Production of Palm Shell-Based Activated Carbon with More Homogeniouse Pore Size Distribution
W.M.A. Wan Daud
Oil palm shell as a raw material was used for the preparation of activated carbon adsorbents. The precursor was first activated chemically with small proportion of zinc chloride and phosporic acid and then the prepared samples were treated with CO2 flow at 850°C at different activation time. The samples activated chemically with phosphoric acid showed higher surface area and pore volume compared to the samples activated using zinc chloride as chemical agent, at the same duration. In addition, it was shown that extra physical activation will grantees more developed pore structure. In terms of pore size distribution the combined preparation method resulted in a better and more homogenous pore size distribution than the commercial palm shell based activated carbon.
September 06, 2010; Accepted: September 06, 2010;
Published: October 19, 2010
Activated carbons with highly developed internal surface area and porosity
are described as solid sponges (Zanzi et al., 2001).
The large surface area of these carbonaceous materials results in a high adsorption
capacity for gases or liquids. Activated carbons are versatile materials that
are employed in a multitude of gas purification, gold purification, sewage treatment,
water purification, metal extraction, medicine, air filters in gas masks and
filter masks, filters in compressed air and many other applications. The storage
and transport activity of fluids in these porous sorbents largely depend on
the pore size distribution in the material. Hence, in order to develop the adsorptive
and catalytic properties of these adsorbents, it is important to have the suitable
Pore Size Distribution (PSD) as the sorbent. In fact, the potential of activated
carbons to obtain both high surface area and homogeneous pore size distribution
made these microporous materials more applicable for adsorption of various materials
(Sing et al., 1985). Table 1
shows the IUPAC convention in dividing the range of pore sizes into different
The production of activated carbon can be assorted into two methods: chemical
and physical treatments. Chemical activation has become widely employed because
of the lower activation temperature (400-500°C compared to >850°C
for physical activation) and higher carbon product yield. Among the commonly
used chemical agents, H3PO4 and ZnCl2 are
used on a relatively large scale (Baker, 1992).
|| IUPAC Classification of pore sizes
On the other hand, it was shown by Prauchner and Rodriguez-Reinoso
(2008) that chemical activation generates carbons with more developed mesoporosity.
Extra physical activation creates more homogeneous pore size distribution. Using
low concentration of the chemical agents allows narrow micropores to develop
without a significant decrease in bulk density. The primary pore structure generated
by low proportion of chemicals would be develop more homogeneously by subsequent
thermal activation (Prauchner and Rodriguez-Reinoso 2008).
Due to increasing usage of AC, exploring the economical supplies for the production
of AC is necessary. Generally, agricultural by-products as waste are ignored
in most countries, their disposal is costly and causes serious environmental
problems. Due to high carbon and low ash contents of these products, many of
them are appropriate to be used as precursors for AC production. Examples of
such bio-materials are; oil palm shell (Daud and Ali, 2004),
coconut shell (Gratuito et al., 2008), pistachio
shells (Yang and Lua, 2006), olive stones (Nakagawa
et al., 2007), date stones (Bouchelta et
al., 2008), rice bran (Suzuki et al., 2007),
coffee residua (Boonamnuayvitaya et al., 2005),
apricot stones (Sentorun-Shalaby et al., 2006),
jackfruit peel (Prahas et al., 2008), arundo
donax (Vernersson et al., 2002).
It is accepted that the differences in material composition, i.e., lignin,
cellulose and halo-cellulose, largely influences the pore structure and pore
size distribution of AC (Daud and Ali, 2004; Gergova
et al., 1994). Palm shell as by-product of the palm oil industries
is abundantly available mainly in South East Asia (Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand).
Many previous studies have been done on the utilization of palm shell as raw
material of AC production and it was reported that due to its high density,
high carbon contents and low ash, this material can be used for the production
of good quality AC (Daud et al., 2000; Guo
and Lua, 2002; Rodriguez-Reinoso, 2002).
