Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Abstract
Fulltext PDF
References

Research Article
The Effects of Nitrogen Fixation Activity and Phytohormone Production of Diazotroph in Promoting Growth of Rice Seedlings

F. Keyeo, O. Noor Ai`shah and H.G. Amir
 
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to observe the influence of diazotroph inoculation on growth of paddy plants under greenhouse conditions. Diazotroph are the most studied and well known Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) that are able to promote plant growth via Biological Nitrogen Fixation (BNF) and phytohormone production. A total of four diazotrophic bacteria inocula were used for the experiment which include Azospirillum brasilense (Sp7), Herbaspirillum seropedicae (Z78), Enterobacter sp. (L2) and Gluconacetobacter sp. (L15). All four strains were able to fix nitrogen with the same ability but produces phytohormone indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) in different concentration. The inoculation effects were tested on paddy plants (Oryza sativa) variety MR220. The rice seedlings were planted in non-sterilized soil and grown under aerobic conditions. Growth of the host plants was measured on parameters such as plants dry weight, plants height, root elongation and total leaf chlorophyll and protein content. Results showed that following inoculation, overall plant growth observation for plants inoculated with L2 and Control positive (+100% N fertilizer) showed better plant growth compared to plants inoculated with L15, Sp7, Z78 and Control negative (+Sp7K). Plants inoculated with Sp7 and Z78 both showed inferior growth compared to Control negative due to excess amount IAA supplied by the inoculants that suppresses the plant growth. Results also showed promising effect of L2 inoculants, to promote rice growth through optimal phtyhormone (IAA) production activity plus the added benefit through successful fixed nitrogen intake by the plant that was provided by L2 via BNF.
Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

F. Keyeo, O. Noor Ai`shah and H.G. Amir, 2011. The Effects of Nitrogen Fixation Activity and Phytohormone Production of Diazotroph in Promoting Growth of Rice Seedlings. Biotechnology, 10: 267-273.

DOI: 10.3923/biotech.2011.267.273

URL: http://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=biotech.2011.267.273
 
Received: March 08, 2011; Accepted: May 10, 2011; Published: August 11, 2011

INTRODUCTION

Root colonizing bacteria (rhizobacteria) that exert beneficial effects on plant development via direct or indirect mechanisms have been defined as Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR). PGPR are soil bacteria that are able to colonize the roots or rhizosphere of plants following inoculation onto seedlings or rhizosphere and have beneficial effects whereby it enhanced plant growth (Ashrafuzzaman et al., 2009; Zahir et al., 2004; Kloepper et al., 1986). PGPR mainly can promote plant growth by two different mechanisms, first is by direct mechanisms and second by indirect mechanisms (Verma et al., 2010). Direct mechanisms include nitrogen fixation, production of phytohormone, enzymes and mobilization of nutrients (Gray and Smith, 2005; Lucy et al., 2004; Khalid et al., 2004). Indirect mechanisms include increasing efficiency of fertilizers uptake, increasing the plant’s tolerance towards stress, inducing host resistance or producing pathogen-suppressing substances (Van Loon, 2007; Raj et al., 2003). These mechanisms can work independently or simultaneously with each other.

One of the most important mechanisms of PGPR in promoting plant growth is through biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) activity. The process changes inert N2 to useful NH3 and is only mediated in nature by bacteria and certain species of actinomycetes (Baldani et al., 2002). Therefore, there is a strong interest in finding and isolating nitrogen fixing PGPR (also known as diazotrophs) to be utilized as alternative to N fertilizers or microbial inoculants (Woyessa and Assefa, 2011). This is especially true in cultivation of rice. Cultivated rice (Oryza sativa) is an important crop, whereby it feeds almost half of world’s populations. Therefore, with the utilization of diazotroph as biofertilizer, diazotrophs will provide a major source of nitrogen for plants and lead to less dependency on inorganic nitrogen fertilizer (Sofi and Wani, 2007; Meunchang et al., 2004). This will also ultimately lead to environmentally friendly and sustainable agricultural practices (Anthony et al., 2009; Kennedy and Tchan, 1992).

