Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Abstract
Fulltext PDF
References

Research Article
Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in Lion (Panthera leo) from Senegal, West Africa

A.R. Kamga-Waladjo, O.B. Gbati, P. Kone, R.A. Lapo, E. Dombou, G. Chatagnon, S.N. Bakou, P.E.H. Diop, L.J. Pangui, D. Tainturier and J.A. Akakpo
 
ABSTRACT
The prevalence of antibodies to Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii were investigated in seven lions (Panthera leo) from Hann’s zoo of Dakar-Senegal. Seven sera samples were examined for antibodies against Neospora caninum (Neospora caninum antibodies test kit, cELISA) and Toxoplasma gondii (ID Screen® Toxoplasmosis Indirect ELISA). All sera were positives to Neospora caninum antibodies whereas 3 for 7 (42.86%) were positives to Toxoplasma gondii. Serological results indicate a common exposure to Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii among lions (Panthera leo) from zoo in Senegal.
Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

A.R. Kamga-Waladjo, O.B. Gbati, P. Kone, R.A. Lapo, E. Dombou, G. Chatagnon, S.N. Bakou, P.E.H. Diop, L.J. Pangui, D. Tainturier and J.A. Akakpo, 2009. Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in Lion (Panthera leo) from Senegal, West Africa. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 4: 346-349.

DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2009.346.349

URL: http://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajava.2009.346.349

INTRODUCTION

Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum are two closely related apicomplexan parasites with a worldwide distribution. Both parasites have indirect life cycles with carnivores as their definitive hosts, i.e., felines in the case of T. gondii (Dubey and Beattie, 1988) and canids in the case of N. caninum (Gondim et al., 2004; McAllister et al., 1998). After sexual recombination within the definitive host, the parasites are excreted as infective oocysts and can cause infection in a wide range of intermediate host species. Toxoplasm gondii, which can cause serious disease in humans, seems to be common in wild animals, especially canids. Accordingly, canids may be important in the sylvatic cycle of this parasite (Hill and Dubey, 2002).

Prior 1984, N. caninum was misidentified as T. gondii, but since its original description in dogs (Bjerkas et al., 1984; Dubey et al., 1988), a large number of studies showed this presence among several domestic and wild species (Costa et al., 2008; Dubey et al., 2007).

Neosporosis is especially important in cattle, where the infection can cause neonatal mortality and abortion in pregnant cows as well as paralysis in newborn calves (Dubey et al., 2007).

Since, reports of neosporosis in African wildlife are limited to East and Southern Africa (Cheadle et al., 1999; Ferroglio et al., 2003), host range and epidemiology of neosporosis in African wild animals are largely unknown.

The aim of this study was to essay N. caninum and T. gondii antibodies in lion (Panthera leo) from Hann’s zoo of Dakar-Senegal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven sera samples were obtained from three adult’s lions (two male and one female born in 2003) and four cub’s lions born July 31, 2006 (Panthera leo) from zoo of Hann Dakar-Senegal in October 2007. Feeding ration for seven lions was composed to uncooked meat beef and donkey. The animals were under veterinary control and any clinical signs of specific disease or pathology were registered.

Individual animals were anesthetized using ketamine (Imalgène®, Merial Lyon-France: 6-7 mg kg-1 IM) and xylazine (Rompun® Bayer Paris-France: 1-2 mg kg-1 IM).

Blood samples were collected from the external saphen veins using vacutainer tubes, stored for 1 to 2 h at room temperature and then centrifuged at 1500x g for 10 min. The sera were stored at -20°C. They were assayed for antibodies against N. caninum and T. gondii by N. caninum antibodies multi-species test kit, cELISA (VMRD Inc, Pullman, WA 99163, USA) (Baszler et al., 2001; Sobrino et al., 2008) and ID Screen® Toxoplasmosis Indirect ELISA multi-species test (ID VET-veterinary diagnostic kits, Montpellier-France).

All sera were analysed at the serology laboratory of the Department of Reproduction Pathology of Nantes National Veterinary School in France.

RESULTS

Sera analysis of seven lions indicated that all are positive to N. caninum antibodies. The couple of lion and their four cubs were positives to N. caninum. T. gondii antibodies were detected in 3 of 7 lions (42.86%). Female lion and two cub’s lions were positives to T. gondii.

DISCUSSION

This is the first report of T. gondii and N. caninum antibodies detected in lions (Panthera leo) from captives felids in Senegal. Serological results indicate a common exposure to N. caninum (100%) and T. gondii (42.86%) among lions. In addition, the couple of lion and their four cubs were positives to N. caninum.

In comparison with other similar study, no antibody [0% (0/2)] of N. caninum was observed in Czeck-slovack (Sedlak and Bártová, 2006) whereas antibodies were observed at 16.6% (3/18) in Southern Africa (Cheadle et al., 1999), 20% (2/10) in USA (Spencer et al., 2003) and 55% (11/20) in Kenya-East Africa (Ferroglio et al., 2003).

With T. gondii which definitive hosts are felids, we found a prevalence of 42.86%. In another similar study, antibodies were observed in 2 of 2 animals in Czeck-slovack (Sedlak and Bartova, 2006), in 8 of 10 (80%) in USA (Spencer et al., 2003) and in 14 of 27 lions (51.8%) in Brazil (Silva et al., 2001).

These prevalences are difficult to compare due to differences between serological tests used. Within a single test, the cut-off value of positivity is sometimes different. Nevertheless, the detection of specific antibodies in wild carnivores is a good indicator of the presence of these parasites in the environment.

