Assessment of Groundwater Quality in the Al-Butana Region of Sudan
Abdelmonem M. Abdellah,
Hago M. Abdel-Magid
Nadia A. Yahia
The quality of drinking groundwater of Al-Butana region of
Sudan was investigated. In this study a total of 209 well water samples belonging
to previous Construction Analysis (CA) and a total of 121 well water samples
belonging to the Current Study (CS) were compared and statistically analyzed.
The comparison indicated that there are obvious differences between the CA and
the CS with respect to their chemical constituents. The TDS concentration levels
tend to decrease by excessive pumping in the investigated boreholes of the study
area. Almost, all of the examined boreholes (with the exception of 6.2% CS and
2% CS) revealed TDS concentrations well below the maximum permissible level
of 1000 mg L-1 adopted by the Sudanese Standards and Metrology Organization.
Generally, the measurements of pH, EC, TH, cations and anions of the investigated
well water samples seemed to be unstable and fluctuating up-and-down with a
whole decrease in TDS during well water pumping. The fluctuation of well water
constituents is submitted to the natural physicochemical equilibrium that termed
by this study.
August 04, 2011; Accepted: November 27, 2011;
Published: January 12, 2012
Groundwater constituents are greatly affected by many factors; the intensive
evaporation of effluent surface irrigation water that led to the precipitation
of evaporites, especially affecting the groundwater at shallow depth (Subyani,
2005), local hydrogeological conditions and the chemical makeup of minerals.
Some chemicals are more soluble than others, making them more likely to become
dissolved in water (Harrington et al., 2008),
proximity of groundwater to seacoast (Nassereddin and Mimi,
2005) and direct contact of seawater to the aquifers (Shaaban,
2001), internal movement of groundwater (Mehta et
al., 2000), intensive evaporation of effluent surface irrigation water
that led to the precipitation of evaporites, especially affecting the groundwater
at shallow depth (Subyani, 2005), increase of groundwater
discharge increases groundwater salinity (Munday and Andrew,
2008), climatic season (total dissolved solids of groundwater decrease at
the beginning of the rainy season and increase after the rainy season (Shanyengana
et al., 2004), over exploitation of coastal aquifers (Ramkumar
et al., 2010) and anthropogenesis also affect fresh water resources
(Humphries and Wood, 2004).
The continuous changes in groundwater chemical constituents necessitate a frequent examination of groundwater quality before being used. Therefore, periodical analysis for drinking water wells is very important; therefore, this study is conducted to investigate the following objectives:
||To compare between the current analyses conducted by the current
study with the routine chemical analysis that usually done after well drilling
||To compare the results obtained (both CA and CS) with the local, regional
and international standards and guidelines
MATERIALS AND MATHOD
Study location: The study area was divided, administratively, into three regions as follows:
||The whole area of East of Gezira Locality, Gezira State
||The Western Administrative Units area of Umelghura Locality, Gezira State
||The Eastern Administrative Units area of Shark-el-Neel Locality, Khartoum
State (Fig. 1)
Samples and data collection: A total of 121 groundwater samples were
collected from different boreholes of various communities using 250 mL plastic
bottles, each bottle was rinsed with the targeted water 3-4 times before filling.
||Location map of the study area, Al-Butana region of Sudan.
Source: Sudan National Survey Authority, prepared for the current study,
1 cm ≡18 km
Samples were collected directly from the outlet points of the well, where and when possible. In boreholes without outlet point, samples were collected from reservoirs or from the nearest water-tap to the groundwater source. The hydro-meteorological data (climate elements) are available at Wed-Medani Meteorological Station. The CA data of boreholes were obtained from the Information Center archives of Groundwater Directorate in Khartoum-Kilo Ashara and from the National Institute for Drilling at Wad-Medani and Water Corporation of East Gezira Locality; Rufaa Town.
Statistical analyses of data: Basic statistics program (Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet) was used to calculate mean, range and standard deviation of the obtained data.