Other than directly enhancing plant growth via fixation of atmospheric nitrogen, the diazotrophs also affect plant growth through synthesizing phytohormones such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (Malhotra and Srivastava, 2009; Asghar et al., 2002; Zimmer and Bothe, 1989). IAA is a type of phytohormone auxin, known to influence a number of plant functions such as promotion of cell elongation and cell division, apical dominance, root initiation, differentiation of vascular tissue, ethylene biosynthesis, mediation of tropistic responses and the alteration of the expression of specific genes (Davies, 2010; Malhotra and Srivastava, 2009; Chasan, 1993; Sachs, 1993). Although IAA have been proven to have stimulatory effect, it is important to note that IAA inhibition has also been reported (Yaqub Chaudhry, 2005). This substance performs optimally at low concentration compared to the nutrients and vitamins that normally affect plant processes. Different bacterial strains produce different concentration of IAA (Yasmin et al., 2009). The production and concentration of IAA could also be influenced by other factors besides species or strains of rhizobacteria, such as culture and medium conditions, growth stage and availability of substrates (Frankenberger and Arshad, 1995).

Thus, through this study several diazotrophs are tested on their ability to influence growth of the host plant (rice) through BNF and IAA production activity. This research was aimed to: (1) assess nitrogen fixation capability and phytohormone production of free living diazotrophic bacteria and (2) observe the effects of diazotrophs inoculation on growth of rice plants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted from July 2009 to May 2010 at School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia. From the total of four strains examined, two were isolated from leaf tissues of oil palm tree which is Enterobacter sp. (L2) and Gluconacetobacter sp. (L15) by a previous study in the year 2007. Identification was done via molecular identification by sequencing the 16S rRNA gene. The other strains tested were Azospirillum brasilense ATCC 29729 (Sp7) and Herbaspirillum seropedicae ATCC 870153 (Z78).

Acetylene Reduction Assay (ARA): The assay for nitrogenase enzyme was conducted for both free-living and associated conditions of the diazotrophs. For free living condition, the method of Somasegaran and Hoben (1985) were used. In associated condition, the nitrogen fixation was defined based on ethylene concentration (μmol C2H4) and sample fresh weight (g) of the inoculated host plants (μmol C2H4 fresh weight g-1 h-1) (Azlin et al., 2009; Baldani and Baldani, 2005).

Indole Acetic Acid Assay (IAA) : An estimation of IAA was assayed using Salkowski’s colorimetric technique for the inocula under free-living conditions (Asghar et al., 2002; Patten and Glick, 2002).

Plant growth experiment: A pot experiment was conducted in the greenhouse using soil and sand at 3:1 ratio as the growth medium (1.5 kg-1polythene bag). Before planting, soil was ensured to be moist and wet enough for paddy seed planting. Three-day-old rice seedlings (Oryza sativa MR220) were transplanted with one seedling per polythene bag. During the growth period, the plants were maintained under greenhouse conditions and watered twice daily. Complete fertilization of N (urea), P (Triple Super Phosphate) and K (Muriate of Potash) was applied to paddy plant (Ai’shah and Amir, 2005). However, for the plants treated with microbial inoculation, the concentrations of N supplied was reduced to 25% of the total N requirement (1.14 g seedling-1) but without any reduction of P and K concentrations. A total of four diazotrophic bacteria inocula were used for the experiment which include Azospirillum brasilense ATCC 29729 (Sp7), Herbaspirillum seropedicae ATCC 870153 (Z78), Enterobacter sp. (L2) and Gluconacetobacter sp. (L15). The bacterial culture at the exponential growth stage (ranging from 1.7 x 109 to 2.0 x 109 cfu mL-1) was used as the inoculum (50 mL inocula per plant at D0 and D35). The inoculation treatments involved in the experiment were as follows: 1) + Herbaspirillum seropedicae (Z78), + 25% N; 2) +Azospirillum brasilense (Sp7),+25% N; and locally isolated diazotrophs; 3) +Enterobacter sp. (L2),+25% N; 4) +Gluconacetobacter sp. (L15),+25% N; 5) Positive control (- Inoculation,+100% N) and 6) Negative control (+Sp7 Killed,+25% N). The experiment was laid out in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with five replications for each treatment and was harvested after 70 days of growth (D70). At day harvest (D70), the inoculated plants were monitored for plant dry weight (g), root elongation (cm), plant height (cm), N2 fixation rates via Acetylene Reduction Assay (ARA) (μmol C2H4 g-1 fresh weight h-1) and total leaf chlorophyll and protein content.