Most of the studies (N. caninum) used Indirect Fluorescence Antibody Test (IFAT) which have 93% of sensitivity and 96% of specificity (Wapenaar et al., 2007). Compared to cELISA (VMRD, Pullman USA), a disadvantage of IFAT was the use of specific species conjugates (Lasri et al., 2004; Sedlak and Bartova, 2006). In contrast, the cELISA N. caninum antibodies test (VMRD, Pullman USA) was used for several species (Sobrino et al., 2008) as felids. The VMRD N. caninum test had a better specificity (99%) and a lower sensibility (89%) than IFAT. In addition, reproducibility of this competitive ELISA was excellent (Wapenaar et al., 2007).

We think about two hypotheses for the source of contamination. First of all, neonatal transmission could have occurred because the couple of tested lion and their four cubs aged 15 months were positives to N. caninum. Secondly, the uncooked meat feeding ration could be another source of infection. N. caninum antibodies were highlighted in local cows (71.4%) from Dakar, in the western region of Senegal (Kamga-Waladjo, personal observations).

To confirm our suspicion, Dubey et al. (2007) and Sedlak and Bartova (2006) have shown that, definitive and intermediate host of both protozoan (N. caninum and T. gondii) may be infected by ingestion of water or food contaminated with oocysts, by ingestion of tissue cysts or by transplacental transmission.

The results of this study indicate that lion (Panthera leo) from Hann’s zoo of Dakar-Senegal have more exposure to N. caninum (100%) than to T. gondii (42.86%). Present data confirm assumption of a sylvatic cycle of N. caninum. Further researches are needed to evaluate the effect of the infection on the health status and conservation of some vulnerable African wild species. Moreover, it is necessary to follow these animals for the identification of parasites at autopsy of lions through direct detection.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We are gratefully acknowledged to Professor Daniel Tainturier, Head of the Department of Reproduction Pathology of Nantes National Veterinary School (France) for providing technical assistance during the study.

REFERENCES
Baszler, T.V., S. Adams, J. Vander-Schalie, B.A. Mathison and M. Kostovic, 2001. Validation of a commercially available monoclonal antibody-based competitive-inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of serum antibodies to Neospora caninum in cattle. J. Clin. Microbiol., 39: 3851-3857.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Bjerkas, I., S.F. Mohn and J. Presthus, 1984. Unidentified cyst-forming protozoan causing encephalomyelitis and myositis in dogs. Parasitol. Res., 70: 271-274.
CrossRef  |  

Cheadle, M.A., J.A. Spencer and B.L. Blagburn, 1999. Seroprevalences of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in nondomestic felids from Southern Africa. J. Zoo Wildl. Med., 30: 248-251.
Direct Link  |  

Costa, K.S., S.L. Santos, R.S. Uzeda, A.M. Pinheiro and M.A. Almeida et al., 2008. Chickens (Gallus domesticus) are natural intermediate hosts of Neospora caninum. Int. J. Parasitol., 38: 157-159.
Direct Link  |  

Dubey, J.P. and C.P. Beattie, 1988. Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Man. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., USA., Pages: 220.

Dubey, J.P., G. Schares and L.M. Ortega-Mora, 2007. Epidemiology and control of Neosporosis and Neospora caninum. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 20: 323-367.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Dubey, J.P., J.L. Carpenter, C.A. Speer, M.J. Topper and A. Uggla, 1988. Newly recognized fatal protozoan disease of dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 192: 1269-1285.
PubMed  |  

Ferroglio, E., E. Wambwa, M. Castiello, A. Trisciuoglio and A. Prouteau et al., 2003. Antibodies to Neospora caninum in wild animals from Kenya. East Afr. Vet. Parasitol., 118: 43-49.
CrossRef  |  

Gondim, L.F.P., M.M. McAllister, W.C. Pitt and D.E. Zemlicka, 2004. Coyotes (Canis latrans) are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int. J. Parasitol., 34: 159-161.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Hill, D. and J.P. Dubey, 2002. Toxoplasma gondii: Transmission, diagnosis and prevention. Clin. Microbiol. Infect., 8: 634-640.
CrossRef  |  

Lasri, S., F. De Meerschman, C. Rettigner, C. Focant and B. Losson, 2004. Comparison of three techniques for the serological diagnosis of Neospora caninum in the dog and their use for epidemiological studies. Vet. Parasitol., 123: 25-32.
PubMed  |  

McAllister, M.M., J.P. Dubey, D.S. Lindsay, W.R. Jolley, R.A. Wills and A.M. McGuire, 1998. Dogs are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int. J. Parasitol., 28: 1473-1479.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Sedlak, K. and E. Bartova, 2006. Seroprevalences of antibodies to Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in zoo animals. Vet. Parasitol., 136: 223-231.

Silva J.C.R., S. Ogassawara, M.F.V. Marvulo, J.S. Ferreira Neto and J.P. Dubey, 2001. Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in exotic wild felids from Brazilian zoos. J. Zoo Wildl. Med., 32: 349-351.
Direct Link  |  

Sobrino, R., J.P. Dubey, M. Pabon, N. Linarez and O.C. Kwok et al., 2008. Neospora caninum antibodies in wild carnivores from Spain. Vet. Parasitol., 155: 190-197.
PubMed  |  

Spencer, J.A., M.J. Higginbotham and B.L. Blagburn, 2003. Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in captive and free-ranging nondomestic felids in the United States. J. Zoo Wildl. Med., 34: 246-249.
Direct Link  |  

Wapenaar, W., H.W. Barkema, J.A. van Leeuwen, J.T. McClure and R.M. O'Handley et al., 2007. Comparison of serological methods for the diagnosis of Neospora caninum infection in cattle. Vet. Parasitol., 143: 166-173.
PubMed  |  

©  2014 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved
Fulltext PDF References Abstract