Chemical analyses: The determinations were carried out according to
the standard methods for the examination of Water and Wastewater APHA
(1998) and Rhoades (1982). In these determinations,
pH was measured by a meter ohm pH-meter, India (Model 632). The pH meter was
first adjusted using standard buffer solutions having pH of 4 and 9.2. Electric
conductivity (EC) (dS m-1 at 25°C) in groundwater samples was
measured by Beckman Solu Bridge type equipment. To convert the EC readings to
TDS, the results for the EC dS m-1 were multiplied by 640. Calcium
(Ca+2) and magnesium (Mg+2) were determined by complex
metric titration using Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic Acid (EDTA). Sodium (Na+)
and potassium (K+) were determined photo metrically by flame photometer
(Model: PFP7, Serial No. 15027, Jenway-England). Chloride (Cl¯) was determined
by titration using standard silver nitrate solution and potassium chromate (5%
solution) as an indicator. Bicarbonates (HCO3¯) were determined
by titration against 0.05 N standard sulphuric acid (H2SO4)
to pH 4.5 using phenolphthalein and methyl orange as indicators. Fluoride (F¯)
was determined by Alizarin Visual method. Nitrate (NO3¯) was
determined by cadmium reduction method according to APHA (1998).
Nitrate (NO3¯) is reduced almost quantitatively to nitrite NO2
in the presence of cadmium. The NO2¯ thus obtained is determined
colorimetrically using instrument Model specord 40-analytikjena spectro-photometer
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Distribution of the TDS, the TH and the cations: For study convenience,
the data of the TDS, the TH and the cations for both CA and CS were statistically
analyzed and categorized in Table 1. Analyses of the data
revealed obvious variations in the TDS level among boreholes. The TDS concentration
levels in the CA range between 110 and 6400 mg L-1, the mean value
is 498 mg L-1, thus resulting in a high SD of 665 mg L-1.
In the CS, the TDS levels ranged between 115 and 1070 mg L-1, the
mean value is 322 mg L-1, thus resulting in SD of 165 mg L-1.
The magnitude of the SD (665) in the CA data is higher than that for the CS
(SD 165). This indicates that there is, comparatively, a little variation in
the TDS magnitude in well water samples analyzed recently during this study.
The levels for the TDS in the CA and the CS samples were compared with the
local, regional and international standards and guidelines for TDS in drinking
water. The data indicates that 71.3% (CA) and 87.6% (CS) of the groundwater
samples have TDS levels lying well below the maximum level of 500 mg L-1
recommended by USEPA (1976). Only 28.71% (CA) and 12.4%
(CS) of the investigated samples have TDS levels well above 500 mg L-1,
93.8% (CA) and 98.4% (CS) of samples have TDS levels well below the maximum
level of 1000 mg L-1 set by each of GCCS (1993),
WHO (1993) and SSMO (2002) while
only 6.2% (CA) and 1.56% (CS) of the investigated samples have TDS levels in
excess of the maximum recommended level of 1000 mg L-1. Moreover,
97.6% (CA) and 100% (CS) of the samples lie well below the maximum level of
1500 mg L-1 set by each of EEC (1992) and
SASO (1984) whereas, only 2.4% (CA) and none of the investigated
samples (CS) exceeded the above-mentioned level. Therefore, according to the
respective standards and guidelines limits for drinking water listed in Table
1, high salinity drinking water with TDS levels violating the maximum recommended
levels is considered unsuitable for drinking but could be used for irrigation
of crops with good salt tolerance (Al-Redhaiman and Abdel
Magid, 2002). TH value ranged between 7 and 156 and between 8 and 138 for
the CA and CS analysis, respectively. The mean value of TH is 64 mg L-1
(CA) and 57 mg L-1 (CS) and the SD value is 23 mg L-1
(CA) and 21 mg L-1 (CS). The SSMO (2002) did
not set any guideline value for TH. The SASO (1984) and
the GCCS (1993) guideline value for the maximum permissible
hardness is 500 mg L-1. None of the investigated boreholes of both
CA and CS exceeded the level of 500 mg L-1 adopted by GCCS and SASO
guideline value as a maximum permissible level for TH in drinking water. According
to Viessman and Hammer (1985) water hardness of more than
300-500 mg L-1 is considered excessive for public water supply. However,
many consumers object to water hardness above 150 mg L-1 (Al-Redhaiman
and Abdel Magid, 2002). Therefore, according to the classification suggested
by USGS (2009), the groundwater quality pertaining to
TH in the study area may be classified as soft water. No remarkable difference
exists between CA and CS analyses with respect to their Ca+2 content.