Total leaf chlorophyll and protein content: Leaf greenness of each plant was recorded using portable chlorophyll meter (MINOLTATM SPAD-502) (Neufeld et al., 2006). The leaf SPAD values were compared to the standard curve for actual values of total leaf chlorophyll content (mg chlorophyll mg-1 leaf fresh weight) (Azlin et al., 2009). Total leaf protein content was determined using Lowry’s colorimetric assay (Lowry et al., 1951). The actual protein content of each sample was determined based on the protein assay standard curve (mg BSA mL-1 protein).

Statistical analysis: The statistical evaluations of data, differences in results between treatments were evaluated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple group comparison using Tukey-Kramer HSD. All statistical analyses were carried out by using JMP 8.0.2 program at p<0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Estimation of acetylene reduction assay and indole-3 acetic acid (IAA) production of free-living bacteria: There are various studies that have been conducted on Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR), since it can be used as a biofertilizer to promote sustainable agricultural practices. As diazotrophic PGPR colonize the plant roots, they are able to promote plant growth based on the ability to fix nitrogen and to excrete plant growth regulator such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (Martinez-Viveros et al., 2010; Park et al., 2005; Baldani and Baldani, 2005; Ryu et al., 2005; Hoque et al., 2001). Diazotrophs are mostly known as bacteria that are able to fix atmospheric nitrogen. This ability is one of the reasons for the introduction of diazotrophs to host plants as an effort to reduce inorganic nitrogen fertilizer usage. All of the isolates tested have the ability to fix nitrogen that ranges from 0.2 x 10-09 to 4.1x10-09 μmol C2H4 cfu h-1 with all of the isolates confirmed as N2 fixers and are able to fix nitrogen with the same capabilities (Fig. 1). The assessment of nitrogen fixation in free-living condition is among the very first step to screen for the possible beneficial bacteria that can successfully transfer the fixed nitrogen to the plant. It acts as the preliminary screening by assessing the acetylene reduction capabilities of the diazotroph (Gough et al., 1997). The diazotrophs also produced IAA 0.02 to 0.12 μg mL-1 with isolate Z78 as the highest producer (0.12 μg mL-1) followed by Sp7 (0.10 μg mL-1) , L2 (0.08 μg mL-1) and lastly L15 which has the lowest IAA production (0.02 μg mL-1) (Fig. 1). The concentration of IAA secreted by each isolate was significantly different from one another. IAA is actually a type of natural auxin that has been studied extensively and it was reported that PGPR were auxin mediated. This type of phytohormone stimulates root growth and elongation and also induces strong modification of lateral roots which are thickened and prolific in root hairs. With stimulated root growth, subsequently nutrients and water uptake will increase, thus promoting the whole plant development (Davies, 2010; Vessey, 2003; Barazani and Friedman, 1999). Positive responses had been garnered from bacterial inoculation of PGPR and this was attributed by phytohormones excreted by bacteria.

Plant growth observation and acetylene reduction assay for associative diazotroph with the host plants: A plant is better able to achieve its optimized physical growth when it receives enough nutrients (e.g., fixed N) and this can be influenced by the presence of diazotrophic bacteria in association with the host plants. Ai’shah et al. (2010) and Nguyen et al. (2003) both emphasized on reducing chemical fertilizer through application of nitrogen-fixing diazotrophs to the host plants.

Fig. 1: N2 fixation activity and phytohormone (indole-3-acetic acid) production potentials of diazotrophs under free living conditions. Means with same letter is not significantly differ at p<0.05. nd: Not detected, ARA: Acetylene reduction assay, IAA: Indole acetic acid assay

Table 1: Plant growth observation and nitrogen-fixing capabilities of diazotrophs in association with the host plants after 70 days of growth (D70)
Means with the same letter is not significantly different at p<0.05, nd: Not detected