In the present study, chemically activated carbons from oil palm shell as a
precursor were prepared using low concentration of zinc chloride or phosphoric
acid as chemical agent (Prauchner and Rodriguez-Reinoso,
2008). The prepared samples were heated under CO2 (Daud
and Ali, 2004) for physical activation at different durations to prepare
microporous activated carbons with high surface area and narrow Micropore Size
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation: Palm shell as raw material collected from Malaysian Oil
Palm Shell (MOPS) was crushed and then sieved to a particle size in the range
of 1-2 mm. After that, it was washed and dried at 110°C for 24 h. First,
a standard solution of phosphoric acid or zinc chloride (2 mL g-1
of the precursor) was used to impregnate the precursor. The chemicals per gram
palm shell mass ratios are showed as Xp and XZn for the
phosphorous and zinc, respectively. A mixture of precursor and chemical solution
of Xp = 0.09 or Xzn = 0.25 was stirred at 85°C for
2 h (Prauchner and Rodriguez-Reinoso, 2008). Next, the
impregnated samples with H3PO4 and ZnCl2 were
heated up to 450 and 500°C, respectively for 2 h under N2 flow
rate of 100 mL min-1 (Noor and Nawi, 2008;
Prauchner and Rodriguez-Reinoso, 2008). To remove the
excess activating agent and increase the pH over 6, the chemically produced
ACs were washed several times with abundant amount of distilled water. For the
ZnCl2 samples, ACs were first washed with 0.1 N solution of HCl (Moreno-Castillaa
et al., 2001). The products were first carbonized at 900°C for
1 h and heating rate of 10°C min-1 (Ahmad
et al., 2008; Daud and Ali, 2004). After
carbonization, the resulting material was used for thermal activation under
carbon dioxide stream. For the physical activation, samples were heated up to
850°C, then carbon dioxide stream with flow rate of 100 mL min-1
was used for 1-7 h (heating rate of 10°C min-1) to obtain ACs
with different burn-off degrees.
The commercial granular palm shell based activated carbon was obtained from Bravo Green Sdn Bhd, a local manufacturer based in Sarawak, Malaysia. This activated carbon was first sieved to the desiered particle size (1-2 mm) and then washed and dried at 110°C overnight.
Characterization: The characterization of AC samples was carried out
using N2 adsorption and desorption at -196°C using Micromeritics
ASAP 2020 surface area analyzer to assess the pore morphology of the produced
activated carbons. The BET surface area, micropore and total pore volume and
pore size distribution were obtained by analyzing the N2 adsorption-desorption.
The specific surface areas were determined according to the BET method at the
relative pressure in the range of 0.05-0.30 (Kenneth, 2001;
Sing, 1998; Terzyk et al.,
where, V is the volume of adsorbed at a relative pressure of P/P0, P0 is the saturation pressure (vapor pressure of liquid gas at adsorption temperature), Vm is the volume of gas (stp) required to form one monolayer of adsorbate and C is the constant related to energy of adsorption.
Pore volume was directly calculated from the volume of nitrogen held at the
highest relative pressure (p/po = 0.99). The volume of micropore
was estimated using the Dubinin-Radushkevich (DR) equation (Rouquerol
et al., 1999). This equation has been widely used for activated carbon
and other microporous adsorbents:
where, V is the volume of adsorbed at a relative pressure of P/P0 and temperature T, V0 is micropore volume, E is the energy of the adsorption, β is the affinity coefficient of the adsorbate and R is the universal gas constant.
Pore size diameters were determined by the Dollimore-Heal adsorption pore distribution method.
Classification of produced activated carbon: In order to make the description
of the prepared systems easy, the following nomenclature is used. CP and CZ
indicate palm shell-based activated by phosphoric acid and zinc chloride followed
by carbon dioxide activation, respectively. Activation time (expressed in hours)
is coming as a suffix for the two letters (example: CZ3 represent zinc chloride
activated sample with extra activation under carbon dioxide for 3 h).
