew
much faster than at high salinities and the length of the growth phase
decreased with decreasing salinity. Significant differences in cell density
were found at the end of cultivation period for all tested salinity degrees
(p<0.05). No significant differences in cell density were found for
two light intensities values (p>0.05). Increasing the light intensities
resulted in decreasing in maximum cell numbers (Table 1).
The highest chlorophyll-a content per cell was calculated as 2.84±0.50
pg cell-1 at 25°C, 50 μmol photon/m2/sec
and 3 M cultures. Between the all experimental groups, the lowest chlorophyll-a
content was obtained from 28°C, 75 μmol photon/m2/sec,
1 M cultures (1.19±0.20 pg cell-1) (Fig.
2). Chlorophyll-a concentration was affected by temperature and light
intensity. Increasing temperature and light caused chlorophyll content
to decrease. Salinity of the culture affected the chlorophyll production
as well and maximum content was achieved with 3 M in 25°C and 2 M
in 28°C. Significant differences in chlorophyll a content per cell
were found for all tested temperature (p<0.05), salinity (p<0.05)
and light intensity (p<0.05) values.
|
|
| Fig. 1: |
Increase in cell density under the conditions of (a)
50 and (b) 75 μmol photon/m2/sec light intensities
at 1, 2 and 3M salinity and 25 and 28°C temperatures |
| Table 1: |
Specific growth rates, doubling times and maximum cell
densities at 1, 2 and 3 M salinities, 25 and 28°C temperatures
and 50 and 75 μmol photon/m2/sec light intensities
|
|
|
| Fig. 2: |
Maximum chlorophyll a concentrations per cell in D.
viridis grown at different light intensities, salinities and temperatures |
|
| Fig. 3: |
Maximum total carotenoids concentrations per cell in
D. viridis grown at different light intensities, salinities
and temperatures |
Between experimental groups, carotenoid content ranged from a minimum
of 0.50±0.09 pg cell-1 to a maximum of 1.11±0.05
pg cell-1 (Fig. 3). In D. viridis cultures,
carotenoid content is obviously affected by salinity. The maximum carotenoid
accumulation on per cell was achieved with 3 M in 25°C and 2 M in
28°C. And also, the highest carotenoid production (pg cell-1)
decreases with increasing light intensity and temperature (Fig.
3). Significant differences in carotenoid content per cell were found
for all tested temperature (p<0.05), salinity (p<0.05) and light
intensity (p<0.05) values.
DISCUSSION
In the present study, the effect of light intensity, salinity and temperature
on growth of D. viridis Çamalti strain was determined. The
maximum specific growth rate of 1.08 day-1 reported here for
D. viridis Çamalti strain with a doubling time of 0.64 d
at salinity around 2 M NaCl; at lower or higher salt concentration this
strain did not grow well. This specific growth rate is in agreement with
that of Ginzburg and Ginzburg (1981), who reported doubling times for
members of members of the D. viridis type at 29°C, 2 M NaCl.
Ithas been observed to grow optimally at salinity around 1M NaCl (5.8%)
(Jiménez and Niell, 1991), however from salt works in Mexico, D.
viridis has been reported to grow well at 15-20% NaCl concentrations
(GarcÃa et al., 2007). The Fig. 3 is comparable
to the results of the study.
The optimum temperature for the growth of D. viridis was around
30°C, as has been earlier reported by Gibor, (1956) and Jiménez
and Niell, (1990). The highest growth of D. viridis of Çamalti
salt works was found at 25°C (Table 1). This result
agrees with the findings of Jiménez and Niell (1991), who studied
D. viridis Yucatan strain.
There was also a clear decrease of both chlorophyll a and carotenoids
content with increasing light intensity. On a per cell basis, chlorophyll
a and carotenoids concentrations were the highest at 50 μmol photon
m2/sec light intensity. This was probably due to the fact that
growth at higher light intensity was faster, so pigment accumulation could
not be promoted. By the adaptation of microalgae to high light, the dimensions
of light harvesting antenna lessen, and thylakoid membranes become more
efficient, which is a natural process. During so called photoacclimation
phenomenon, cellular chlorophyll components come to minimum and thylakoid
membranes start to work more efficiently (Falkowski, 1980; Prezelin and
Matlick, 1980; Ramus, 1990). Salinity also has a strong influence in pigment
production (Borowitzka and Borowitzka, 1992). Maximum pigment yield increased
with the increasing of salinity to up to 2 M; however at higher concentration
there was a decrease in pigment yield. This result agrees with the findings
of Jiménez and Niell, (1991). Data on growth characteristics of
D. viridis from Çamalti salt work will help better understanding
the production system. This study shows that cell divisions and pigment
yields of D. viridis Çamalti strain are strongly dependant
on salinity, temperature and light intensity.