The diazotrophs provide nutrients and phytohormones to the host plants, a practice which was proven to have significant economic benefit to farmers. Phytohormone production of the bacteria will stimulate root growth, thus increasing the root area available for diazotroph colonization, consequently increases the probability of the plant in getting fixed nitrogen. The beneficial effects of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) have been attributed to both BNF (Mia and Shamsuddin, 2010; Meunchang et al., 2004; Boddey, 1995) and production of phytohormones that promote root development and proliferation, thus resulting in more efficient uptake of water and nutrients (Ashrafuzzaman et al., 2009; Jacoud et al., 1999). The results have shown that inoculation of L15 and L2 significantly promoted higher plant dry weight (1.12 and 1.11 g consecutively) compared to Sp7 and Z78 (0.37 and 0.63 g consecutively) (Table 1). Response of the inoculation treatments (L2 and L15) was similar to the control plants with complete N fertilization (+100%N) that have the highest plant dry weight. The results can be associated with the success of the diazotrophic bacteria in colonizing the roots, promoting root development, via phytohormone IAA secretion, added with the abilities of the isolates (L2 and L15) in fixing atmospheric nitrogen and subsequently increasing the uptake of nutrients by the plants. Watanabe et al. (1987) and Zhu (1989), suggested that BNF process could provide significant amount of nutrient (up to 20-25% of N) needed by paddy plant. The results also showed that plants inoculated with L2 and L15 had the highest roots elongation amongst all of the treatments. The response is proportional to IAA concentration, but overproduction may affect growth stimulation in plants (Davies, 2010; Malhotra and Srivastava, 2006, 2008a, b; Patten and Glick, 1996). The phytohormones enhance cell division and root elongation of host plants; however, it will only benefit the host when produced in a minimal amount. Inoculation of Sp7 and Z78 showed the lowest root elongation and growth due to higher levels of IAA produced that incapacitate its roots development. Excess amount of IAA produced by both Sp7 and Z78 had interfered with the root development, thus slowing the growth of the plant (Table 1). Sp7 and Z78 also recorded the lowest for leaf chlorophyll and protein content similar with the results of root elongation. Both isolates Sp7 and Z78 in IAA free-living assessment have the highest IAA production. However, the root development was suppressed by the over-production of IAA. When the root is suppressed, there is less colonization site for the attachments of diazotroph. It is known that the effectiveness of PGPR in the field has often been attributed to their ability to colonize plant roots. It is reasonable to assume that PGPR must colonize the rhizosphere of the host plant to be most beneficial (Malhotra and Srivastava, 2009; De Weger et al., 1995). If colonization failed to occur then the beneficial effect of diazotroph such as providing fixed nitrogen via BNF cannot be exerted to plants. With this, the intake of water, minerals and nutrients from the soil become slow, thus affecting the overall growth of plants. So, even if the diazotrophic bacteria readily fix nitrogen in the vicinity of the rhizosphere, since there is a deficiency in attachment site for colonization, the plants ability to absorb nutrients and grow to its optimal level is incapacitated. Minimal concentration of IAA produced by L2 (0.08 μg mL-1) and L15 (0.02 μg mL-1) could be the most suitable amount of IAA to improve root growth of paddy plants. Introduction of suitable amount of IAA to the host plant stimulates root development through increasing root length and density, enhanced nutrient and water absorption and thus promoted good plant growth (Baca and Elmerich, 2007). It was reported that plant root growth will be enhanced when auxin is at its optimal level which is in low concentration of 10-7 and 10-13 M and any higher than that it will inhibit root development (Fassler et al., 2010; Gaspar et al., 2002).

Well developed root systems and longer roots can influence better growth of paddy plants. The diazotrophs supposedly will be able to increase root growth and function and this will increase yield of crops (De-Bashan et al., 2008; Kennedy et al., 2004). The plants inoculated with L2 showed higher values for leaf chlorophyll and protein content (highest amongst the 4 strains – L2, L15, Sp7 and Z78) which is as good as the fully fertilized treatment of Control Positive (+100%N). This can be related to the optimal concentration of IAA secreted by isolate L2 that managed to develop extensive root system of the plant and with the addition of N2 fixation of the isolate that provide fixed nitrogen for plants excellent growth (Table 1). All of this is indicates that L2 can successfully promote plant growth even with minimal N fertilizer (25%). This is in accordance to the study by Yasmin et al. (2007) that PGPR can be used as biofertilizer for plants at reduced rate of N fertilization.

CONCLUSION

In overall, the inoculation of paddy plants with diazotrophic bacteria, such as Enterobacter sp. (L2) may increase plant dry weight, chlorophyll content, root elongation and protein content of the host plants. Combination of both N2 fixation activity and optimal phytohormones production of L2 may increase nutrient uptake of the plant itself, making it thrive compared to other isolates tested. However, it is acknowledged that the results cannot be explained only through nitrogen fixation and the production of phytohormone IAA. Further understanding of the potential value of these bacteria as biofertilizers, especially L2, would help in the studies conducted towards future studies on sustainable agriculture practices for paddy plants. However, in order to reach the maximum potential of the diazotrophs as biofertilizers, strategies to fully manipulate the bacterial factors should continue to be emphasized.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the School of Biological Sciences, USM, Penang and the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation for the research facilities and funding. We also thank Dr. Samuel Allen, USM Postdoctoral Fellow, for his review of the manuscript.