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
N2 adsorption isotherms: Figure 1 shows the nitrogen adsorption isotherms of CZ activated carbons. Similar to typical AC, all CZ samples show almost flat plateau at higher relative pressures, showing type I isotherm.
According to the IUPAC categorization this indicates extremely microporous
materials with a narrow pore size distribution (Yang et
al., 2007). The evolution of the isotherms shapes for these series indicates
that the adsorption capacity increases with increasing activation time. This
signifies the widening of microporosity. The similar isotherms for all of CZ
series, shows that all of these samples include micropores and the size of these
micropores widens with the increase of the activation length. There is small
variation between the uptake of CZ1 and CZ3 at low and high relative pressures
which indicates common microporosity either in narrow or large micropores. As
the activation time increases, nitrogen adsorption and micropore volume enlarge
as well. As it can be seen, the commercial activated carbon adsorbed lower amount
of nitrogen than the CZ7 sample. Moreover, the slope of this plateau and the
increase in adsorption at higher relative pressures are the major differences
with other samples though, its isotherm shows type I. Hence, it can be concluded
that this sample includes wide range of micropores in comparison with the CZ
series. Like the CZ series, CP carbons in Fig. 2 demonstrate
the same form of adsorption isotherm at low burn-off degree. CP1 and CP3 with
similar type I adsorption isotherm show the difference in the uptake at low
relative pressure. CP3 achieved higher adsorption capacity as compare to CP1,
at low relative pressure. This shows that the increase in burn-off causes some
degree of micropores widening. This raise in nitrogen adsorption is continued
up to CP5. The isotherms of CP3 and CP5 have similar tendency at very low relative
pressure and parallel at relative pressure above P/P0 = 0.4. This
indicates that the differences are in the large size micropores (Nakagawa
et al., 2007). In addition, throughout the entire pressure range,
CP7 reveals a gradual increase in nitrogen uptake; therefore, the resulting
isotherm is more likely of type 2.
The nitrogen uptake in this case is less than the other three preparation methods
in this series of ACs at low relative pressure (P/P0<0.3). This
is followed by an increase in adsorption at higher pressures and then it turns
into similar form with the other plateaus.
||N2 adsorption isotherms of ZnCl2 activated
carbons followed by CO2
||N2 adsorption isotherms of H3PO4
activated carbons followed by CO2
|| Preparing condition, production burn-off, surface area, pore
This suggests that CP7 is not a highly microporous substance, indeed a mesoporous
Textural characterization: Table 2 lists the burn-off
percentage, surface area, micropore and pore volume of AC samples. Although,
the CZ samples have expected surface area values within the normal range, all
of the preparation techniques show high relative micropores. On the other hand,
CZ5 demonstrates higher rate of micropore volume and surface area compared to
other conditions in this series. As the time of activation increases from CZ1
to CZ3, there is a small variation between CZ1 and CZ3 micropore volume values.
However, there is a observable increase in BET surface area and micropore volume
values from CZ3 to CZ5. It can also be observed that all products except CP7,
show low mesopore volume. This could be because of the use of carbon dioxide
as activating agent. Larger mesopore volume could be created if steam is used
as the activating agent (Czechowski et al., 1979).
Although, all of samples in this series demonstrate lower pore volume value
in comparison to the commercial AC (0.52 cm3 g-1), CZ5
results higher micropore volume. It confirms that the produced ACs are highly
In the CP series, the entire pore volume of all samples are higher compared with 0.47 cm3 g-1 for commercial activated carbon. In particular, CP3 and CP5 samples have values as high as 0.80 cm3 g-1. Increases in both surface area and micropore volume from CP1 to CP3 is very noticeable. Although, there is a raise in micropore volume in CP5 compared to CP3, this increase is lower than that of the two previous samples. CP5 has a higher mesopore and total pore volume than that of CP3, proposing that increasing burn-off higher than 38% produces some new pores being mesoporous and extends some micropores to form mesopores. The rate of mesopore formation is higher for CP5 to CP7 and the BET surface area is lower with a microporosity of 78% (VMicro/VTotal). It is obvious that CP3 is a highly microporous substance with a microporosity value of 97% while CP7 has a lower microporosity of 78% and therefore more mesopore volume as shown in Table 2. However, CP5 had the highest surface area, pore volume and micropore volume between all CP series. It also achieved better microporous ACs compared to previously publish biomass raw material based AC.