In the CA, the mean value of Ca+2 level is 39 mg L-1,
the range is between 0.0 and 90 mg L-1 and the SD is 19 while in
the CS analyses, the mean value is 37 mg L-1, the range is between
6 and 88 mg L-1 and the SD is 17. All Ca+2 levels of the
investigated well water samples fall below the maximum permissible level of
200 mg L-1 set by the GCCS (1993) and SASO
(1984) standards. No standard and guideline value was set for Ca+2
level in drinking water by USEPA (1976), SSMO
(2002) and WHO (1993). The Blue Nile has a high concentration
of Ca2+ which may be attributed to the weathering of basaltic rocks
in the ethiopia highlands.
|| The TDS, TH and the cations of well drinking water samples
for CA analysis (n = 209) and CS analysis (n = 121) in the study area
|NS: No standard
Therefore, the Blue Nile which is considered as the main source of aquifers
recharge in the study area, may have replenished groundwater, thus resulting
in an increased concentration of Ca2+ in boreholes close to the river.
Away from the Blue Nile, the level of Ca2+ tends to decrease due
to ion exchange (Abdel-Salam, 1966). High concentration
of Ca2+ in groundwater may be attributed to weathering of silicate
minerals (Ramkumar et al., 2010). In Erude City,
India, the groundwater Ca2+ ranged between 28 and 188 (Ramkumar
et al., 2010). According to the data embodied in Table
1, in the CA, the mean value of Mg+2 is 20 mg L-1,
the range is between 0.0 and 90 mg L-1 and the SD is 13, similarly,
in the CS, no significant differences exist, the mean value is also 20 mg L-1,
the range is between 2 and 58 mg L-1 and the SD is 10. Only 3 of
the examined boreholes (1.4%) in the CA exceeded the level of 150 mg L-1
set by SASO (1984) and GCCS (1993)
for Mg+2 in drinking water and none of the boreholes in the SA exceeded
the level of 150 mg L-1. No standard and guideline value was set
by SSMO (2002), WHO (1993) and USEPA
(1976) for the maximum permissible level of Mg+2 in drinking
water. Regarding the EEC (1992) only 9 samples (4.3%
CA) and 2 samples (1.7% CS) of the examined boreholes are in excess of the permissible
level of 50 mg L-1 set for magnesium. The international standards
set the limits for Mg+2 not to be more than 30 mg L-1
if there is 250 mg L-1 of sulfate, if there is less sulfate, Mg+2
up to 150 mg L-1 may be allowed (Al-Redhaiman
and Abdel Magid, 2002). The Mg+2 levels in fresh water is usually
below that of Ca2+, this is probably due to the lower geological
abundance of Mg2+ in the study area groundwater aquifer (El-Nazeer,
1987). The Mg+2 levels in the groundwater of Gezira formation
generally varies from 5 to 4 5 mg L-1 and the average is 15 mg L-1
while the Nubian Sandstone formation contains a low amount of Mg+2
varying from 9 to 27 mg L-1 (Abdel-Salam, 1966).