REFERENCES
Ai'shah, O.N. and H.G. Amir, 2005. Effects of Herbaspirillum sp. and Locally Isolated Diazotrophic Rhizobacteria on Growth of Aerobic Rice. In: Grand Plaza Parkroyal Penang. Innovation Through Microbes, Sijam, K., A.M.A. Zainal, S. Neelam, N.S. Mariana and L. Kamariah (Eds.)., Society of Microbiology, Malaysia, pp: 379-381.

Ai'shah, O.N., H.G. Amir, C.L. Keng and A.R. Othman, 2010. Influence of various combinations of diazotrophs and chemical n fertilizer on plant growth and N2 fixation capacity of oil palm seedlings (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Thai. J. Agric. Sci., 42: 139-149.
Direct Link  |  

Anthony, O.A., J.A. Daniel, J.B. Carols and J.S. Jan, 2009. Plant Growth-Promoting Diazotrophs and Productivity of Wheat on the Canadian Prairies. In: Microbial Stratergies for Crop Improvement, Khan, M.S., A. Zaidi and J. Musarrat (Eds.)., Springer-Verlag, Germany, pp: 287-300.

Asghar, H., Z. Zahir, M. Arshad and A. Khaliq, 2002. Relationship between in vitro production of auxins by rhizobacteria and their growth promoting activities in Brassica juncea L. Bio. Fertility Soil, 35: 231-237.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Ashrafuzzaman, M., F.A. Hossen, M.R. Ismail, M.A. Hoque, M.Z. Islam, S.M. Shahidullah and S. Meon, 2009. Efficiency of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) for the enhancement of rice growth. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 8: 1247-1252.
Direct Link  |  

Azlin, C.O., H.G. Amir, L.K. Chan and I. Zamzuri, 2009. Microbial inoculation improves growth of oil palm plants (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Trop. Life Sci., 20: 71-77.

Baca, B.E. and C. Elmerich, 2007. Microbial Production of Plant Hormones. In: Associative and Endophytic Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria and Cyanobacterial Associations, Elmerich, C. and W.E. Newton (Eds.). Springer, Dordrecht, pp: 113-143.

Baldani, I.J. and L.V. Baldani, 2005. History on the biological nitrogen fixation research in graminaceous plants: Special emphasis on the Brazilian experience. Anais Da Acad. Brasiliera De Ciencias Sci., 77: 549-579.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Baldani, J.I., V.M. Reis, V.L.D. Baldani and J. Dobereiner, 2002. A brief story of nitrogen fixation in sugarcane-reasons for success in Brazil. Funct. Plant Biol., 29: 417-423.
Direct Link  |  

Barazani, O. and J. Friedman, 1999. Is IAA the major root growth factor secreted from plant-growth-mediating bacteria. J. Chem. Ecol., 25: 2397-2406.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Boddey, R.M., 1995. Biological nitrogen fixation in sugarcane: A key to energetically viable biofuel production. Critical Rev. Plant Sci., 14: 263-279.
Direct Link  |  

Chasan, R., 1993. Embryogenesis: New molecular insights. Plant Cell., 5: 597-599.
Direct Link  |  

Davies, P.J., 2010. The Plant Hormones: Their Nature, Occurrence and Functions. 3rd Edn., Kluwer Academic, New York, USA., pp: 2-6.

De Bashan, L.E., H. Antoun and Y. Bashan, 2008. Involvement of indole-3-acetic acid produced by the growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum sp. in promoting browth of Chlorella vulgaris. J. Physiol., 44: 938-947.
CrossRef  |  

De Weger, L.A., A.J. van der Bij, L.C. Dekkers, M. Simons, C.A. Wijffelman and B.J.J. Lugtenberg, 1995. Colonization of the rhizosphere of crop plants by plant-beneficial Pseudomonads. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 17: 221-228.
Direct Link  |  

Fassler, E., M.W. Evangelou, B.H. Robinson and R. Schulin, 2010. Effects of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) on sunflower growth and heavy metal uptake in combination with ethylene diamine disuccinic acid (EDDS). Chemosphere, 80: 901-907.
CrossRef  |  

Frankenberger, Jr. W.T. and M. Arshad, 1995. Phytohormones in Soil: Microbial Production and Function. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, USA., ISBN: 0824794427, Pages: 503.