Pore size distribution: The pore size distribution is described as structural
heterogeneity of the porous material and closely related to both equilibrium
characteristics and kinetics of these materials used in industrial purposes
(Adinata et al., 2007). Figure
3 shows the pore size distribution of CZ series and the commercial AC. All
of the pore size distribution curves of prepared activated carbons have their
maximum at the pore diameter around 2 nm signifying the presence of micropores.
From this figure, it is apparent that the activation method had significant effect on the pore formation of the produced activated carbons. The commercial activated carbon shows wide range of pore size distribution including mesopores. In comparison with this AC, the produced samples presenting more micropore percentage and homogenous pore size distribution.
||Pore size distribution of ZnCl2 activated carbons
followed by CO2
||Pore size distribution of H3PO4 activated
carbons followed by CO2
Figure 4 demonstrates the pore size distribution of CP series. In these samples, it is obvious that increasing the time of thermal activation has considerable effect on pore size distribution. When the period increases, the pore size distribution develops into wider and the curves moving to the mesoporous area (more than 2 nm). In CP7 sample, the highest point of adsorption is in the pores with diameters between 2-3 nm.
By increasing the activation duration from 1 to 7 h, the mesopore volume increases. It demonstrates that although the formation of micropores increases up to 5 h of activation, widening of these micropores to mesopores carries out continuously in all the samples.
Combined physical and chemical activation of palm shell revealed that H3PO4
impregnated samples attained higher surface area and micropore volume than those
prepared using ZnCl2 or the physically activated samples. Using small
amount of ZnCl2 and H3PO4 creates some small
pores that can be developed homogenously by extra physical activation. Combination
of physical and chemical activation creates more homogenous pore size distribution.
Consequently, this method of activation is a powerful technique for controlling
and developing similar micropores which enhances the overall adsorption capacity
of the ACs.
Adinata, D., W.M.A. Wan Daud and M.K. Aroua, 2007. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from palm shell by chemical activation with K2CO3. Bioresour. Technol., 98: 145-149.
Ahmad, M.A., W.M.A. Wan Daud and M.K. Aroua, 2008. CO2/CH4 AND O2/N2 kinetic selectivities of oil palm shell-based carbon molecular sieves. Oil Palm Res., 20: 453-460.
Baker, F.S., 1992. Activated Carbon. In: Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Miller, C.E., A.J. Repik and E.D. Tolles (Eds.). Wiley, New York, pp: 1015-1037.
Boonamnuayvitaya, V., S. Sae-Ung and W. Tanthapanichakoon, 2005. Preparation of activated carbons from coffee residue for the adsorption of formaldehyde. Separation Purification Technol., 42: 159-168.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
Bouchelta, C., M.S. Medjram, O. Bertand and J.P. Bellat, 2008. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from date stones by physical activation steam. J. Anal. Applied Pyrolysis., 82: 70-77.
Czechowski, F., A. Jankowska, H. Marsh, T. Siemieniewska and K. Tomkow, 1979. Characterization of Porous Solid. The Society of Chemical Industry. London.
Daud, W.M.A.W. and W.S.W. Ali, 2004. Comparison on pore development of activated carbon produced from palm shell and coconut shell. Bioresour. Technol., 93: 63-69.
Gergova, K., N. Petrov and S. Eser, 1994. Adsorption properties and microstructure of activated carbons produced from agricultural by-products by steam pyrolysis. Carbon, 32: 693-702.