In Erude City, India, the groundwater Mg2+ ranged between 5 and 209
mg L-1 (Ramkumar et al., 2010). The
Na+ mean value of the CA data is 65 mg L-1, the range
is between 0.0 and 775 mg L-1 and the SD is 98 while in the CS data,
the Na+ mean value is 52 mg L-1, the range is between
2 and 310 mg L-1 and the SD is 56. Only 13 boreholes out of 209 (6.2%)
in the CA exceeded the maximum level of 200 mg L-1 adopted by the
SSMO (2002), GCCS (1993) and WHO
(1993), whereas in the CS only 3 boreholes out of 121 (2.5%) exceeded the
previously mentioned level. The EEC (1992) standard adopted
a maximum allowable level of 175 mg L-1 for Na+ in drinking
groundwater. The number of samples exceeding the EEC guideline is 20 boreholes
(10%) and 7 boreholes (5.8%) in the CA and CS, respectively. No standard has
been set by SASO (1984) and USEPA (1976)
for sodium. In Erude City, India, the groundwater Na+ ranged between
6 and 437 mg L-1 (Ramkumar et al., 2010).
The K+ concentration in the CA analysis ranged between 0.0 and 90
mg L-1, mean 6 mg L-1 and the SD is 12 while in the CS,
K+ ranged between 1.0 and 45 mg L-1, mean 5.6 and the
SD is 10. The SSMO (2002) did not set any guideline value
for potassium. The unique standard that was set for K+ is 12 mg L-1
which is adopted by EEC (1992) to be the maximum limit
for this element. A total of 26 boreholes (11.96%) in the CA and 12 boreholes
(9.92%) in the CS exceed the maximum level that set by the EEC standard (Table
1). In general, K+ concentration in the groundwater of the study
area is very low; however, some boreholes showed high K+ levels.
Potassium ion tends to be fixed again through sorption on clay minerals but,
in general, the concentration of K+ is predicted by the theoretical
dissolution of potassium feldspars. The relative immobility of K+
as related to Na+ is due to the fact that K+ enters into
the structure of certain clay minerals and also due to the lesser rate of disintegration
of K+ minerals compared to Na+ minerals (El-Nazeer,
1987). The relatively low levels of K+ in the study area, however,
may be due to its greater resistance to weathering and its fixation in the formation
of clay mineral (Ramkumar et al., 2010). In
Erude City, India, the groundwater K+ concentration level ranged
between 4 and 76 mg L-1 (Ramkumar et al.,
Distribution of the TH and the anions: Table 2 summarizes
the data of the TH and the anions for both CA and CS. The pH value ranges are
(6.5 and 9.1 CA), (7.1, 8.4 CS). The mean pH value 7.8 (CA) and 7.7 (CS) indicates
the alkaline nature of groundwater samples studied. The SSMO
(2002) and WHO (1993) range for pH level in drinking
water is 6.5-8.5. None of the pH levels of the drinking water samples studied
was below or above this level in both CA and CS. Nearly; all of the groundwater
samples investigated in the study area are alkaline. Alkalinity is due to the
presence of high levels of NaHCO3 and Ca (HCO3)2
(Abdel-Salam, 1966). In Erude City, India, the groundwater
pH level ranged between 7 and 8.2 (Ramkumar et al.,
2010). The Cl¯ level in the CA varies between 0.0 and 930 mg L-1
with a mean of 70 mg L-1 and SD of 108 while in the SA analysis the
Cl¯ concentration level ranged between 21 and 369 mg L-1 with
a mean of 114 mg L-1 and a SD of 66. A level of 250 mg L-1
has been recommended by SSMO (2002), WHO
(1993), USEPA (1976) and GCCS
(1993) guidelines to be the maximum recommended level for this element.