|
|
REFERENCES |
Ben-Amotz, A. and M. Avron, 1983. Accumulation of metabolites by halotolerant algae and its industrial potential. Ann. Rev. Microbiol., 37: 95-119. CrossRef | PubMed |
Ben-Amotz, A. and M. Avron, 1990. The biotechnology of cultivating halotolerant algaa Dunaliella. Trends Biotechnol., 8: 121-126. CrossRef |
Borowitzka, L.J., D.S. Kessly and A.D. Brown, 1977. The salt releations of Dunaliella. Further observations on glycerol production and its regulation. Arch. Microbiol., 113: 131-138. CrossRef |
Borowitzka, L.J., M.A. Borowitzka and T.P. Moulton, 1984. The mass culture of Dunaliella salina for fine chemicals: From laboratory to pilot plant. Hydrobiologia, 116-117: 115-134. CrossRef |
Borowitzka, M.A. and L.J. Borowitzka, 1992. Dunaliella. In: Micro-Algal Biotechnology, Borowitzka, M.A. and L.J. Borowitzka (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN: 0-521-32349-5, pp: 27-58.
Borowitzka, M.A., 1986. Microalagae as sources of fine chemicals. Microbiol. Sci., 3: 372-375. PubMed |
Davis, J.S., 1990. Biological Management for the Production Salt from Saewater. In: Introduction Applied Phycology, Akatsuka, I. (Ed.). SPB Academiz Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands, ISBN: 9051030525, pp: 479-488.
Falkowski, P.G., 1980. Light-Shade Adapation and Vertical Mixing of Marine Phytoplankton. In: Primary Productivity in the Sea, Falkowski, P.G. (Ed.). Plenum, New York, ISBN: 978-0306406232, pp: 99-117.
Garcia, F., Y. Freile-Pelegrin and D. Robledo, 2007. Physiological characterization of Dunaliella sp. (Chlorophyta, Volvocales) from Yucatan, Mexico. Bioresour. Technol., 98: 1359-1365. CrossRef | PubMed |
Gibor, A., 1956. The culture of brine algae. Bio. Bull., 111: 223-229. Direct Link |
Ginzburg, M. and B.Z. Ginzburg, 1981. Interrelationships of light, temperature, sodium chloride and carbon source in growth of halotolerant and halophilic strains of Dunaliella. Eur. J. Phycol., 16: 313-324. CrossRef |
Goldman, J.C., 1977. Temperature effects on phytoplankton growth in continuous culture. Limnol. Oceanog., 22: 932-936. Direct Link |
Javor, B., 1989. Hypersaline Environments: Microbiology and Biogeochemistry. 1st Edn., Springer-Verlag, New York, ISBN: 978-0387506661, pp: 328.
Jiménez, C. and F.X. Niell, 1990. Influence of temperature and nitrogen concentration on photosynthesis of Dunaliella viridis Teodoresco. J. Applied Phycol., 2: 309-317. CrossRef |
Jiménez, C. and F.X. Niell, 1991. Growth of Dunaliella viridis Teodoresco: Effect of salinity, temperature and nitrogen concentration. J. Applied Phycol., 3: 319-327. CrossRef |
Johnson, M.K., E.J. Johnson, R.D. MacElroy, H.L. Speer and B.S. Bruff, 1968. Effects of salts on the halophilic alga Dunaliella viridis. J. Bacteriol., 95: 1461-1468.
Moulton, T.P. and M.A. Burford, 1990. The mass culture of Dunaliella viridis (Volvocales, Chlorophyta) for oxygenated carotenoids: Laboratory and pilot plant studies. Hydrobiologia, 204-205: 401-408. CrossRef |
Moulton, T.P., T.R. Sommer and M.A. Burford, 1987. Competition between Dunaliella species at high salinity. Hydrobiologia, 151-152: 107-116. CrossRef |
Preising, H.R., 1992. Morphology and Taxonomy in Dunaliella. In: Physiology, Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Ben-Amotz, A. and M. Avron, (Eds.). CRC Press, London, ISBN: 978-0849366475, pp: 2-15.
Prezelin, B.B. and H.A. Matlich, 1980. Time course of photoadaptation in the photosynthesis irradiance relationship of dinoflagellate exhibiting photosynthetic periodicity. Mar. Biol., 58: 85-96. CrossRef |
Ramus, J., 1990. A form-function analysis of photon captures for seaweeds. Hydrobiologia, 204-205: 65-71. CrossRef |
Scor-Unesco, 1966. Determination of photosynthetic pigments in seawater. Monogr. Oceanog. Methodol., 1: 11-18.
|
|
|
 |