Gaspar, T., O. Faivre-Rampant, C. Kevers, J. Dommes and J.F. Hausman, 2002. Auxins in the Biology of Roots, Plant Roots the Hidden Half. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA., pp: 383-403.

Gough, C., J. Vasse, C. Galera, G. Webster, E. Cocking and J. Denarie, 1997. Interaction between bacterial diazotrophs and non-legume dicots: Arabidopsis thaliana as a model plant. Plant Soil, 194: 123-130.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Gray, E.J. and D.L. Smith, 2005. Intracellular and extracellular PGPR: Commonalities and distinctions in the plant-bacterium signaling processes. Soil Biol. Biochem., 37: 395-412.
Direct Link  |  

Hoque, M.M., K. Inubushi, S. Miura, K. Kobayashi, K.H. Yong, M. Okada and S. Yabashi, 2001. Biological dinitrogen fixation and soil microbial biomass carbon as influenced by Free Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) at three levels of nitrogen fertilization in a paddy field. Biol. Fertility Soils, 34: 453-459.
Direct Link  |  

Jacoud, C., D. Job, P. Wadoux and R. Bally, 1999. Initiation of root growth stimulation by Azospirillum lipoferum CRT1 during maize seed germination. Can. J. Microb., 45: 339-342.
Direct Link  |  

Kennedy, I.R. and Y.T. Tchan, 1992. Biological nitrogen fixation in non-leguminous field crops: Recent advances. Plant Soil., 141: 93-118.
CrossRef  |  

Kennedy, I.R., A.T.M.A. Choudhury and M.L. Kecskes, 2004. Non-symbiotic bacterial diazotrophs in crop-farming systems: Can their potential for plant growth promotion be better exploited? Soil Biol. Biochem., 36: 1229-1244.
CrossRef  |  

Khalid, A., M. Arshad and Z.A. Zahir, 2004. Screening plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for improving growth and yield of wheat. J. Applied Microbiol., 96: 473-480.
Direct Link  |  

Kloepper, J.W., F.M. Scher, M. Laliberte and B. Tipping, 1986. Emergence Promoting Rhizobacteria: Description and Implications for Agriculture. In: Iron, Siderophore and Plant Diseases, Swinburne, T.R. (Ed.). Pelnum Publishing Company, New York, pp: 155-164.

Lowry, O.H., N.J. Rosebrough, A.L. Farr and R.J. Randall, 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem., 193: 265-275.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Lucy, M., E. Reed and B.R. Glick, 2004. Applications of free living plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 86: 1-25.
CrossRef  |  

Malhotra, M. and S. Srivastava, 2006. Targeted engineering of Azospirillum brasilense SM with indole acetamide pathway for iaa over-expression. Can. J. Microbiol., 52: 1078-1084.
PubMed  |  

Malhotra, M. and S. Srivastava, 2008. An Ipdc gene knock-out of Azospirillum brasilense strain MS and its implications on indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis and plant growth promotion. Antonie. Van Leeuwenhoek, 93: 425-433.
PubMed  |  

Malhotra, M. and S. Srivastava, 2008. Organization of the ipdc region regulates IAA levels in different Azospirillum brasilense strains: Molecular and functional analysis of ipdc in strain SM. Environ. Microbiol., 10: 1365-1373.
PubMed  |  

Malhotra, M. and S. Srivastava, 2009. Stress-responsive indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis by Azospirillum brasilense SM and its ability to modulate plant growth. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 45: 73-80.
CrossRef  |  

Martinez-Viveros, O., M.A. Jorquera, D.E. Crowley, G. Gajardo and M.L. Mora, 2010. Mechanisms and practical considerations involved in plant growth promotion by rhizobacteria. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 10: 293-319.
PubMed  |  

Meunchang, S., S. Panichsakpatana, S. Ando and T. Yokoyama, 2004. Phylogenetic and physiological characterization of indigenous Azospirillum isolates in Thailand. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 50: 413-421.
Direct Link  |  