A total of 11 boreholes (5.3%) and 6 boreholes (5%) exceeded this level in the
CA and CS, respectively. Only 3 boreholes (1.4%) in the CA exceeded the maximum
level of 600 mg L-1 set by SASO (1984) while
none of the boreholes in the CS analysis exceeded this level. The number of
the boreholes exceeding the 200 mg L-1 set by the EEC
(1992) guidelines jumped to 18 boreholes CA (8.6%) and 17 boreholes CS (14%).
In Erude City of India, the groundwater Cl¯ ranged between 28 and 759 mg
L-1 (Ramkumar et al., 2010). In general,
Cl¯ content in the Gezira formation varies between 10 to 105 mg L-1
with an average of 28 mg L-1 while in the Nubian formation the Cl¯
ion content varies between 4 to 78 mg L-1 with an average of 40 mg
L-1 (Abdel-Salam, 1966). According to the
data presented in Table 2, in the CA analysis, the HCO3¯
level ranged between 0.0 and 610 mg L-1, with a mean of 66 mg L-1
and SD of 119. In the CS analysis, the HCO3¯ level ranged between
41 and 464 mg L-1, with a mean of 114 mg L-1 and SD of
73. No standard and guideline limit has been set for HCO3¯ by
any of the standards used for comparison in this study. Obviously, most of the
investigated boreholes in the CA showed mean HCO3¯ levels less
than that found in the CS Obiefuna and Sheriff (2011)
reported that HCO3¯ concentrations in drinking water of Pindiga
and Tudun Wada, Nigeria, ranged between 0.0 and 217 mg L-1. In general,
the amount of HCO3¯ content in the Gezira formation is more
than that found in the Nubian Sandstone formation (Abdel-Salam,
1966). The mean value of NO3¯ ion concentration is 6.7 and
3.0 mg NO3¯ with a range between 0.0 and 750 mg L-1
and between 0.0 and 26 mg L-1 for CA and CS, respectively. It may
be observed that the SD of the CA data (55 mg L-1) is higher than
that of the CS data (3.7 mg L-1). In aquifers underlying the agricultural
area of Canada Bonton et al. (2010) reported
NO3¯ levels ranging between 6 and 125 mg L-1. Nitrate
concentration level for the groundwater samples investigated in this study (CA
and CS) revealed that only 1.91% of the investigated groundwater samples in
the CA exceeded the maximum permissible limit of 45 mg L-1 guideline
set by SASO, GCCS and USEPA standards and the guideline limit of 50 mg L-1
set by the SSMO, WHO and EEC standards while none of the CS samples investigated
exceeded the maximum recommended level of either 45 mg L-1 or 50
mg L-1 and therefore, pose no health hazards with respect to their
NO3¯ ion consent. The mean value of F¯ level is 0.7 in
both CA and CS with a range from 0.0 to 7 mg L-1 and from 0.0 to
2.6 mg L-1 for CA and CS, respectively. As manifested and judged
by the magnitude of the SD, negligible variation exists between CA and CS data.
Yasir (2004) reported that groundwater F¯ concentration
levels in the study area ranged between 0.2 and 0.8 mg L-1.
|| The pH and the anions of well drinking water samples for
CA analysis (n = 209) and SA analysis (n = 121) in the study area
|NS: No standard, *: No lower limit
Birkeland et al. (2005) reported that F¯
concentration levels in Abu-Deleig area ranged between 1 and 2 mg L-1.
Li et al. (2011) found that the F¯ levels
in sandstone aquifers of Taiyuan basin of China ranged between 1.5 and 2 mg
L-1. Fluoride concentration levels for both CA and CS revealed that
94.26 and 88.43% of the well water samples analyzed are lying well below the
maximum permissible limit of 1.5 mg L-1 set by both of the SSMO
(2002) for CA and CS, respectively. On the other hand, it may observe that
5.75% (CA) and 11.58% (CS) of the well water samples are violating the maximum
permissible limit of 1.5 mg L-1 set by SSMO (2002)
and WHO (1993). With respect to the Economic European
Community EEC (1992) standards and guidelines for F¯
in drinking water (0.7-1.5 mg L-1), 64.11 and 61.15% of the well
water samples examined have F¯ concentration level lying well below the
minimum recommended limit of 0.7 mg L-1 set by the EEC
(1992), 30.14 and 27.27% are lying within the 0.7-1.5 mg L-1
guideline limit set by the respective standard while only 5.75 and 11.58% of
the well water samples are above the maximum permissible limit of 1.5 mg L-1
for CA and CS, respectively. Only 27.75 and 27.27% of the samples are within
the recommended level of 0.6-1 mg L-1, set by both SASO
(1984) and GCCS (1993), in CA and CS, respectively.