Gratuito, M.K.B., T. Panyathanmaporn, R.A. Chumnanklang, N. Sirinuntawittaya and A. Dutta, 2008. Production of activated carbon from coconut shell: Optimization using response surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol., 99: 4887-4895.
Guo, J. and A.C. Lua, 2002. Microporous activated carbons prepared from palm shell by thermal activation and their application to sulphur dioxide adsorption. J. Coll. Interface Sci., 251: 242-247.
Kenneth, S., 2001. The use of nitrogen adsorption for the characterization of porous materials. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 187–188: 3-9.
Moreno-Castilla, C., F. Carrasco-Marın, M.V. Lopez-Ramon and M.A. Alvarez-Merino, 2001. Chemical and physical activation of olive-mill waste water to produce activated carbons. Carbon, 39: 1415-1420.
Nakagawa, Y., M. Molina-Sabio and F. Rodrıguez-Reinoso, 2007. Modification of the porous structure along the preparation of activated carbon monoliths with H3PO4 and ZnCl2. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 103: 29-34.
Noor, A.B.M. and M.A.B.M. Nawi, 2008. Textural characteristics of activated carbons prepared from oil palm shells activated with ZnCl2 and pyrolysis under nitrogen and carbon dioxide. J. Phys. Sci., 19: 93-104.
Direct Link |
Prahas, D., Y. Kartika, N. Indraswati and S. Ismadji, 2008. Activated carbon from jackfruit peel waste by H3PO4 chemical activation: Pore structure and surface chemistry characterization. Chem. Eng. J., 140: 32-42.
Prauchner, M.J. and F. Rodrıguez-Reinoso, 2008. Preparation of granular activated carbons for adsorption of natural gas. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 109: 581-584.
Rodriguez-Reinoso, F., 2002. Handbook of Porous Solids. Wiley VCH, Weinheim, Germeny.
Rouquerol, F., J. Rouquerol and K. Sing, 1999. Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids: Principles, Methodology and Applications. Academic Press, London 439-467.
Sentorun-Shalaby, C., M.G. Ucak-Astarlioglu, L. Artok and C. Sarici, 2006. Preparation and characterization of activated carbons by one-step steam pyrolysis/activation from apricot stones. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 88: 126-134.
Sing, K.S.W., 1998. Adsorption methods for the characterization of porous materials. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 76–77: 3-11.
Sing, K.S.W., D.H. Everett, R.A.W. Haul, L. Moscou and R.A. Pierotti, J. Rouquerol and T. Siemieniewska, 1985. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (recommendations 1984). Pure Applied Chem., 57: 603-619.
Direct Link |
Suzuki, R.M., A.D. Andrade, J.C. Sousa and M.C. Rollemberg, 2007. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from rice bran. Bioresour. Technol., 98: 1985-1991.
Terzyk, A.P., P.A. Gauden, J. Zawadzki, G. Rychlicki, M. Wisniewski and P. Kowalczyk, 2001. Toward the characterization of microporosity of carbonaceous films. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 243: 183-192.
Vernersson, T., P.R. Bonelli, E.G. Cerrella and A.L. Cukierman, 2002. Arundo donax cane as a precursor for activated carbons preparation by phosphoric acid activation. Bioresour. Technol., 83: 95-104.
Wan Daud, A.W.M., W.S. Wan-Ali and Z.M. Sulaiman, 2000. The effects of carbonization temperature on pore development in palm-shell-based activated carbon. Carbon, 38: 1925-1932.
Yang, H., R. Yan, H. Chen, D.H. Lee and C. Zheng, 2007. Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel, 86: 1781-1788.
Yang, T. and A.C. Lua, 2006. Textural and chemical properties of zinc chloride activated carbons prepared from pistachio-nut shells. Mater. Chem. Physics, 100: 438-444.
Zanzi, R., X. Bai, P. Capdevila and E. Bjornbom, 2001. Pyrolysis of biomass in presence of steam for preparation of activated carbon, liquid and gaseous products. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Chemical Engineering, September 2001, Melbourne, Australia, pp: 23-27.