Mia, M.A.B. and Z.H. Shamsuddin, 2010. Nitrogen fixation and transportation by rhizobacteria: A scenario of rice and banana. Int. J. Bot., 6: 235-242.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Neufeld, H.S., A.H. Chappelka, G.L. Somers, K.O. Burkey, A.W. Davison and P.L. Finkelstein, 2006. Visible foliar injury caused by ozone alters the relationship between SPAD meter readings and chlorophyll concentrations in cutleaf coneflower. Photosynth. Res., 87: 281-286.
CrossRef  |  

Nguyen, H.T., R. Deaker, I.R. Kennedy and R.J. Roughley, 2003. The positive yield response of field-grown rice to inoculation with a multi-strain biofertiliser in the Hanoi area, Vietnam. Symbiosis, 35: 261-265.
Direct Link  |  

Park, M., C. Kim, J. Yang, H. Lee, W. Shin, S. Kim and T. Sa, 2005. Isolation and characterization of diazotrophic growth promoting bacteria from rhizosphere of agricultural crops of Korea. Microbiol. Res., 160: 127-133.
CrossRef  |  

Patten, C.L. and B.R. Glick, 1996. Bacterial biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid. Can. J. Microbiol., 42: 207-220.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Patten, C.L. and B.R. Glick, 2002. Role of Pseudomonas putida indole-acetic acid in development of the host plant root system. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 68: 3795-3801.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Raj, N.S., G. Chaluvaraju, K.N. Amruthesh, H.S. Shetty, M.S. Reddy and J.W. Kloepper, 2003. Induction of growth promotion and resistance against downy mildew on pearl millet (Pennisetum glacum) by rhizobacteria. Plant Dis., 87: 380-384.
Direct Link  |  

Ryu, C.M., C.H. Hu, R.D. Locy and J.W. Kloepper, 2005. Study of mechanism for plant growth promotion elicited by rhizobacteria in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Soil, 268: 285-292.
Direct Link  |  

Sachs, T., 1993. The role of auxin in the polar organization of apical meristems. Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 20: 531-533.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Sofi, P. and S. Wani, 2007. Prospects of nitrogen fixation in rice. Asian J. Plant Sci., 6: 203-213.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Somasegaran, P. and H.J. Hoben, 1985. Methods in Legume Rhizobium Technology. University of Hawaii (NifTAL), Hawaii, USA., pp: 1-46.

Van Loon, L.C., 2007. Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 119: 243-254.
CrossRef  |  

Verma, J.P., J. Yadav, K.N. Tiwari, Lavakush and V. Singh, 2010. Impact of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on crop production. Int. J. Agric. Res., 5: 954-983.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Vessey, J.K., 2003. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil, 255: 571-586.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Watanabe, I., T. Yoneyama, B. Padre and J.K. Ladha, 1987. Difference in natural abundance of 15n in several rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 33: 407-415.

Woyessa, D. and F. Assefa, 2011. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on growth and yield of Tef (Eragrostis tef Zucc. Trotter) under greenhouse condition. Res. J. Microbiol., 6: 343-355.
CrossRef  |  

Yaqub Chaudhry, N., 2005. Morphogenetic effects of IAA and HgCl2 on the seedlings of Pisum sativum L. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 8: 1643-1648.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Yasmin, F., R. Othman, K. Sijam and M.S. Saad, 2007. Effect of PGPR inoculation on growth and yield of sweetpotato. J. Boil. Sci., 7: 421-424.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Yasmin, F., R. Othman, K. Sijam and M.S. Saad, 2009. Characterization of beneficial properties of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolated from sweet potato rhizosphere. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res., 3: 815-821.
Direct Link  |  

Zahir, Z.A., M. Arshad and W.T. Frankenberger Jr, 2004. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Applications and perspectives in agriculture. Adv. Agron., 81: 97-168.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Zhu, Z., 1989. Dynamics of Soil Nitrogen and its Management. Progress in Irrigated Rice Research. IRRI, Wageningen, Manila, pp: 151-164.

Zimmer, W. and H. Bothe, 1989. The Phytohormonal Interactions between Azospirillum and Wheat. In: Nitrogen Fixation with Non-Legumes, Skinner, F.A., R.M. Boddey and I. Fendrik (Eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp: 137-146.

©  2014 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved
Fulltext PDF References Abstract