A total of 60.29 and 53.71% of the investigated samples are lying below the
minimum recommended level while only 11.96 and 19% (23 boreholes) are above
the maximum recommended guideline level in both CA and CS, respectively. Percentages
of 99.04 and 100% are well below the maximum recommended level of 4 mg L-1
set for F¯ in drinking water by the USEPA (1976)
in both CA and CS, respectively. It may be observed that only 0.96% in the CA
are in excess of the maximum recommended level of 4 mg L-1 while
none of the well water samples in CS have exceeded the maximum recommended level
of 4 mg L-1 set by the USEPA (1976) standard.
Based on the results of the present investigation, the following conclusions may be drawn:
||Only 6.2% (CA) and 1.6% (CS) of the investigated boreholes
were found to be in excess of the TDS level of 1000 mg L-1 set
by SSMO (2002) and WHO (1993)
||Due to the excessive pumping and extraction, TDS concentrations of groundwater
in the study area are continuously decreasing during withdrawal-time in
accord with the daily pumping rate and aquifer geological formation
||Most of the groundwater constituents levels obtained in this study exhibited
compliance to the standards and guidelines set by SSMO
(2002) and WHO (1993).
||The study recommends that the respective authorities should
encourage population groups in the study area to live in areas where groundwater
is of an acceptable quality. Moreover, it is advisable to build water-treatment
plants close to the Blue Nile instead of the high-cost installing and operating
||Groundwater directorates throughout the study area should closely monitor
the activities of the private drilling companies and force them to prepare
precise composite log files for each of the boreholes fixed and posted in
a visible position at the borehole site
||The concern authorities should have to re-analyze well drinking water
periodically and data should be kept properly in well-knit composite logs
||The study recommends SSMO to prepare drinking water standards independent
of WHO guidelines according to environmental conditions and the prevailing
The authors acknowledge the assistance of all those who contributed to this study.
APHA, 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 17th Edn., American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
Abdel-Salam, Y., 1966. The groundwater geology of the Gezira. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Khartoum.
Al-Redhaiman, K.N. and H.M.A. Magid, 2002. The applicability of the local and international water quality guidelines to Al-Gassim region of central Saudi Arabia. Water Air Soil Pollut., 137: 235-246.
Birkeland, J.M., Y.E. Ibrahim, I.A. Ghandour and O. Haugejorden, 2005. Severity of dental caries among 12-year-old Sudanese children with different fluoride exposure. Clin. Oral Invest., 9: 46-51.
CrossRef | PubMed |
Bonton, A., A. Rouleau, C. Bouchard and M.J. Rodriguez, 2010. Assessment of groundwater quality and its variations in the capture zone of a pumping well in an agricultural area. Agric. Water Manage., 97: 824-834.
EEC, 1992. Standards. In: Hash Water Analysis Handbook, Hash (Ed.). 2nd Edn, HACH Company, Loveland, Colorado, USA.
El-Nazeer, G.A., 1987. Water resources evaluation of Gedaref basin (East Central Sudan). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Khartoum.
GCCS, 1993. Unbottled drinking water standards. Standardization and Metrology Organization for the Gulf Corporation Council Countries #GS 149/193, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Harrington, N.M., A.L. Herczeg and C.LG.L. Salle, 2008. Hydrological and geochemical processes controlling variations in Na+-Mg2+-Cl−-SO42− groundwater brines, south-eastern Australia. Chem. Geol., 251: 8-19.
Humphries, J.R. and M.S. Wood, 2004. Reverse osmosis environmental remediation. Development and demonstration pilot project. Desalination, 168: 177-184.
Li, X., X. Hou, Z. Zhou and L. Liu, 2011. Geochemical provenance and spatial distribution of fluoride in groundwater of Taiyuan basin, China. Environ. Earth Sci., 62: 1635-1642.
Mehta, S., A.E. Fryar, R.M. Brady and R.H. Morin, 2000. Modeling regional salinization of the Ogallala aquifer, Southern High Plains, TX, USA. J. Hydrol., 238: 44-64.
Direct Link |
Munday, T. and F. Andrew, 2008. The targeted application of aim for salinity mapping, interception and disposal: An illustration of the multifarious of helicopter and data in environmental management across the Murray Basin of southeast, Australia. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Airborne Electromagnetics, May 28-30, 2008, Haikko Manor, Finland -.
Nassereddin, K.M. and Z.A. Mimi, 2005. Numerical simulation of saline upconing in the pleistocene aquifer of Jericho area. Water Environ. J., 19: 25-29.
Obiefuna, G.I. and A. Sheriff, 2011. Assessment of shallow ground water quality of Pindiga Gombe Area, Yola Area, NE, Nigeria for irrigation and domestic purposes. Res. J. Environ. Earth Sci., 3: 131-141.
Direct Link |
Ramkumar, T., S. Venkatramanan, I. Anitha Mary, M. Tamilselvi and G. Ramesh, 2010. Hydrogeochemical quality of groundwater in Vedaraniyam Town, Tamil Nadu, India. Res. J. Environ. Earth Sci., 2: 44-48.
Direct Link |
Rhoades, J.D., 1982. Soluble Salts. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties, Page, A.L., R.H. Miller and D. Keeney (Eds.). 2nd Edn., American Society of Agronomy Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, pp: 167-179.
SASO (Saudi Arabian Standards Organization), 1984. Bottled and Unbottled Drinking Water. 2nd Edn., SASO Information Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, pp: 1-8.
SSMO, 2002. Unbottled Drinking Water: Standard NO.044. 1st Edn., Sudanese Standards and Metrology Organization, Khartoum.
Shaaban, F.F., 2001. Vertical electrical soundings for groundwater investigation in northwestern Egypt: A case study in a coastal area. J. Afr. Earth Sci., 33: 673-686.
Direct Link |
Shanyengana, E.S., M.K. Seely and R.D. Sanderson, 2004. Major-ion chemistry and ground-water salinization in ephemeral floodplains in some arid regions of Namibia. J. Arid Environ., 57: 211-223.
Subyani, A.M., 2005. Hydrochemical identification and salinity problem of ground-water in Wadi Yalamlam basin, Western Saudi Arabia. J. Arid Environ., 60: 53-66.
USEPA, 1976. National interim primary drinking water regulations. EPA Number: 570976003. US. Environment Protection Agency Washington, DC., http://yosemite.epa.gov/water/owrccatalog.nsf/9da204a4b4406ef885256ae0007a79c7/490344d9eaf40d4e85256b0600724162!OpenDocument.
USGS, 2009. Water hardness and alkalinity. USGS Water-Quality Information, U.S. Geological Survey, http://water.usgs.gov/owq/hardness-alkalinity.html.
Viessman, W. and M. Hammer, 1985. Water Supply and Pollution Control. 4th Edn., Harper and Row Publishers, New York, ISBN: 0-06-046821-1 Pages: 797.
WHO, 193. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. 2nd Edn., WHO, Geneva.
Yasir, I.A., 2004. Domestic water supply in al-butana and umelghura provinces. quantitative and qualitative analysis. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Gezira, Sudan.